Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is a necessary but not sufficient cause of cervical cancer. While chlamydia infection has been associated with cervical cancer, the meaning of this association remains unclear. The authors' objective was to investigate this association by evaluating whether concurrent genital tract infections are associated with HPV persistence, a precursor to cervical cancer. Interview data and biologic samples for HPV, Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Trichomonas vaginalis, and bacterial vaginosis testing were collected from female adolescents in an Atlanta, Georgia, longitudinal cohort study at 6-month visits (1999–2003). Associations with persistence (detection of the same HPV type at two sequential visits (visit pair)) were assessed among subjects with 2–5 visits and ≥6 months of follow-up. Associations were evaluated by logistic regression using methods for correlated data. Type-specific persistence of high-risk HPV types was detected in 77 of 181 (43%) analyzed visit pairs. Concurrent infection with C. trachomatis was independently associated with persistence of high-risk HPV types (adjusted odds ratio = 2.1, 95% confidence interval: 1.0, 4.1). Infection with more than one HPV type at the initial visit was also associated with high-risk persistence (adjusted odds ratio = 2.8, 95% confidence interval: 1.6, 4.9). The association between chlamydia infection and cervical cancer may be due to an effect of chlamydia infection on persistence of high-risk HPV.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is a necessary but not sufficient cause of cervical cancer. Most HPV infections are resolved by the host immune response, and it is thought that host or external cofactors are required for progression to cancer. Studies examining associations between other sexually transmitted infections and cervical cancer (15) have demonstrated associations between cervical cancer and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, and herpes simplex virus type 2 in analyses controlling for HPV infection status (1, 4), which suggests that these sexually transmitted infections may be cofactors for the development of cancerous lesions.

The association between a history of sexually transmitted infection and cervical cancer has been explored most thoroughly for C. trachomatis. Case-control studies controlling for HPV infection status have demonstrated an association between detection of antibodies to C. trachomatis and the development of cervical cancer (1, 2, 6, 7), providing supporting evidence for this hypothesis. A retrospective study demonstrated an increased risk of cervical cancer in women who had a history of C. trachomatis infection (7). These studies showed an association between C. trachomatis infection and subsequent cervical cancer but were unable to evaluate the role of concurrent C. trachomatis and HPV infections, either because the concurrency of these infections could not be determined or because few participants with concurrent infection were present in the study populations.

It is possible that changes in the host response to HPV that occur during concurrent infection may decrease the host's ability to resolve the HPV infection. If present, this effect would be detected as increased persistence of HPV infection. Persistence of HPV infection has been closely associated with progression to cancer (810). Therefore, detection of an association between concurrent C. trachomatis infection and increased HPV persistence would support the association between C. trachomatis infection and cervical cancer and would suggest a mechanism for this association. To evaluate the effect of concurrent infection on HPV infection, we analyzed data from a prospective longitudinal cohort study. We examined associations between concurrent C. trachomatis infection and other genital tract infections and type-specific HPV persistence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study population

Study participants were recruited from a primary care clinic at a public pediatric hospital in Atlanta, Georgia. All sexually active females aged 13–19 years were eligible to participate if a pelvic examination was indicated. Participants were excluded if they were pregnant or infected with human immunodeficiency virus or if they had been treated with antibiotics in the past month. For adolescents aged 13–17 years, the informed assent of the adolescent and the permission of a parent/guardian were obtained prior to enrollment; for adolescents aged 18 or 19 years, informed consent was obtained prior to enrollment. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the institutional review boards at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Emory University. The human experimentation guidelines of the US Department of Health and Human Services and Emory University were followed.

In this analysis, we evaluated study data collected between January 1999 and May 2003. During that period, 621 girls were enrolled. Data for girls not enrolled in the study were not available.

Data collection

A questionnaire was administered in private by trained interviewers as previously described (11). The questionnaire included questions on demographic factors, sexual and reproductive history, condom use, and drug and alcohol use.

Papanicolaou testing and HPV detection

At the time of pelvic examination, cervical cells from the endo- and ectocervix were collected using the Cytyc plastic broom collection kit and placed in 20 ml of PreservCyt cytologic fixative following the manufacturer's protocol for a routine diagnostic ThinPrep Papanicolaou smear (Cytyc Corporation, Marlborough, Massachusetts); this procedure was performed at every visit. ThinPrep Papanicolaou smears were prepared and evaluated in the hospital cytopathology laboratory. The cytologic finding, based on the Bethesda classification (12), was recorded from the resulting clinical report.

Residual PreservCyt cervical material was retrieved from the cytology laboratory. A 3-ml aliquot of resuspended cells was washed with 5 ml of Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (Gibco BRL, Gaithersburg, Maryland) and extracted with the MasterPure total nucleic acid extraction kit (Epicentre, Madison, Wisconsin) using minor modifications to the manufacturer's protocol as previously described (11). One blank tube was included for every 10 samples to monitor cross-sample contamination.

HPV detection and typing was performed using the Roche line blot assay (Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Pleasanton, California) as previously described (11). This assay uses HPV L1 consensus polymerase chain reaction with biotinylated PGMY09/11 primer sets and β-globin as an internal control for sample amplification (13, 14). Total nucleic acid from CaSki (cervical carcinoma) cells harboring HPV 16 was used as the positive control. Amplicons (10 μl) were evaluated for β-globin and HPV bands using 1.5 percent agarose gel electrophoresis stained with ethidium bromide, and those with an HPV band were hybridized to the typing strips. Samples with an HPV band that did not hybridize to the strip were sequenced for determination of HPV type as previously described (15). Samples negative for β-globin and HPV were considered inadequate for interpretation.

Specimen collection and detection of concurrent infections

Specimens were collected for detection of C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, Trichomonas vaginalis, and bacterial vaginosis at every study visit. First-catch urine specimens were collected for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoea testing for all study participants, using ligase chain reaction (LCx; Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois), polymerase chain reaction (COBAS AMPLICOR; Roche Diagnostic Systems, Branchburg, New Jersey), or strand displacement amplification (BD ProbeTec; BD Biosciences, Sparks, Maryland), according to manufacturers' instructions. Because of changing testing protocols, a cervical swab was also collected for some participants and tested for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoea with ligase chain reaction or strand displacement amplification.

In 355 visits where results of urine and cervical C. trachomatis testing were available, discrepant results were found for 12 visits (at eight visits the urine specimen only was positive; at four the cervical specimen only was positive). In 354 visits with results from urine and cervical N. gonorrhoea testing, discrepant results were found for eight visits (at seven the urine specimen only was positive; at one the cervical specimen only was positive). Any positive C. trachomatis or N. gonorrhoea test was considered a positive result.

Lateral-wall vaginal swabs were collected for T. vaginalis and bacterial vaginosis testing. T. vaginalis infection was detected through wet mount examination of vaginal fluid under microscopy and was confirmed by at least one other reader (E. H. K. or M. K. S.). For detection of bacterial vaginosis, vaginal swabs were rolled onto clean glass slides, air-dried, Gram-stained, and read (E. H. K.) using Nugent's criteria (16); a Nugent's score of 7–10 was considered evidence of bacterial vaginosis. Samples for bacterial vaginosis analysis were not collected during the first year of the study.

Study participants with C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoea, T. vaginalis, or bacterial vaginosis were treated with appropriate directly observed one-dose therapy. Cure of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoea infections was evaluated by urine testing, and no treatment failures were detected.

Data analysis

To evaluate factors associated with HPV persistence, we limited our analysis to pairs of visits where 1) HPV was detected at the initial visit of the pair, 2) HPV detection data were available for a subsequent visit, and 3) the visits were separated by at least 6 months. Any visit pair meeting these criteria was included in the analysis. More than one visit pair could be contributed by one study participant. Therefore, a study participant with three study visits separated by 6 months and detection of HPV 18 and HPV 53 at visits 1 and 2 and detection of HPV 26 at visit 2 would contribute two visit pairs (visits 1–2 and visits 2–3). A type-specific persistent outcome occurred when at least one of the HPV types detected at the initial visit of the pair was also detected at the second visit; if none of the types present at the initial visit were detected at the second visit, the outcome was considered nonpersistent (17). Therefore, the study participant described above would contribute one outcome of 6-month persistence for each of HPV 18 and HPV 53 and one nonpersistent outcome for HPV 26.

One negative test was considered a marker of clearance. Redetection of an HPV type after a single negative result (a sequence of successive tests with positive–negative–positive findings, suggesting a potential false-negative result) occurred rarely (nine times) in these data. Omission of these events did not alter the results of the analysis.

After type-specific assessment of persistence, outcomes were grouped into high-risk (types 16, 18, 26, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51–53, 55, 56, 58, 59, 66, 68, 73, 82, and 83) and low-risk (types 6, 11, 40, 42, 54, 57, and 84) HPV types, according to the association between type and oncogenicity. If persistence of any high-risk type occurred over the period of a visit pair, one episode of high-risk persistence was generated; if no high-risk infection persisted, one outcome of nonpersistent high-risk infection was generated. Therefore, the example study participant described above would contribute one outcome of high-risk persistence over visits 1–2 and one outcome of nonpersistence over visits 2–3. These criteria were also applied to detection of low-risk virus types. If both high-risk and low-risk types were detected at the initial visit of a pair, one high-risk episode and one low-risk episode were contributed. Since persistence of more than one HPV type over a given pair of visits was not uncommon, use of one outcome per risk type per visit pair is conservative. Clearance of two virus types over a single pair of visits may reflect the same immunologic event; therefore, counting this event twice may inappropriately magnify the effect seen.

Logistic regression using generalized estimating equations with an exchangeable correlation structure, a method appropriate for correlated data (18), was used to evaluate associations between type-specific high- or low-risk persistence and concurrent infections (C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoea, T. vaginalis, bacterial vaginosis, or more than one type of HPV) detected at the initial visit of the visit pair and to assess the role of potential confounders or effect modifiers (lifetime and current numbers of sex acts or sex partners, time between study visits, age, smoking, oral contraceptive use, parity, and douching) (17, 1922). Univariate analyses were used to assess two-way associations; variables significant in univariate analysis were entered into a multivariate model, and determination of significance was based on robust standard errors.

RESULTS

Study population characteristics

Study participants for whom 2–5 study visits 6 months apart had been completed (282 participants contributing 335 study visits) were evaluated. The cumulative prevalence of HPV in these participants was 78 percent (219/282). Among these 282 participants, HPV was detected at the initial visit of a visit pair in 151. This group, contributing 181 visit pairs, was our final study population. These 151 participants did not differ from the study participants not included in this analysis with regard to age, race, ethnicity, age at first sex, number of sex partners, or C. trachomatis prevalence at baseline.

