Public Attitudes Towards Treatment of Depression: Effects of an Information Campaign

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

In 2000 and 2001, telephone surveys in the German cities Nuremberg and Wurzburg were carried out to gain insights into beliefs and attitudes of the public towards depression and its treatment and to evaluate the activites of the ”Nuremberg Alliance Against Depression”, a joint effort of health professionals, aiming at the improvement of the situation of people in Nuremberg suffering from depression. In 2000, most people considered depression a serious illness that can be treated fairly well by a professional. Concerning the proper means for this, we found that the well-known bad reputation of psychotropic drugs still prevails. Since 2001 a prominent part of the activities of the Nuremberg Alliance is a citywide campaign informing the public about causes and treatment of depression. Although the campaign had been performed for only 10 months, slight to moderate effects concerning causes and treatment of depression were observed in both cities. However, no effects were found with respect to the misconceptions about pharmacotherapy.

References

• 1 Althaus D, Stefanek J, Hasford J, Hegerl U. Wissensstand und Einstellungen der Allgemeinbevölkerung zu Symptomen, Ursachen und Behandlungsmöglichkeiten depressiver Erkrankungen [Attitudes of the General Population towards Symptoms, Causes and Treatment of Depressive Disorders].  Nervenarzt. 2002;  73 659-664
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Angermeyer M C, Matschinger H. Public attitude towards psychiatric treatment.  Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1996;  94 326-336
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Angermeyer M C, Daumer R, Matschinger H. Benefits and risks of psychotropic medication in the eyes of the general public: results of a survey in the Federal Republic of Germany.  Pharmacopsychiatry. 1993;  26 114-120
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Benkert O, Kepplinger HM; Sobota K. Psychopharmaka im Widerstreit: Eine Studie zur Akzeptanz von Psychopharmaka - Bevölkerungsumfrage und Medienanalyse. Berlin; Springer-Verlag 1995
  Google Scholar
• 5 Fischer W, Georg D, Zbinden E, Guimón J. Determining factors and the effects of attitudes towards psychotropic medication. In: Guimón J, Fischer W, Sartorius N, editors The Image of Madness. The Public Facing Mental Illness and Psychiatric Treatment. Basel; Karger 1999: p. 162-186
  Google Scholar
• 6 Freimuth V. Effectiveness of Mass-Media Health Campaigns. Paper presented at the Second International Symposium on the Effectiveness of Health Promotion. May 28 to 30, 2001 Toronto, Canada;
  Google Scholar
• 7 Holzinger A, Löffler W, Matschinger H, Müller P, Priebe S, Angermeyer M C. Einstellung zu Psychopharmaka bei schizophrenen Patienten vs. Allgemeinbevölkerung.  Psychopharmakotherapie. 2001;  8 76-80
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Jorm A F, Angermeyer M, Katschnig H. Public knowledge of and attitudes to mental disorders: a limiting factor in the optimal use of treatment services. In: Andrews G, Henderson S, editors Unmet need in psychiatry: problems, resources, responses. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press 2000: p. 399-413
  Google Scholar
• 9 Jorm A F, Korten A E, Jacomb P A,. et al . Helpfulness of interventions for mental disorders: beliefs of health professionals compared with the general public.  Br J Psychiatry. 1997;  171 233-237
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Lönnqvist J. Psychiatric aspects of suicidal behaviour: depression. In: Hawton K, van Heeringen K, editors Suicide and attempted suicide. Chincester; John Wiley & Sons Ltd 2000: p. 107-120
  Google Scholar
• 11 Murray C J, Lopez A D. The global burden of disease in 1990. In: Murray CJ, Lopez AD, editors The global burden of disease. Harvard; Harvard University Press 1997: p. 247-293
  Google Scholar
• 12 Paykel E S, Tylee A, Wright A, Priest R G, Rix S, Hart D. The Defeat Depression Campaign: psychiatry in the public arena.  Am J Psychiatry. 1997;  154 59-65
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Priest R G, Vize C, Roberts A, Roberts M, Tylee A. Lay people’s attitude to treatment of depression: results of opinion poll for Defeat Depression Campaign just before its launch.  BMJ. 1996;  313 858-859
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Rix S, Paykel E S, Lelliott P ,. et al . Impact of a national campaign on GP education: an evaluation of the Defeat Depression Campaign.  Br J Gen Pract. 1999;  49 99-102
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Rutz W. Preventing suicide and premature death by education and treatment.  J Affect Disord. 2001;  62 123-129
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Snyder L B, Hamilton M A, Mitchell E W, Kiwanuka-Tondo J, Fleming-Milici F, Proctor D. The effectiveness of mediated health communication campaigns: Meta-analysis of differences in commenvement, prevention, and cessation behavior campaigns. In: Carveth R, Bryant J, editors Meta-analysis of media effects. Mahwah, NJ; Lawrence Erlbaum 2000
  Google Scholar

Prof. Dr. Ulrich Hegerl

University of Munich

Department of Psychiatry

Nussbaumstr. 7

80336 Munich

Germany