- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Christie M. Sayes, Rajeev Wahi, Preetha A. Kurian, Yunping Liu, Jennifer L. West, Kevin D. Ausman, David B. Warheit, Vicki L. Colvin, Correlating Nanoscale Titania Structure with Toxicity: A Cytotoxicity and Inflammatory Response Study with Human Dermal Fibroblasts and Human Lung Epithelial Cells, Toxicological Sciences, Volume 92, Issue 1, July 2006, Pages 174–185, https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfj197
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
Nanocrystalline titanium dioxide (nano-TiO2) is an important material used in commerce today. When designed appropriately it can generate reactive species (RS) quite efficiently, particularly under ultraviolet (UV) illumination; this feature is exploited in applications ranging from self-cleaning glass to low-cost solar cells. In this study, we characterize the toxicity of this important class of nanomaterials under ambient (e.g., no significant light illumination) conditions in cell culture. Only at relatively high concentrations (100 μg/ml) of nanoscale titania did we observe cytotoxicity and inflammation; these cellular responses exhibited classic dose-response behavior, and the effects increased with time of exposure. The extent to which nanoscale titania affected cellular behavior was not dependent on sample surface area in this study; smaller nanoparticlulate materials had effects comparable to larger nanoparticle materials. What did correlate strongly to cytotoxicity, however, was the phase composition of the nanoscale titania. Anatase TiO2, for example, was 100 times more toxic than an equivalent sample of rutile TiO2. The most cytotoxic nanoparticle samples were also the most effective at generating reactive oxygen species; ex vivo RS species generation under UV illumination correlated well with the observed biological response. These data suggest that nano-TiO2 samples optimized for RS production in photocatalysis are also more likely to generate damaging RS species in cell culture. The result highlights the important role that ex vivo measures of RS production can play in developing screens for cytotoxicity.
The objective of this study is to establish how the chemical properties of titania nanocrystals correlate to their in vitro toxicological effects. Nanoparticles offer a particularly interesting system for establishing such correlations; some of their properties are smoothly varying with both particle size and shape, and modern synthetic methods can produce highly monodisperse particles of well-defined phase composition (Katari et al., 1994; Murray et al., 1993; Trentler et al., 1999; Yu et al., 2004). These highly uniform samples have been crucial to the identification of size tunable properties in nanoscale systems, and this knowledge has in turn driven applications of nanoparticles in technologies as diverse as cancer phototherapy and self-cleaning glass (Alivisatos, 1996; Chang et al., 2005; Colvin, 2003; Hirsch et al., 2003; Parkin and Palgrave, 2005; Martin, 1994; Murray et al., 1993). This high level of material control now also enables the detailed examination of how the size, shape, and phase-dependent properties of nanoparticles affect biological systems (Colvin, 2003; Fortner et al., 2005; Vogler, 1998). An understanding of these relationships will permit nanoscale scientists and engineers to create environmentally friendly and biologically relevant nanomaterials. In addition, if chemical properties can be established as a strong predictor for toxicological behavior, then ex vivo tests become powerful initial screens for the design of low-toxicity nanomaterials.
In this study, we exploit state-of-the-art methods in nanochemistry to generate a set of nanocrystalline titanium dioxide (nano-TiO2) samples of controlled phase composition and rely on in vitro cytotoxicity assays to compare their biological effects. The production of nanocrystalline titania in liquid phase reactions has been of great interest over the past decade (Chemseddine and Mortiz, 1999; Trentler et al., 1999). In this work, we use hydrothermal methods to generate nano-TiO2 samples of varying phase composition. Surface coatings were intentionally eliminated in these experiments not only because of our focus on phase composition and but also because of the widespread use of uncoated materials in commerce (http://azonano.com/). As a result, the nanoparticles exist in soft aggregates (a porous aggregate with high moisture absorption) in biological media. The biological effects are examined using in vitro studies in two human cell lines. Cytotoxicity screens are emerging as simple and cost-effective ways to evaluate the toxicity of these complex systems and are well suited to comparative toxicological studies of different nanoparticle systems (Kirchner et al., 2005; Oberdorster et al., 2005; Sayes et al., 2004, 2005). In this work, we use such comparisons to further develop for the structure-function relationships for engineered nanotitania toxicology (Cai et al., 1992; Gurr et al., 2005; Uchino et al., 2002).
