Key Points
-
Biology is entering an exciting era brought about by the increase in genome-wide information. Functional genomics in particular is making rapid progress in assigning biological meaning to genomic data.
-
One of the main challenges for the future for functional genomics lies in the transition of this technology, which is at present mainly carried out in a few dedicated centres, into individual laboratories — because this is where the biological expertise lies.
-
For this transition to be achieved, experiments must be miniaturized and costs must be lowered.
-
The three applications of genome technology that have achieved significant attention include gene knock-out approaches, gene-expression profiling and the genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTLs).
-
Molecular barcoding provides tremendous power for the parallel phenotypic analysis of knock-outs in yeast and is among the most promising technologies for miniaturizing high-throughput approaches.
-
Gene-expression profiling has achieved high throughput, yet the technology and its interpretation are still problematic. Poor correlation with other functional parameters indicates that much insight can be gained from more rigorous study.
-
The genetic mapping of QTLs is plagued by both the lack of approaches that allow the scoring of thousands of markers in large numbers of samples and insufficient data to support statistical expectations. Functional studies in model organisms are needed to provide examples of the complexity that underlies quantitative traits.
-
High-throughput approaches show promise for revolutionizing disease diagnosis and treatment; however, the false-prediction rates of high-throughput approaches need to be eliminated.
-
Single-gene studies promise to remain essential.
Abstract
Geneticists have made tremendous progress in understanding the genetic basis of phenotypes, and genomics promises to bring further insights at a rapid pace. The progress in functional genomics has been driven primarily by the development of new techniques that are used in a few dedicated research centres. Focusing on selected advances in genomic technologies, we assess the results that have been obtained so far, highlight the challenges faced by these new tools and suggest ways in which they can be overcome. We argue that progress in functional genomics will depend on developing high-throughput technologies that can easily be moved away from dedicated centres and into individual laboratories.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Risch, N. J. Searching for genetic determinants in the new millennium. Nature 405, 847–856 (2000).
Flint, J. & Mott, R. Finding the molecular basis of quantitative traits: successes and pitfalls. Nature Rev. Genet. 2, 437–445 (2001).
Collins, F. S., Green, E. D., Guttmacher, A. E. & Guyer, M. S. A vision for the future of genomics research. Nature 422, 835–847 (2003).
Waterston, R. H. et al. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 420, 520–562 (2002).
Kellis, M., Patterson, N., Endrizzi, M., Birren, B. & Lander, E. S. Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature 423, 241–254 (2003).
Cliften, P. et al. Finding functional features in Saccharomyces genomes by phylogenetic footprinting. Science 301, 71–76 (2003).
Stockwell, B. R. Chemical genetics: ligand-based discovery of gene function. Nature Rev. Genet. 1, 116–125 (2000).
Giaever, G. et al. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418, 387–391 (2002).
Winzeler, E. A. et al. Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science 285, 901–906 (1999).
Shoemaker, D. D., Lashkari, D. A., Morris, D., Mittmann, M. & Davis, R. W. Quantitative phenotypic analysis of yeast deletion mutants using a highly parallel molecular bar-coding strategy. Nature Genet. 14, 450–456 (1996). The first use of PCR-amplifiable molecular barcodes for high-throughput parallel biology.
Thomas, K. R. & Capecchi, M. R. Site-directed mutagenesis by gene targeting in mouse embryo-derived stem cells. Cell 51, 503–512 (1987).
Rong, Y. S. & Golic, K. G. Gene targeting by homologous recombination in Drosophila. Science 288, 2013–2018 (2000).
McCreath, K. J. et al. Production of gene-targeted sheep by nuclear transfer from cultured somatic cells. Nature 405, 1066–1069 (2000).
Hughes, T. R. et al. Widespread aneuploidy revealed by DNA microarray expression profiling. Nature Genet. 25, 333–337 (2000).
Ross-Macdonald, P. et al. Large-scale analysis of the yeast genome by transposon tagging and gene disruption. Nature 402, 413–418 (1999).
Alonso, J. M. et al. Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 301, 653–657 (2003). A large-scale insertional mutagenesis screen in Arabidopsis.