Behavioral and demographic characteristics of this population are presented in table 1. The majority of the analyzed participants were African-American and in high school, with a median age at first sex of 14 years. The prevalence of all sexually transmitted infections evaluated in this population was high. Concurrent infection with more than one of these sexually transmitted agents was not uncommon; infection with both C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoea or C. trachomatis and T. vaginalis was detected in 26 (17 percent) of the 151 study participants contributing analyzable visits.

TABLE 1.

Demographic and behavioral characteristics of female adolescent study participants (n = 151) from a primary care clinic in whom human papillomavirus was detected at the initial visit of a visit pair, Atlanta, Georgia, 1999–2003


Characteristic

No.

%
Median age (years)16 (13–19)*
Race/ethnicity
    African-American14395
    Other75
    No information10
Attending secondary school
    Yes11375
    No2114
    No information1711
Median age (years) at first sex14 (11–17)
Median lifetime no. of sex partners at baseline
3 (1–150)


Characteristic

No.

%
Median age (years)16 (13–19)*
Race/ethnicity
    African-American14395
    Other75
    No information10
Attending secondary school
    Yes11375
    No2114
    No information1711
Median age (years) at first sex14 (11–17)
Median lifetime no. of sex partners at baseline
3 (1–150)

*

Numbers in parentheses, range.

TABLE 1.

Demographic and behavioral characteristics of female adolescent study participants (n = 151) from a primary care clinic in whom human papillomavirus was detected at the initial visit of a visit pair, Atlanta, Georgia, 1999–2003


Characteristic

No.

%
Median age (years)16 (13–19)*
Race/ethnicity
    African-American14395
    Other75
    No information10
Attending secondary school
    Yes11375
    No2114
    No information1711
Median age (years) at first sex14 (11–17)
Median lifetime no. of sex partners at baseline
3 (1–150)


Characteristic

No.

%
Median age (years)16 (13–19)*
Race/ethnicity
    African-American14395
    Other75
    No information10
Attending secondary school
    Yes11375
    No2114
    No information1711
Median age (years) at first sex14 (11–17)
Median lifetime no. of sex partners at baseline
3 (1–150)

*

Numbers in parentheses, range.

HPV persistence

Data on the persistence of HPV by type are presented in table 2. Some study participants were infected with more than one type of HPV. Therefore, summation of persistence by HPV type (as shown in table 2) generates a larger number of outcomes than the persistence analysis reported in the text, which grouped high-risk types and used only one outcome per visit pair.

TABLE 2.

Six-month persistence of human papillomavirus (HPV) by HPV type among analyzed visit pairs contributed by female adolescent study participants, Atlanta, Georgia, 1999–2003*


HPV type

No. of participants

Type-specific persistence
No.
%
Low-risk type
    HPV623313
    HPV113133
    HPV40900
    HPV421119
    HPV5413431
    HPV57100
    HPV8423522
    Any low-risk type711317
High-risk type
    HPV16451738
    HPV1820630
    HPV264125
    HPV3111445
    HVP33500
    HPV3522941
    HPV3917424
    HPV4514643
    HPV5119211
    HPV5223835
    HPV5315427
    HPV55800
    HPV5611546
    HPV58241042
    HPV5928518
    HPV6624938
    HPV6821733
    HPV7314429
    HPV82900
    HPV8310440
    Any high-risk type
181
77
43

HPV type

No. of participants

Type-specific persistence
No.
%
Low-risk type
    HPV623313
    HPV113133
    HPV40900
    HPV421119
    HPV5413431
    HPV57100
    HPV8423522
    Any low-risk type711317
High-risk type
    HPV16451738
    HPV1820630
    HPV264125
    HPV3111445
    HVP33500
    HPV3522941
    HPV3917424
    HPV4514643
    HPV5119211
    HPV5223835
    HPV5315427
    HPV55800
    HPV5611546
    HPV58241042
    HPV5928518
    HPV6624938
    HPV6821733
    HPV7314429
    HPV82900
    HPV8310440
    Any high-risk type
181
77
43
*

Because more than one type of HPV may have been present at a given visit, summation by HPV type will not equal the totals given for “Any low-/high-risk type.”

TABLE 2.

Six-month persistence of human papillomavirus (HPV) by HPV type among analyzed visit pairs contributed by female adolescent study participants, Atlanta, Georgia, 1999–2003*


HPV type

No. of participants

Type-specific persistence
No.
%
Low-risk type
    HPV623313
    HPV113133
    HPV40900
    HPV421119
    HPV5413431
    HPV57100
    HPV8423522
    Any low-risk type711317
High-risk type
    HPV16451738
    HPV1820630
    HPV264125
    HPV3111445
    HVP33500
    HPV3522941
    HPV3917424
    HPV4514643
    HPV5119211
    HPV5223835
    HPV5315427
    HPV55800
    HPV5611546
    HPV58241042
    HPV5928518
    HPV6624938
    HPV6821733
    HPV7314429
    HPV82900
    HPV8310440
    Any high-risk type
181
77
43

HPV type

No. of participants

Type-specific persistence
No.
%
Low-risk type
    HPV623313
    HPV113133
    HPV40900
    HPV421119
    HPV5413431
    HPV57100
    HPV8423522
    Any low-risk type711317
High-risk type
    HPV16451738
    HPV1820630
    HPV264125
    HPV3111445
    HVP33500
    HPV3522941
    HPV3917424
    HPV4514643
    HPV5119211
    HPV5223835
    HPV5315427
    HPV55800
    HPV5611546
    HPV58241042
    HPV5928518
    HPV6624938
    HPV6821733
    HPV7314429
    HPV82900
    HPV8310440
    Any high-risk type
181
77
43
*

Because more than one type of HPV may have been present at a given visit, summation by HPV type will not equal the totals given for “Any low-/high-risk type.”

