Download PDF
Semin Reprod Med 2008; 26(4): 322-330
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1082390
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Laparoscopy and Adhesion Formation, Adhesions and Laparoscopy

Douglas E. Ott1
  • 1Adjunct Professor, Biomedical Engineering, Mercer University, Macon, Georgia
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
28 August 2008 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Laparoscopic peritoneal adhesion formation follows a pathway similar to laparotomy, both of which are only partially understood. Laparoscopic adhesion formation is complicated and influenced by pressure, dry gas desiccation, and hypoxia caused and superimposed by the pneumoperitoneum. It may further be affected by products of tissue combustion and inappropriate irrigation. Adjuvants are a poor substitute for attention to surgical detail and offer little help for the problem. The best defenses to reduce adhesion formation are maintenance of a normal physiologic peritoneal state that is wet and warm, gentle tissue handling, low intra-abdominal pressure, appropriate irrigation, and evacuation of smoke. Continued research into peritoneal cell response to the provocative circumstances of laparoscopic surgery will hopefully offer assistance to diminish the potential for laparoscopic adhesion formation.

KEYWORDS

Laparoscopy - hyproxia - desiccation - adhesions - humidified

REFERENCES

  • 1 Ellis H, Moran B, Thompson J et al.. Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study.  Lancet. 1999;  353 1476-1480
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ray N F, Denton W G, Thamer M, Henderson S C, Perry S. Abdominal adhesiolysis: inpatient care and expenditures in the United States in 1994.  J Am Coll Surg. 1998;  186 1-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 diZerega G, Rogers K. The Peritoneum. New York, NY; Springer-Verlag 1992: 1-56
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Ott D. Effect of irrigation on peritoneal fluid and cell count: dilutional effect of lavage.  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004;  11 33
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Halme J, Becker S, Hammond M, Raj M, Raj S. Increase activation of pelvic macrophages in infertile women with endometriosis.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;  145 333-337
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ott D. Laparoscopy and tribology: the effect of laparoscopic gas on peritoneal fluid.  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001;  8 117-123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ott D. Desertification of the peritoneum by thin film evaporation during laparoscopy.  JSLS. 2003;  7 189-195
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hertzler A. The Peritoneum. St. Louis, MO; CV Mosby 1919
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Ellis H, Harrison W, Hugh T. The healing of peritoneum under normal and pathological conditions.  Br J Surg. 1965;  52 471-476
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hubbard T J, Khan M, Carag V, Albites V, Hricko G. The pathology of peritoneal repair: its relation to the formation of adhesions.  Ann Surg. 1967;  165 908-916
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Raftery A T. Regeneration of parietal and visceral peritoneum: an electron microscopical study.  J Anat. 1973;  115 375-392
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Raftery A T. Regeneration of parietal and visceral peritoneum. A light microscopical study.  Br J Surg. 1973;  60 293-299
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ryan G B, Grobety J, Majno F. Postoperative peritoneal adhesions: a study of the mechanisms.  Am J Pathol. 1971;  65 117-148
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Ryan G B, Grobety J, Majno G. Mesothelial injury and recovery.  Am J Pathol. 1973;  71 93-112
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Holmdahl L, Eriksson E, Eriksson B, Risberg B. Depression of peritoneal fibrinolysis during operation is a local response to trauma.  Surgery. 1998;  123 539-544
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Brokelman W J, Holmdahl L, Bergstrom M, Falk P, Klinkenbijl J, Rejnen M. Peritoneal fibrinolytic response to various aspects of laparoscopic surgery: a randomized trial.  J Surg Res. 2006;  136 309-313
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ott D E. Carboxyhemoglobin due to peritoneal smoke absorption from laser tissue combustion at laparoscopy.  J Clin Laser Med Surg. 1998;  16 309-315
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Suematsu T, Hirabayashi Y, Shiraishi N, Adachi Y, Kitamura H, Kitano S. Morphology of the murine peritoneum after pneumoperitoneum vs laparotomy.  Surg Endosc. 2001;  15 954-958
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Erikoglu M, Yol S, Avunduk M, Erdemli E, Can A. Electron-microscopic alterations of the peritoneum after both cold and heated carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum.  J Surg Res. 2005;  125 73-77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Rosario M, Ribeiro U, Corbett C et al.. Does CO2 pneumoperitoneum alter the ultra-structure of the mesothelium?.  J Surg Res. 2006;  133 84-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Holmdahl L, Risberg B, Beck D et al.. Adhesions: pathogenesis and prevention-panel discussion and summary.  Eur J Surg Suppl. 1997;  577 56-62
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Wiseman D, Richardson J. Humidity and temperature of insufflation gas on intact peritoneum.  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002;  9 552
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Holmdahl L, Risberg B, Beck D et al.. Adhesions: pathogenesis and prevention-panel discussion and summary.  Eur J Surg Suppl. 1997;  577 56-62
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Chegini N. Peritoneal molecular environment, adhesion formation and clinical implication.  Front Biosci. 2002;  7 e91-115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Cheong Y C, Laird S M, Li T C, Shelton J B, Ledger W L, Cooke I D. Peritoneal healing and adhesion formation/reformation.  Hum Reprod Update. 2001;  7 556-566
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Gutt C N, Oniu T, Schemmer P, Mehrabi A, Büchler M W. Fewer adhesions induced by laparoscopic surgery?.  Surg Endosc. 2004;  18 898-906
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 United States Pharmacopeia–National Formulary .Rockville, MD; United States Pharmacopeia 1984: XXI-NF
  • 28 Lackey L W, Ott D E. Terminal gas velocity during laparoscopy.  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002;  9 297-305
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Hazebroek E J, Schreve M, Visser P, DeBruin R, Marquet R, Bonjer J. Impact of temperature and humidity of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on body temperature and peritoneal morphology.  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2002;  12 355-364
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Binda M M, Molinas C R, Hansen P, Koninckx P R. Effect of desiccation and temperature during laparoscopy on adhesion formation in mice.  Fertil Steril. 2006;  86 166-174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Diamond M, El-Mowafi D. Pelvic adhesions.  Surg Technol Int. 1998;  VII 273-283
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Holmdahl L, Risberg B, Beck D et al.. Adhesions: pathogenesis and prevention-panel and summary.  Eur J Surg Suppl. 1997;  577 56-62
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Gomel V. Foreword. In: DiZerega GS Peritoneal Surgery. New York, NY; Springer 1999: vii-xi
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Beste T M, Daucher J A, Holbert D. Humidified compared with dry, heated carbon dioxide at laparoscopy to reduce pain.  Obstet Gynecol. 2006;  107 263-268
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Hensman C, Hanna G, Drew T, Moseley H, Cushieri A. Total radiated power, infrared output, and heat generation by cold light sources at the distal end of endoscopes and fiber optic bundle of light cables.  Surg Endosc. 1998;  12 335-337
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Yavuz Y, Skogas J, Gulluoglu M, Lango T. Are cold light sources really cold?.  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2006;  16 370-376
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Molinas C R, Mynbaev O, Puwels A, Novak P, Koninckx P. Peritoneal mesothelial hypoxia during pneumoperitoneum is a cofactor in adhesion formation in a laparoscopic mouse model.  Fertil Steril. 2001;  76 560-567
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Saed G M, Diamond M. Apoptosis and proliferation of human peritoneal fibroblasts in response to hypoxia.  Fertil Steril. 2002;  78 137-143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Saed G M, Zhang W. Molecular characterization of fibroblasts isolated from human peritoneum and adhesions.  Fertil Steril. 2001;  75 763-768
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Diamond M, El-Hammady E, Wang R, Kruger M, Saed G M. Regualation of expression of tissue plasminogen activator and plaminogen activator inhibitor-1 dichloroacetic acid in human fibroblasts from normal peritoneum and adhesions.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;  190 926-934
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Saed G M, Munkarah A, Abu-Soud H, Diamond M. Hypoxia upregulates cyclooxygenase-2 and prostaglandin E(2) levels in human peritoneal fibroblasts.  Fertil Steril. 2005;  83(Suppl 1) 1216-1219
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Elkelani O A, Binda M, Molinas C, Koninckx P. Effect of adding more than 3% of oxygen to carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum upon adhesion formation in a laparoscopic mouse model.  Fertil Steril. 2004;  82 1616-1622
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Wildbrett P, Oh A, Naundorf D, Volk T, Jacobi C. Impact of laparoscopic gases on peritoneal microenvironment and essential parameters of cell function.  Surg Endosc. 2003;  17 78-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Alpay Z, Saed G, Diamond M. Female infertility and free radicals: potential role in adhesions and endometriois.  J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2006;  13 390-398
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Yesildaglar N, Koninckx P R. Adhesion formation in intubated rabbits increases with high insufflation pressure during endoscopic surgery.  Hum Reprod. 2000;  15 687-691
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Ordoñez J L, Dominguez J, Evrard V, Koninckx P R. The effect of training and duration of surgery on adhesion formation in the rabbit model.  Hum Reprod. 1997;  12 2654-2657
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Yesildaglar N, Ordoñez J L, Laermans I. The mouse as a model to study adhesion formation following endoscopic surgery: a preliminary report.  Hum Reprod. 1999;  14 55-59
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Topley N. Cytokine responses to peritoneal inflammation: the role of the mesothelium. In: diZerega G, DeCherney A, Diamond M, et al. Peritoneal Sugery. New York, NY; Springer-Verlag 2000: 75-84
    Google Scholar
  • 49 Ott D. Haptics (hypoxic anoxic peritoneal tissue iatrogenic crushing systems) – They are Odd? (objects of damage and destruction).  Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2005;  12 S62
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Shakeshaft A J, Cartmill J A, Walsh W R, Martin C J. A curved edge moderates high pressure generated by a laparoscopic grasper.  Surg Endosc. 2001;  5 1232-1234
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 El-Mowafi D M, Diamond M. Are pelvic adhesions preventable?.  Surg Technol Int. 2003;  11 222-235
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Pope S. The use of citrate solutions in the prevention of peritoneal adhesions.  Ann Surg. 1914;  59 101-106
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Food and Drug Administration, Obstetrics and Gynecology Devices Panel, Seventy-first Meeting .Available at: http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/06/minutes/2006-4217m1-02-summ-Final.htm
  • 54 Filmar S, Gomel V, McComb P. Operative laparoscopy versus open abdominal surgery: a comparative study on postoperative adhesion formation in the rat model.  Fertil Steril. 1987;  48 486-489
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Luciano A A, Maier D, Koch E, Nulsen J, Whitman G. A comparative study of postoperative adhesions following laser surgery by laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the rabbit model.  Obstet Gynecol. 1989;  74 220-224
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Lundorff P, Hahlin M, Kallfelt B, Thorburn J, Lindblom B. Adhesion formation after laparoscopic surgery in tubal pregnancy: a randomized trial versus laparotomy.  Fertil Steril. 1991;  55 911-915
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Marana R, Luciano A, Muzii L, Marendino V, Mancuso S. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for ovarian conservative surgery: a randomized trial in the rabbit model.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;  171 861-864
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Jorgenson J W, Lalak N, Hunt D. Is laparoscopy associated with a lower rate of postoperative adhesions than laparotomy? A comparative study in the rabbit.  Aust N Z J Surg. 1995;  65 342-344
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Moore R G, Partin A W, Adams J B, Kovoussi L R. Adhesion formation after transperitoneal nephrectomy: laparoscopic vs open approach.  J Endourol. 1995;  9 277-280
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Schippers E, Tittel A, Ottinger A, Schumpelick V. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy: comparison of adhesion-formation after bowel resection in a canine model.  Dig Surg. 1998;  15 145-147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Chen M D, Teigen G A, Reynolds H T, Johnson P R, Fowler J M. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy: an evaluation of adhesion formation after pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in a porcine model.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;  178 499-503
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Krähenbühl L, Schafer M, Kuzinkovas V, Renzulli P, Baer H, Buchler M. Experimental study of adhesion formation in open and laparoscopic funcoplication.  Br J Surg. 1998;  85 826-830
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Garrard C L, Clements R, Nanney L, Davidson J, Richards W. Adhesion formation is reduced after laparoscopic surgery.  Surg Endosc. 1999;  13 10-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Milingos S, Kallipolitis G, Loutradis D et al.. Adhesions: laparoscopic surgery versus laparotomy.  Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;  900 272-285
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Audebert A J, Gomel V. Role of microlaparoscopy in the diagnosis of peritoneal and visceral adhesions and in the prevention of bowel injury associated with blind trocar insertion.  Fertil Steril. 2000;  73 631-635
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Tittle A, Treutner K, Titkova S, Ottinger A, Schumpelick V. Comparison of adhesion reformation after laparoscopic and conventional adhesiolysis in an animal model.  Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2001;  386 141-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Jacobi C A, Sterzel A, Braumann C et al.. The impact of conventional and laparoscopic colon resection (CO2 or helium) on intraperitoneal adhesion formation in a rat peritonitis model.  Surg Endosc. 2001;  15 380-386
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Polymeneas G, Theodosopoulos T, Stamatiadis A, Kourias E. A comparative study of postoperative adhesion formation after laparoscopic vs open cholecystectomy.  Surg Endosc. 2001;  15 41-43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Douglas E OttM.D. 

Mercer University

161 Gateway Drive, Macon, GA 31210

Email: Gabiomed@mindspring.com

      >