Elsevier

Clinical Nutrition

Volume 21, Issue 1, February 2002, Pages 59-65
Clinical Nutrition

Regular Article
Feeding the gut early after digestive surgery: results of a nine-year experience

https://doi.org/10.1054/clnu.2001.0504Get rights and content

Abstract

Background & Aims: Early enteral nutrition (EEN) after surgery should be preferred to parenteral feeding, but its clinical use is limited for concerns about possible gastrointestinal (GI) adverse effects and feeding tube-related complications. Thus we evaluated our experience focusing on safety and tolerance of early postoperative jejunal feeding and possible risk factors for gastrointestinal adverse effects. Methods: 650 subjects treated with EEN after major digestive surgery for cancer were prospectively studied. EEN was started within 12 hours after operation via a naso-jejunal (NJ) feeding tube or a catheter-feeding jejunostomy. The rate of infusion was progressively increased to reach the nutritional goal (25 kcal/kg/day) within the 4th postoperative day. Rigorous treatment protocols for diet delivery and EEN-related GI adverse effects were applied. Results: 402 patients had a jejunostomy and 248 patients a NJ tube. EEN-related GI adverse effects were observed in 194/650 patients (29.8%). In 136/194 patients, these events were successfully handled by treatment protocols. Overall the nutritional goal was achieved in 592/650 patients (91.1%). Fifty-eight (8.9%) subjects had to be switched to parenteral feeding because of refractory intolerance to EEN. Intra-abdominal surgical complications and low serum albumin (<30 g/L) were the two major factors affecting tolerance. Severe jejunostomy-related complications occurred in 7/402 (1.7%) patients. EEN-related mortality was 0.1% (1/650). Conclusions: The use of the gut early after surgery is safe and well-tolerated and it should represent the first choice for nutritional support in this type of patients.

References (42)

  • R Biffi et al.

    Complications and long-term outcome of 80 oncology patients undergoing needle catheter jejunostomy placement for early postoperative enteral feeding

    Clin Nutr

    (2000)
  • S Klein et al.

    Nutrition support in clinical practice: review of published data and recommendations for future research of directions

    JPEN

    (1997)
  • Gastroenterology

    (1995)
  • Clin Nutr

    (1996)
  • Riv Ital Nutr Parent Enter

    (1995)
  • L Gianotti et al.

    Role of early enteral feeding and acute starvation on postburn bacterial translocation and host defense: prospective randomized trials

    Crit Care Med

    (1994)
  • M Braga et al.

    Early postoperative enteral nutrition improves gut oxygenation and reduces costs compared with total parenteral nutrition

    Crit Care Med

    (2001)
  • M-T Lin et al.

    Route of nutritional supply influences local, systemic, and remote organ responses to intraperitoneal bacterial challenge

    Ann Surg

    (1996)
  • M Braga et al.

    Artificial nutrition after major abdominal surgery: impact of route of administration and composition of the diet

    Crit Care Med

    (1998)
  • MG Sarr

    Appropriate use, complications and advantages demonstrated in 500 consecutive needle catheter jejunostomies

    Br J Surg

    (1999)
  • Cited by (114)

    • ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition in surgery

      2021, Clinical Nutrition
      Citation Excerpt :

      Many studies have shown the benefits and feasibility of feeding via a tube either inserted distal to the anastomosis, e.g. NCJ, or inserted via the nose with its tip passed distally at the time of operation e.g. nasojejunal tube [168–173]. Open or even laparoscopic placement [174] of the NCJ according to standardized techniques in a specialized center is associated with low risk and a complication rate of about 1.5–6% in most series [120,168,170,175–185]. Some authors consider the routine use of NCJ and overtreatment and propose consideration of NCJ only in high-risk patients [186–188].

    • Nutritional support and therapy in pancreatic surgery: A position paper of the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS)

      2018, Surgery (United States)
      Citation Excerpt :

      Postpyloric enteral access can be obtained via insertion of a nasoenteral feeding tube or through more invasive operative, laparoscopic, percutaneous, or endoscopic options, such as the operative insertion of a feeding jejunostomy at the time of pancreatic surgery or via a percutaneous or endoscopic gastrostomy with a jejunal extension. Each of these techniques is associated with its own complications4,139,153,166–173 (Supplementary Table IV). In general, in the literature, nasojejunal feeding tubes are reported to dislodge in up to 36% of the cases within the first week.

    • ESPEN guideline: Clinical nutrition in surgery

      2017, Clinical Nutrition
      Citation Excerpt :

      Many studies have shown the benefits and feasibility of feeding via a tube either inserted distal to the anastomosis, e.g. NCJ, or inserted via the nose with its tip passed distally at the time of operation e.g. nasojejunal tube [287,369–374] (all 2+). Open or even laparoscopic placement [375] of the NCJ according to standardized techniques in a specialized centre is associated with low risk and a complication rate of about 1.5–6% in most series [371,376–386] (all 2−), [317,369] (both 2+). Some authors consider routine use of NCJ an overtreatment and propose consideration of NCJ only in high-risk patients [387–389] (all 2−).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    f1

    (Correspondence to: LG, Department of Surgery (Chirurgia 3), Ospedale S. Gerardo, Via Donizetti 106, 20052 Monza (MI) Italy)

    View full text