ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Use and expenditure on complementary medicine in England: a population based survey

https://doi.org/10.1054/ctim.2000.0407Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives: Many claims are made that complementary medicine use is a substantial and growing part of health-care behaviour. Estimates of practitioner visits in the USA and Australia indicate high levels of use and expenditure. No reliable population-based estimates of practitioner use are available for the UK. Methods: In 1998, a previously piloted postal questionnaire was sent to a geographically stratified, random sample of 5010 adults in England. The questionnaire focuses on practitioner contacts, but also asked about the purchase of over-the-counter remedies. Additional information was requested on socio-demographic characteristics, perceived health, and recent NHS resource use. Information on use included reason for encounter, expenditure, insurance, and location of visit. Main outcome measures: Population estimates (by age group and sex) of lifetime use and use in the past 12 months for acupuncture, chiropractic, homoeopathy, hypnotherapy, medical herbalism, osteopathy. Estimates for two additional therapies (reflexology and aromatherapy), and homoeopathic or herbal remedies purchased over-the-counter. Estimates of annual out-of-pocket expenditure on practitioner visits in 1998. Results: A crude response rate of 60% was achieved (adjusted response rate 59%). Responders were older and more likely to be female than non-responders. Usable responses (n = 2669) were weighted using the age/sex profile of the sample frame. From these adjusted data we estimate that 10.6% (95% CI 9.4 to 11.7) of the adult population of England had visited at least one therapist providing any one of the six more established therapies in the past 12 months (13.6% for use of any of the eight named therapies, 95% CI 12.3 to 14.9). If all eight therapies, and self-care using remedies purchased over the counter are included, the estimated proportion rises to 28.3% (95% CI 26.6 to 30.0) for use in the past 12 months, and 46.6% (95% CI 44.6 to 48.5) for lifetime use. All types of use declined in older age groups, and were more commonly reported by women than men (P < 0.01 for all comparisons). An estimated 22 million visits were made to practitioners of one of the six established therapies in 1998. The NHS provided an estimated 10% of these contacts. The majority of non-NHS visits were financed through direct out-of-pocket expenditure. Annual out-of-pocket expenditure on any of the six more established therapies was estimated at £450 million (95% CI 357 to 543). Conclusion: This survey has demonstrated substantial use of practitioner-provided complementary therapies in England in 1998. The findings suggest that CAM is making a measurable contribution to first-contact primary care. However, we have shown that 90% of this provision is purchased privately. Further research into the cost-effectiveness of different CAM therapies for particular patient groups is now urgently needed to facilitate equal and appropriate access via the NHS.

References (23)

  • P. Harris et al.

    The prevalence of Complementary and Alternative Medicine use among the general population: a systematic review of the literature

    Complement Ther Med

    (2000)
  • A.H. MacLennan et al.

    Prevalence and cost of alternative medicine in Australia

    Lancet

    (1996)
  • S. Fulder

    The Handbook of Complementary Medicine

    (1988)
  • W.B. Jonas

    Alternative Medicine – Learning from the past, Examining the Present, Advancing the Future

    JAMA

    (1998)
  • C. Zollman et al.

    ABC of Complementary medicine: complementary medicine in conventional practice

    BMJ

    (1999)
  • D.M. Eisenberg et al.

    Unconventional medicine in the United States – prevalence costs and patterns of use

    N Engl J Med

    (1993)
  • D.M. Eisenberg et al.

    Trends in Alternative medicine Use in the United States, 1990–1997

    JAMA

    (1998)
  • Thomas, K. J. Fall, M. Williams, B. Methodological study to investigate the feasibility of conducting a...
  • Lamberts, H. Wood, M. ICPC, International Classification of Primary Care, Oxford, Oxford University Press,...
  • Airey, National Surveys of NHS Patients: General Practice, 1998, London, NHS Executive,...
  • A. White et al.

    The BBC survey of complementary medicine use in the UK

    Complement Ther Med

    (2000)
  • Cited by (605)

    • Traditional Nutraceutical Perspectives of Floral Honey: A Review

      2023, Ethnic Knowledge and Perspectives of Medicinal Plants: Volume 2: Nutritional and Dietary Benefits
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text