Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

Validity of self-reported height and weight in a Japanese workplace population

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the validity of self-reported height and weight in a Japanese workplace population, and to examine factors associated with the validity of self-reported weight.

DESIGN:

Comparison of self-reported height and weight with independent measurement.

SUBJECTS:

In total, 4253 men and 1148 women aged 35–64 y (mean measured body mass index (BMI): 23.3 kg/m2 in men, 21.9 kg/m2 in women) were included in the study.

MEASUREMENTS:

Self-reported height and weight were obtained by a self-administered questionnaire. Measured height and weight were based on annual health checkups. Sex, age, measured BMI, and the presence of hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia were examined as potential factors associated with the accuracy of self-reported weight.

RESULTS:

Self-reported height and weight were highly correlated with measured height and weight for men and women (Pearson’s r for men and women: 0.979 and 0.988 in height, 0.961 and 0.959 in weight, 0.943 and 0.950 in BMI, respectively). For men, mean differences±2 s.d. of height and weight were 0.078±2.324 cm and −0.034±5.012 kg, respectively, and for women 0.029±1.652 cm and 0.024±4.192 kg, respectively. The prevalence of obesity with BMI ≥25 kg/m2 based on self-reported data (23.6 and 11.5% for men and women, respectively) was slightly smaller than that based on measured data (24.9 and 12.4%, respectively). Specificity and sensitivity, however, were quite high for both men and women (sensitivity was 85.8 and 85.2%, and specificity was 97.0 and 98.9%, respectively). The subjects with higher measured BMI significantly underestimated their weight compared with those with smaller BMI after adjustments for age in men and women. Furthermore, the presence of diabetes in men and age in women affected self-reported weight. Neither the presence of hypertension nor hyperlipidemia was associated with reporting bias.

CONCLUSION:

The self-reported height and weight were generally reliable in the middle-aged employed Japanese men and women. However, it should be remembered that self-reported weight was biased by actual BMI and affected by age and the presence of diabetes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cornoni-Huntley JC, Harris TB, Everett DF, Albanes D, Micozzi MS, Miles TP, Feldman JJ . An overview of body weight of older persons, including the impact on mortality. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey I—epidemiologic follow-up study. Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44: 743–753.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pi-Sunyer FX . Medical hazards of obesity. Ann Intern Med 1993; 119: 655–660.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lin J, Zhang SM, Cook NR, Rexrode KM, Lee IM, Buring JE . Body mass index and risk of colorectal cancer in women (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2004; 15: 581–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Serdula MK, Collins ME, Williamson DF, Anda RF, Pamuk E, Byers TE . Weight control practices of U.S. adolescents and adults. Ann Intern Med 1993; 119: 667–671.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Niedhammer I, Bugel I, Bonenfant S, Goldberg M, Leclerc A . Validity of self-reported weight and height in the French GAZEL cohort. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000; 24: 1111–1118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nawaz H, Chan W, Abdulrahman M, Larson D, Katz DL . Self-reported weight and height: implications for obesity research. Am J Prev Med 2001; 20: 294–298.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brener ND, McManus T, Galuska DA . Reliability and validity of self-reported height and weight among high school students. J Adolesc Health 2003; 32: 281–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Giacchi M, Mattei R, Rossi S . Correction of the self-reported BMI in a teenage population. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1998; 22: 673–677.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Crawley HF, Portides G . Self-reported versus measured height, weight and body mass index amongst 16–17 year old British teenagers. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1995; 19: 579–584.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gunnell D, Berney L, Holland P, Maynard M, Blane D, Frankel S, Smith GD . How accurately are height, weight and leg length reported by the elderly, and how closely are they related to measurements recorded in childhood? Int J Epidemiol 2000; 29: 456–464.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rowland ML . Self-reported weight and height. Am J Clin Nutr 1990; 52: 1125–1133.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Spencer EA, Appleby PN, Davey GK, Key TJ . Validity of self-reported height and weight in 4808 EPIC-Oxford participants. Public Health Nutr 2002; 5: 561–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bostrom G, Diderichsen F . Socioeconomic differentials in misclassification of height, weight and body mass index based on questionnaire data. Int J Epidemiol 1997; 26: 860–866.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lawlor DA, Bedford C, Taylor M, Ebrahim S . Agreement between measured and self-reported weight in older women. Results from the British Women’s Heart and Health Study. Age Ageing 2002; 31: 169–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jeffery RW . Bias in reported body weight as a function of education, occupation, health and weight concern. Addict Behav 1996; 21: 217–222.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bolton-Smith C, Woodward M, Tunstall-Pedoe H, Morrison C . Accuracy of the estimated prevalence of obesity from self reported height and weight in an adult Scottish population. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000; 54: 143–148.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Strauss RS . Comparison of measured and self-reported weight and height in a cross-sectional sample of young adolescents. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1999; 23: 904–908.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Abraham S, Luscombe G, Boyd C, Olesen I . Predictors of the accuracy of self-reported height and weight in adolescent female school students. Int J Eat Disord 2004; 36: 76–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Villanueva EV . The validity of self-reported weight in US adults: a population based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2001; 1: 11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuczmarski MF, Kuczmarski RJ, Najjar M . Effects of age on validity of self-reported height, weight, and body mass index: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. J Am Diet Assoc 2001; 101: 28–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. McCabe RE, McFarlane T, Polivy J, Olmsted MP . Eating disorders, dieting, and the accuracy of self-reported weight. Int J Eat Disord 2001; 29: 59–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Masheb RM, Grilo CM . Accuracy of self-reported weight in patients with binge eating disorder. Int J Eat Disord 2001; 29: 29–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nakamura K, Hoshino Y, Kodama K, Yamamoto M . Reliability of self-reported body height and weight of adult Japanese women. J Biosoc Sci 1999; 31: 555–558.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Engstrom JL, Peterson SA, Doherty A, Trabulsi M, Speer KL . Accuracy of self-reported height and weight in women: an integrative review of the literature. J Midwifery Womens Health 2003; 48: 338–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bland JM, Altoman DG . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307–310.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Examination Committee of Criteria for ‘Obesity Disease’ in Japan. Japan Society for the Study of Obesity. New criteria for ‘obesity disease’ in Japan. Circ J 2002; 66: 987–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Larson MR . Social desirability and self-reported weight and height. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000; 24: 663–665.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Shapiro JR, Anderson DA . The effects of restraint, gender, and body mass index on the accuracy of self-reported weight. Int J Eat Disord 2003; 34: 177–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported in party by grants to Hideaki Toyoshima (13470087), Koji Tamakoshi (16590499), and Hiroshi Yatsuya (15689011) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology and the Japan Atherosclerosis Prevention Fund (JAPF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H Toyoshima.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wada, K., Tamakoshi, K., Tsunekawa, T. et al. Validity of self-reported height and weight in a Japanese workplace population. Int J Obes 29, 1093–1099 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803012

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803012

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links