Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Opinion
  • Published:

Sharing primary data: a threat or asset to discovery?

Nature Reviews Neuroscience volume 3, pages 311–313 (2002)Cite this article

Abstract

The degree of complexity of neuroscience data is a sufficient reason both for sharing and for not sharing primary data. Sharing data should make research more efficient and greatly facilitate our understanding of brain function. The intellectual challenges are identical with or without data sharing. Sharing increases the value of the data and provides new knowledge and understanding.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The complexity of neuroscience research.
Figure 2: Pathways in neurons, astrocytes and microglia that are implicated in β-amyloid toxicity.
Figure 3: The value of data.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chicurel, M. Databasing the brain. Nature 406, 822–825 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pechura, C. M. & Martin, J. B. Mapping the Brain and its Functions. Integrating Enabling Technologies into Neuroscience Research (National Academy Press, Washington DC, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Editorial. Whose scans are they, anyway? Nature 406, 443 (2000).

  4. Aldhous, P. Prospect of data sharing gives brain mappers a headache. Nature 406, 445–446 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Editorial. A debate over fMRI data sharing. Nature Neurosci. 3, 845–846 (2000).

  6. Van Horn, J. D. & Gazzaniga, M. S. Databasing fMRI studies — towards a 'discovery science' of brain function. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 3, 314–318 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Koslow, S. H. Should the neuroscience community make a paradigm shift to sharing primary data? Nature Neurosci. 3, 863–865 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Small, D. H., Mok, S. S. & Bornstein, J. C. Alzheimer's disease and Aβ toxicity: from top to bottom. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 2, 595–598 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This is not an official policy document of the National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health or the US federal government. It reflects the opinions of the author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. the Office on Neuroinformatics, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, 20892, Maryland, USA

    Stephen H. Koslow

Authors
  1. Stephen H. Koslow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Related links

Related links

FURTHER INFORMATION

Alliance for Cellular Signaling

Encyclopedia of Life Sciences

bioinformatics

biological data centres

magnetic resonance imaging

mining biological databases

fMRI Data Center

MIT Encyclopedia of Cognitive Sciences

magnetic resonance imaging

Neuroinformatics

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koslow, S. Sharing primary data: a threat or asset to discovery?. Nat Rev Neurosci 3, 311–313 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn787

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn787

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing