Skip to main content
Log in

Narrowing gender differences in procedure use for acute myocardial infarction

Insights from the worcester heart attack study

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine age-specific gender differences and trends over time in the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of patients admitted with AMI from a community-wide perspective over a 10-year period (1990–1999).

SETTING: All hospitals in the Worcester (Mass) metropolitan area (1990 census =437,000).

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: We identified 2,037 women and 2,645 men who were hospitalized in the Worcester metropolitan area with confirmed AMI during six 1-year periods between 1990 and 1999. Four age groups (<55, 55 to 64, 65 to 74 and ≥75 years) of men and women were studied.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Use of echocardiography, exercise treadmill testing (ETT), cardiac catheterization, percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) during the index hospitalization was examined in relation to age and gender. Overall, women were less likely to undergo ETT, cardiac catheterization, and CABG than were men, and these trends remained after controlling for potentially confounding factors. Between 1990 and 1999, there was a dramatic decrease in ETT, whereas the use of echocardiography remained unchanged. There were marked increases over time in the use of cardiac catheterization and PCI in women and men. Use of cardiac catheterization and PCI increased to a greater extent in women as compared to men. In patients who underwent cardiac catheterization, rates of coronary revascularization were similar between men and women.

CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that women and men with AMI are treated differently with respect to use of diagnostic and revascularization procedures. However, gender differences in the use of these diagnostic and interventional approaches have narrowed over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U.S. Bureau of the Census. Statistical Abstracts of the United States: 1990, 110th ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital statistics of the United States, 1988, Vol II, Part A. DHHS Publication No. (PHS) 91-1101. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vaccarino V, Krumholz HM, Yarzebski J, Gore JM, Goldberg RJ. Sex differences in 2-year mortality after hospital discharge for myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:173–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vaccarino V, Parsons L, Every NR, Barron HV, Krumholz HM. Sex-based differences in early mortality after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:217–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chandra NC, Ziegelstein RC, Rogers WJ, et al., for the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-I. Observations of the treatment of women in the United States with myocardial infarction: A report from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-I. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:981–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chiriboga DE, Yarzebski J, Goldberg RJ, et al. A community-wide perspective of gender differences and temporal trends in the use of diagnostic and revascularization procedures for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1993;71:268–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kostis JB, Wilson AC, O’Dowd K, et al. for the MIDAS Study Group. Sex differences in the management and long term outcome of acute myocardial infarction: a statewide study. Circulation. 1994;90:1715–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ayanian JZ, Epstein AM. Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:221–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tobin JN, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Wexler JP, et al. Sex bias in considering coronary bypass surgery. Ann Intern Med. 1987;107:19–25.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vacek JL, Rosamond TL, Kramer PH, et al. Sex-related differences in patients undergoing direct angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1993;126:521–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mark DB, Shaw LK, DeLong ER, Califf RM, Pryor DB. Absence of sex bias in the referral of patients for cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:1101–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Canto JG, Allison JJ, Kiefe CI, et al. Relation of race and sex to the use of reperfusion therapy in Medicare beneficiaries with acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1094–100.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Goldberg RJ, Gore JM, Alpert JS, Dalen JE. Recent changes in the attack rates and survival rates of acute myocardial infarction (1975–1981): the Worcester Heart Attack Study. JAMA. 1986;255:2774–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldberg RJ, Gorak EJ, Yarzebski J, et al. A community-wide perspective of sex differences and temporal trends in the incidence and survival rates following acute myocardial infarction and out-of-hospital deaths due to coronary heart disease. Circulation. 1993;87:1947–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Goldberg RJ, Gore JM, Alpert JS, Dalen JE. Incidence and case fatality rates of acute myocardial infarction (1975–1984): The Worcester Heart attack Study. Am Heart J. 1988;115:761–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Goldberg RJ, McCormick D, Gurwitz J, Yarzebski J, Lessard D, Gore JM. Age-related trends in short- and long-term survival after acute myocardial infarction: a 20-year population-based perspective (1975–1995). Am J Cardiol. 1998;82:1311–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Goldberg RJ, Yarzebski J, Lessard D, Gore JM. A two-decades (1975–1995)-long experience in the incidence, in-hospital and long-term case-fatality rates of acute myocardial infarction: a community-wide perspective. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:1533–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Goldberg RJ, Samad NA, Yarzebski J, Gurwitz J, Bigelow C, Gore JM. Temporal trends (1975–1997) in the incidence and hospital death rates of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction (Worcester Heart Attack Study). N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1162–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Spencer FA, Meyer TE, Goldberg RJ, et al. Twenty-year trends (1975–1995) in the incidence, in-hospital, and long-term death rates associated with heart failure complicating acute myocardial infarction: a community-wide perspective. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999;34:1378–87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Curzen N, Patel D, Clarke D, et al. Women with chest pain: is exercise testing worthwhile? Heart. 1996;76:156–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hill J, Timmis A. Exercise tolerance testing. BMJ. 2002;324:1084–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chan B, Cox JL, Anderson G. Trends in the utilization of noninvasive cardiac diagnostic tests in Ontario from fiscal year 1989/90 to 1992/93. Can J Cardiol. 1996;12:237–48.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gan SC, Beaver SK, Houck PM, MacLehose RF, Lawson HW, Chan L. Treatment of acute myocardial infarction and 30-day mortality among women and men. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:8–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schulman KA, Berlin JA, Harless W, et al. The effect of race and sex on physicians’ recommendations for cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:618–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Heidenreich PA, McClellan M. Trends in treatment and outcomes for acute myocardial infarction: 1975–1995. Am J Med. 2001;110:165–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. McGovern PG, Folsom AR, Sprafka JM, et al. Trends in survival of hospitalized myocardial infarction patients between 1970 and 1985. The Minnesota Heart Survey. Circulation. 1992;85:172–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. McGovern PG, Pankow JS, Shahar E, et al. Recent trends in acute coronary heart disease-mortality, morbidity, medical care, and risk factors. The Minnesota Heart Survey Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:884–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leslie R. Harrold MD, MPH.

Additional information

Received from the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Mass.

This study was made possible through the cooperation of the administration, medical records, and cardiology departments of participating Worcester metropolitan area hospitals. Dr. Harrold was supported by a Beginning Grant-in-Aid award from the American Heart Association. Grant support for this project was provided by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (RO1 HL35434).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harrold, L.R., Esteban, J., Lessard, D. et al. Narrowing gender differences in procedure use for acute myocardial infarction. J GEN INTERN MED 18, 423–431 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20929.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20929.x

Key words

Navigation