Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of a triage-based e-mail system on clinic resource use and patient and physician satisfaction in primary care

A randomized controlled trial

  • Innovations In Education And Clinical Practice
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: E-mail communication between patients and their providers has diffused slowly in clinical practice. To address concerns about the use of this technology, we performed a randomized controlled trial of a triage-based e-mail system in primary care.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Physicians in 2 university-affiliated primary care centers were randomized to a triage-based e-mail system promoted to their patients. E-mails from patients of intervention physicians were routed to a central account and parsed to the appropriate staff for response. Control group physicians and their patients did not have access to the system. We collected information on patient e-mail use, phone calls, and visit distribution by physician over the 10 months and performed physician and patient surveys to examine attitudes about communication.

RESULTS: E-mail volume was greater for intervention versus control physicians (46 weekly e-mails per 100 scheduled visits vs 9 in the control group at the study midpoint; P<.01) but there were no between-group differences in phone volume (67 weekly phone calls per 100 scheduled visits vs 55 in the control group; P=.45) or rates of patient no-shows (5% in both groups; P=.77). Intervention physicians reported more favorable attitudes toward electronic communication than did control physicians but there were no differences in attitudes toward patient or staff communication in general. There were few between-group differences in patient attitudes toward electronic communication or communication in general.

CONCLUSIONS: E-mail generated through a triage-based system did not appear to substitute for phone communication or to reduce visit no-shows in a primary care setting. Physicians’ attitudes toward electronic communication were improved, but physicians’ and patients’ attitudes toward general communication did not change. Growth of e-mail communication in primary care settings may not improve the efficiency of clinical care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ball M, Lillis J. E-health: transforming the physician/patient relationship. Int J Med Inf. 2001;61:1–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Starr P. Health care reform and the new economy. Health Aff. 2000;19:23–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kassirer J. Patients, physicians, and the Internet. Health Aff. 2000;19:115–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cole JI, Suman M, Schramm P, et al. The UCLA Internet Report. Surveying the Digital Future. Year Two, 2001. Available at: http://ccp.ucla.edu/pdf/UCLA-Internet-Report-2001.pdf. Accessed June 25, 2003.

  5. The Harris Poll. Patient/physician online communication: many patients want it, would pay for it, and it would influence their choice of doctors and health plans. Harris Interactive Health Care News. 2002;2:1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sittig D, King S, Hazlehurst B. A survey of patient-provider e-mail communication: What do patients think? Int J Med Inf. 2001;61:71–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Moyer C, Stern D, Katz S, Fendrick A. We got mail: electronic communication between physicians and patients. Am J Manag Care. 1999;5:1513–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Moyer C, Stern D, Dobias K, Cox D, Katz S. Bridging the electronic divide: patient and provider perspectives on e-mail communication in primary care. Am J Manag Care. 2002;8:427–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kleinke J. Vaporware.com: the failed promise of the health care Internet. Health Aff. 2000;19:57–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Baur C. Limiting factors on the transformative powers of e-mail in patient-physician relationships: a critical analysis. Health Commun. 2000;12:239–59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldsmith J. The Internet and managed care: A new wave of innovation. Health Aff. 2000;19:42–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Anema MG, Brown BE. Increasing survey responses using the total design method. J Contin Educ Nurs. 1995;26:109–14.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kao AC, Green DC, Zaslavsky AM, Koplan JP, Cleary PD, for the Institute for Ethics AMACIU. The relationship between method of physician payment and patient trust. JAMA. 1998;280:1708–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. White C, Moyer C, Stern D, Cox D, Katz S. A content analysis of e-mail communication between patients and their providers: patients get the message. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(suppl):245.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Prady S, Norris D, Lester J, Hoch D. Expanding the guidelines for electronic communication with patients: application to a specific tool. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;8:344–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven J. Katz MD, MPH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Katz, S.J., Moyer, C.A., Cox, D.T. et al. Effect of a triage-based e-mail system on clinic resource use and patient and physician satisfaction in primary care. J GEN INTERN MED 18, 736–744 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20756.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20756.x

Key words

Navigation