We chose nano-TiO2 for this work not only because it is already an important commercial material but also because there is extensive knowledge about how its chemical properties depend on nanoparticle phase and size (Li et al., 2001; Paul and Moulik, 1997; Tadros, 1993). Anatase TiO2 with dimensions under 100 nm is a high refractive index material with low scattering and strong absorption of ultraviolet (UV) radiation (Davis, 1992; Hashimoto et al., 2000; Serpone et al., 2001). This material is currently used in products such as sunscreens (Serpone et al., 2001) and coatings for self-cleaning windows (Parkin and Palgrave, 2005). TiO2, in its larger micron-scale form, is generally inert; however, nano-TiO2 particles under illumination are strong oxidizing agents capable of reacting with a wide range of organic and biological molecules (Serpone et al., 2001). Their reactivity is generally ascribed to the dissociative adsorption of water to titania surfaces; under illumination, highly reactive carriers trap onto nanotitania surfaces and facilitate the transformation of chemisorbed water into OH•. This process can be leveraged in photocatalysis where nanotitania materials are used to remove organic compounds in water (Hurum et al., 2003, 2005; Parkin and Palgrave, 2005; Rajeshwar et al., 2001; Serpone and Emeline, 2005; Zhang and Banfield, 1999). Interest in the use of titania in photocatalysis has driven extensive work on optimization of nanotitania samples for reactive species (RS) generation; phase composition, even more than nanoparticle size, has emerged as the key material parameter (Ding et al., 2000; Linsebigler et al., 1995; Ohtani and Nishimoto, 1993). This prior literature informed our choice of samples for these experiments. Our nanotitania samples have different phase composition and as expected quite different (inactive, intermediate, and high) photoactivity.
Interestingly, TiO2 particles have also long been of interest in particle toxicology, where they have largely served as a negative control material in pulmonary studies; however, some systematic evaluations of how particle structure influences biological response have been reported. Several studies found that ultrafine particles of titania are more toxic than equivalent larger fine particles of the same chemical (e.g., TiO2) composition (Donaldson et al., 1998; Gilmour et al., 1997; Oberdorster, 1996; Oberdorster et al., 1992, 1995). However, titania can exist as several different phases (anatase, rutile, and brookite) and control over this phase in nanoparticle systems is challenging. When produced with grain sizes under ∼ 10 nm, titania is generally in the more photoactive anatase form, while larger nanocrystalline titania can be generated as either pure anatase or rutile, or a particularly photoactive mixture of the two (Agrawal et al., 1998; Navrotsky et al., 1967; Zhang and Banfield, 1999). Studies of size-dependent effects in nanoscale titania are thus intrinsically confounded with changes in sample structure and photoactivity. For these reasons, we focus here on the phase composition of nanoscale titania as the primary variable. We hypothesize that this parameter will have the greatest effect on toxicity because it is so strongly correlated with chemical reactivity. Future studies will evaluate what effect, if any, grain size has on the toxicity of nanotitania of constant phase composition.
The studies presented in this manuscript focus specifically on nano-TiO2 spherical nanoparticles of ∼ 3–10 nm diameter (specific surface area [SSA] = 110–155 m2/g). The high degree of material control afforded by these materials makes it possible to correlate the photocatalytic and in vitro toxicological behavior and relate both back to the basic phase composition of nano-TiO2 particles. We evaluated the photocatalytic properties of various nano-TiO2 particles (anatase, anatase/rutile, and rutile) and compared these properties with biological endpoints such as cytotoxicity and inflammatory indices of human dermal fibroblasts (HDF) and immortalized human lung epithelial cells (A549). Biological endpoints including lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release, metabolic activity, and production of inflammation mediators were all evaluated in exposed cells. We found that more photoactive titania materials exhibited more substantial toxicological effects on cells. Both of these results are correlated to the ability for nanotitania to generate RS species, and we confirmed this using ex vivo chemiluminescence studies and the degradation of an azo dye. This paper not only shows the photochemical and cytotoxicological differences in the anatase and rutile phases of TiO2 nanoparticles, but also demonstrates that for these systems ex vivo methods for detecting RS species can correlate well with in vitro toxicological data.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Nano-TiO2 Particle Production
Chemicals.
The Degussa Corporation Hanau-Wolfgang, Germany supplied a commercial control anatase/rutile mixture (Degussa TiO2). Milli-Q ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ cm) was obtained using a Millipore purification system. Titanium (IV) isopropoxide (99.999%), titanium (IV) chloride (99.995%), Congo red (85%), and 2-propanol (99.5%) were purchased from Aldrich (St. Louis, MO); titanium (IV) ethoxide (97%) was obtained from Fluka (Seelze, Germany); dry ethanol (200 proof) was from Pharmco (Brookefield, CT); and hydrochloric acid, sodium hydroxide, and sodium chloride were from Fisher Scientific (Fairlawn, NJ). All chemicals were used “as received” without further purification.
Preparation of nano-TiO2 anatase particles.
Hydrothermal anatase dots were prepared as follows. First, a known amount of ultrapure water was dissolved in dry ethanol and heated with stirring inside a 450-ml Monel autoclave (Parr Instruments, Moline, CA, Model no. 4562). Once the autoclave reached the desired temperature, a solution of titanium (IV) ethoxide (Ti(OEt)4, 0.32 mol/l) in dry ethanol was injected into the reactor. In all cases, the total reaction volume was 100 ml and the molar ratio of water to ethoxide was 20:1. The reaction mixture was stirred at constant temperature for 2 h and then cooled by plunging the vessel in a water bath maintained at room temperature. The product was filtered, washed twice with water, and air-dried overnight in an oven maintained at 60°C.
Preparation of nano-TiO2 rutile and nano-TiO2 anatase/rutile particles.
The nano-TiO2 rutile and anatase/rutile samples were prepared with grain sizes of 3–5 nm using a modified procedure similar to that reported by Cheng et al. (1995). For these materials, titanium (IV) chloride (TiCl4, 0.5 mol/l) was added slowly to ultrapure water (450 ml) at room temperature to produce a white suspension of amorphous TiO2. Hydrochloric acid (37.5%, 50 ml) was added to the suspension as a peptizing agent, and after stirring overnight, the mixture became clear. Then, a 100-ml portion of the peptized TiO2 suspension was adjusted to the desired pH by addition of aqueous sodium hydroxide, after which it was heated to 85–100°C and refluxed for 2 h. The nanoscale TiO2 particles were recovered from this solution by the addition of solid sodium chloride, followed by centrifugation. The pellet was washed twice with the ultrapure water and dialyzed (Spectra/Por, membrane molecular weight cutoff = 3500 MW) in several successive ultrapure water baths (4 l each) for a total of at least 24 h to remove unreacted titanium. The resulting powder (100% pure TiO2) was dried overnight in an oven maintained at 60°C.
Nano-TiO2 particle sample characterization.
BET-SSAs were determined from N2 adsorption onto the nano-TiO2 powders using a Micromeritics ASAP 2010 apparatus. Samples were degassed for several hours prior to the N2 adsorption analysis, which was carried out at liquid nitrogen temperature (− 196°C). Transmission electron micrographs were taken on a JEOL 2010 microscope. Each TEM sample was prepared by flash freezing 2 μl of 3 mg/ml nano-TiO2 solution via FEI Vitrobot at liquid nitrogen temperature (− 196°C) onto a 300-mesh copper/carbon grid (Ted Pella, Inc., Redding, CA). DTA was performed in air on a Thermal Advantage SDT 2960 apparatus using a temperature range of 25–600°C and a heating rate of 20°C/min.
Before the nano-TiO2 powder samples were inoculated into the in vitro systems, each was suspended in Mill-Q ultrapure water (UVPlus, Millipore, Billerica, MA) at a concentration of 30 mg/ml. Each stock solution was subsequently diluted serially to yield seven concentrations ranging from 3 μg/ml to 30 mg/ml. These samples were then sonicated (Ultrasonic Processor, 50 W/60 Hz) for 30 min before exposure to cells in culture to produce a stable, less aggregated nanocrystalline suspension; typically, solutions were slightly clouded and gave no evidence of settling over the course of the experiment (50 h). All samples were prepared under sterile conditions.
Further analyses of these samples in cell culture media suspensions indicate an increased aggregation state. However, each nano-TiO2 sample exhibits similar changes in aggregation. Because of this, nanoparticle size is not a variable in these studies.
Cytotoxicity and Inflammation Studies of Nano-TiO2 Particles on Human Cell Lines
Two cell lines were used in this study. The initial cytotoxicity screen was probed using HDF (Cambrex, Baltimore, MD) cultured in Dulbecco's Modification of Eagle's Media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% L-glutamine, penicillin, and streptomycin. Studies were expanded to include immortalized human lung epithelial cells to monitor the production of inflammation mediators. Human lung epithelial cells (A549) (ATCC, Manassas, VA) were cultured in F-12K media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% L-glutamine, penicillin, and streptomycin. For both cell lines, passage numbers 2–10 were used in the experiments, and cells were seeded at a density of 2 × 105 cells/ml. For these experiments, cells were exposed to uncontrolled ambient light conditions or in one instance, controlled exposure to a nontoxic UV light.
Various biochemical endpoints were examined in this report. For these analyses, all chemicals were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) at the highest purity unless otherwise stated. Tests for LDH release, mitochondrial activity (1-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-3,5-diphenylformazan [MTT]), and production of an inflammatory mediator (interleukin-8 [IL-8]) were performed on both cell lines (HDF and A549) and done in triplicate. The nano-TiO2 anatase, anatase/rutile, and rutile samples were used in both the cytotoxicity screen and LDH release. The results of these tests showed that the nano-TiO2 anatase/rutile sample, a 60:40 mixture of anatase and rutile TiO2, fell between the nano-TiO2 anatase and rutile biological response. Therefore, the MTT and IL-8 tests were conducted on nano-TiO2 anatase and rutile samples only. Data are presented as mean ± SD, and an ANOVA followed by a Dunnett's test was used to determine significance. The single factor ANOVA test was applied specifically to the samples used in a particular study as well as each dilution of the sample being tested. Statistical significance was established as p < 0.05. All statistical tests were performed with Excel software (Analysis ToolPak for Microsoft Excel 2000).
Live/dead viability screen.
To determine the cytotoxic response of the different nano-TiO2 samples to cells in culture, a viability stain was used to determine dose-response and time-course relationships. First, HDF cells were inoculated with nano-TiO2 particles (anatase, anatase/rutile, rutile, and Degussa TiO2) ranging from 0.3 μg/ml to 3 mg/ml for 48 h. Since the nano-TiO2 samples were in powder form, the exact mass concentrations of the final inoculation solutions were precisely determined (i.e., 3 mg of nano-TiO2 in 1 ml of ultrapure water). We note that converting these mass doses into a particle number density is problematic due to the distribution in particle sizes. For this reason, we express all doses in terms of mass of particles. Second, cells were exposed to nano-TiO2 anatase particles and then subsequently stained at varying time points ranging from 1 to 48 h postinoculation. For both experiments, calcein AM (0.5%) and ethidium homodimer (2%) (Molecular Probes, Carlsbad, CA) in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) solution were used to determine cell viability after exposure to nano-TiO2 anatase and rutile particles (Nolan and Packer, 1974).
LDH release.
The release of LDH was monitored in cells dosed with varying concentrations of nano-TiO2 anatase, anatase/rutile, and rutile particles (3 μg/ml–3mg/ml). Cells (HDF and A549) were seeded in 24-well plates, exposed to nano-TiO2 particles, and incubated for 48 h. After incubation, the plate was centrifuged at 1900 rpm for 4 min. The media was transferred into a fresh 24-well plate and analyzed for LDH release, as described previously (Decker and Lohmann-Matthes, 1988; Legrand, 1992). Upon addition of assay solutions, the media was protected from the light for 30 min. During this exposure time, Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide is reduced to Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide using the LDH that was released in the medium during the 48-h incubation. A total of 150 μl of 1 N HCl was then added to each well to terminate the reduction of NADH. The resulting absorbance was measured at 490 nm.
Mitochondrial activity.
The MTT assay (Sigma) was used to evaluate mitochondrial activity (Mossman, 1983). Cells grown in 24-well plates were exposed to varying concentrations of nano-TiO2 anatase and rutile particles (3 μg/ml–3 mg/ml). After 48 h, 150 μl of MTT (5 mg/ml) was added to each well and incubated for 4 h. Afterward, 850 μl of the MTT solubilization solution (10% Triton X-100 in 0.1 N HCl in anhydrous isopropanol) was added to each well. The resulting formazan crystals were solubilized in acidic isopropanol and quantified by measuring absorbance at 570 nm. Data were calibrated to the appropriate calibration curve as stated in Sigma protocols.
Production of IL-8.
Human IL-8 Enzyme Immunometric Assay Kit (Assay Designs) was used to evaluate the production of the inflammation mediator, IL-8 (Beutler et al., 1985). Cells grown in 24-well plates were exposed to varying concentrations of nano-TiO2 anatase and rutile particles (3 μg/ml–3 mg/ml). A total of 100 μl of each standard and sample were transferred into different wells in a human IL-8 96-well Microtiter Plate (Assay Designs, Ann Arbor, MI), a plate whose wells are coated with monoclonal antibody specific to human IL-8. After the plate was incubated for 1 h at room temperature, each well was washed with 5% tris-buffered saline solution and tapped upside down to dryness. A total of 100 μl of rabbit polyclonal antibody to human IL-8 was added to each well, incubated for 1 h at room temperature, and washed with 5% tris-buffered saline solution and tapped upside down to dryness. This step was repeated with 100 μl of donkey anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase for 30 min and 100 μl of 3,3′,5,5′ tetramethylbenzidine and hydrogen peroxide for 15 min. A total of 100 μl of 1 N aqueous solution of hydrochloric acid was added to each well and spectroscopically measured at 450 nm. A standard curve composed of varying concentrations of human IL-8 (15–1000 pg/ml) was used to standardize the samples of interest.
Exposure to UV illumination.
To further investigate the effects of RS generation by nano-TiO2, cells were exposed to a nontoxic wavelength of UV light (λ = 356 nm) at an intensity of 10 mW/cm2 for 20 min after inoculation by titania. The light used in the exposure was wavelength selective, had no thermal effect, and was photometrically calibrated (DeLong et al., 2005). Cells were then incubated and tested for LDH release as described above.
Ex Vivo Reactive Species Determination
We describe two independent methods for determining the presence of reactive species (
Luminol (< 99%, Sigma) was prepared using Milli-Q water at 0.140M NaCl, 10.0mM PBS, and adjusted to pH 7.30 (Allen and Loose, 1976; Hallett and Campbell, 1983; Murata, 2002; Pfefferkorn, 1995; Takayama, 2005). The solution was stored in the dark at 4°C. Chemiluminescence intensities were measured with a SpectraMax M2 (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). Nano-TiO2 particles, suspended in water or media, were preincubated and evaluated spectroscopically for 1 min in a final volume of 10.0 μl. A total of 190 μl of the luminol solution was added and changes in the luminescence of the sample were measured. The final concentrations of nano-TiO2 solution and luminol in the plate wells were 0.150 g/l and 0.126 mol/l, respectively. Chemiluminescence intensities were measured as the peak amplitude in arbitrary units. All experiments were repeated at least three times and performed at room temperature in the absence of light.
Under illumination, nano-TiO2 anatase and rutile samples generate RS species that can be detected via their degradation of dyes. The nano-TiO2 anatase, anatase/rutile, and rutile suspensions were stirred individually in the dark for at least 24 h (or 1 h in the case of the Degussa TiO2 sample) to ensure adsorption equilibrium was established prior to irradiation. Photocatalytic reactions were then carried out inside a Luzchem Model 4-V photoreactor equipped with a magnetic stirrer and 14 UV-A lamps with an emission maximum at λ = 350 nm. In all cases, the total TiO2 mass concentration was 1.0 g/l and the total suspension volume was 10.0 ml. Initial Congo red concentrations ranged from 1.0 to 30 mg/l (1.4–33 μmol/l). The disappearance of dye was monitored as a function of irradiation time using the UV-Vis absorbance feature at λ = 496 nm. Dye concentrations were calculated from the total absorbances of the dye/nano-TiO2 suspensions after correcting for the contributions of nano-TiO2 particles to the UV-Vis spectra.
