Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II) – Presentation of methodology, general results, and analysis of complications

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Background and study aims: Appropriate use of colonoscopy is a key component of quality management in gastrointestinal endoscopy. In an update of a 1998 publication, the 2008 European Panel on the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE II) defined appropriateness criteria for various colonoscopy indications. This introductory paper therefore deals with methodology, general appropriateness, and a review of colonoscopy complications.

Methods:The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was used to evaluate the appropriateness of various diagnostic colonoscopy indications, with 14 multidisciplinary experts using a scale from 1 (extremely inappropriate) to 9 (extremely appropriate). Evidence reported in a comprehensive updated literature review was used for these decisions. Consolidation of the ratings into three appropriateness categories (appropriate, uncertain, inappropriate) was based on the median and the heterogeneity of the votes. The experts then met to discuss areas of disagreement in the light of existing evidence, followed by a second rating round, with a subsequent third voting round on necessity criteria, using much more stringent criteria (i. e. colonoscopy is deemed mandatory).

Results: Overall, 463 indications were rated, with 55 %, 16 % and 29 % of them being judged appropriate, uncertain and inappropriate, respectively. Perforation and hemorrhage rates, as reported in 39 studies, were in general < 0.1 % and < 0.3 %, respectively

Conclusions: The updated EPAGE II criteria constitute an aid to clinical decision-making but should in no way replace individual judgment. Detailed panel results are freely available on the internet (www.epage.ch) and will thus constitute a reference source of information for clinicians.

References

• 1 Misra T, Lalor E, Fedorak R N. Endoscopic perforation rates at a Canadian university teaching hospital.  Can J Gastroenterol. 2004;  18 221-226
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Viiala C H, Zimmerman M, Cullen D J, Hoffman N E. Complication rates of colonoscopy in an Australian teaching hospital environment.  Intern Med J. 2003;  33 355-359
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Froehlich F, Harris J K, Wietlisbach V. et al . Current sedation and monitoring practice for colonoscopy: an International Observational Study (EPAGE).  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 461-469
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Heuss L T, Froehlich F, Beglinger C. Changing patterns of sedation and monitoring practice during endoscopy: results of a nationwide survey in Switzerland.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 161-166
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Rex D K, Overley C, Kinser K. et al . Safety of propofol administered by registered nurses with gastroenterologist supervision in 2000 endoscopic cases.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;  97 1159-1163
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Cohen L B, Wecsler J S, Gaetano J N. et al . Endoscopic sedation in the United States: results from a nationwide survey.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 967-974
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Sonnenberg A, Amorosi S L, Lacey M J, Lieberman D A. Patterns of endoscopy in the United States: analysis of data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the National Endoscopic Database.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 489-496
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Harewood G C, Lieberman D A. Colonoscopy practice patterns since introduction of medicare coverage for average-risk screening.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;  2 72-77
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Froehlich F, Gonvers J J, Fried M. Conscious sedation, clinically relevant complications and monitoring of endoscopy: results of a nationwide survey in Switzerland.  Endoscopy. 1994;  26 231-234
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 May A, Manner H, Schneider M. et al . Prospective multicenter trial of capsule endoscopy in patients with chronic abdominal pain, diarrhea and other signs and symptoms (CEDAP-Plus Study).  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 606-612
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Mergener K, Ponchon T, Gralnek I. et al . Literature review and recommendations for clinical application of small-bowel capsule endoscopy, based on a panel discussion by international experts. Consensus statements for small-bowel capsule endoscopy, 2006/2007.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 895-909
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Cotton P B, Durkalski V L, Pineau B C. et al . Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia.  JAMA. 2004;  291 1713-1719
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Johnson C D, Toledano A Y, Herman B A. et al . Computerized tomographic colonography: performance evaluation in a retrospective multicenter setting.  Gastroenterology. 2003;  125 688-695
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Kim D H, Pickhardt P J, Taylor A J. et al . CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia.  N Engl J Med. 2007;  357 1403-1412
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Pickhardt P J, Choi J R, Hwang I. et al . Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults.  N Engl J Med. 2003;  349 2191-2200
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Rex D K, Lieberman D. ACG colorectal cancer prevention action plan: update on CT-colonography.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 1410-1413
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Rockey D C, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D. et al . Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison.  Lancet. 2005;  365 305-311
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Brook R H, Chassin M R, Fink A. et al . A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies.  Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1986;  2 53-63
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Naylor C D. What is appropriate care?.  N Engl J Med. 1998;  338 1918-1920
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Bernstein S J, Hilborne L H, Leape L L. et al . The appropriateness of use of coronary angiography in New York State.  JAMA. 1993;  269 766-769
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Vader J P, Froehlich F, Juillerat P. et al . Appropriate treatment for Crohn’s disease: methodology and summary results of a multidisciplinary international expert panel approach – EPACT.  Digestion. 2006;  73 237-248
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Park R E, Fink A, Brook R H. et al . Physician ratings of appropriate indications for six medical and surgical procedures.  Am J Public Health. 1986;  76 766-772
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Vader J P, Porchet F, Larequi-Lauber T. et al . Appropriateness of surgery for sciatica: reliability of guidelines from expert panels.  Spine. 2000;  25 1831-1836
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Bochud M, Burnand B, Froehlich F. et al . 12. Appropriateness of colonoscopy: surveillance after polypectomy.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 654-663
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Bochud M, Burnand B, Froehlich F. et al . 13. Appropriateness of colonoscopy: surveillance after curative resection of colorectal cancer.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 664-672
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Bochud M, Gonvers J J, Vader J P. et al . 2. Appropriateness of gastroscopy: gastro-esophageal reflux disease.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 596-603
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Bochud M, Gonvers J J, Vader J P. et al . 3. Appropriateness of gastroscopy: Barrett’s esophagus.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 604-610
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Burnand B, Bochud M, Froehlich F. et al . 14. Appropriateness of colonoscopy: screening for colorectal cancer in asymptomatic individuals.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 673-683
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 De Bosset V, Gonvers J J, Burnand B. et al . 7. Appropriateness of colonoscopy: iron-deficiency anemia.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 627-630
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 De Bosset V, Gonvers J J, Froehlich F. et al . 5. Appropriateness of gastroscopy: bleeding and dysphagia.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 615-622
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 De Bosset V, Gonvers J J, Vader J P. et al . 9. Appropriateness of colonoscopy: lower abdominal pain or constipation.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 637-640
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Froehlich F, Bochud M, Gonvers J J. et al . 1. Appropriateness of gastroscopy: dyspepsia.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 579-595
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Froehlich F, Gonvers J J, Vader J P. et al . Appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy: risk of complications.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 684-686
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Froehlich F, Larequi-Lauber T, Gonvers J J. et al . 11. Appropriateness of colonoscopy: inflammatory bowel disease.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 647-653
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Gonvers J J, De Bosset V, Froehlich F. et al . 8. Appropriateness of colonoscopy: hematochezia.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 631-636
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Gonvers J J, de Bosset V, Vader J P. et al . 6. Appropriateness of gastroscopy: risk factors for gastric cancer.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 623-626
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Gonvers J J, Harris J K, Wietlisbach V. et al . A European view of diagnostic yield and appropriateness of colonoscopy.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2007;  54 729-735
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Vader J P, Burnand B, Froehlich F. et al . The European Panel on Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE): project and methods.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 572-578
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Vader J P, Froehlich F, Dubois R W. et al . European Panel on the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE): conclusion and WWW site.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 687-694
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Vader J P, Larequi-Lauber T, Froehlich F. et al . 4. Appropriateness of gastroscopy: atypical chest pain.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 611-614
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Burnand B, Harris J K, Wietlisbach V. et al . Use, appropriateness, and diagnostic yield of screening colonoscopy: an international observational study (EPAGE).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 1018-1026
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Harris J K, Froehlich F, Gonvers J J. et al . The appropriateness of colonoscopy: a multi-center, international, observational study.  Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;  19 150-157
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 Vader J P, Pache I, Froehlich F. et al . Overuse and underuse of colonoscopy in a European primary care setting.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 593-599
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Vader J P, Wietlisbach V, Harris J K. et al . Gastroenterologists overestimate the appropriateness of colonoscopies they perform: an international observational study.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 840-846
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Terraz O, Wietlisbach V, Jeannot J G. et al . The EPAGE internet guideline as a decision support tool for determining the appropriateness of colonoscopy.  Digestion. 2005;  71 72-77
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Arditi C, Gonvers J J, Burnand B. et al . Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II) Surveillance after polypectomy and after resection of colorectal cancer.  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 209-217
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Arditi C, Peytremann-Bridevaux I, Burnand B. et al . Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II) Screening for colorectal cancer.  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 200-208
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Peytremann-Bridevaux I, Arditi C, Froehlich F. et al . Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II) Iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) and hematochezia.  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 227-233
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 49 Schusselé Filliettaz S, Gonvers J J, Peytremann-Bridevaux I. et al . Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II) Functional bowel disorders: pain, constipation and bloating.  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 234-239
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 Schusselé Filliettaz S, Juillerat P, Burnand B. et al . Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II) Chronic diarrhea and known inflammatory bowel disease.  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 218-226
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Kahan J P, Bernstein S J, Leape L L. et al . Measuring the necessity of medical procedures.  Med Care. 1994;  32 357-365
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 Anderson M L, Pasha T M, Leighton J A. Endoscopic perforation of the colon: lessons from a 10-year study.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;  95 3418-3422
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Araghizadeh F Y, Timmcke A E, Opelka F G. et al . Colonoscopic perforations.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 713-716
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Arora A, Singh P. Colonoscopy in patients 80 years of age and older is safe, with high success rate and diagnostic yield.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 408-413
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 55 Bini E J, Firoozi B, Choung R J. et al . Systematic evaluation of complications related to endoscopy in a training setting: a prospective 30-day outcomes study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 8-16
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 56 Bowles C J, Leicester R, Romaya C. et al . A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?.  Gut. 2004;  53 277-283
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 57 Canard J M, Debette-Gratien M, Dumas R. et al . A prospective national study on colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy in 2000 in France.  Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2005;  29 17-22
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 58 Cobb W S, Heniford B T, Sigmon L B. et al . Colonoscopic perforations: incidence, management, and outcomes.  Am Surg. 2004;  70 750-757; discussion 757–758
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 59 Cotton P B, Connor P, McGee D. et al . Colonoscopy: practice variation among 69 hospital-based endoscopists.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 352-357
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 60 Dafnis G, Ekbom A, Pahlman L, Blomqvist P. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy within a defined population in Sweden.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 302-309
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 61 Denis B, Ben Abdelghani M, Peter A. et al . [Two years of mortality and morbidity conferences in a hospital gastrointestinal endoscopy unit].  Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2003;  27 1100-1104
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 62 Denis B, Weiss A M, Peter A. et al . Quality assurance and gastrointestinal endoscopy: an audit of 500 colonoscopic procedures.  Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2004;  28 1245-1255
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 63 Duncan J E, Sweeney W B, Trudel J L. et al . Colonoscopy in the elderly: low risk, low yield in asymptomatic patients.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;  49 646-651
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 64 Eckardt V F, Kanzler G, Schmitt T. et al . Complications and adverse effects of colonoscopy with selective sedation.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 560-565
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 65 Fasoli R, Repaci G, Comin U, Minoli G. A multi-centre North Italian prospective survey on some quality parameters in lower gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Dig Liver Dis. 2002;  34 833-841
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 66 Gangi S, Saidi F, Patel K. et al . Cardiovascular complications after GI endoscopy: occurrence and risks in a large hospital system.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 679-685
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 67 Gatto N M, Frucht H, Sundararajan V. et al . Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: a population-based study.  J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;  95 230-236
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 68 Heldwein W, Dollhopf M, Rosch T. et al . The Munich Polypectomy Study (MUPS): prospective analysis of complications and risk factors in 4000 colonic snare polypectomies.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 1116-1122
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 69 Karajeh M A, Sanders D S, Hurlstone D P. Colonoscopy in elderly people is a safe procedure with a high diagnostic yield: a prospective comparative study of 2000 patients.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 226-230
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 70 Ko C W, Riffle S, Shapiro J A. et al . Incidence of minor complications and time lost from normal activities after screening or surveillance colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 648-656
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 71 Korman L Y, Overholt B F, Box T, Winker C K. Perforation during colonoscopy in endoscopic ambulatory surgical centers.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  58 554-557
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 72 Levin T R, Zhao W, Conell C. et al . Complications of colonoscopy in an integrated health care delivery system.  Ann Intern Med. 2006;  145 880-886
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 73 Luning T H, Keemers-Gels M E, Barendregt W B. et al . Colonoscopic perforations: a review of 30 366 patients.  Surg Endosc. 2007;  21 994-997
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 74 Ma W T, Mahadeva S, Kunanayagam S. et al . Colonoscopy in elderly Asians: a prospective evaluation in routine clinical practice.  J Dig Dis. 2007;  8 77-81
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 75 Nelson D B, McQuaid K R, Bond J H. et al . Procedural success and complications of large-scale screening colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 307-314
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 76 Newcomer M K, Shaw M J, Williams D M, Jowell P S. Unplanned work absence following outpatient colonoscopy.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 1999;  29 76-78
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 77 Rathgaber S W, Wick T M. Colonoscopy completion and complication rates in a community gastroenterology practice.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  64 556-562
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 78 Sardinha T C, Nogueras J J, Ehrenpreis E D. et al . Colonoscopy in octogenarians: a review of 428 cases.  Int J Colorect Dis. 1999;  14 172-176
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 79 Sharma V K, Nguyen C C, Crowell M D. et al . A national study of cardiopulmonary unplanned events after GI endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 27-34
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 80 Sieg A, Hachmoeller-Eisenbach U, Eisenbach T. Prospective evaluation of complications in outpatient GI endoscopy: a survey among German gastroenterologists.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 620-627
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 81 Sieg A, Theilmeier A. [Results of coloscopy screening in 2005 – an Internet-based documentation].  Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2006;  131 379-383
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 82 Taku K, Sano Y, Fu K I. et al . Iatrogenic perforation associated with therapeutic colonoscopy: a multicenter study in Japan.  J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;  22 1409-1414
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 83 Tran D Q, Rosen L, Kim R. et al . Actual colonoscopy: what are the risks of perforation?.  Am Surg. 2001;  67 845-847; discussion 847–848
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 84 Tulchinsky H, Madhala-Givon O, Wasserberg N. et al . Incidence and management of colonoscopic perforations: 8 years’ experience.  World J Gastroenterol. 2006;  12 4211-4213
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 85 Wexner S D, Forde K A, Sellers G. et al . How well can surgeons perform colonoscopy?.  Surg Endosc. 1998;  12 1410-1414
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 86 Wexner S D, Garbus J E, Singh J J. A prospective analysis of 13 580 colonoscopies. Reevaluation of credentialing guidelines.  Surg Endosc. 2001;  15 251-261
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 87 Zerey M, Paton B L, Khan P D. et al . Colonoscopy in the very elderly: a review of 157 cases.  Surg Endosc. 2007;  21 1806-1809
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 88 Zubarik R, Fleischer D E, Mastropietro C. et al . Prospective analysis of complications 30 days after outpatient colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  50 322-328
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 89 Imperiale T F, Wagner D R, Lin C Y. et al . Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings.  N Engl J Med. 2000;  343 169-174
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 90 Lieberman D A, Weiss D G, Bond J H. et al . Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380.  N Engl J Med. 2000;  343 162-168
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

V. PittetPhD 

Health Care Evaluation Unit
Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (IUMSP)
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne

Rue du Bugnon 17
CH-1005 Lausanne
Switzerland

Fax: +41-21-3144954

Email: valerie.pittet@chuv.ch

• Supplementary Material