Fire, A. et al. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 391, 806–811 (1998).
Kamath, R. S. et al. Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi. Nature 421, 231–237 (2003).
Kennerdell, J. R. & Carthew, R. W. Heritable gene silencing in Drosophila using double-stranded RNA. Nature Biotechnol. 18, 896–898 (2000).
Nasevicius, A. & Ekker, S. C. Effective targeted gene 'knockdown' in zebrafish. Nature Genet. 26, 216–220 (2000).
Wianny, F. & Zernicka-Goetz, M. Specific interference with gene function by double-stranded RNA in early mouse development. Nature Cell Biol. 2, 70–75 (2000).
Ogita, S., Uefuji, H., Yamaguchi, Y., Koizumi, N. & Sano, H. RNA interference: producing decaffeinated coffee plants. Nature 423, 823 (2003).
Elbashir, S. M. et al. Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in cultured mammalian cells. Nature 411, 494–498 (2001).
Jackson, A. L. et al. Expression profiling reveals off-target gene regulation by RNAi. Nature Biotechnol. 21, 635–637 (2003).
Bridge, A. J., Pebernard, S., Ducraux, A., Nicoulaz, A. L. & Iggo, R. Induction of an interferon response by RNAi vectors in mammalian cells. Nature Genet. 34, 263–264 (2003).
Sledz, C. A., Holko, M., de Veer, M. J., Silverman, R. H. & Williams, B. R. Activation of the interferon system by short-interfering RNAs. Nature Cell Biol. 5, 834–839 (2003).
Hughes, T. R. et al. Functional discovery via a compendium of expression profiles. Cell 102, 109–126 (2000). The use of expression signature profiles on yeast knock-out mutants for achieving functional groupings.
Marton, M. J. et al. Drug target validation and identification of secondary drug target effects using DNA microarrays. Nature Med. 4, 1293–1301 (1998).
Pilpel, Y., Sudarsanam, P. & Church, G. M. Identifying regulatory networks by combinatorial analysis of promoter elements. Nature Genet. 29, 153–159 (2001).
Ihmels, J. et al. Revealing modular organization in the yeast transcriptional network. Nature Genet. 31, 370–377 (2002).
Segal, E. et al. Module networks: identifying regulatory modules and their condition-specific regulators from gene expression data. Nature Genet. 34, 166–176 (2003).
Holstege, F. C. et al. Dissecting the regulatory circuitry of a eukaryotic genome. Cell 95, 717–728 (1998).
Lee, T. I. et al. Transcriptional regulatory networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 298, 799–804 (2002).
Brenner, S. Sillycon valley fever. Curr. Biol. 9, R671 (1999).
Ideker, T. et al. Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of a systematically perturbed metabolic network. Science 292, 929–934 (2001).
Griffin, T. J. et al. Complementary profiling of gene expression at the transcriptome and proteome levels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1, 323–333 (2002).
Washburn, M. P. et al. Protein pathway and complex clustering of correlated mRNA and protein expression analyses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 3107–3112 (2003).
Patterson, S. D. & Aebersold, R. H. Proteomics: the first decade and beyond. Nature Genet. 33 (Suppl), 311–323 (2003).
Ghaemmaghami, S. et al. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425, 737–741 (2003).
Birrell, G. W. et al. Transcriptional response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to DNA-damaging agents does not identify the genes that protect against these agents. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 8778–8783 (2002).
Steinmetz, L. M. et al. Systematic screen for human disease genes in yeast. Nature Genet. 31, 400–404 (2002).
Deutschbauer, A. M., Williams, R. M., Chu, A. M. & Davis, R. W. Parallel phenotypic analysis of sporulation and postgermination growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 15530–15535 (2002).
Steinmetz, L. M. & Davis, R. W. High-density arrays and insights into genome function. Biotechnol. Genet. Eng. Rev. 17, 109–146 (2000).
Yang, Y. H. & Speed, T. Design issues for cDNA microarray experiments. Nature Rev. Genet. 3, 579–588 (2002).
Van Eerdewegh, P. et al. Association of the ADAM33 gene with asthma and bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Nature 418, 426–430. (2002).
Sklar, P. et al. Association analysis of NOTCH4 loci in schizophrenia using family and population-based controls. Nature Genet. 28, 126–128. (2001).
Botstein, D. & Risch, N. Discovering genotypes underlying human phenotypes: past successes for mendelian disease, future approaches for complex disease. Nature Genet. 33 (Suppl), 228–237 (2003).
Hardenbol, P. et al. Multiplexed genotyping with sequence-tagged molecular inversion probes. Nature Biotechnol. 21, 673–678 (2003).
Faham, M. & Cox, D. R. A novel in vivo method to detect DNA sequence variation. Genome Res. 5, 474–482 (1995).
Faham, M., Baharloo, S., Tomitaka, S., DeYoung, J. & Freimer, N. B. Mismatch repair detection (MRD): high-throughput scanning for DNA variations. Hum. Mol. Genet. 10, 1657–1664 (2001).
Perez-Iratxeta, C., Bork, P. & Andrade, M. A. Association of genes to genetically inherited diseases using data mining. Nature Genet. 31, 316–319 (2002).
Mootha, V. K. et al. Identification of a gene causing human cytochrome c oxidase deficiency by integrative genomics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 605–610 (2003).
Wayne, M. L. & McIntyre, L. M. Combining mapping and arraying: an approach to candidate gene identification. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 14903–14906 (2002).
Aitman, T. J. et al. Identification of Cd36 (Fat) as an insulin-resistance gene causing defective fatty acid and glucose metabolism in hypertensive rats. Nature Genet. 21, 76–83 (1999).
Belli, G., Gari, E., Aldea, M. & Herrero, E. Functional analysis of yeast essential genes using a promoter-substitution cassette and the tetracycline-regulatable dual expression system. Yeast 14, 1127–1138 (1998).
Kanemaki, M., Sanchez-Diaz, A., Gambus, A. & Labib, K. Functional proteomic identification of DNA replication proteins by induced proteolysis in vivo. Nature 423, 720–725 (2003).
Raamsdonk, L. M. et al. A functional genomics strategy that uses metabolome data to reveal the phenotype of silent mutations. Nature Biotechnol. 19, 45–50 (2001).
Allen, J. et al. High-throughput classification of yeast mutants for functional genomics using metabolic footprinting. Nature Biotechnol. 21, 692–696 (2003).
Tong, A. H. et al. Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 294, 2364–2368 (2001).
Ooi, S. L., Shoemaker, D. D. & Boeke, J. D. DNA helicase gene interaction network defined using synthetic lethality analyzed by microarray. Nature Genet. 35, 277–286 (2003).
Hensel, M. et al. Simultaneous identification of bacterial virulence genes by negative selection. Science 269, 400–403 (1995).
Karlyshev, A. V. et al. Application of high-density array-based signature-tagged mutagenesis to discover novel Yersinia virulence-associated genes. Infect. Immun. 69, 7810–7819 (2001).
Heller, R. A. et al. Discovery and analysis of inflammatory disease-related genes using cDNA microarrays. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 2150–2155 (1997). One of the first applications of gene-expression profiling for disease sample classification.
Perou, C. M. et al. Distinctive gene expression patterns in human mammary epithelial cells and breast cancers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 9212–9217 (1999).
Golub, T. R. et al. Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science 286, 531–537 (1999).
Bohen, S. P. et al. Variation in gene expression patterns in follicular lymphoma and the response to rituximab. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 1926–1930 (2003).
Eisen, M. B., Spellman, P. T., Brown, P. O. & Botstein, D. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 14863–14868 (1998).
Tavazoie, S., Hughes, J. D., Campbell, M. J., Cho, R. J. & Church, G. M. Systematic determination of genetic network architecture. Nature Genet. 22, 281–285 (1999).
Wu, L. F. et al. Large-scale prediction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene function using overlapping transcriptional clusters. Nature Genet. 31, 255–265 (2002).
Stuart, J. M., Segal, E., Koller, D. & Kim, S. K. A gene-co-expression network for global discovery of conserved genetic modules. Science 302, 249–255 (2003).
Glazier, A. M., Nadeau, J. H. & Aitman, T. J. Finding genes that underlie complex traits. Science 298, 2345–2349 (2002).
Steinmetz, L. M. et al. Dissecting the architecture of a quantitative trait locus in yeast. Nature 416, 326–330 (2002). The first report of the dissection of a complex trait from a description of the phenotype to identification of the genes published in a single study. Provides evidence for complex QTL architecture and describes a new functional assay.
Darvasi, A. & Pisante-Shalom, A. Complexities in the genetic dissection of quantitative trait loci. Trends Genet. 18, 489–491 (2002).
Christians, J. K. & Keightley, P. D. Genetic architecture: dissecting the genetic basis of phenotypic variation. Curr. Biol. 12, R415–416 (2002).
Mackay, T. F. Quantitative trait loci in Drosophila. Nature Rev. Genet. 2, 11–20 (2001).
Freimer, N. & Sabatti, C. The human phenome project. Nature Genet. 34, 15–21 (2003).
Spradling, A. C. et al. The Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project gene disruption project: single P-element insertions mutating 25% of vital Drosophila genes. Genetics 153, 135–177 (1999).
Peter, A. et al. Mapping and identification of essential gene functions on the X chromosome of Drosophila. EMBO Rep. 3, 34–38 (2002).
Zambrowicz, B. P. et al. Disruption and sequence identification of 2,000 genes in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature 392, 608–611 (1998).
Martin, E. et al. Identification of 1,088 new transposon insertions of Caenorhabditis elegans: a pilot study toward large-scale screens. Genetics 162, 521–524 (2002).
Gura, T. A silence that speaks volumes. Nature 404, 804–808 (2000).
Clemens, J. C. et al. Use of double-stranded RNA interference in Drosophila cell lines to dissect signal transduction pathways. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 6499–6503 (2000).
Esposito, M. S. & Esposito, R. E. The genetic control of sporulation in Saccharomyces. I. The isolation of temperature-sensitive sporulation-deficient mutants. Genetics 61, 79–89 (1969).
Giaever, G. et al. Genomic profiling of drug sensitivities via induced haploinsufficiency. Nature Genet. 21, 278–283 (1999).
Lum, P. Y. et al. Discovering modes of action for therapeutic compounds using a genome-wide screen of yeast heterozygotes. Cell 116, 121–137 (2004).
Hirsh, A. E. & Fraser, H. B. Protein dispensability and rate of evolution. Nature 411, 1046–1049 (2001).
Fraser, H. B., Hirsh, A. E., Steinmetz, L. M., Scharfe, C. & Feldman, M. W. Evolutionary rate in the protein interaction network. Science 296, 750–752 (2002).
Gu, Z. et al. Role of duplicate genes in genetic robustness against null mutations. Nature 421, 63–66 (2003). An example of the use of fitness data in addressing fundamental questions in molecular evolution. Incorporates published data sets without new bench experiments.
Papp, B., Pal, C. & Hurst, L. D. Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeast. Nature 424, 194–197 (2003).
Fodor, S. P. et al. Light-directed, spatially addressable parallel chemical synthesis. Science 251, 767–773 (1991). The first high-density microarray made by direct synthesis.
Blanchard, A. P., Kaiser, R. J. & Hood, L. E. Synthetic DNA arrays. Biosens. Bioelectron. 11, 687–690 (1996).
Schena, M., Shalon, D., Davis, R. W. & Brown, P. O. Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science 270, 467–470 (1995). The first cDNA microarray for gene-expression profiling made by printing.
Ferguson, J. A., Boles, T. C., Adams, C. P. & Walt, D. R. A fiber-optic DNA biosensor microarray for the analysis of gene expression. Nature Biotechnol. 14, 1681–1684 (1996).
Khrapko, K. R. et al. Hybridization of DNA with oligonucleotides immobilized in a gel: a convenient method for recording single base replacements. Mol. Biol. (Mosk) 25, 718–730 (1991).
