Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

A comparison of methods for analyzing glucose and insulin areas under the curve following nine months of exercise in overweight adults

International Journal of Obesity volume 26, pages 87–89 (2002)Cite this article

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We examined three methods for calculating the area under the curve (AUC) following an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in overweight adults prior to and after 9 months of exercise.

METHOD: Subjects (n=27) were randomly assigned to a control (CON, n=9) or intervention (INT, n=18) group. INT performed supervised exercise 5 days per week, 45 min per session, at 65% of heart rate reserve. OGTTs were administered pre- and post-training. Blood was collected during a 75 g OGTT and analyzed for glucose (GLU) and insulin (INS) concentrations. AUCs were calculated using the incremental, positive incremental, and total AUC methods and the difference scores for pre- and post-training were determined.

RESULTS: No differences were observed among the methods for glucose AUC for either group. Significant differences were observed for INT insulin AUC with total AUC (1525±3291 µU/1/180 min) significantly greater than incremental AUC (1112±3229 µU/1/180 min) or positive incremental AUC (1085±3195 µU/I/180 min). Total insulin AUC was significantly reduced following training for INT, while incremental and positive incremental insulin AUCs showed no change.

CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the method of used to calculate AUC may affect the interpretation of whether or not an intervention was effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allison DB, Paultre F, Maggio C, Mezzitis N, Pi-Sunyer FX . The use of areas under curves in diabetes research Diabetes Care 1995 18: 245–250.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wolever TMS, Jenkins DJA . The use of the glycemic index in predicting the blood glucose response to mixed meals Am J Clin Nutr 1986 43: 167–172.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wolever TMS, Jenkins DJA, Jenkins AL, Josse RG . The glycemic index: methodology and clinical implications Am J Clin Nutr 1991 54: 846–854.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Purves RD . Optimum numerical integration methods for estimation of area-under-the-curve (AUC) and area-under-the-moment-curve (AUMC) J Pharmacokin Biopharm 1992 20: 211–227.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. King DS, Baldus PJ, Sharp RL, Kesl LD, Feltmeyer TL, Riddle MS . Time course for exercise-induced alterations in insulin action and glucose tolerance in middle-aged people J Appl Physiol 1995 78: 17–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. King DS, Dalsky GP, Clutter WE, Young DA, Staten MA, Cryer PE et al. Effects of exercise on insulin secretion and action in trained subjects Am J Physiol 1988 254: E537–E542.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. King DS, Dalsky GP, Clutter WE, Young DA, Staten MA, Cryer PE et al. Effects of exercise and lack of exercise on insulin sensitivity and responsiveness J Appl Physiol 1988 64: 1942–1946.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cartee GD, Holloszy JO . Exercise increases susceptibility of muscle glucose transport to activation by various stimuli Am J Physiol 1990 258: E390–E393.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Goodyear LJ, Kahn BB . Exercise, glucose transport, and insulin sensitivity A Rev Med 1998 49: 235–261.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Houmard JA, Egan PC, Neufer PD, Friedman JE, Wheeler WS, Israel RG et al. . Elevated skeletal muscle glucose transporter levels in exercise trained middle aged men Am J Physiol 1991 261: E437–E443.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gao J, Ren J, Gulve EA, Holloszy JO . Additive effect of contractions and insulin on GLUT-4 translocation into the sarcolemma J Appl Physiol 1994 77: 1597–1601.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hughes VA, Fiatarone MA, Fielding RA, Kahn BB, Ferrara CM, Shepherd P et al. Exercise increases muscle GLUT-4 levels and insulin action in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance Am J Physiol 1993 364: E855–E862.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by NIH grant DK49181.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health, Sport, and Exercise Sciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA

    JA Potteiger, DJ Jacobsen & JE Donnelly

Authors
  1. JA Potteiger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. DJ Jacobsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. JE Donnelly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to JA Potteiger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Potteiger, J., Jacobsen, D. & Donnelly, J. A comparison of methods for analyzing glucose and insulin areas under the curve following nine months of exercise in overweight adults. Int J Obes 26, 87–89 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801839

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801839

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links