Skip to main content
Log in

Attitudes toward colorectal cancer screening tests

A survey of patients and physicians

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine patient and physician preferences in regard to 5 colorectal cancer screening alternatives endorsed by a 1997 expert panel, determine the impact of patient and physician values regarding certain test features on screening preference, and assess physicians’ perceptions of patients’ values.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey.

SETTING: A general internal medicine practice at an academic medical center in 1998.

PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=217; 76% response rate) and physicians (N=39; 87% response rate) at the study setting.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients preferred fecal occult blood testing (43%) or colonoscopy (40%). In patients for whom accuracy was the most important test feature, colonoscopy (62%) was the preferred screening method. Patients for whom invasive test features were more important preferred fecal occult blood testing (76%; P<.001). Patients and physicians were similar in their values regarding the various test features. However, there was a significant difference between physicians’ perceptions of which test features were important to patients compared with the patients’ actual responses (P<.001). The largest discrepancy was for accuracy (patient actual 54% vs physician opinion 15%) and discomfort (patient actual 15% vs physician opinion 64%).

CONCLUSIONS: Patients have distinct preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests that are associated with the importance placed on certain test features. Physicians incorrectly perceive those factors that are important to patients. Physicians should incorporate patient values in regard to certain test features when discussing colorectal cancer screening with their patients and when eliciting their screening preferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Greenlee RT, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics, 2000. Ca Cancer J Clin. 2000;50:7–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. (published erratum appears in N Engl J Med 1993;329:672) N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1365–71.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mandel JS, Church TR, Ederer F, Bond JH. Colorectal cancer mortality: effectiveness of biennial screening for fecal occult blood. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91:434–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jorgensen OD, Sondegaard O. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet. 1996;348:1467–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-ocult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1996;348:1472–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Selby JV, Friedman GD, Quesenberry CP, Weiss NS. A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:653–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Newcomb PA, Norfleet RG, Storer BE, Surawicz TS, Marcus PM. Screening sigmoidoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992;84:1572–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Winawer SJ, Flehinger BJ, Schottenfeld D, Miller DG. Screening for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood testing and sigmoid-oscopy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:1311–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1977–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Atkin WS, Cuzick J, Northover JM, Whynes DK. Prevention of colorectal cancer by once-only sigmoidoscopy. Lancet. 1993;341:736–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Muller AD, Sonnenberg A. Prevention of colorectal cancer by flexible endoscopy and polypectomy. Ann Intern Med. 1995;123:904–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mandel JS, Church TR, Bond JH, et al. The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1603–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd Ed. Alexandria, Va: International Medical Publishing; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smith RA, von Eschenbach AC, Wender R, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer: update of early detection guidelines for prostate, colorectal, and endometrial cancers and update 2001: testing for early lung cancer detection. Ca Cancer J Clin. 2001;51:38–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:594–642.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Brody DS. The patient’s role in clinical decision-making. Ann Intern Med. 1980;93:718–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Eraker SA, Kirscht JP, Becker MH. Understanding and improving patient compliance. Ann Intern Med. 1984;100:258–68.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Vernon SW. Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;89:1406–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Trends in screening for colorectal cancer—United States, 1997 and 1999. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001;50:162–6.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Quill TE, Brody H. Physician recommendations and patient autonomy: finding a balance between physician power and patient choice. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:763–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pignone M, Bucholtz D, Harris R. Patient preferences for colon cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:432–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Leard LE, Savides TJ, Ganiats TG. Patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening. J Fam Pract. 1997;45:211–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Braddock CH, Fihn SD, Levinson W, Jonsen AR, Pearlman RA. How doctors and patients discuss routine clinical decisions: informed decision making in the outpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:339–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pignone MP, Bucholtz D, Harris R. Patient interest and preferences for colon cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(Suppl 1):96.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dolan JG. Are patients capable of using the analytic hierarchy process and willing to use it to help make clinical decisions? Med Decis Making. 1995;15:76–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL, Kuller LH. Sigmoidoscopy use among primary care physicians. Prev Med. 1995;24:249–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. American Cancer Society. 1989 survey of physicians’ attitudes and practices in early cancer detection. Ca Cancer J Clin. 1990;40:77–101.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Eraker SA, Polister P. How decisions are reached: physician and patient. Ann Intern Med. 1982;97:262–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Redelmeier DA, Rozin P, Kahneman D. Understanding patients’ decisions: cognitive and emotional perspectives. JAMA. 1993;270:72–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. http. www.medicare.gov/publications/pubs/pdf/prevent.pdf

  31. Sonnenberg A, Delco F, Inadomi JM. Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:573–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Frazier AL, Colditz GA, Fuchs CS, Kuntz KM. Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population. JAMA. 2000;284:1954–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pignone M, Harris R, Kinsinger L. Videotape-based decision aid for colon cancer screening—a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:761–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Freimuth VS, Quinn SC, Thomas SB, Cole G, Zook E, Duncan T. African Americans’ views on research and the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52:797–808.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce S. Ling MD, MPH.

Additional information

BSL’s efforts on this study were supported by the Physician Training Award in Preventive Medicine, American Cancer Society, Award 97-3.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ling, B.S., Moskowitz, M.A., Wachs, D. et al. Attitudes toward colorectal cancer screening tests. J GEN INTERN MED 16, 822–830 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.10337.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.10337.x

Key words

Navigation