RESULTS
Characterization of Nano-TiO2 Samples
Nanoscale titania samples of variable composition were produced using quenched hydrothermal reactions (Chemseddine and Mortiz, 1999; Trentler et al., 1999). Figures 1A and 1B show the nano-TiO2 anatase and anatase/rutile samples used in these studies; although the particles are loosely aggregated, individual nanoparticles are clearly defined (Figs. 1A and 1B). While anatase nanoparticles generally aggregate into spherical assemblies, rutile nanocrystals tend to arrange more compactly into larger, striated structures (Fig. 1C). We note that the Degussa TiO2 control samples used in this work are reported to be ∼ 20 nm in grain size and loosely agglomerated (Bickley et al., 1991; Hurum et al., 2003; Sun and Smirniotis, 2003). BET surface areas ranged from 112 to 153 m2/g in the nanomaterials studied here. In general, higher surface areas corresponded to smaller average crystallite sizes, except for nano-TiO2 rutile particles, which despite its extremely fine grain sizes (3.2 nm) exhibited only intermediate surface areas (112 m2/g) as a result of extensive aggregation (Fig. 1C) (Cheng et al., 1995; Hurum et al., 2003; Kominami et al., 1999).
XRD patterns for the three nano-TiO2 powders confirm their phase composition (Fig. 1D). Nano-TiO2 anatase/rutile particles are mixed-phase powders with anatase/rutile mass ratios of approximately 40:60. Small amounts of brookite were also detected in the nano-TiO2 anatase/rutile sample. DTA was used to evaluate the amorphous content of the TiO2 samples. None of the DTA profiles exhibited an exothermic peak between 350 and 450°C, thus confirming the complete crystallinity of the powders (Fig. 1E). Our control material, Degussa TiO2 has an 80:20 ratio of anatase/rutile phases (Hurum et al., 2003). In addition to determining the crystallinity of the nano-TiO2 samples, XRD patterns were utilized to gather grain size of each sample used in this study. Grain sizes can be deduced from the X-ray peak linewidths, as described above in the experimental section, after corrections for instrumental broadening.
Cytotoxicity and Inflammatory Mediator Results with HDF and A549
The nanoparticle samples were exposed to cells in culture and the viability of the populations measured after various time points; in general, all of the nano-TiO2 samples were found to be have relatively low toxicity compared to other nanoparticle systems such as fullerenes (Sayes et al., 2004). The flowchart describes the experimental protocol used to establish the cellular response of various nano-TiO2 samples (Fig. 2). Figure 3 shows the dose-response and time-response relationships of various nano-TiO2 samples on HDFs. The time-response study revealed that the longer the HDFs were exposed to nano-TiO2 anatase particles, the greater the cytotoxic response (Fig. 3B). The exposure time was truncated at 48 h. At this time point, the cell media lacks sufficient nutrients for cells in culture to remain vital. Ex vivo analysis showed that nano-TiO2 particles stayed in suspension (did not precipitate out of cell culture media) during the course of these experiments.
While overall the toxicity in culture was low, different types of nano-TiO2 did exhibit different levels of toxicity. Nano-TiO2 anatase particles were the most cytotoxic to human cells in culture, while nano-TiO2 rutile particles were the least cytotoxic. Specifically, nano-TiO2 anatase particles induced an LC50 of 3.6 μg/ml, while nano-TiO2 rutile particles induced an LC50 of 550 μg/ml. The control Degussa nano-TiO2 and another mixed anatase/rutile nano-TiO2 sample were in between the pure phases in their cytotoxic effect. Additionally, we observed that the toxic response of nano-TiO2 increased substantially with UV illumination. Figure 4 shows that under UV illumination, cell death increases by 20% (λ = 356 nm, nontoxic to cells in culture) for a fixed dose.
The observations of cell death in these systems were confirmed by an examination of multiple biochemical endpoints. Figures 4–6 show the results of such studies for both HDF and A549 cells exposed to nano-TiO2 anatase and rutile particles and anatase/rutile particles for LDH release. Under all conditions, nano-TiO2 anatase particles produced a greater toxicity, while the nano-TiO2 rutile sample was the least toxic to the human cells. Specifically, nano-TiO2 anatase particles produced a high LDH release in cells under ambient conditions and a higher cellular LDH release when exposed to UV light after nano-TiO2 particle inoculation. Nano-TiO2 anatase/rutile particles produced a biological response less than that of anatase but greater than rutile. In addition, nano-TiO2 anatase particles decreased mitochondrial activity (or cellular viability) and enhanced IL-8 in both HDF and A549 cell lines.
