Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a brief, multicomponent intervention could improve the skin cancer diagnosis and evaluation planning performance of primary care residents to a level equivalent to that of dermatologists.
PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-two primary care residents (26 in the control group and 26 in the intervention group) and 13 dermatologists completed a pretest and posttest.
DESIGN: A randomized, controlled trial with pretest and posttest measurements of residents’ ability to diagnose and make evaluation plans for lesions indicative of skin cancer.
INTERVENTION: The intervention included face-to-face feedback sessions focusing on residents’s performance deficiencies; an interactive seminar including slide presentations, case examples, and live demonstrations; and the Melanoma Prevention Kit including a booklet, magnifying tool, measuring tool, and skin color guide.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We compared the abilities of a control and an intervention group of primary care residents, and a group of dermatologists to diagnose and make evaluation plans for six categories of skin lesions including three types of skin cancer—malignant melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and basal cell carcinoma. At posttest, both the intervention and control group demonstrated improved performance, with the intervention group revealing significantly larger gains. The intervention group showed greater improvement than the control group across all six diagnostic categories (a gain of 13 percentage points vs 5, p<.05), and in evaluation planning for malignant melanoma (a gain of 46 percentage points vs 36, p<.05) and squamous cell carcinoma (a gain of 42 percentage points vs 21, p<.01). The intervention group performed as well as the dermatologists on five of the six skin cancer diagnosis and evaluation planning scores with the exception of the diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary care residents can diagnose and make evaluation plans for cancerous skin lesions, including malignant melanoma, at a level equivalent to that of dermatologists if they receive relevant, targeted education.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alper PR. Primary care in transition. JAMA. 1994;274:1523–7.
Lynch PJ. Dermatology for the House Officer. The House Officer Series. 2nd ed. Baltimore, Md: Williams and Wilkins; 1987.
Weinstock MA, Goldstein MG, Dube CE, Rhodes AR, Sober AJ. Basic skin cancer triage for melanoma detection. J. Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;34:1063–6.
National Center for Health Statistics. Vital and Health Statistics: Current Estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 1993. Hyattsville, Md: National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Public Health Service, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services; 1994.
Johnson MA. On teaching dermatology to nondermatologists. Arch Dermatol. 1994;130:850–2.
McCarthy GM, Lamb GC, Russell TJ, Young MJ. Primary care-based dermatology practice: internists need more training. J. Gen Intern Med. 1991;6:52–6.
Cassileth BR, Clark W Jr, Lusk EJ, Frederick BE, Thompson CJ, Walsh WP. How well do physicians recognize melanoma and other problem lesions? J Am Acad Dermatol. 1986;14:555–60.
Ramsay DL, Mayer F. National survey of undergraduate dermatologic medical education. Arch Dermatol. 1985;121:1529–30.
Gerbert B, Maurer T, Berger T, et al. Primary care physicians as gatekeepers in managed care: primary care physicians’ and dermatologists’ skills at secondary prevention of skin cancer. Arch Dermatol. 1996;132:1030–8.
Solomon BA, Collins R, Silverberg N, Glass AT. Quality of care: issue or oversight in health care reform? J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;34:601–7.
Allen SW, Norman GR, Brooks LR. Experimental studies of learning dermatologic diagnosis: the impact of examples. Teaching Learning Med. 1992;4:35–44.
Robinson J, McGaghie W. Skin cancer detection in a clinical practice examination with standardized patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;34:709–11.
Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA. 1995;274:700–5.
Amonette R, Sparks D. Recognizing skin cancer. Am Fam Physician Monograph. 1993:1–16.
USC Melanoma Prevention Program. The Melanoma Prevention Kit. Los Angeles, Calif: USC School of Medicine; 1995.
Norman GR, Coblenz CL, Brooks LR, Babcook CJ. Expertise in visual diagnosis: a review of the literature. Acad Med. 1992;67:S78–83.
Davis D, Thomson MA. Implications for undergraduate and graduate education derived from quantitative research in continuing medical education: lessons learned from an automobile. J Cont Educ Health Prof. 1996;16:159–66.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by the National Cancer Institute, grant 5 R01 CA62959-02.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gerbert, B., Bronstone, A., Wolff, M. et al. Improving primary care residents’ proficiency in the diagnosis of skin cancer. J GEN INTERN MED 13, 91–97 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00024.x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00024.x