Halgren, R. G., Fielden, M. R., Fong, C. J. & Zacharewski, T. R. Assessment of clone identity and sequence fidelity for 1189 IMAGE cDNA clones. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 582–588 (2001).
Knight, J. When the chips are down. Nature 410, 860–861 (2001).
Modrek, B. & Lee, C. A genomic view of alternative splicing. Nature Genet. 30, 13–19 (2002).
Johnson, J. M. et al. Genome-wide survey of human alternative pre-mRNA splicing with exon junction microarrays. Science 302, 2141–2144 (2003).
Patil, N. et al. Blocks of limited haplotype diversity revealed by high-resolution scanning of human chromosome 21. Science 294, 1719–1723 (2001).
Winzeler, E. A. et al. Direct allelic variation scanning of the yeast genome. Science 281, 1194–1197 (1998).
Kwok, P. Y. SNP genotyping with fluorescence polarization detection. Hum. Mutat. 19, 315–323 (2002).
Jurinke, C., van den Boom, D., Cantor, C. R. & Koster, H. Automated genotyping using the DNA MassArray technology. Methods Mol. Biol. 187, 179–192 (2002).
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank L. David and T. Neklesa for helpful comments on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Related links
Related links
DATABASES
Entrez
OMIM
FURTHER INFORMATION
Glossary
- COMPLEX TRAITS
-
A trait that is determined by many genes, almost always interacting with environmental influences.
- RNA INTERFERENCE
-
(RNAi). A process by which double-stranded RNA silences specifically the expression of homologous genes through degradation of their cognate mRNA.
- SATURATION MUTAGENESIS
-
A mutagenesis screen that has reached a stage of saturation in which additional mutagenesis does not seem to recover mutations in new genes.
- HAPLOINSUFFICIENCY
-
A gene dosage effect that occurs when a diploid requires both functional copies of a gene for a wild-type phenotype. An organism that is heterozygous for a haploinsufficient locus does not have a wild-type phenotype.
- STOICHIOMETRIC
-
The molar ratio of interacting molecules.
- TRANSFERRED DNA
-
(T DNA). The segment of DNA in the Ti plasmid of Agrobacterium tumefaciens that is transferred to plant cells and inserted into the chromosomes of the plant.
- CRE
-
Cre encodes a site-specific recombinase that recognizes and binds to specific sites called lox. Two lox sites recombine at nearly 100% efficiency in the presence of Cre, allowing DNA that is cloned between two such sites to be removed by Cre-mediated recombination.
- EPISOME
-
An independent DNA element, such as a plasmid, that can replicate extrachromosomally or that can be maintained by integrating into the genome of the host.
- LOX SITE
-
A site to which Cre recombinase binds to mediate recombination, allowing DNA that is cloned between two such sites to be removed.
- COMPLEMENTATION
-
One example is the use of partial diploids to determine whether two mutations affect the same or different genes. If the mutations are in the same gene, they generally fail to complement each other and the diploid retains the mutant phenotype. By contrast, mutations in different genes usually complement one another and restore a wild-type phenotype to the diploid. However, exceptions to both cases abound.
- HEMIZYGOUS
-
A diploid genotype that has only one copy of a particular gene, as in X-chromosome genes in a male, or when the homologous chromosome carries a deletion.
- EPISTASIS
-
An interaction between non-allelic genes, such that one gene masks, interferes with or enhances the effect of the other gene.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Steinmetz, L., Davis, R. Maximizing the potential of functional genomics. Nat Rev Genet 5, 190–201 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1293
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1293
This article is cited by
-
Effect of the over-dominant expression of proteins on nicotine heterosis via proteomic analysis
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Genotyping 1000 yeast strains by next-generation sequencing
BMC Genomics (2013)
-
Microfluidics-based capture of human neutrophils for expression analysis in blood and bronchoalveolar lavage
Laboratory Investigation (2011)
-
The genetics of quantitative traits: challenges and prospects
Nature Reviews Genetics (2009)
-
The evolution of fungal drug resistance: modulating the trajectory from genotype to phenotype
Nature Reviews Microbiology (2008)