Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Short Communication
  • Published:

Frequent activating FGFR2 mutations in endometrial carcinomas parallel germline mutations associated with craniosynostosis and skeletal dysplasia syndromes

Abstract

Endometrial carcinoma is the most common gynecological malignancy in the United States. Although most women present with early disease confined to the uterus, the majority of persistent or recurrent tumors are refractory to current chemotherapies. We have identified a total of 11 different FGFR2 mutations in 3/10 (30%) of endometrial cell lines and 19/187 (10%) of primary uterine tumors. Mutations were seen primarily in tumors of the endometrioid histologic subtype (18/115 cases investigated, 16%). The majority of the somatic mutations identified were identical to germline activating mutations in FGFR2 and FGFR3 that cause Apert Syndrome, Beare–Stevenson Syndrome, hypochondroplasia, achondroplasia and SADDAN syndrome. The two most common somatic mutations identified were S252W (in eight tumors) and N550K (in five samples). Four novel mutations were identified, three of which are also likely to result in receptor gain-of-function. Extensive functional analyses have already been performed on many of these mutations, demonstrating they result in receptor activation through a variety of mechanisms. The discovery of activating FGFR2 mutations in endometrial carcinoma raises the possibility of employing anti-FGFR molecularly targeted therapies in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burgar HR, Burns HD, Elsden JL, Lalioti MD, Heath JK . (2002). Association of the signaling adaptor FRS2 with fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (Fgfr1) is mediated by alternative splicing of the juxtamembrane domain. J Biol Chem 277: 4018–4023.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burset M, Seledtsov IA, Solovyev VV . (2000). Analysis of canonical and non-canonical splice sites in mammalian genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 4364–4375.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cho JY, Guo C, Torello M, Lunstrum GP, Iwata T, Deng C et al. (2004). Defective lysosomal targeting of activated fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 in achondroplasia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 609–614.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chong A, Zhang G, Bajic VB . (2004). Information for the Coordinates of Exons (ICE): a human splice sites database. Genomics 84: 762–766.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gold LI, Saxena B, Mittal KR, Marmor M, Goswami S, Nactigal L et al. (1994). Increased expression of transforming growth factor beta isoforms and basic fibroblast growth factor in complex hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: evidence for paracrine and autocrine action. Cancer Res 54: 2347–2358.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenman C, Stephens P, Smith R, Dalgliesh G, Hunter C, Bignell G et al. (2007). Patterns of Somatic mutation in cancer genomes. Nature 446: 153–158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahimi OA, Eliseenkova AV, Plotnikov AN, Yu K, Ornitz DM, Mohammadi M . (2001). Structural basis for fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 activation in Apert syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 7182–7187.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahimi OA, Zhang F, Eliseenkova AV, Itoh N, Linhardt RJ, Mohammadi M . (2004). Biochemical analysis of pathogenic ligand-dependent FGFR2 mutations suggests distinct pathophysiological mechanisms for craniofacial and limb abnormalities. Hum Mol Genet 13: 2313–2324.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Smigal C : et al. (2006). Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin 56: 106–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi M, Olsen SK, Ibrahimi OA . (2005). Structural basis for fibroblast growth factor receptor activation. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 16: 107–137.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moller B, Rasmussen C, Lindblom B, Olovsson M . (2001). Expression of the angiogenic growth factors VEGF, FGF-2, EGF and their receptors in normal human endometrium during the menstrual cycle. Mol Hum Reprod 7: 65–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Monsonego-Ornan E, Adar R, Feferman T, Segev O, Yayon A . (2000). The transmembrane mutation G380R in fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 uncouples ligand-mediated receptor activation from down-regulation. Mol Cell Biol 20: 516–522.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Obel JC, Friberg G, Fleming GF . (2006). Chemotherapy in endometrial cancer. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 4: 459–468.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ornitz DM, Itoh N . (2001). Fibroblast growth factors. Genome Biol 2: Reviews3005.1–reviews3005.12.

  • Passos-Bueno MR, Wilcox WR, Jabs EW, Sertie AL, Alonso LG, Kitoh H . (1999). Clinical spectrum of fibroblast growth factor receptor mutations. Hum Mutat 14: 115–125.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sangha RK, Li XF, Shams M, Ahmed A . (1997). Fibroblast growth factor receptor-1 is a critical component for endometrial remodeling: localization and expression of basic fibroblast growth factor and FGF-R1 in human endometrium during the menstrual cycle and decreased FGF-R1 expression in menorrhagia. Lab Invest 77: 389–402.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai SJ, Wu MH, Chen HM, Chuang PC, Wing LY . (2002). Fibroblast growth factor-9 is an endometrial stromal growth factor. Endocrinology 143: 2715–2721.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Rhijn BW, Lurkin I, Radvanyi F, Kirkels WJ, van der Kwast TH, Zwarthoff EC . (2001). The fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) mutation is a strong indicator of superficial bladder cancer with low recurrence rate. Cancer Res 61: 1265–1268.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie AO . (2005). Bad bones, absent smell, selfish testes: the pleiotropic consequences of human FGF receptor mutations. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 16: 187–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie AO, Patey SJ, Kan SH, van den Ouweland AM, Hamel BC . (2002). FGFs, their receptors, and human limb malformations: clinical and molecular correlations. Am J Med Genet 112: 266–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu K, Herr AB, Waksman G, Ornitz DM . (2000). Loss of fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 ligand-binding specificity in Apert syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 14536–14541.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Ibrahimi OA, Olsen SK, Umemori H, Mohammadi M, Ornitz DM . (2006). Receptor specificity of the fibroblast growth factor family. The complete mammalian FGF family. J Biol Chem 281: 15694–15700.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the TGen Sequencing Core for their excellent work. We also thank Feng Gao and the Biostatistics Core at Siteman Cancer Center, Barnes-Jewish Hospital Washington University for assistance with the survival analyses (CA091842). Supported in part by RO1 CA71754 (PJG and MAM), Wellcome Trust (MS, AF and HD), the Melanoma Research Foundation (PMP) and R01 CA109544 (JT).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P M Pollock.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Oncogene website (http://www.nature.com/onc).

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pollock, P., Gartside, M., Dejeza, L. et al. Frequent activating FGFR2 mutations in endometrial carcinomas parallel germline mutations associated with craniosynostosis and skeletal dysplasia syndromes. Oncogene 26, 7158–7162 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1210529

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1210529

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links