Skip to main content
Log in

Variation by specialty in the treatment of urinary tract infection in women

  • Brief Reports
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To determine practicing physicians’ strategies for diagnosing and managing uncomplicated urinary tract infection, we surveyed physicians in general internal medicine, family practice, obstetrics and gynecology, and emergency medicine in four states, Responses differed significantly by respondents’ specialty. For example, nitrofurantoin was the antibiotic of first choice for 46% of obstetricians, while over 80% in the other specialties chose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Most surveyed said they do not usually order urine culture, but the percentage who do varied by specialty. Most use a colony count of 105 colony-forming units or more for diagnosis although evidence favors a lower threshold, and 70% continue antibiotic therapy even if the culture result is negative. This survey found considerable variation by specialty and also among individual physicians regarding diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract infection and also suggests that some of the new information from the literature has not been translated to clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Berg AO. Variations among family physicians’ management strategies for lower urinary tract infection in women: a report from the Washington family physicians collaborative research network. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1991;4:327–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vernon S, Foo CK, Coulthard MD. How general practitioners manage children with urinary tract infection: an audit in the former Northern Region. Br J Gen Pract. 1997;47:297–300.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McLeon D, Kljakovic M. What do general practitioners do when patients present with symptoms indicative of urinary tract infections? N Z Med J. 1998;111:189–91.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stamm WE, Counts GW, Running KR, Fihn S, Turck M, Holmes KK. Diagnosis of coliform infection in acutely dysuric women. N Engl J Med. 1982;307:463–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kass EH. Bacteriuria and the diagnosis of infections of the urinary tract. Arch Intern Med. 1957;100:709–14.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stamm WE, Hooton TM. Management of urinary tract infections in adults. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1328–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pappas PG. Laboratory in the diagnosis and management of urinary tract infections. Med Clin North Am. 1991;75:313–25.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hooton TM. A simplified approach to urinary tract infection. Hosp Pract. 1995;Feb 15:23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Saint S, Scholes D, Fihn SD, Farrell RG, Stamm WE. The effectiveness of a clinical practice guideline for the management of presumed uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women. Am J Med. 1999;106:636–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wigton RS, Nicolas JA, Blank LL. Procedural skills of the general internist: a survey of 2500 physicians. Ann Intern Med. 1989;111:1023–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kunin CM. Urinary tract infections: flow carts (algorithms) for detection and treatment. JAMA. 1975;233:458–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wigton, R.S., Longenecker, J.C., Bryan, T.J. et al. Variation by specialty in the treatment of urinary tract infection in women. J GEN INTERN MED 14, 491–494 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.05398.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.05398.x

Key Words

Navigation