Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Cancer stem cells: mirage or reality?

Abstract

The similarities and differences between normal tissue stem cells and cancer stem cells (CSCs) have been the source of much contention, with some recent studies calling into question the very existence of CSCs. An examination of the literature indicates, however, that the CSC model rests on firm experimental foundations and that differences in the observed frequencies of CSCs within tumors reflect the various cancer types and hosts used to assay these cells. Studies of stem cells and the differentiation program termed the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) point to the possible existence of plasticity between stem cells and their more differentiated derivatives. If present, such plasticity would have major implications for the CSC model and for future therapeutic approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Stem-differentiation hierarchy.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kelly, P.N., Dakic, A., Adams, J.M., Nutt, S.L. & Strasser, A. Science 317, 337 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Quintana, E. et al. Nature 456, 593–598 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Clarke, M.F. et al. Cancer Res. 66, 9339–9344 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lapidot, T. et al. Nature 367, 645–648 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Al-Hajj, M., Wicha, M.S., Benito-Hernandez, A., Morrison, S.J. & Clarke, M.F. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 3983–3988 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Singh, S.K. et al. Cancer Res. 63, 5821–5828 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bonnet, D. & Dick, J.E. Nat. Med. 3, 730–737 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Harris, M.A. et al. Cancer Res. 68, 10051–10059 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Thon, N. et al. Mol. Cell Neurosci. published online, doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2008.07.022 (7 August 2008).

  10. Chiou, S.H. et al. Clin. Cancer Res. 14, 4085–4095 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Honeth, G. et al. Breast Cancer Res. 10, R53 (2008).

  12. Kennedy, J.A., Barabe, F., Poeppl, A.G., Wang, J.C. & Dick, J.E. Science 318, 1722 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, M. et al. Cancer Res. 68, 4674–4682 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cho, R.W. et al. Stem Cells 26, 364–371 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Deshpande, A.J. et al. Cancer Cell 10, 363–374 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu, A. et al. Stem Cells Dev. 17, 173–184 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mani, S.A. et al. Cell 133, 704–715 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Morel, A.P. et al. PLoS One 3, e2888 (2008).

  19. Thiery, J.P. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 15, 740–746 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hugo, H. et al. J. Cell. Physiol. 213, 374–383 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Brabletz, T. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 10356–10361 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yook, J.I. et al. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 1398–1406 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Till, J.E., McCulloch, E.A. & Siminovitch, L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 51, 29–36 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Santisteban, M. et al. Cancer Res. 69, 2887–2895 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Clarkson, B. & Strife, A. Leuk. Lymphoma 11, 101–107 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Barr, S. et al. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 25, 685–693 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Buck, E. et al. Cancer Res. 68, 8322–8332 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Li, X. et al. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 100, 672–679 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Thomson, S. et al. Cancer Res. 65, 9455–9462 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Woodward, W.A. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 618–623 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert A Weinberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gupta, P., Chaffer, C. & Weinberg, R. Cancer stem cells: mirage or reality?. Nat Med 15, 1010–1012 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0909-1010

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0909-1010

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing