Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

A closer look at choice

We often look back and forth between options before deciding which one to choose, even if we have seen them both before. A new study suggests that people are biased to choose things they look at more, providing new insight into how the subjective values of options are constructed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Choice by diffusion.

Katie Vicari

References

  1. Krajbich, I., Armel, C. & Rangel, A. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 1292–1298 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Glimcher, P.W. in Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain (eds. Glimcher, P.W., Camerer, C., Poldrack, R.A. & Fehr, E.) 501–519 (Academic Press, London, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schultz, W., Dayan, P. & Montague, P.R. Science 275, 1593–1599 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Platt, M.L. & Glimcher, P.W. Nature 400, 233–238 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sugrue, L.P., Corrado, G.S. & Newsome, W.T. Science 304, 1782–1787 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gold, J.I. & Shadlen, M. Neuron 36, 299–308 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ratcliff, R. & Smith, P. Psychol. Rev. 111, 333–367 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Thier, P. & Andersen, R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 4962–4967 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Armel, K., Beaumel, A. & Rangel, A. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 3, 396–403 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stewart, N., Chater, N. & Brown, G. Cognit. Psychol. 53, 1–26 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Erev, I., Ert, E. & Yechiam, E. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 21, 575–597 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Niv, Y., Joel, D. & Dayan, P. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 375–381 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Balleine, B.W., Daw, N.D. & O'Doherty, J.P. in Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain (eds. Glimcher, P.W., Camerer, C., Poldrack, R.A. & Fehr, E.) (Academic Press, London, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Daw, N.D., Niv, Y. & Dayan, P. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1704–1711 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Payne, J., Bettman, J. & Johnson, E. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 43, 87–131 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathaniel D Daw.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Constantino, S., Daw, N. A closer look at choice. Nat Neurosci 13, 1153–1154 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1010-1153

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1010-1153

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing