Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Sonic hedgehog guides commissural axons along the longitudinal axis of the spinal cord

Abstract

Dorsal commissural axons in the developing spinal cord cross the floor plate, then turn rostrally and grow along the longitudinal axis, close to the floor plate. We used a subtractive hybridization approach to identify guidance cues responsible for the rostral turn in chicken embryos. One of the candidates was the morphogen Sonic hedgehog (Shh). Silencing of the gene SHH (which encodes Shh) by in ovo RNAi during commissural axon navigation demonstrated a repulsive role in post-commissural axon guidance. This effect of Shh was not mediated by Patched (Ptc) and Smoothened (Smo), the receptors that mediate effects of Shh in morphogenesis and commissural axon growth toward the floor plate. Rather, functional in vivo studies showed that the repulsive effect of Shh on postcommissural axons was mediated by Hedgehog interacting protein (Hip).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Commissural axons turn into the longitudinal axis of the spinal cord in close contact with the contralateral floor-plate border.
Figure 2: Shh directs postcommissural axons rostrally.
Figure 3: Neither Ptc nor Smo are expressed by commissural neurons when axons turn into the longitudinal axis.
Figure 4: Hip is expressed transiently by commissural neurons during the time when their axons turn into the longitudinal axis.
Figure 5: Hip is the receptor that mediates the effect of Shh on postcommissural axons.
Figure 6: SHH is expressed in a gradient along the rostro-caudal axis of the lumbosacral spinal cord.
Figure 7: Postcommissural axons avoid high levels of Shh in vivo.
Figure 8: Shh acts as a repellent on postcommissural axons.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dickson, B.J. Molecular mechanisms of axon guidance. Science 298, 1959–1964 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tessier-Lavigne, M. & Goodman, C.S. The molecular biology of axon guidance. Science 274, 1123–1133 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stoeckli, E.T. & Landmesser, L.T. Axon guidance at choice points. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 8, 73–79 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaprielian, Z., Runko, E. & Imondi, R. Axon guidance at the midline choice point. Dev. Dyn. 221, 154–181 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Leonardo, E.D. et al. Guidance of developing axons by netrin-1 and its receptors. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 62, 467–478 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Livesey, F.J. Netrins and netrin receptors. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 56, 62–68 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Charron, F., Stein, E., Jeong, J., McMahon, A.P. & Tessier-Lavigne, M. The morphogen sonic hedgehog is an axonal chemoattractant that collaborates with netrin-1 in midline axon guidance. Cell 113, 11–23 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stoeckli, E.T. & Landmesser, L.T. Axonin-1, Nr-CAM, and Ng-CAM play different roles in the in vivo guidance of chick commissural neurons. Neuron 14, 1165–1179 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stoeckli, E.T., Sonderegger, P., Pollerberg, G.E. & Landmesser, L.T. Interference with axonin-1 and NrCAM interactions unmasks a floor-plate activity inhibitory for commissural axons. Neuron 18, 209–221 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Burstyn-Cohen, T. et al. F-Spondin is required for accurate pathfinding of commissural axons at the floor plate. Neuron 23, 233–246 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lyuksyutova, A.I. et al. Anterior-posterior guidance of commissural axons by Wnt-frizzled signaling. Science 302, 1984–1988 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Placzek, M. The role of the notochord and floor plate in inductive interactions. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 5, 499–506 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Briscoe, J. & Ericson, J. The specification of neuronal identity by graded Sonic Hedgehog signalling. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 353–362 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jessell, T.M. Neuronal specification in the spinal cord: inductive signals and transcriptional codes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 1, 20–29 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee, S.K. & Pfaff, S.L. Transcriptional networks regulating neuronal identity in the developing spinal cord. Nat. Neurosci. 4, Suppl. 1183–1191 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bourikas, D. & Stoeckli, E.T. New tools for gene manipulation in chicken embryos. Oligonucleotides 13, 411–419 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pekarik, V. et al. Screening for gene function in chicken embryo using RNAi and electroporation. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 93–96 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Stoeckli, E.T. RNAi in avian embryos. in RNAi: A Guide to Gene Silencing (ed. Hannon, G.J.) 297–312 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bovolenta, P. & Dodd, J. Perturbation of neuronal differentiation and axon guidance in the spinal cord of mouse embryos lacking a floor plate: analysis of Danforth's short-tail mutation. Development 113, 625–639 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Matise, M.P., Lustig, M., Sakurai, T., Grumet, M. & Joyner, A.L. Ventral midline cells are required for the local control of commissural axon guidance in the mouse spinal cord. Development 126, 3649–3659 (1999).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. van Straaten, H.W. & Hekking, J.W. Development of floor plate, neurons and axonal outgrowth pattern in the early spinal cord of the notochord-deficient chick embryo. Anat. Embryol. (Berl.) 184, 55–63 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Greenspoon, S., Patel, C.K., Hashmi, S., Bernhardt, R.R. & Kuwada, J.Y. The notochord and floor plate guide growth cones in the zebrafish spinal cord. J. Neurosci. 15, 5956–5965 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Clarke, J.D., Holder, N., Soffe, S.R. & Storm-Mathisen, J. Neuroanatomical and functional analysis of neural tube formation in notochordless Xenopus embryos; laterality of the ventral spinal cord is lost. Development 112, 499–516 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Perrin, F.E., Rathjen, F.G. & Stoeckli, E.T. Distinct subpopulations of sensory afferents require F11 or axonin-1 for growth to their target layers within the spinal cord of the chick. Neuron 30, 707–723 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Briscoe, J., Pierani, A., Jessell, T.M. & Ericson, J. A homeodomain protein code specifies progenitor cell identity and neuronal fate in the ventral neural tube. Cell 101, 435–445 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wijgerde, M., McMahon, J.A., Rule, M. & McMahon, A.P. A direct requirement for Hedgehog signaling for normal specification of all ventral progenitor domains in the presumptive mammalian spinal cord. Genes Dev. 16, 2849–2864 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Briscoe, J. et al. Homeobox gene Nkx2.2 and specification of neuronal identity by graded Sonic hedgehog signalling. Nature 398, 622–627 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Goodrich, L.V., Johnson, R.L., Milenkovic, L., McMahon, J.A. & Scott, M.P. Conservation of the hedgehog/patched signaling pathway from flies to mice: induction of a mouse patched gene by Hedgehog. Genes Dev. 10, 301–312 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Stone, D.M. et al. The tumour-suppressor gene patched encodes a candidate receptor for Sonic hedgehog. Nature 384, 129–134 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Alcedo, J., Ayzenzon, M., Von Ohlen, T., Noll, M. & Hooper, J.E. The Drosophila smoothened gene encodes a seven-pass membrane protein, a putative receptor for the hedgehog signal. Cell 86, 221–232 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. van den Heuvel, M. & Ingham, P.W. smoothened encodes a receptor-like serpentine protein required for hedgehog signalling. Nature 382, 547–551 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ingham, P.W. & McMahon, A.P. Hedgehog signaling in animal development: paradigms and principles. Genes Dev. 15, 3059–3087 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Incardona, J.P., Gaffield, W., Kapur, R.P. & Roelink, H. The teratogenic Veratrum alkaloid cyclopamine inhibits sonic hedgehog signal transduction. Development 125, 3553–3562 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chuang, P.T. & McMahon, A.P. Vertebrate Hedgehog signalling modulated by induction of a Hedgehog-binding protein. Nature 397, 617–621 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Zou, Y., Stoeckli, E., Chen, H. & Tessier-Lavigne, M. Squeezing axons out of the gray matter: a role for Slit and Semaphorin proteins from midline and ventral spinal cord. Cell 102, 363–375 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Trousse, F., Marti, E., Gruss, P., Torres, M. & Bovolenta, P. Control of retinal ganglion cell axon growth: a new role for Sonic hedgehog. Development 128, 3927–3936 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Marigo, V., Davey, R.A., Zuo, Y., Cunningham, J.M. & Tabin, C.J. Biochemical evidence that patched is the Hedgehog receptor. Nature 384, 176–179 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Murone, M., Rosenthal, A. & de Sauvage, F.J. Sonic hedgehog signaling by the patched-smoothened receptor complex. Curr. Biol. 9, 76–84 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Chuang, P.T. & Kornberg, T.B. On the range of hedgehog signaling. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10, 515–522 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Lee, C.S., Buttitta, L.A., May, N.R., Kispert, A. & Fan, C.M. SHH-N upregulates Sfrp2 to mediate its competitive interaction with WNT1 and WNT4 in the somitic mesoderm. Development 127, 109–118 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Baranski, M., Berdougo, E., Sandler, J.S., Darnell, D.K. & Burrus, L.W. The dynamic expression pattern of frzb-1 suggests multiple roles in chick development. Dev. Biol. 217, 25–41 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Ladher, R.K. et al. Cloning and expression of the Wnt antagonists Sfrp-2 and Frzb during chick development. Dev. Biol. 218, 183–198 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Hamburger, V. & Hamilton, H.L. A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J. Morphol. 88, 49–92 (1951).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Perrin, F.E. & Stoeckli, E.T. Use of lipophilic dyes in studies of axonal pathfinding in vivo. Microsc. Res. Tech. 48, 25–31 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Schaeren-Wiemers, N. & Gerfin-Moser, A. A single protocol to detect transcripts of various types and expression levels in neural tissue and cultured cells: in situ hybridization using digoxigenin-labelled cRNA probes. Histochemistry 100, 431–440 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank C. Krull for the pMES plasmid, M. Mielich for technical assistance and M. Gesemann for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Human Frontier Science Program Organization, the Olga Mayenfisch Stiftung and the Ott Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esther T Stoeckli.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1

Blocking shh function at the protein level confirms its role as a guidance cue for postcommissural axons. As an alternative method to demonstrate the role of shh as a guidance cue for postcommissural axons, we injected 5E1 hybridoma cells into the central canal of the spinal cord. In accordance with the results from our in ovo RNAi experiments (Fig. 2), the perturbation of shh function at the protein level was found to interfere with the rostral turn of postcommissural axons (a). Axons either stalled at the floor-plate exit site or erroneously turned caudally (arrows in a). As a control, we used 9E10 hybridoma cells producing antibodies against c-myc (b). Grafting c-myc-producing cells did not interfere with commissural axon guidance. Dashed lines indicate the floor plate. Rostral is toward the top in both panels. Bar 100µm (PDF 256 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 2

Perturbation of shh function during the time window of commissural axon guidance does not interfere with spinal cord patterning. The morphogen Shh was shown to determine cell identity along the dorso-ventral axis of the spinal cord during early development13-15. However, the interference with shh function after the pattern of the spinal cord was established did not alter cell identity as determined by the expression of class I and class II transcription factors that are known to be either induced or repressed by Shh (see text for details). We chose pax7 as an example for a class I gene. Its expression pattern in the dorsal spinal cord is similar at stage 23 (not shown) and stage 25 (a and d). As examples for class II genes, we used isl-1 (Islet-1) and nkx2.2. Isl-1 is expressed in motoneurons and a few cells of the dorsal spinal cord (b and e). Nkx2.2 is expressed in a small group of cells immediately adjacent to the floor plate (c and f). No difference in the expression of Pax7, Isl1, and Nkx2.2 was found between control embryos (a-c) and experimental embryos lacking shh function (d-f), when shh was silenced by in ovo RNAi at st18 or later. Bar 300 µm. (PDF 981 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 3

Silencing shh during early spinal cord development interferes with patterning. As a positive control for shh silencing by in ovo RNAi, we injected shh dsRNA and electroporated chicken embryos between st13 and st14 (b,d,f) or at st8 (not shown). When compared to control embryos (a,c,e) the expression of selected markers of spinal cord patterning (see text for details), such as Nkx2.2 (b) or Isl-1(d) was not induced indicating the absence of the normal dorso-ventral pattern of cell differentiation in the absence of Shh. HNF3 was still expressed in the floor plate of embryos treated with shh dsRNA at stage 8 (not shown) albeit at reduced levels when compared to control embryos (e). No change in HNF3 expression was observed in embryos where shh was silenced at st13 or older (f). These findings are in line with previous reports about the requirements for shh during different time windows25,26. At early stages of development, Shh derived from the notochord is required for floor plate induction (as indicated by HNF3 induction in the floor plate). Subsequently, Shh derived from the notochord and the floor plate is responsible for the differentiation of cells along the dorso-ventral axis of the spinal cord in a dose-dependent manner14. Bar 100 µm. (PDF 563 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 4

The effect of shh on postcommissural axon guidance is not mediated by ptc and smo. Because shh was shown to affect the expression level of ptc28, we compared the expression of ptc and smo in the spinal cord of embryos at st25 after silencing shh by in ovo RNAi (a,b) with control embryos (c,d). Neither the pattern of ptc (a,c) nor that of smo (b,d) was changed after silencing shh. Furthermore, silencing of smo by in ovo RNAi (e) or by the injection of the alkaloid cyclopamine (not shown) did not change the pathfinding behavior of postcommissural axons. Dashed lines indicate the floor plate. Rostral is toward the top in e. Bar 200 µm in a-d; 50 µm in e. (PDF 702 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 5

Hip expression in the spinal cord does not change after shh downregulation by in ovo RNAi at st18/19. To assess whether downregulation of shh would interfere with hip expression, we compared the in situ patterns of st26.5 embryos treated with shh dsRNA a with an age-matched control embryo b. We chose stage 26.5 because the expression pattern of hip changed significantly at st26. A striking upregulation of hip expression in a cell population just ventral of the dorsal root entry zone was seen in both the control embryo b and the embryo treated with shh dsRNA a. Note that a slightly younger embryo (Fig. 4c) does not yet show hip expression in the lateral spinal cord. Bar 300 µm. (PDF 238 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 6

Downregulation of shh by in ovo RNAi abolishes its increasing rostral to caudal gradient. In order to silence shh by in ovo RNAi we injected dsRNA derived from shh into the central canal of the spinal cord together with a plasmid encoding YFP to visualize transfected cells. Placing the electrodes over the dorsal (cathode) and the ventral (anode) midline of the spinal cord resulted in efficient targeting of floor-plate cells (a,b). Using this approach to silence shh resulted in the almost complete absence of Shh protein (c,d). In a control embryo, Shh forms a gradient throughout the lumbosacral level of the spinal cord with lower levels rostrally (compare e to h). The sections shown in c and d correspond to f and h. Sections shown in e-h were taken every 100 µm. Sections from the control embryo and the embryo treated with shh dsRNA were processed in parallel and imaged with the same camera settings. Bar 500 µm in b, 200 µm in c-h. (PDF 624 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 7

Shh is expressed in the floor plate throughout the time window of postcommissural axon pathfinding. After its effect on spinal cord patterning during early stages of development shh continues to be expressed in the floor plate of the embryonic chicken spinal cord. At stage 19, commissural neurons in the lumbosacral spinal cord start to extend axons. At this time shh expression is clearly seen in the floor plate and the notochord. After a transient decrease at stage 20, the expression increases during the time when commissural neurons are contacting and crossing the floor plate (stages 21 through 23). During the time when commissural axons turn into the longitudinal axis shh expression is higher in the lateral compared to the medial floor plate (stage 26). At stage 30 shh is no longer expressed. (PDF 316 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 8

Downregulation of hip in commissural neurons by in ovo RNAi. To silence hip by in ovo RNAi we injected dsRNA derived from the chicken hip cDNA into the central canal of the spinal cord (see Material and Methods for details). The electrodes were placed in parallel to the longitudinal axis of the spinal cord at the lumbosacral level (a). With this set-up commissural axons could be targeted very efficiently, as shown by the expression of YFP from a co-injected plasmid (b-d). Depending on the dorso-ventral position of the electrodes cells all along the dorso-ventral axis (b) or only at more dorsal levels (c,d) were targeted. The electroporation of hip dsRNA resulted in a decrease of hip mRNA on the electroporated compared to the control side (e). No change of Shh expression was seen under these conditions (f), as determined by 5E1 staining. Bar 300 µm in b-d, 100 µm in e, 200 µm in f. (PDF 245 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bourikas, D., Pekarik, V., Baeriswyl, T. et al. Sonic hedgehog guides commissural axons along the longitudinal axis of the spinal cord. Nat Neurosci 8, 297–304 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1396

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1396

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing