Risk perception, somatization, and self report of complaints related to electromagnetic fields – A randomized survey study

https://doi.org/10.1078/1438-4639-00170Get rights and content

Summary

Exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) as well as EMF-related complaints has increased over the past decades. However, it is unclear whether these complaints are related to the electromagnetic or other physical properties of these fields per se, to salience of EMF in media, or to both. What is the prevalence of EMF-related complaints in the general population? What are the influencing factors on this prevalence? Does reporting of EMF-related symptoms depend on cognitive factors? To answer these questions, a survey with random variation of three cognitive factors was performed. As expected, EMF-related complaints were reported more by females and people with higher somatization tendency. Age had no significant linear effect on EMF-related complaints. The cognitive condition of threat produced a significant contrast effect among people with high somatization tendency on EMF-related complaints. Cognition can influence reporting of EMF-related effects. Thus, in future research of such effects, psychologically influencing factors should be included. Also risk communication should incorporate knowledge about social cognition.

References (31)

  • Frick, U., Eichhammer, P.: Zwischenbericht zum Untersuchungsvorhaben StSch 4357-Machbarkeitsstudie: Verifizierung der...
  • Frick. U., von Kovatsits, U., Mayer, M., Binder, H., Eichhammer, P., Rehm, J.: Epidemiologie von Beschwerden mit...
  • S. Greenland et al.

    A pooled analysis of magnetic fields, wire codes, and childhood leukemia. Childhood Leukemia-EMF Study Group

    Epidemiology

    (2000)
  • International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group

    (Arthur S. Walters MD Group Organizer and Correspondent). Towards a better definition of the Restless Legs Syndrome

    Mov Disord

    (1995)
  • W.T. Kaune et al.

    Rate of Occurrence of Transient Magnetic Field Events in U.S. Residences

    Bioelectromagnetics

    (2000)
  • Cited by (56)

    • Time course of health complaints attributed to RF-EMF exposure and predictors of electromagnetic hypersensitivity over 10 years in a prospective cohort of Dutch adults

      2023, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      In particular, IEI-EMF and EHS have been hypothesized to correspond to different levels of involvement in the EMF topic (Röösli et al., 2010). Nevertheless, diagnostic criteria for these conditions are not fully established and research has yet to produce clear evidence on the mechanisms causing people to attribute health complaints to EMF exposure or to define themselves as hypersensitive to EMFs (Baliatsas et al., 2009; Dieudonné, 2019, 2020; Stein and Udasin, 2020), although psychosocial factors are thought to play a role (Augner and Hacker, 2009; Baliatsas et al., 2015; Frick et al., 2002; Martens et al., 2018; Ramirez-Vazquez et al., 2019; Rubin et al., 2010; Watrin et al., 2022). As a consequence, the terms IEI-EMF and EHS are frequently used interchangeably in epidemiological studies, and this is likely to affect the range in estimated prevalence, which in industrialized countries varies between 1.5 % and 21 % (Eltiti et al., 2007; Hillert et al., 2002; Karvala et al., 2018; Levallois et al., 2002; Schreier et al., 2006).

    • Why electrohypersensitivity and related symptoms are caused by non-ionizing man-made electromagnetic fields: An overview and medical assessment

      2022, Environmental Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      In fact, as emphasized by several scientists (Carpenter, 2015), the strongest evidence that EHS is a real syndrome similar to the microwave syndrome comes from the initial cases reported from 1980 to 2000 of acute high intensity exposure to MW EMF of healthy people, resulting in “prolonged illness” (Williams and Webb, 1980; Forman et al., 1982; Schilling, 1997, 2000; Reeves, 2000). Moreover, since it was shown that MCS is associated with EHS in near 25% of the EHS cases (Belpomme et al., 2015) and that both disorders are associated with inflammation, OS, possible BBB opening and brain neurotransmitter changes (Belpomme et al., 2015; Irigaray et al., 2018a; Belpomme and Irigaray, 2020); it is believed that both EHS and MCS are objective somatic disorders, which cannot be claimed to originate from non-EMF-related psychologic or psychiatric cause, and neither result from a simple undefined and unproven functional impairment (Belpomme and Irigaray 2020, 2021; Belpomme et al., 2021)–although it cannot be excluded these disorders may occur in patients with some particular psychologic traits (Frick et al., 2002). The purpose of provocation studies is to prove that EHS patients display acute symptoms at the time they are exposed (or after they are exposed) to man-made electric, magnetic and electromagnetic sources; whatever they are, i.e. ELF, RF or MW EMFs.

    • Longitudinal associations between risk appraisal of base stations for mobile phones, radio or television and non-specific symptoms

      2018, Journal of Psychosomatic Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      This could be the result of lower exposure to information among lower educated participants about potential health risks of RF-EMF from base stations due to differences in media consumption as well as social networks. Previous studies [3, 26, 63, 64] often focused on a single aspect of risk appraisal, for example perceived exposure or worry about a risk. In this study we analyzed three different aspects of risk appraisal regarding RF-EMF: perceived personal exposure, perceived risks in general, and concerns about personal health because of RF-EMF from mobile phone base stations.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text