Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effectiveness of a skin cancer control educational intervention for internal medicine housestaff and attending physicians

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the effects of a brief educational program on beliefs, knowledge, and behaviors related to skin cancer control among internal medicine housestaff and attending physicians.

Design

Randomized controlled trial.

Setting

Urban academic general medicine practice.

Participants

Internal medicine housestaff and attending physicians with continuity clinics at the practice site.

Intervention

Two 1-hour educational seminars on skin cancer control conducted jointly by a general internist and a dermatologist.

Measurements and main results

Self-reported attitudes and beliefs about skin cancer control, ability to identify and make treatment decisions on 18 skin lesions, and knowledge of skin cancer risk factors were measured by a questionnaire before and after the teaching intervention. Exit surveys of patients at moderate to high risk of skin cancer were conducted 1 month before and 1 month after the intervention to measure physician skin cancer control practices reported by patients. Eighty-two physicians completed baseline questionnaires and were enrolled in the study, 46 in the intervention group and 36 in the control group. Twenty-five physicians attended both sessions, 11 attended one, and 10 attended neither. Postintervention, the percentage of physicians feeling adequately trained increased from 35% to 47% in the control group (p=.34) and from 37% to 57% in the intervention group (p=.06). Intervention physicians had an absolute mean improvement in their risk factor identification score of 6.7%, while control physicians' mean score was unchanged (p=.06). Intervention and control physicians had similar increases in their postintervention lesion identification and managment scores. Postintervention, the mean proportion of patients per physician stating they were advised to watch their moles increased more among intervention physicians than control physicians (absolute difference of 19% vs −8%,p=.04). Other changes in behavior were not significant.

Conclusions

Although we observed a few modest intervention effects, overall this brief skin cancer education intervention did not significantly affect primary care physicians’ skin cancer control attitudes, beliefs, knowledge, or behaviors. A more intensive intervention with greater participation may be necessary to show a stronger impact on attitudes and knowledge about skin cancer control among primary care physicians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marks R. An overview of skin cancers: incidence and causation. Cancer. 1995;75(suppl):607–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Parker SL, Tong T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics, 1997. CA Cancer J Clin. 1997;47(1):5–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Glass AG, Hoover RN. The emerging epidemic of melanoma and squamous cell skin cancer. JAMA. 1989;262:2097–100.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Urback R. Incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Dermatol Clin. 1991;9:751–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Koh HK. Cutaneous melanoma. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:171–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mackie RM, Hole D. Audit of public education campaign to encourage earlier detection of melanoma. BMJ. 1992;304:1012–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rigel DS, Rivers JK, Kopf AW, et al. Dysplastic nevi: markers for increased risk for melanoma. Cancer. 1989;63:386–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tristen AD, Grin CM, Kopf AW, et al. Prospective follow-up for malignant melanoma in patients with atypical-mole syndrome. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1991;17:44–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dolan NC, Martin GJ, Robinson JK, Rademaker AW. Skin cancer control practices among physicians in a university general medicine practice. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:515–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wender RC. Barriers to effective skin cancer detection. Cancer. 1995;75S(2suppl):691–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. American Cancer Society. 1989 survey of physicians' attitudes and practices in early cancer detection. CA Cancer J Clin. 1990;40(2):77–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McCarthy GM, Lamb GC, Russel TJ, Young MJ. Primary carebased dermatology practice: internists need more training. J Gen Intern Med. 1991;6:52–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cassileth BR, Clark WH, Lusk EJ, Frederick BE, Thompson CJ, Walsh WP. How well do physicians recognize melanoma and other problem lesions. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1986;14:555–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ramsey DL, Fox AB. The ability of primary care physicians to recognize the common dermatoses. Arch Dermatol. 1981;117:620–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Geller AC, Koh HK, Miller DR, Clapp RW, Mercer MB, Lew RA. Use of health services before the diagnosis of melanoma. Implications for early detection and screening. J Gen Intern Med. 1992;7:154–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ries LAG, Miller BA, Hankey BF, et al., eds. WEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973–1991: Tables and Graphs. Bethesda, Md: National Cancer Institute: 1994. NIH publication no. 94-2789.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rhodes AR, Weinstock MA, Fitzpatrick TB, Mihm MC, Sober AJ. Risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: a practical method of recognizing predisposed individuals. JAMA. 1987;258:3146–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Koh HK, Barnhill RL, Rogers GS. Melanoma. In: Arndt K, LeBoit R, Robinson JK, Whitcomb R, eds. Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co.: 1996:1576–9.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Weinstock HA. Assessment of sun sensitivity by questionnaire: validity of items and formulation of a prediction rule. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:547–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Headrick LA, Speroff T, Pelecanos HI, Cebul RD. Efforts to improve compliance with the National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines. Results of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:2490–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Browner WS, Baron RB, Solkowitz S, Adler LJ, Gullion DS. Physician management of hypercholesterolemia: a randomized trial of continuing medical education. West J Med. 1994;161(6):572–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cohen SJ, Halvorson HW, Gosselink CA. Changing physician behavior to improve disease prevention. Prev Med. 1994;23(3):284–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. McKinney WP, Barnas GP. Influenza immunization in the elderly: knowledge and attitudes do not explain physician behavior. Am J Public Health. 1989;79(10):1422–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by the Robert H. Lurie Cancer Center of Northwestern University. Dr. Dolan is a recipient of the American Cancer Society Career Development Award for Primary Care Physicians.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dolan, N.C., Ng, J.S., Martin, G.J. et al. Effectiveness of a skin cancer control educational intervention for internal medicine housestaff and attending physicians. J GEN INTERN MED 12, 531–536 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07106.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07106.x

Key words

Navigation