A larger proportion of high-risk infections persisted than low-risk infections. Of 181 visit pairs with a high-risk HPV type detected at the first visit of the pair, the same high-risk type was detected at the second visit of the pair in 77 (43 percent). Of 71 visit pairs with a low-risk virus type detected at the first visit, the same virus type was detected at the second visit in 13 (17 percent).

We evaluated whether HPV persistence was associated with abnormal cytologic findings, as has been reported for other populations (10, 23). Persistence was associated with detection of low- or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (p < 0.01); 19 (59 percent) of 32 low- or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions identified were detected at a visit at which high-risk HPV persistence was also detected (i.e., the second visit of a visit pair). Only four of these lesions were high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

Risk factor analysis

Data on the detection and persistence of high- and low-risk HPV types and the proportions of participants coinfected with C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoea, T. vaginalis, bacterial vaginosis, or another HPV type at the initial visit of the visit pair are shown in table 3. A higher proportion of high-risk HPV types persisted if any evaluated sexually transmitted infection was present at the initial visit of the pair; for example, among high-risk infections at visits with concurrent C. trachomatis infection, 53 percent persisted, while 39 percent of infections at visits with no concurrent C. trachomatis infection persisted. This pattern was not seen for low-risk HPV types.

TABLE 3.

Detection and persistence of high- and low-risk types of human papillomavirus (HPV) and proportions of participants with concurrent infection among analyzed visit pairs contributed by female adolescent study participants, Atlanta, Georgia, 1999–2003


Concurrent infection at first visit of visit pair

High-risk HPV type

Low-risk HPV type
No. of infections detected
Persistent infections
No. of infections detected
Persistent infections
No.
%
No.
%
Chlamydia trachomatis
    Present47255318422
    Absent134513953917
Neisseria gonorrhoeae*
    Present2311481318
    Absent1586642571119
Trichomonas vaginalis
    Present13754500
    Absent1687042661320
Bacterial vaginosis
    Present53244523522
    Absent62233723522
    Not tested66304625312
More than one type of HPV
    Present88485536822
    Absent93293135514
Total
181
77
43
71
13
18

Concurrent infection at first visit of visit pair

High-risk HPV type

Low-risk HPV type
No. of infections detected
Persistent infections
No. of infections detected
Persistent infections
No.
%
No.
%
Chlamydia trachomatis
    Present47255318422
    Absent134513953917
Neisseria gonorrhoeae*
    Present2311481318
    Absent1586642571119
Trichomonas vaginalis
    Present13754500
    Absent1687042661320
Bacterial vaginosis
    Present53244523522
    Absent62233723522
    Not tested66304625312
More than one type of HPV
    Present88485536822
    Absent93293135514
Total
181
77
43
71
13
18
*

For analysis of visit pairs with low-risk HPV infection, the total number of infections detected was 70.

TABLE 3.

Detection and persistence of high- and low-risk types of human papillomavirus (HPV) and proportions of participants with concurrent infection among analyzed visit pairs contributed by female adolescent study participants, Atlanta, Georgia, 1999–2003


Concurrent infection at first visit of visit pair

High-risk HPV type

Low-risk HPV type
No. of infections detected
Persistent infections
No. of infections detected
Persistent infections
No.
%
No.
%
Chlamydia trachomatis
    Present47255318422
    Absent134513953917
Neisseria gonorrhoeae*
    Present2311481318
    Absent1586642571119
Trichomonas vaginalis
    Present13754500
    Absent1687042661320
Bacterial vaginosis
    Present53244523522
    Absent62233723522
    Not tested66304625312
More than one type of HPV
    Present88485536822
    Absent93293135514
Total
181
77
43
71
13
18

Concurrent infection at first visit of visit pair

High-risk HPV type

Low-risk HPV type
No. of infections detected
Persistent infections
No. of infections detected
Persistent infections
No.
%
No.
%
Chlamydia trachomatis
    Present47255318422
    Absent134513953917
Neisseria gonorrhoeae*
    Present2311481318
    Absent1586642571119
Trichomonas vaginalis
    Present13754500
    Absent1687042661320
Bacterial vaginosis
    Present53244523522
    Absent62233723522
    Not tested66304625312
More than one type of HPV
    Present88485536822
    Absent93293135514
Total
181
77
43
71
13
18
*

For analysis of visit pairs with low-risk HPV infection, the total number of infections detected was 70.

To evaluate associations between concurrent infections detected at the initial visit and persistence of HPV to the following visit, we performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses appropriate for correlated data. No significant associations were found with persistence of low-risk infections (data not shown). Table 4 shows univariate and multivariate associations between high-risk HPV persistence and concurrent infections. In univariate analysis, concurrent infection with C. trachomatis (odds ratio (OR) = 1.9, 95 percent confidence interval (CI): 1.0, 3.6) or another HPV type (OR = 2.6, 95 percent CI: 1.5, 4.9) at the initial visit was associated with persistence of high-risk HPV infections to the following visit. No other concurrent infections of interest were significantly associated with persistence, nor was detection of C. trachomatis at the second visit of the visit pair (27 of 181 visit pairs; 15 percent). In a multivariate model, concurrent infection with C. trachomatis and concurrent infection with another type of HPV were each independently associated with persistence of a high-risk infection (for C. trachomatis, OR = 2.1, 95 percent CI: 1.0, 4.1; for more than one HPV type, OR = 2.8, 95 percent CI: 1.6, 4.9). No interaction was detected. Neither concurrent infection with C. trachomatis nor concurrent infection with another HPV type was associated with detection of low- or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

TABLE 4.

Association between concurrent infection and persistence of high-risk types of human papillomavirus (HPV) among analyzed visit pairs (n = 181) contributed by female adolescent study participants, Atlanta, Georgia, 1999–2003


Concurrent infection detected

Univariate OR*

Multivariate OR
OR
95% CI*
Adjusted OR
95% CI
Chlamydia trachomatis1.91.0, 3.62.11.0, 4.1
Neisseria gonorrhoeae1.40.6, 3.3
Trichomonas vaginalis1.50.5, 5.0
Bacterial vaginosis1.30.6, 2.7
More than one type of HPV
2.6
1.5, 4.9
2.8
1.6, 4.9

Concurrent infection detected

Univariate OR*

Multivariate OR
OR
95% CI*
Adjusted OR
95% CI
Chlamydia trachomatis1.91.0, 3.62.11.0, 4.1
Neisseria gonorrhoeae1.40.6, 3.3
Trichomonas vaginalis1.50.5, 5.0
Bacterial vaginosis1.30.6, 2.7
More than one type of HPV
2.6
1.5, 4.9
2.8
1.6, 4.9
*

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

TABLE 4.

Association between concurrent infection and persistence of high-risk types of human papillomavirus (HPV) among analyzed visit pairs (n = 181) contributed by female adolescent study participants, Atlanta, Georgia, 1999–2003


Concurrent infection detected

Univariate OR*

Multivariate OR
OR
95% CI*
Adjusted OR
95% CI
Chlamydia trachomatis1.91.0, 3.62.11.0, 4.1
Neisseria gonorrhoeae1.40.6, 3.3
Trichomonas vaginalis1.50.5, 5.0
Bacterial vaginosis1.30.6, 2.7
More than one type of HPV
2.6
1.5, 4.9
2.8
1.6, 4.9

Concurrent infection detected

Univariate OR*

Multivariate OR
OR
95% CI*
Adjusted OR
95% CI
Chlamydia trachomatis1.91.0, 3.62.11.0, 4.1
Neisseria gonorrhoeae1.40.6, 3.3
Trichomonas vaginalis1.50.5, 5.0
Bacterial vaginosis1.30.6, 2.7
More than one type of HPV
2.6
1.5, 4.9
2.8
1.6, 4.9
*

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

To evaluate whether detection of the same HPV type at two sequential study visits reflected reinfection, we assessed whether there was an association between the number of sex partners or the number of sex acts reported in the 90 days prior to the second visit of the pair and HPV persistence. No association was detected between these factors and persistence. High lifetime numbers of sex partners reflect risky sexual behavior and are associated with high HPV infection rates (22). We evaluated associations between the number of lifetime sex partners and persistence; again, no association was found. Finally, to evaluate whether the amount of time between study visits affected detection of persistence, we evaluated whether the number of days between study visits was associated with detection of persistence; no association was found.

Age, smoking (ever smoking; reported at baseline), oral contraceptive use (90 days prior to the second visit of the pair), parity (ever giving birth; reported at baseline), and douching (90 days prior to the second visit of the pair) may affect cervical and vaginal tissue and/or may have been associated with persistence in other studies. We evaluated associations between these variables and HPV persistence. No association was detected with any of these variables in univariate or multivariate analysis, except smoking. Although smoking was significantly associated with high-risk HPV persistence in univariate analysis, when it was entered into multivariate analysis including concurrent infection with C. trachomatis and another HPV type, this variable was not significant, and odds ratios for C. trachomatis and more than one HPV type were not altered.

To validate our conclusions, we reran the regression analyses with unstructured and autoregressive correlation structures. The same factors were found to be significant and nonsignificant using these correlation structures.

DISCUSSION

Several studies have demonstrated an association between infection with C. trachomatis and cervical cancer independent of HPV status (1, 24, 25); associations between other sexually transmitted infections and cervical cancer have also been reported (24, 2628). We investigated associations between concurrent infection with other sexually transmitted agents and HPV persistence among adolescent girls infected with HPV. In this population, high-risk HPV infections evaluated over 6 months persisted in 43 percent of visit pairs. Persistence was associated with concurrent infection with C. trachomatis and concurrent infection with other types of HPV but was not associated with concurrent infection with T. vaginalis, N. gonorrhoea, or bacterial vaginosis.

The finding that concurrent infection with C. trachomatis is associated with HPV persistence accords with studies demonstrating an association between serologic evidence of exposure to C. trachomatis and cervical cancer (1, 7, 24). Our findings suggest a mechanism by which concurrent C. trachomatis infection may be associated with the development of cervical cancer, since persistence of HPV is the strongest risk factor for the development of cervical cancer (23, 24, 29).

Analyses of the association between C. trachomatis and cervical cancer have evaluated women many years after initiation of sexual activity. In this paper, we report an association between C. trachomatis and HPV persistence in a relatively young population with a median of 2.6 years since first sex (range, 0.1–5.7 years), which suggests that long-term infection with C. trachomatis is not necessary to detect an association between C. trachomatis and HPV persistence. Thus, C. trachomatis may influence the natural history of HPV infection soon after infection by affecting persistence. In a population in which C. trachomatis was associated with cervical cancer, C. trachomatis DNA was detected in Papanicolaou smears performed many years before cancer diagnosis but not in Papanicolaou smears performed close in time to the cancer diagnosis (25, 30); this supports the idea that concurrent infection with C. trachomatis may affect HPV early in the course of HPV infection.

Other studies have evaluated factors associated with HPV persistence. The only other sexually transmitted agent associated with HPV persistence is human immunodeficiency virus (31, 32). While human immunodeficiency virus infection may have local as well as systemic effects on HPV persistence, the effect of C. trachomatis infection is likely to be localized at the cervix.

The association between C. trachomatis infection and persistence may reflect host or infectious agent-derived factors. Detection of an association between high-risk HPV persistence and concurrent C. trachomatis infection but not N. gonorrhoea or T. vaginalis infection suggests that the association is due to factors specific to C. trachomatis infection; however, the small number of concurrent infections with N. gonorrhoea and T. vaginalis may have limited our ability to detect an association with HPV persistence.

C. trachomatis infection may increase susceptibility to HPV on a cellular level by increasing access to the basal epithelium due to microabrasions or by altering characteristics of epithelial cells, increasing the viral load of the infection and facilitating persistence. Alternatively, concurrent infection with C. trachomatis may impede clearance of HPV by inducing a shift in the immune response to the HPV infection. Cellular (T-helper cell type 1) immune responses have been shown to be important in the clearance of HPV lesions (33). Unresolved C. trachomatis infection has been associated with a humoral (T-helper cell type 2) immune response (34, 35), and inflammatory infiltrates seen in C. trachomatis infection are characterized by a high proportion of plasma cells, in contrast to the histopathology of gonorrhea infection, wherein a lower proportion of the inflammatory infiltrate is composed of plasma cells (36). Therefore, modulation of the cervical immune response toward a T-helper cell type 2 response may be a C. trachomatis-specific effect which increases persistence of HPV. Evaluations of the immunologic milieu surrounding the cervices of coinfected women as compared with women infected with HPV only would test this hypothesis. It is possible that concurrent infection with other sexually transmitted agents may exacerbate the effect of C. trachomatis on HPV persistence; further evaluation of concurrent infection with more than one sexually transmitted agent would also be valuable.

The effect of infection with multiple HPV types on persistence may be due to an increased viral load, which has been associated with persistence (8, 37), or it may reflect host susceptibility to both infection and persistence. The importance of host factors in susceptibility to infection with multiple HPV types is underscored by the observation that infection with multiple HPV types occurred more commonly than would be expected if independence of acquisition of the different types was assumed, in an analysis controlling for sexual behavior (38). However, this study did not control for sex partner's age, which was a predictor of baseline HPV infection in our study population (11). Two studies have reported no association between persistence and infection with multiple HPV types (39, 40), while one other study has reported this association (17). Further evaluation of this issue is needed, particularly because a vaccine for HPV may alter the population of infecting types for vaccinated populations and thereby alter the frequency of infection with multiple types.

Our study had several limitations. We do not know whether these results are generalizable to a population with lower rates of C. trachomatis and HPV infection. The relatively short follow-up time limited our ability to evaluate persistence of longer than 6 months. HPV persistence has been evaluated at 4, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months and as being present at two sequential or nonsequential visits, irrespective of the intervening time. Several studies have evaluated 6-month persistence (8, 10, 17, 39), making this measurement useful for comparing results. Cervical cancer develops over a longer period of time, making evaluation of long-term persistence important to confirm the role of C. trachomatis in progression to cancer.

Many of the HPV infections we evaluated were initially detected at the baseline visit, making any analysis of incidence impossible and limiting our ability to draw conclusions about duration of infection. In the situation of infection with more than one type of HPV, it is possible that the times of infection differed and one or more of the infections was recently incident. Therefore, persistence of more than 6 months may reflect differing lengths of persistence. Detection of one HPV type at two sequential visits cannot distinguish between persistent infection and reinfection—a limitation shared by all studies of this type. However, lack of a detectable association between the number of sex partners or sex acts and persistence suggests that we detected persistence rather than reinfection. Relatively low numbers of study participants with persistent low-risk HPV infection were expected; this made evaluation of associations with persistence of low-risk types difficult, and the fact that no associations were seen may have been due to sample size as well as biologic differences between high- and low-risk types. The use of more than one C. trachomatis or N. gonorrhoea test in a subset of our study samples could have created a bias toward detecting these infections at visits with multiple tests; however, because the number of discrepant results between tests was very low, it is likely that any bias introduced was minimal. The test we used to detect T. vaginalis, the wet mount technique, is relatively insensitive, and this may have resulted in an inability to detect an association between T. vaginalis infection and HPV persistence. Finally, the limited age range in our study made assessment of the effect of age difficult, and we were not able to assess the role of nutritional factors or another coinfection associated with cervical cancer, herpes simplex virus type 2.