Ex Vivo RS Determination of Nano-TiO2 Samples
We sought to correlate the differential cytotoxicity observed in the nano-TiO2 with the RS production of the same samples. Figure 7 shows the ex vivo determination of RS in each aqueous suspension of nano-TiO2 particles using a traditional methodology in biochemistry, namely the chemiluminescence of luminol (Allen and Loose, 1976; Hallett and Campbell, 1983; Murata, 2002; Pfefferkorn, 1995; Takayama, 2005). In this test, nano-TiO2 anatase and rutile particles were added to luminol solutions; an increase in relative luminescent units within the scatter plot indicates an increase in reactive oxygen species, generally interpreted to consist of OH• radicals. These data show that under a wide variety of conditions (dark/illuminated, sonicated, in biological media), nano-TiO2 anatase particles produce greater levels of reactive species than nano-TiO2 rutile particles.
To get a more quantifiable measure of RS generation, these samples were also evaluated for their photocatalytic activity. For this, samples were illuminated by UV light and their RS production measured via the degradation of an azo dye. Figure 8 shows the bleaching over time of a 10 mg/l (14 μmol/l) aqueous Congo red solution in the presence of various nano-TiO2 powders (mass concentration 1 g/l). The dye decomposition curves indicate that the nano-TiO2 anatase particles and commercial Degussa TiO2 catalysts were comparably efficient (t1/2,m = 1.5–3.5 min, g) on a mass basis, while the mixed-phase powder nano-TiO2 anatase/rutile particles took slightly longer (t1/2,m ≡ 5 min, g) to degrade the dye. In contrast, the photocatalytic reaction was prohibitively slow (t1/2,m ≅ 120 min, g) in the presence of the nano-TiO2 rutile particles. The t1/2 values obtained for each sample are listed in tabular form in Table 2. The photocatalytic activity of each nano-TiO2 catalyst was quantified using the half-life (t1/2) for a 10-mg/l dye solution. The value of t1/2 was expressed on both a unit mass basis (t1/2,m) and a unit surface area basis (t1/2,s). Activities evaluated on a unit mass basis reflected the influence of surface area on a catalyst's efficiency, while activities expressed on a unit surface area basis (i.e., specific activities) reflected the effects of other physical properties independent of surface area.
DISCUSSION
Nano-TiO2 particles at high enough concentrations will disrupt the normal activity of cells in culture. Particle exposure caused HDF and immortalized human lung epithelial cells to increase LDH release, decrease mitochondrial activity, and produced increased levels of IL-8 (Figs. 3–6). A classic dose-response curve is observed for cell effects for all sample types studied here, and time course experiments show that the toxicological response increases as expected for a standard toxicant (Fig. 3). We note that the doses required to observe changes in cell function, 1500 μg/ml, are relatively large compared to similar studies of carbon nanoparticles, which found altered cell function at much lower doses (0.02 μg/ml) (Sayes et al., 2004, 2005).
Of most interest in this study was the comparison of the in vitro toxicity of different phases of nano-TiO2; it is clear (Table 1) that the phase of the nano-TiO2 particles, rather than their SSA, is the most important material parameter for determining toxicity. Nano-TiO2 anatase particles (SSA = 153 m2/g) induced a cytotoxic response more than two orders of magnitude larger than nano-TiO2 rutile particles (SSA = 123 m2/g). Samples of mixed phase fell in between these two extremes (Table 1). We note that this data does not rule out nanoparticle size as a parameter that can influence toxicity; however, it is far less important than phase composition in the case of titania nanoparticles.
Particle sample . | Shape . | Size (nm) . | Surface area (m2/g) . | Amorphous content . | Aggregation . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nano-TiO2 anatase particles | Spherical | 10.1 ± 1.0 | 153 | None | Mild |
Nano-TiO2 anatase/rutile particles | Spherical | 3.2 ± 0.34 | 112 | None | Mild |
Nano-TiO2 rutile particles | Spherical | 5.2 ± 0.65 | 123 | None | Severe |
Particle sample . | Shape . | Size (nm) . | Surface area (m2/g) . | Amorphous content . | Aggregation . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nano-TiO2 anatase particles | Spherical | 10.1 ± 1.0 | 153 | None | Mild |
Nano-TiO2 anatase/rutile particles | Spherical | 3.2 ± 0.34 | 112 | None | Mild |
Nano-TiO2 rutile particles | Spherical | 5.2 ± 0.65 | 123 | None | Severe |
Particle sample . | Shape . | Size (nm) . | Surface area (m2/g) . | Amorphous content . | Aggregation . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nano-TiO2 anatase particles | Spherical | 10.1 ± 1.0 | 153 | None | Mild |
Nano-TiO2 anatase/rutile particles | Spherical | 3.2 ± 0.34 | 112 | None | Mild |
Nano-TiO2 rutile particles | Spherical | 5.2 ± 0.65 | 123 | None | Severe |
Particle sample . | Shape . | Size (nm) . | Surface area (m2/g) . | Amorphous content . | Aggregation . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nano-TiO2 anatase particles | Spherical | 10.1 ± 1.0 | 153 | None | Mild |
Nano-TiO2 anatase/rutile particles | Spherical | 3.2 ± 0.34 | 112 | None | Mild |
Nano-TiO2 rutile particles | Spherical | 5.2 ± 0.65 | 123 | None | Severe |
The importance of titania phase composition in biological effects is not unexpected; nanoparticle structure, particularly at surfaces, is central for chemical reactivity generally. For titania, anatase, rutile, and anatase/rutile particles differ substantially in their surface chemistry particularly as it relates to generating reactive oxygen species. First-principles calculations have indicated that water molecules will adsorb dissociatively (i.e., as H+ and OH−) to anatase faces but nondissociatively (i.e., as H2O) to rutile faces (Selloni et al., 1998; Vittadini et al., 1998). When these materials are illuminated with UV light, reactive photocarriers trap to the surface where in anatase systems they encounter Ti-OH species that react to form OH•. These are thought to be the primary oxidizing species in photocatalytic oxidation processes; thus, as we show in Figure 7, anatase materials are quite effective at degrading organic dyes when illuminated, while rutile materials are comparatively inactive. The half-life (t1/2,s) of an azo dye treated with anatase sample is one to two orders of magnitude shorter than that of the nano-TiO2 rutile sample. Thus, the generally superior photocatalytic activity of anatase particles is not merely a result of the typically larger surface areas found in anatase but rather a result of the fundamental differences between the anatase and rutile surfaces. Specifically, the poor performance of nano-TiO2 rutile particles suggests that even a moderately high surface area (112 m2/g) cannot compensate for the inefficient OH• production and low adsorptive affinity that typically limit rutile's efficiency as a photocatalyst.
As Table 1 illustrates, those samples that were the effective photocatalysts were also the most cytotoxic and inflammatory in cell culture. For example, the anatase samples were a hundred times faster at degrading organic dyes and also two orders of magnitude more acutely cytotoxic than rutile samples of comparable surface area. Samples of mixed phase fell in between these two extremes, both in catalytic activity and in biological activity. With only four samples, a quantitative correlation is not possible, but the data do suggest that the photocatalytic efficiency and biological effect of nanoscale titania (Table 2) may stem from a common material feature.
Particle sample . | Anatase/rutile ratios . | Surface area (m2/g) . | Average diameter (nm) . | Half-life of Congo red by unit mass, t1/2,m (min, g) . | Half-life of Congo red by unit surface area, t1/2,s (min, m2) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degussa TiO2 | 80/20 | 50 | ∼ 21 | 3.5 | 175a |
Nano-TiO2 anatase particles | 100/0 | 153 | 10.1 | 1.5 | 230 |
Nano-TiO2 anatase/rutile particles | 60/40 | 123 | 5.2 | 5.0 | 1160 |
Nano-TiO2 rutile particles | 0/100 | 112 | 3.2 | 120 | 13,400 |
Particle sample . | Anatase/rutile ratios . | Surface area (m2/g) . | Average diameter (nm) . | Half-life of Congo red by unit mass, t1/2,m (min, g) . | Half-life of Congo red by unit surface area, t1/2,s (min, m2) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degussa TiO2 | 80/20 | 50 | ∼ 21 | 3.5 | 175a |
Nano-TiO2 anatase particles | 100/0 | 153 | 10.1 | 1.5 | 230 |
Nano-TiO2 anatase/rutile particles | 60/40 | 123 | 5.2 | 5.0 | 1160 |
Nano-TiO2 rutile particles | 0/100 | 112 | 3.2 | 120 | 13,400 |
Particle sample . | Anatase/rutile ratios . | Surface area (m2/g) . | Average diameter (nm) . | Half-life of Congo red by unit mass, t1/2,m (min, g) . | Half-life of Congo red by unit surface area, t1/2,s (min, m2) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degussa TiO2 | 80/20 | 50 | ∼ 21 | 3.5 | 175a |
Nano-TiO2 anatase particles | 100/0 | 153 | 10.1 | 1.5 | 230 |
Nano-TiO2 anatase/rutile particles | 60/40 | 123 | 5.2 | 5.0 | 1160 |
Nano-TiO2 rutile particles | 0/100 | 112 | 3.2 | 120 | 13,400 |
Particle sample . | Anatase/rutile ratios . | Surface area (m2/g) . | Average diameter (nm) . | Half-life of Congo red by unit mass, t1/2,m (min, g) . | Half-life of Congo red by unit surface area, t1/2,s (min, m2) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degussa TiO2 | 80/20 | 50 | ∼ 21 | 3.5 | 175a |
Nano-TiO2 anatase particles | 100/0 | 153 | 10.1 | 1.5 | 230 |
Nano-TiO2 anatase/rutile particles | 60/40 | 123 | 5.2 | 5.0 | 1160 |
Nano-TiO2 rutile particles | 0/100 | 112 | 3.2 | 120 | 13,400 |
We hypothesized that the ability for titania to generate RS could be the central factor that governs both photreactivity as well as acute cellular toxicity and inflammation. Existing literature has established RS production in aqueous nano-TiO2 anatase systems (Barnes, 1990; Bast et al., 1991; Cronstein et al., 1992; Dargel, 1992; Doelman and Bast, 1990; Frenkel, 1992; Jaeschke, 1991; Kukreja and Hess, 1992). To develop this further, we looked for evidence of RS species in cells exposed to nanotitania (Cho et al., 2004; Maness et al., 1999; Zheng et al., 2000). We confirmed with the luminol method that even without light, nanoscale titania systems can produce radical species (Fig. 7) under a wide range of conditions. The quantity of RS generated is increased when suspended in cell culture media. It is further increased when irradiated with UV light for 20 min. These ex vivo tests are confirmed by biological indicators (LDH release, “leaky membrane” visualization) that suggest oxidative damage is involved in the mechanism of cell damage for these experiments. While more work is required to definitively establish the mechanism of biological activity of nanoscale titania, it is apparently similar to that found for cells exposed to nano-C60, a water-soluble colloidal aggregate of pristine fullerenes (Sayes et al., 2004). However, unlike aggregated fullerenes, nano-TiO2 is capable of disrupting the mitochondrial activity of cells (Sayes et al., 2005). These data suggest that Ti-OH anatase surfaces in the presence of appropriate donors may be reactive enough to oxidatively damage biological species even in the absence of light.
