Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Cyclosporin A and mini short-term methotrexate vs cyclosporin A as graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in patients with beta thalassemia major undergoing allogeneic blood and marrow transplantation

Summary:

We compared the effects of cyclosporin A (CsA) alone as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis vs cyclosporine with short-course methotrexate (MTX) in patients with thalassemia. In all, 140 patients were enrolled in this study. The first group, of 50 patients, received CsA alone at 3 mg/kg i.v. from day −2 to +5 followed by 12.5 mg/kg p.o., which was tapered according to the patient's condition. The other group, of 90 patients, received the combination of CsA+MTX in which CsA was used with the above-mentioned dose and MTX was on 10 mg/m2 day +1 and 6 mg/m2 on days +3 and +6. Incidence of acute GVHD grade II–IV in the CsA group was 78% and in the CsA+MTX group was 52.2%, which was statistically significant (P=<0.001). There were no significant differences in the incidence of chronic GVHD between the two groups. The mean neutrophil engraftment to 0.5 × 109/l was 14 and 23 days for CsA group and CsA+MTX group, respectively (P=<0.001). There were no significant differences for platelet recovery between the two groups. Graft failure in the CsA and CsA+MTX groups was seven (14%) and nine (10%) patients, respectively (P=0.58). Overall survival in the CsA and CsA+MTX groups was 77 and 85%, respectively. Disease-free survival in the CsA and CsA+MTX groups were 58 and 80%, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Arnon Nagler, Myriam Labopin, … Mohamad Mohty

References

  1. Storb R, Deeg HJ, Whitehead J et al. Methotrexate and cyclosporine compared with cyclosporine alone for prophylaxis of acute graft versus host disease after marrow transplantation for leukemia: long term follow-up of a controlled trial. Blood 1989; 73: 1729–1734.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rindgen O, Labopin M, Gluckman E et al. Graft-versus-leukemia effect in allogeneic marrow transplant recipient with acute leukemia is maintained using cyclosporine A combined with methotrexate as prophylaxis. Bone Marrow Transplantation 1996; 18: 921–929.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Locatelli F, Bruno B, Zecca M et al. Cyclosporin A and short-term methotrexate versus cyclosporin A as graft versus host disease prophylaxis in patients with severe aplastic anemia given allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from an HLA-identical sibling: results of a GITMO/EBMT randomized trial. Blood 2000; 96: 1690–1697.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Deeg HJ, Spitzer TR, Cottler-Fox M et al. Conditioning-related toxicity and acute graft-versus-host disease in patients given methotrexate/cyclosporine prophylaxis. Bone Marrow Transplantation 1991; 7: 193–198.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Atkinson K, Downs K . Omission of day 11 methotrexate does not appear to influence the incidence of moderate to severe acute graft-versus-host disease, chronic graft-versus-host disease, relapse rate or survival after HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplantation 1995; 16: 755–758.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Storb R, Deeg HJ, Fisher L et al. Cyclosporine vs methotrexate for GVHD prevention in patients given marrow grafts for leukemia: long term follow-up of 3 controlled trials. Blood 1988; 71: 293–298.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Santos G, Tutschka PJ, Brook Meyer R et al. Cyclosporine plus methylprednisolone versus cyclophosphamide plus methylprednisolone as prophylaxis for graft-versus-host disease. A randomized double-blind study in patients undergoing allogeneic marrow transplantation. Clin Transplant 1987; 1: 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Deeg HJ, Storb R, Thomas GD et al. Cyclosporine as prophylaxis for graft versus host disease. A randomized study in patients undergoing BMT for ANLL. Blood 1985; 65: 1325–1334.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ringden O, Klaesson S, Sundberg B et al. Decreased incidence of GVHD and improved survival with MTX combined with CsA compared with monotherapy in recipients of bone marrow from donors other than HLA identical siblings. Bone Marrow Transplant 1992; 9: 19–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mrsic M, Labar B, Boganic V et al. Combination of CsA and MTX for prophylaxis of aGVHD after allo BMT for leukemia. Bone Marrow Transplant 1990; 6: 137–141.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gluckman G, Horowitz MM, Champlin RG et al. BMT for severe aplastic anemia: influence of conditioning and GVHD prophylaxis regimens on outcome. Blood 1992; 79: 269–275.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Storb R, Deeg HJ, Farewell V et al. BMT for severe aplastic anemia: MTX alone compared with a combination of MTX and CsA for prevention of aGVHD. Blood 1986; 68: 119–125.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Storb R, Deeg HJ, Whitehead J et al. MTX and CsA compared with CsA alone for prophylaxis of aGVHD after BMT for leukemia. N Eng J Med 1986; 314: 729–735.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Storb R, Deeg HJ, Whitehead J et al. BMT for leukemia and aplastic anemia: Two controlled trials of a combination of MTX and CsA vs CsA alone or MTX alone for prophylaxis of aGVHD. Transplant Proc 1987; 19: 2608–2613.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Storb R, Deeg HJ, Pepe M et al. MTX and CsA versus CsA alone for prophylaxis of GVHD in patients given HLA-identical marrow grafts for leukemia: Long term follow up of a controlled trial. Blood 1989; 73: 1729–1734.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Atkinson K, Downs K, Asby M et al. Clinical correlation with CsA blood levels after allo BMT. An analysis of four different assays. Transplant Proc 1990; 22: 1331–1334.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hunter AG, Bessell GM, Russell NH . Effective prevention of aGVHD following Allo BMT with low leukemic relapse using MTX and therapeutically monitored levels of CsA. Bone Marrow Transplant 1992; 10: 431–434.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bartolomeo PD, Girolamo GD, Olioso P et al. The Pescara experience at allo BMT in thalassemia. Bone Marrow Transplant 1997; 19: 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zikos P, Van Lint MT, Frassoni F et al. Low transplant mortality in allo BMT for AML. A randomized study of low dose cyclosporine versus low dose cyclosporine and low dose methotrexate. Blood 1991; 9: 3503–3508.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Marks DI, Hughes TP, Szydlo R et al. HLA identical sibling BMT for CML in first chronic phase influence of GVHD prophylaxis on outcome. Br J Hematol 1992; 81: 383–390.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M Iravani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iravani, M., Mousavi, A., Gholibeikian, S. et al. Cyclosporin A and mini short-term methotrexate vs cyclosporin A as graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in patients with beta thalassemia major undergoing allogeneic blood and marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 35, 1095–1099 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704935

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704935

Keywords

Search

Quick links