Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Choice of cranial window type for in vivo imaging affects dendritic spine turnover in the cortex

Abstract

Determining the degree of synapse formation and elimination is essential for understanding the structural basis of brain plasticity and pathology. We show that in vivo imaging of dendritic spine dynamics through an open-skull glass window, but not a thinned-skull window, is associated with high spine turnover and substantial glial activation during the first month after surgery. These findings help to explain existing discrepancies in the degree of dendritic spine plasticity observed in the mature cortex.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: High spine turnover was associated with the open-skull window.
Figure 2: Extensive glial activation is observed after open-skull surgery but not thinned-skull surgery.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grutzendler, J., Kasthuri, N. & Gan, W.B. Nature 420, 812–816 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Holtmaat, A., Wilbrecht, L., Knott, G.W., Welker, E. & Svoboda, K. Nature 441, 979–983 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Holtmaat, A.J. et al. Neuron 45, 279–291 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Trachtenberg, J.T. et al. Nature 420, 788–794 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zuo, Y., Yang, G., Kwon, E. & Gan, W.B. Nature 436, 261–265 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zuo, Y., Lin, A., Chang, P. & Gan, W.B. Neuron 46, 181–189 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Meyer, M.P., Niell, C.M. & Smith, S.J. Curr. Biol. 13, R180–R182 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ottersen, O.P. & Helm, P.J. Nature 420, 751–752 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Allen, N.J. & Barres, B.A. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 15, 542–548 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bruce-Keller, A.J. J. Neurosci. Res. 58, 191–201 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stellwagen, D. & Malenka, R.C. Nature 440, 1054–1059 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Plock, N. & Kloft, C. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 25, 1–24 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Super, H. & Roelfsema, P.R. Prog. Brain Res. 147, 263–282 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Navari, R.M., Wei, E.P., Kontos, H.A. & Patterson, J.L., Jr . Microvasc. Res. 16, 304–315 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Polikov, V.S., Tresco, P.A. & Reichert, W.M. J. Neurosci. Methods 148, 1–18 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank N. Kasthuri, J. Grutzendler and K. Helmin for critical comments on this manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the US National Institutes of Health (W.-B.G.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

H.-T.X., F.P. and G.Y. contributed equally to this work. All of the authors contributed to the experimental design. G.Y., F.P. and H.-T.X. did the in vivo imaging experiments and the data analysis. H.-T.X. did the immunostaining and imaging of glial cells. W.-B.G. initiated the project, contributed to the initial experiments and wrote the manuscript. H.-T.X., F.P. and G.Y. discussed the results, made the figures and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen-Biao Gan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1

Survival fraction of dendritic spines from individual mice under open-skull or thinned-skull windows. (PDF 606 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 2

Reduction in spine density in the first 2 weeks after open-skull surgery. (PDF 609 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 3

Additional examples showing microglial activation under open-skull windows, but not thinned skull windows. (PDF 2337 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 4

Additional examples showing astrocyte activation under the open-skull window, but not the thinned skull window. (PDF 1214 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 5

Astrocyte activation continues 20–30 d after open-skull surgery. (PDF 1097 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

Microglia density quantification 10 d after surgery. (PDF 283 kb)

Supplementary Methods (PDF 1064 kb)

Supplementary Notes (PDF 78 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, HT., Pan, F., Yang, G. et al. Choice of cranial window type for in vivo imaging affects dendritic spine turnover in the cortex. Nat Neurosci 10, 549–551 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1883

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1883

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing