Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Internet access and empowerment

A community-based health initiative

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether access to health information via in-home Internet technology can positively influence empowerment among residents of a low-income urban community.

DESIGN: In-home Internet access and training were provided to volunteers, who, along with a comparison group, were interviewed prior to and 1 year after initiation of the program. Community-based participatory research methods were used to design and implement the intervention.

SETTING: A 57-block area on the West Side of Chicago.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-five community residents completed all phases of the technology intervention. Thirty-five randomly selected neighbors of these residents served as the comparison group.

INTERVENTIONS: Members of the intervention group received Internet access via WebTV, training, technical support, and access to a community specific health-oriented web page during the course of the study.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Intervention group members were similar to comparison group members in terms of empowerment at baseline. After receiving Internet access and training, empowerment related to health decision-making improved significantly in the intervention group. Similar changes did not occur in the comparison group. Affinity for and appreciation of information technology also increased in the intervention group but not in the comparison group. As a result, differences in attitudes toward technology increased between the 2 groups over time.

CONCLUSIONS: Using community-based participatory research methods, we found that Internet access to community-specific and general health information can lead to increased empowerment and appreciation of information technology. These benefits accrued among the intervention group but not among a random group of their neighbors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010, 2nd edition. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Israel BA, Checkoway B, Schulz A, Zimmerman M. Health education and community empowerment: Conceptualizing and measuring perceptions of individual, organizational, and community control. Health Educ Q. 1994;21:149–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Conger JA, Kanungo RN. The empowerment process: integrating theory and practice. Acad Manage Rev. 1988;13:471–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Thomas KW, Velhouse BA. Cognitive elements of empowerment: an “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Acad Manage Rev. 1990;15:666–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Menon ST. Psychological empowerment: definition, measurement, and validation. Can J Behav Sci. 1999;31:161–4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zimmerman MA. Empowerment theory: psychological, organizational and community levels of analysis. In: Rappaport J, Seidman E, ed. Handbook of Community Psychology. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Longo DR, Patrick TB, Kruse RL. The natural history of the use of healthcare information by women with breast cancer: a conceptual model. Proc AMIA Symp. 2001;Jan:413–7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D’Alessandro DM, Dosa NP. Empowering children and families with information technology. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155:1131–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Levin-Zamir D, Peterburg Y. Health literacy in health systems: perspectives on patient self-management in Israel. Health Promot Internation. 2001;16:87–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, Grumbach K. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA. 2002;288:2469–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. New York, NY: Free Press; 1983:5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rogers EM. Lessons for guidelines from the diffusion of innovation. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1995;21:324–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. City of Chicago. Department of Public Health, Epidemiology Program Report, Community Area Health Inventory, 1989 & 1999, Volume I: Demographic and Health Profiles. Chicago, Ill: Department of Public Health; 2003.

  14. Cassey MZ, Masi CM, Every block a village online: a strategy transfer guide. Bureau of Primary Health Care 2000. Available at: http://bphc.hrsa.gov/mtw/STGs.htm. Accessed June 1, 2003.

  15. Suarez-Balcazar Y, Kinney L, Masi C, Cassey M, Muhammad B. Implementing a WebTV intervention in an African American neighborhood. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community. In press.

  16. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker A. A review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173–202.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Park PL, Lee WL. A theoretical framework for participatory evaluation research. Sociological Practice. 1999;2:89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Selener D. Participatory Action Research and Social Change. Ithaca, NY: The Cornell Participatory Action Research Network; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Suarez-Balcazar Y, Balcazar F, Fawcett SB. Problem identification in applied social research. In: Bryant F, Edwards J, Tindale RS, et al., eds. Social Psychological Methods Applied to Social Issues. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1992:25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Whyte WF. Participatory Action Research. London, UK: Sage Publications; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Balcazar F, Keys C, Kaplan D, Suarez-Balcazar Y. Participatory action research and people with disabilities: principles and challenges. Can J Rehab. 1999;12:105–12.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fetterman DM, Kaftarian SJ, Wandersman A. Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-Assessment and Accountability. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fawcett SB, Paine-Andrews A, Francisco VT, et al. Empowering community health initiatives through evaluation. In: Fetterman DM, Kaftarian SJ, Wandersman A, eds. Empowerment Evaluation. London, UK: Sage Publications; 1996:161–87.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Suarez-Balcazar Y, Orellana-Damacela L. A university-community partnership for empowerment evaluation in a community housing organization. Sociological Practice. 1999;1:115–32.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Linney JA, Wandersman A. Empowering community groups with evaluation skills: The Prevention Plus III Model. In: Fetterman DM, Kaftarian SJ, Wandersman A, eds. Empowerment Evaluation. London, UK: Sage Publications; 1996:259–76.

    Google Scholar 

  26. American Psychological Association. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher M. Masi MD, PhD.

Additional information

Financial support was provided by the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Technology Opportunities Program and West Suburban Health Care, Oak Park, III.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Masi, C.M., Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Cassey, M.Z. et al. Internet access and empowerment. J GEN INTERN MED 18, 525–530 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20344.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20344.x

Key Words

Navigation