Assessment of cancer risk and environmental levels of arsenic in New Hampshire

https://doi.org/10.1078/1438-4639-00133Get rights and content

Abstract

The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) and the United States (US) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER) list arsenic as a major concern for Superfund sites and the environment at large. Arsenic is clearly linked to skin, bladder, and lung cancer occurrence in populations highly exposed to arsenic occupationally, medicinally, or through contaminated drinking water (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 1999; IARC, 1987). While these studies have identified important adverse health effects, they cannot provide risk information at lower levels of exposure such as those commonly found in the US. Additionally, precise measurement of exposure is critical to assessing risk in populations consuming relatively trace amounts of arsenic. In New Hampshire, domestic wells serve roughly 40% of the population, and about 10% of these contain arsenic concentrations in the controversial range of 10 to 50 μg/l. New Hampshire, along with other states in New England, has among the highest bladder cancer mortality rates in the country. Therefore, we are conducting a population-based epidemiologic study in New Hampshire (1) to assess the risk of skin and bladder cancer associated with arsenic exposure in a US population, (2) to evaluate methods of quantifying individual exposure to arsenic at low to moderate levels, and (3) to explore alternative models of determining the dose-response relationship at the lower end of exposure. Our findings to date indicate that toenail arsenic concentrations are a reliable, long-term biomarker of total arsenic exposure and reflect arsenic intake by drinking water containing 1 μg/l or more. We found that urinary arsenic cannot be detected consistently in a population for which drinking water arsenic is primarily below 50 μg/l. Lastly, our data suggest that use of a biologic marker along with alternative statistical approaches may aid detection of the levels at which arsenic may affect cancer occurrence in the US.

References (46)

  • N. Breslow et al.

    Statistical Methods in Cancer Research

  • K. Brown et al.

    A dose-response analysis of skin cancer from inorganic arsenic in drinking water

    Risk Anal

    (1989)
  • K. Brown et al.

    Uncertainty in cancer risk at low doses of inorganic arsenic

    Human and Ecological Risk Assessment

    (1997)
  • R.L. Calderon et al.

    Excretion of arsenic in urine as a function of exposure to arsenic in drinking water

    Environ Health Perspect

    (1999)
  • M.E. Cebrian et al.

    Chronic arsenic poisoning in the north of Mexico

    Human Toxicology

    (1983)
  • C.J. Chen et al.

    A retrospective study on malignant neoplasms of bladder, lung and liver in blackfoot disease endemic area in Taiwan

    Br J Cancer

    (1986)
  • J. Cuzick et al.

    Ingested arsenic, keratoses, and bladder cancer

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1992)
  • M. Garland et al.

    Toenail trace element levels as biomarkers: reproducibility over a 6-year period [published erratum appears in Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1994 Sep; 3(6): 523]

    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev

    (1993)
  • R.T. Greenlee et al.

    Cancer Statistics

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (2001)
  • H.R. Guo et al.

    Arsenic in drinking water and incidence of urinary cancers

    Epidemiology

    (1997)
  • G. Henke et al.

    Detection of repeated arsenical poisoning by neutron activation analysis of foot nail segments

    Arch Toxicol

    (1982)
  • C. Hopenhayn-Rich et al.

    Bladder cancer mortality associated with arsenic in drinking water in Argentina

    Epidemiology

    (1996)
  • Y.M. Hsueh et al.

    Serum beta-carotene level, arsenic methylation capability, and incidence of skin cancer

    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev

    (1997)
  • Cited by (106)

    • Arsenic risk assessment

      2023, Handbook of Arsenic Toxicology
    • Human health risk from consumption of aquatic species in arsenic-contaminated shallow urban lakes

      2021, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Arsenic is also a prevalent pollutant associated with industrial practices such as mining, wood processing, herbicide applications, and smelting, and thus anthropogenic sources of arsenic are widespread (Ferguson and Gavis, 1972; Rodie et al., 1995; Smedley and Kinniburgh, 2002). Exposure to arsenic, either through ingestion of contaminated drinking water (Karagas et al., 2002) or food (Banerjee et al., 2013; Kar et al., 2011) can lead to adverse effects on human health. Arsenic is a carcinogen and neurotoxin and known to cause skin disorders including Blackfoot disease, hyperpigmentation, and skin lesions through chronic exposure (Kazi et al., 2009; Smith et al., 2000; Tseng, 1977; Vega et al., 2001).

    • Toenails as a biomarker of exposure to arsenic: A review

      2021, Environmental Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Then, toenail samples were washed with detergent, deionized water, methanol, Triton solution, or acetone in a sonicator or in an ultrasound bath (Aguiar and Saiki, 2001; Chanpiwat et al., 2015; Hossain et al., 2012; Huyck et al., 2007; Islam et al., 2015; Karim et al., 2010; MacIntosh et al., 1997; Nath et al., 2008; Rahman et al., 2017; Rodrigues et al., 2015; Saat et al., 2013). Finally, samples were dried in an oven, air-dried or freeze-dried before analysis (Abdulrahman et al., 2012; Alamdar et al., 2016; Cottingham et al., 2013; Farzan et al., 2015; Gruber et al., 2012; Karagas et al., 2001a, 2001b, 2002, 2004; Lee et al., 2016). A digestion process prior analysis was performed when arsenic content was measured using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) or atomic fluorescence spectrometry (AFS), which are among the most common techniques for measuring toenail arsenic concentrations (Table S1).

    • Arsenic contamination in water resources and its health risk assessment

      2021, Contamination of Water: Health Risk Assessment and Treatment Strategies
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text