Abstract
Objective
To isolate the effect of spoken language from financial barriers to care, we examined the relation of language to use of preventive services in a system with universal access.
Design
Cross-sectional survey.
Setting
Household population of women living in Ontario, Canada, in 1990.
Participants
Subjects were 22,448 women completing the 1990 Ontario Health Survey, a population-based random sample of households.
Measurements and Main Results
We defined language as the language spoken in the home and assessed self-reported receipt of breast examination, mammogram and Pap testing. We used logistic regression to calculate odds ratios for each service adjusting for potential sources of confounding: socioeconomic characteristics, contact with the health care system, and measures reflecting culture. Ten percent of the women spoke a non-English language at home (4% French. 6% other). After adjustment, compared with English speakers, French-speaking women were significantly less likely to receive breast exams or mammography, and other language speakers were less likely to receive Pap testing.
Conclusions
Women whose main spoken language was not English were less likely to receive important preventive services. Improving communication with patients with limited English may enhance participation in screening programs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hu DJ, Covell RM. Health care usage by Hispanic outpatients as a function of primary language. West J Med. 1986;144:490–3.
Solis J, Marks G, Garcia M, Shelton D. Acculturation, access to care, and use of preventive services by Hispanics: findings from HHANES 1982-84 Am J Publich Health. 1990;80(suppl):11–9.
Kirkman-Liff B, Mondragon D. Language of interview: relevance for research of Southwest Hispanics. Am J Public Health. 1991; 81:1399–404.
Feinstein J. The relationship between socioeconomic status and health: a review of the literature. Milbank O. 1993;71:279–322.
Stein J, Fox S. Language preference as an indicator of mammography use among Hispanic women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990;82:1715–6.
Makuc D, Fried V, Kleinman J. National trends in the use of preventive health care by women. Am J Public Health. 1989;79:21–6.
Hayward R, Shapiro M, Freeman H, Corey C. Who gets screened for cervical and breast cancer? Arch Intern Med. 1988;148:1177–81.
Marks G, Solis J, Richardson J, Collins L, Birba L, Hisserich J. Health behavior of elderly Hispanic women: does cultural assimilation make a difference? Am J Public Health. 1987;77:1315–9.
Deyo R, Diehl A, Hazuda H, Stern M. A simple language-based acculturation scale for Mexican-Americans: validation and application to health care research. Am J Public Health. 1985;75:51–5.
Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. Canadian Guide to Clinical Preventive Health Care. Ottawa, Ont: Canada Communication Group: 1994.
United States Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1996.
Rust K. Variance estimations for complex estimators in sample surveys. J Off Stat. 1985;4:381–97.
Katz S, Hofer T. Socioeconomic disparities in preventive care persist despite universal coverage: breast and cervical cancer screening in Ontario and the United States. JAMA. 1994;272:530–4.
Perez-Stable E, Sabogal F, Otero-Sabogal R, Hiatt R, McPhee S. Misconceptions about cancer among Latinos and Anglos. JAMA. 1992;268:3219–23.
Harlan L, Bernstein A, Kessler L. Cervical cancer screening: who is not screened and why? Am J Public Health. 1991;81:885–91.
Kottke T, Trapp M, Fores M, et al. Cancer screening behaviors and attitudes of women in southeastern Minnesota JAMA. 1995;273: 1099–1105.
Fox SA, Stein JA. The effect of physician-patient communication on mammography utilization by different ethnic groups. Med Care. 1991;29:1065–82.
Statistical Abstract of the U.S. 1990 Census. 113th ed. Washington, DC: US Bureau of the Census: 1993.
Woloshin S, Bickell N, Schwartz L, Gany F, Welch H. Language barriers in medicine in the United States. JAMA 1995;273:724–8.
Baker D, Parker R, Williams M, Coates W, Pitkin K. Use and effectiveness of interpreters in an emergency department. JAMA. 1996; 275:783–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Drs. Woloshin and Schwartz were supported by a Veterans Affairs Fellowship in Ambulatory Care. Dr. Katz was supported by a Robert Wood Johnson Generalist Faculty Scholars Award and the Ann Arbor VA Center for Practice Management and Outcomes Research. Dr. Welch was supported by a Veterans Affairs Career Development Award in health services research and development.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Woloshin, S., Schwartz, L.M., Katz, S.J. et al. Is language a barrier to the use of preventive services?. J GEN INTERN MED 12, 472–477 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.00085.x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.00085.x