Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

The influence of the stigma of obesity on overweight individuals

International Journal of Obesity volume 28, pages 1333–1337 (2004)Cite this article

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the internalization of anti-fat bias among overweight individuals across a variety of attitudes and stereotypes.

DESIGN: Two studies were conducted using the Implicit Association Test (IAT), a performance-based measure of bias, to examine beliefs among overweight individuals about ‘fat people’ vs ‘thin people’. Study two also contained explicit measures of attitudes about obese people.

SUBJECTS: Study 1 participants were 68 overweight patients at a treatment research clinic (60 women, 8 men; mean Body Mass Index (BMI) of 37.1±3.9 kg/m2). Study 2 involved 48 overweight participants (33 women, 15 men) with a BMI of 34.5±4.0 kg/m2.

RESULTS: Participants exhibited significant anti-fat bias on the IAT across several attributes and stereotypes. They also endorsed the explicit belief that fat people are lazier than thin people.

CONCLUSION: Unlike other minority group members, overweight individuals do not appear to hold more favorable attitudes toward ingroup members. This ingroup devaluation has implications for changing the stigma of obesity and for understanding the psychosocial and even medical impact of obesity on those affected.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Puhl R, Brownell KD . Bias, discrimination, and obesity. Obes Res 2001; 9: 788–805.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Greenberg BS, Eastin M, Hofshire L, Lachlan K, Brownell KD . The portrayal of overweight and obese persons in commercial television. Am J Public Health 2003; 93: 1342–1348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tajfel H, Turner JC . Social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Worchel S, Austin WG (eds). Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Nelson-Hall: Chicago; 1986. pp 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rudman LA, Feinberg J, Fairchild K . Minority members’ implicit attitudes: automatic ingroup bias as a function of group status. Soc Cogn 2002; 20: 294–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schwarz N . Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. Am Psychol 1999; 54: 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nisbett RE, Wilson TD . Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes. Psychol Rev 1977; 84: 231–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Greenwald AG, Banaji M . Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychol Rev 1995; 105: 4–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rudman LA, Ashmore RD, Gary ML . ‘Unlearning’ automatic biases: the malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes. J Pers Soc Psychol 2001; 81: 856–868.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bessenhoff GR, Sherman JW . Automatic and controlled components of prejudice toward fat people: evaluation versus stereotype activation. Soc Cogn 2000; 18: 329–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dovidio JF, Kawakami K, Johnson C, Johnson B, Howard A . On the nature of prejudice: implicit and controlled processes. J Exp Soc Psych 1997; 33: 510–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dovidio JF, Kawakami K, Gaertner SL . Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interactions. J Pers Soc Psych 2002; 82: 62–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilson TD, Lindsey S, Schooler TY . A model of dual attitudes. Psychol Rev 2000; 107: 101–126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JLK . Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. J Pers Soc Psychol 1998; 74: 1464–1480.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Teachman BA, Brownell KD . Implicit anti-fat bias among health professionals: is anyone immune? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001; 25: 1525–1531.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Teachman BA, Gapinski KD, Brownell KD, Rawlins M, Jeyaram S . Demonstrations of implicit anti-fat bias: the impact of providing causal information and evoking empathy. Health Psychol 2003; 22: 68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ofosu HB, Lafreniere KD, Senn CY . Body image perception among women of African descent: a normative context? Feminism Psychol 1998; 8: 303–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cohen J . Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Allison DB, Basile VC, Yuker HE . The measurement of attitudes toward and beliefs about obese persons. Int J Eating Disord 1991; 10: 599–607.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Petty RE, Fleming MA, White PH . Stigmatized sources and persuasion: prejudice as a determinant of argument scrutiny. J Pers Soc Psychol 1999; 76: 19–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gluck ME, Geliebter A . Racial/ethnic differences in body image and eating behaviors. Eating Behav 2002; 3: 143–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Quinn DM, Crocker J . When ideology hurts: effects of belief in the Protestant ethic and feeling overweight on the psychological well-being of women. J Pers Soc Psychol 1999; 77: 402–414.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tiggemann M, Anesbury T . Negative stereotyping of obesity in children: the role of controllability beliefs. J Appl Soc Psychol 2000; 30: 1993–1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Anesbury T, Tiggemann M . An attempt to reduce negative stereotyping of obesity in children by changing controllability beliefs. Health Ed Res 2000; 15: 145–152.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Rebecca Rothman and Stephanie Sargent for their assistance with data collection. Portions of this study were presented in October 2001 at the meeting of the North American Association for the Study of Obesity, Quebec, Canada. This research was supported by NIH grant DK56124-03 and by an unrestricted educational grant from Abbott Laboratories (both to Dr Wadden).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA

    S S Wang & K D Brownell

  2. University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, USA

    T A Wadden

Authors
  1. S S Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K D Brownell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T A Wadden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S S Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, S., Brownell, K. & Wadden, T. The influence of the stigma of obesity on overweight individuals. Int J Obes 28, 1333–1337 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802730

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802730

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links