Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The impact of cervical cancer education for deaf women using a video educational tool employing American Sign Language, open captioning, and graphics

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background. Deaf women encounter barriers to accessing cancer information. In this study, we evaluated whether deaf women’s knowledge could be increased by viewing a graphically enriched, American Sign Language (ASL) cervical cancer education video. Methods. A blind, randomized trial evaluated knowledge gain and retention. Deaf women (n=130) completed questionnaires before, after, and 2 months after viewing the video. Results. With only a single viewing of the in-depth video, the experimental group gained and retained significantly more cancer knowledge than the control group. Conclusions. Giving deaf women access to the ASL cervical cancer education video (http://cancer.ucsd.edu/deafinfo) significantly increased their knowledge of cervical cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Glicken S. Health care for Deaf adolescents. Adolesc Med. 1994;5:345–358.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jones EG, Renger R, Firestone R. Deaf community analysis for health education priorities. Public Health Nurs. 2005;22:27–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ubido J, Huntington J, Warburton D. Inequalities in access to health-care faced by women who are deaf. Health Soc Care Community. 2002;10:247–253.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Meador HE, Zazove P. Health care interactions with Deaf culture. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2005;18:218–222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lotke M. She won’t look at me. Ann Intern Med. 1995;123:54–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Steinberg AG, Barnett S, Meador HE, Wiggins EA, Zazove P. Health care system accessibility experiences and perceptions of Deaf people. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:260–266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zazove P, LC N, Gorenflo D, et al. The health status and health care utilization of deaf and hard of hearing persons. Arch Fam Med. 1993;2:745–752.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Iezzone LI, O’Day BL, Killeen M, Harker H. Communicating about health care: observations from persons who are deaf or hard of hearing. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:356–363.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jones NL. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): The definition of disability (RL33304). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service (2006). Available at http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/crs/8/.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Steinberg AG, Wiggins EA, Barmada CH, Sullivan VJ. Deaf women: experiences and perceptions of health system access. J Womens Health. 2002;11:729–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ralston E, Zazove P, Gorenflow D. Physicians’ attitudes and beliefs about deaf patients. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1996;9:167–173.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sadler GR, Gunsauls DC, Huang J, et al. Bringing breast cancer education to deaf women. J Cancer Educ. 2001;16:225–228.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Harmer L. Health care delivery and deaf people: practice, problems, and recommendations for change. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 1999;4:73–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Steinberg AG, Barnett S, Meador HE, Wiggins EA, Zazove P. Health care system accessibility experiences and perceptions of deaf people. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;21:260–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dipietro L, Knight C, Sams J. Health care delivery for deaf patients: the provider’s role. Am Ann Deaf. 1981;2:106–112.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Allen TE. Who are the deaf and hard-of-hearing students leaving high school and entering postsecondary education? Paper submitted to Pelavin Research Institute as part of the project, A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Postsecondary Educational Opportunities for Students who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing, funded by the U.S. Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Washington, DC. Available at http://gri.gallaudet.edu/AnnualSurvey/whodeaf.html. 1994.

  17. Bat-Chava Y, Rosen RB, Sausa A, Meza C, Shockett S. An evaluation of a college preparatory and readiness program for deaf students. J Rehabil. 1999;65:329–404.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sadler GR, Huang JT, Padden CA, et al. Bringing health care information to the deaf community. J Cancer Educ. 2001;16:105–108.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Singleton JL, Morgan D, DiGello E, Wiles J, Rivers R. Vocabulary use by low, moderate, and high ASL-proficient writers compared to hearing ESL and monolingual speakers. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2004;9:86–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Baranowski E. Childbirth education classes for expectant deaf parents. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 1983;8:143–146.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Davenport S. Improving communication with the deaf patient. J Fam Pract. 1977;31:533–538.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Smeltzer SC, Zimmerman V, Frain M, DeSilets L, Duffin J. Accessible online health promotion information for persons with disabilities. Online J Issues Nurs [serial online]. January 31; 2004; 9(1):11. PMID:14998351 [PubMed-indexed for MEDLINE].

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lyttle NLM, Stadelman KM. Assessing awareness and knowledge of breast and cervical cancer among Appalachian women. Prev Chronic Dis. 2006;3:A125.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Basu P, Sarkar S, Mukherjee S, et al. Women’s perceptions and social barriers determine compliance to cervical screening: results from a population based study in India. Cancer Detect Prev. 2006;30:369–374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wollin J, Elder R. Mammograms and pap smears for Australian deaf women. Cancer Nurs. 2003;26:405–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. California Department of Health Services. Cancer Detection Programs: Every Woman Counts. Available at: http://www.dhs.ca.gov/ps/cdic/ccb/cds/documents/cervicalcancer.pdf. Accessed March 29, 2008.

  27. Saslow D, Runowicz CD, Solomon D, et al. American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of cervical neoplasia and cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52:342–362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Goldie SJ, Gaffikin L, Goldhaber-Fiebert JD, et al. Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening in five developing countries. New Engl J Med. 2005;353:2158–2168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cervical Cancer Prevention. National Cancer Institute. Available at: 〈http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/prevention/cervical/Patient/ page2〉. Accessed August 8, 2007.

  30. Katz ML, Wewers ME, Single N, Paskett ED. Key informants’ perspective prior to beginning a cervical cancer study in Ohio Appalachia. Qual Health Res. 2007;17:131–142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kaskowitz SR, Nakajii MC, Clark KL, Gunsauls DC, Sadler RS. Bringing prostate cancer education to deaf men. Cancer Detect Prev. 2006;30:439–448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Folkins A, Sadler GR, Ko C, Branz P, Marsh S, Bovee M. Improving the deaf community’s access to prostate and testicular cancer information: a survey study. BioMed Cent Public Health. 2005;5:63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wood RY, Duffy ME. Video breast health kits: testing a cancer education innovation in older high-risk populations. J Cancer Educ. 2004;19:98–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Meade CD, Calvo A, Cuthbertson D. Impact of culturally, linguistically, and literacy relevant cancer information among Hispanic farm worker women. J Cancer Educ. 2002;17:50–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Erwin DO, Johnson VA, Feliciano-Libid L, Zamora D, Jandore L. Incorporating cultural constructs and demographic diversity in the research and development of a Latina breast and cervical cancer education program. J Cancer Educ. 2005;20:39–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bosch X, Harper D. Prevention strategies of cervical cancer in the HPV vaccine era. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;103:21–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rozmovits L, Ziebland S. What do patients with prostate or breast cancer want from an Internet site?: a qualitative study of information needs. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;53:57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgia Robins Sadler BSN, MBA, PHD.

Additional information

Supported by The Alliance Healthcare Foundation, the California Endowment, the SIRA Medical-Student Aging Research Training Program; the National Cancer Institute grants R25 CA101317, R25 CA108731, R25 CA65745 and Cancer Center Core grant 5 P30 CA023100-22; the National Institutes of Health’s Division of National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities EXPORT grant P60MD00220; and the Minority Institution/Cancer Center Partnership Program grants U56 CA92079 and U56 CA92081.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Choe, S., Lim, R.SH., Clark, K. et al. The impact of cervical cancer education for deaf women using a video educational tool employing American Sign Language, open captioning, and graphics. J Canc Educ 24, 10–15 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/08858190802665245

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08858190802665245

Keywords

Navigation