Our results demonstrate an association between infection with C. trachomatis and outcomes of HPV infection in adolescents with risky sexual behaviors. C. trachomatis screening is recommended for all sexually active adolescents. C. trachomatis screening coverage among adolescents is estimated to be as low as 27 percent in some states, and the median estimated C. trachomatis screening coverage for all states is 60 percent (41). C. trachomatis infection is a common sexually transmitted disease with outcomes that include infertility, and concurrent C. trachomatis infection may influence HPV outcomes; therefore, efforts need to be made to improve C. trachomatis screening coverage.

These results suggest that concurrent infections can affect the host's ability to resolve HPV infection, and as such they emphasize the value of screening and treatment for sexually transmitted infections. This study further demonstrates an effect of concurrent infection with HPV and C. trachomatis, supporting a possible role for C. trachomatis infection in the development of cervical cancer.

This study was supported by funds from the Division of Sexually Transmitted Disease Prevention/National Center for Infectious Diseases Emerging Infections Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, Georgia).

The authors gratefully acknowledge the participation of the study coordinators and interviewers. They also acknowledge Jason Dover, Angelica Wendt, Carol Farshy, Ruth Ann Tucker, and Juanita Onyekwuluje for laboratory support and Billy Litchfield for administrative support. Finally, the authors thank the Cytyc Corporation (Marlborough, Massachusetts) for the gift of ThinPrep supplies and Roche Molecular Systems (Pleasanton, California) for provision of Roche line blot materials.

These data were presented at the 53rd annual conference of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Epidemic Intelligence Service, Atlanta, Georgia, April 19–23, 2004.

Partial program and salary support were provided to M. K. S. by the Cytyc Corporation.

References

1.

Anttila T, Saikku P, Koskela P, et al. Serotypes of Chlamydia trachomatis and risk for development of cervical squamous cell carcinoma.

JAMA
2001
;
285
:
47
–51.

2.

Koutsky LA, Holmes KK, Critchlow CW, et al. A cohort study of the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 in relation to papillomavirus infection.

N Engl J Med
1992
;
327
:
1272
–8.

3.

Platz-Christensen JJ, Sundstrom E, Larsson PG. Bacterial vaginosis and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
1994
;
73
:
586
–8.

4.

Smith JS, Herrero R, Bosetti C, et al. Herpes simplex virus-2 as a human papillomavirus cofactor in the etiology of invasive cervical cancer.

J Natl Cancer Inst
2002
;
94
:
1604
–13.

5.

Viikki M, Pukkala E, Nieminen P, et al. Gynaecological infections as risk determinants of subsequent cervical neoplasia.

Acta Oncol
2000
;
39
:
71
–5.

6.

Paavonen J, Karunakaran KP, Noguchi Y, et al. Serum antibody response to the heat shock protein 60 of Chlamydia trachomatis in women with developing cervical cancer.

Am J Obstet Gynecol
2004
;
189
:
1287
–92.

7.

Wallin K-L, Wiklund F, Luostarinen T, et al. A population-based prospective study of Chlamydia trachomatis infection and cervical carcinoma.

Int J Cancer
2002
;
101
:
371
–4.

8.

Dalstein V, Riethmuller D, Pretet J-L, et al. Persistence and load of high-risk HPV are predictors for development of high-grade cervical lesions: a longitudinal French cohort study.

Int J Cancer
2003
;
106
:
396
–403.

9.

Kjaer SK, van den Brule AJC, Paull G, et al. Type specific persistence of high risk human papillomavirus (HPV) as indicator of high grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions in young women: population based prospective follow up study.

BMJ
2002
;
325
:
572
–9.

10.

Kotloff K, Wasserman SS, Russ K, et al. Detection of genital human papillomavirus and associated cytological abnormalities among college women.

Sex Transm Dis
1998
;
25
:
243
–50.

11.

Tarkowski TA, Koumans EH, Sawyer M, et al. Epidemiology of human papillomavirus infection and abnormal cytologic test results in an urban adolescent population.

J Infect Dis
2004
;
189
:
46
–50.

12.

Tabbara S, Saleh AD, Andersen WA, et al. The Bethesda classification for squamous intraepithelial lesions: histologic, cytologic, and viral correlates.

Obstet Gynecol
1992
;
79
:
338
–46.

13.

Gravitt PE, Peyton CL, Apple RJ, et al. Genotyping of 27 human papillomavirus types by using L1 consensus PCR products by a single-hybridization, reverse line blot detection method.

J Clin Microbiol
1998
;
36
:
3020
–7.

14.

Gravitt PE, Peyton CL, Alessi TQ, et al. Improved amplification of genital human papillomaviruses.

J Clin Microbiol
2000
;
38
:
357
–61.

15.

Vernon SD, Unger ER, Williams D. Comparison of human papillomavirus detection and typing by cycle sequencing, line blotting, and hybrid capture.

J Clin Microbiol
2000
;
38
:
651
–5.

16.

Gratacos E, Figueras F, Barranco M, et al. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and correlation of clinical to Gram stain diagnostic criteria in low risk pregnant women.

Eur J Epidemiol
1999
;
15
:
913
–16.

17.

Ho GYF, Bierman R, Beardsley L, et al. Natural history of cervicovaginal papillomavirus infection in young women.

N Engl J Med
1998
;
338
:
423
–8.

18.

Zeger SL, Liang KY. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes.

Biometrics
1986
;
42
:
121
–30.

19.

Burk RD, Kelly P, Feldman J, et al. Declining prevalence of cervicovaginal human papillomavirus infection with age is independent of other risk factors.

Sex Transm Dis
1996
;
23
:
333
–41.

20.

Kahn JA, Rosenthal SL, Succop PA, et al. Mediators of the association between age of first sexual intercourse and subsequent human papillomavirus infection.

Pediatrics
2002
;
109
:
e5
. (Electronic article).

21.

Moscicki A-B, Winkler B, Irwin CE, et al. Differences in biologic maturation, sexual behavior, and sexually transmitted disease between adolescents with and without cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

J Pediatr
1989
;
115
:
487
–93.

22.

Moscicki A-B, Hills N, Shiboski S, et al. Risks for incident human papillomavirus infection and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion development in young females.

JAMA
2001
;
285
:
2995
–3002.

23.

Ho GYF, Burk RD, Klein S, et al. Persistent genital human papillomavirus infection as a risk factor for persistent cervical dysplasia.

J Natl Cancer Inst
1995
;
87
:
1345
–71.

24.

Smith JS, Munoz N, Herrero R, et al. Evidence for Chlamydia trachomatis as a human papillomavirus cofactor in the etiology of invasive cervical cancer in Brazil and the Philippines.

J Infect Dis
2002
;
185
:
324
–31.

25.

Wallin K-L, Wiklund F, Luostarinen T, et al. A population-based prospective study of Chlamydia trachomatis infection and cervical carcinoma.

Int J Cancer
2002
;
101
:
371
–4.

26.

Johansen C, Mellemkjaer L, Frisch M, et al. Risk for anogenital cancer and other cancer among women hospitalized with gonorrhea.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
2001
;
80
:
757
–61.

27.

Olsen AO, Orstavik I, Dillner J, et al. Herpes simplex virus and human papillomavirus in a population-based case-control study of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade II–III.

APMIS
1998
;
106
:
417
–24.

28.

Thomas DB, Qin Q, Kuypers J, et al. Risk factors for in situ and invasive squamous cell cervical carcinomas.

Am J Epidemiol
2001
;
153
:
732
–9.

29.

Giuliano AR, Siegel EM, Roe DJ, et al. Dietary intake and risk of persistent human papillomavirus infection: The Ludwig-McGill HPV Natural History Study.

J Infect Dis
2003
;
188
:
1508
–16.

30.

Koskela P, Anttila T, Bjorge T, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis infection as a risk factor for invasive cervical cancer.

Int J Cancer
2000
;
85
:
35
–9.

31.

Ahdieh L, Klein RS, Burk RD, et al. Prevalence, incidence, and type-specific persistence of human papillomavirus in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive and HIV-negative women.

J Infect Dis
2001
;
184
:
682
–90.

32.

Moscicki A-B, Ellenberg JH, Farhat S, et al. Persistence of human papillomavirus infection in HIV-infected and -uninfected adolescent girls: risk factors and differences, by phylogenetic type.

J Infect Dis
2004
;
190
:
37
–45.

33.

Stern PL, Brown M, Stacey SN, et al. Natural HPV immunity and vaccination strategies.

J Clin Virol
2000
;
19
:
57
–66.

34.

Debattista J, Timms P, Allan J, et al. Immunogenesis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women.

Fertil Steril
2003
;
79
:
1273
–87.

35.

Stephens RS. The cellular paradigm of chlamydial pathogenesis.

Trends Microbiol
2003
;
11
:
44
–51.

36.

Kiviat NB, Paavonen J, Wolner-Hanssen P, et al. Histopathology of endocervical infection caused by Chlamydia trachomatis, herpes simplex virus, Trichomonas vaginalis, and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Hum Pathol
1990
;
21
:
831
–7.

37.

van Duin M, Snijders PJF, Schrijnemakers HFJ, et al. Human papillomavirus 16 load in normal and abnormal cervical scrapes: an indicator of CIN II/III and viral clearance.

Int J Cancer
2002
;
98
:
590
–5.

38.

Thomas KK, Hughes JP, Kuypers JM, et al. Concurrent and sequential acquisition of different genital human papillomavirus types.

J Infect Dis
2000
;
182
:
1097
–102.

39.

Molano M, van den Brule AJC, Plummer M, et al. Determinants of clearance of human papillomavirus infections in Colombian women with normal cytology: a population-based, 5-year follow-up study.

Am J Epidemiol
2003
;
158
:
486
–94.

40.

Rousseau M-C, Pereira JS, Prado JCM, et al. Cervical coinfection with human papillomavirus (HPV) types as a predictor of acquisition and persistence of HPV infection.

J Infect Dis
2001
;
184
:
1508
–17.

41.

Levine WC, Dicker LW, Devine O, et al. Indirect estimation of Chlamydia screening coverage using public health surveillance data.

Am J Epidemiol
2004
;
160
:
91
–6.