CONCLUSIONS
This study relates the photocatalytic effectiveness of different crystalline phases of nano-TiO2 particles to their cytotoxic responses in HDF and A549 cells (Table 3). The most inactive catalytic materials (rutile) were two orders of magnitude less cytotoxic than similarly sized anatase nanoparticles that exhibited high photoactivity. This correlation is a manifestation of a fundamental structure-activity relationship in nanoscale titania; nanoparticle structures optimized to produce RS species under UV illumination also are more effective at disrupting cellular functioning. Our data suggest that oxidative damage, whether light induced in photocatalysis studies or generated in biological media, is strongly predicted by the phase of nanoscale materials. Simple ex vivo tests of nanotitania photoactivity could thus prove useful as a comparative screen for cytotoxicity in this important class of materials.
Particle sample . | Photoactive (Fig. 8) . | Generates RS (Fig. 7) . | Produces cytotoxic response LC50 (Fig. 3) . | Induces LDH release (Figs. 3 and 4) . | Decreases MTT activity (Fig. 5) . | Produces IL-8 (Fig. 6) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nano-TiO2 anatase particles | Yes | Yes | 1500 μg/ml | 1500 μg/ml (w/o light) | 1500 μg/ml | 300 μg/ml |
30 μg/ml (w/light) | ||||||
Nano-TiO2 rutile particles | No | No | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Particle sample . | Photoactive (Fig. 8) . | Generates RS (Fig. 7) . | Produces cytotoxic response LC50 (Fig. 3) . | Induces LDH release (Figs. 3 and 4) . | Decreases MTT activity (Fig. 5) . | Produces IL-8 (Fig. 6) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nano-TiO2 anatase particles | Yes | Yes | 1500 μg/ml | 1500 μg/ml (w/o light) | 1500 μg/ml | 300 μg/ml |
30 μg/ml (w/light) | ||||||
Nano-TiO2 rutile particles | No | No | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
N/A = not applicable; w = with; w/o = without.
Particle sample . | Photoactive (Fig. 8) . | Generates RS (Fig. 7) . | Produces cytotoxic response LC50 (Fig. 3) . | Induces LDH release (Figs. 3 and 4) . | Decreases MTT activity (Fig. 5) . | Produces IL-8 (Fig. 6) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nano-TiO2 anatase particles | Yes | Yes | 1500 μg/ml | 1500 μg/ml (w/o light) | 1500 μg/ml | 300 μg/ml |
30 μg/ml (w/light) | ||||||
Nano-TiO2 rutile particles | No | No | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Particle sample . | Photoactive (Fig. 8) . | Generates RS (Fig. 7) . | Produces cytotoxic response LC50 (Fig. 3) . | Induces LDH release (Figs. 3 and 4) . | Decreases MTT activity (Fig. 5) . | Produces IL-8 (Fig. 6) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nano-TiO2 anatase particles | Yes | Yes | 1500 μg/ml | 1500 μg/ml (w/o light) | 1500 μg/ml | 300 μg/ml |
30 μg/ml (w/light) | ||||||
Nano-TiO2 rutile particles | No | No | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
N/A = not applicable; w = with; w/o = without.
We thank Prof. Jane Grande-Allen for use of the SpectraMax M2, Prof. Andreas Luttge for use of the ASAP 2010 BET apparatus, and Dr Wenhua Guo for his assistance with TEM characterization. This research was funded by the Center for Biological and Environmental Nanotechnology (EEC-0118007) and DuPont Haskell Laboratory for Health & Environmental Sciences.
References
Agrawal, A., Cizeron, J., and Colvin, V. L. (
Alivisatos, A. P. (
Allen, R. C., and Loose, L. D. (
Arnhold, J., Mueller, S., Arnold, K., and Grimm, E. et al. (
Barnes, P. J. (
Bast, A., Haenen, G., and Doelman, C. J. A. (
Beutler, B., Greenwald, D., Hulmes, J. D., Chang, M., Pan, Y. C., Mathison, J., Ulevitch, R., and Cerami, A. (
Bickley, R. I., Gonzalez-Carreno, T., Lees, J. T., Palmisano, L., and Tilley, R. J. (
Brunauer, S., Emmett, P. H., and Teller, E. (
Cai, R., Kubota, Y., Shuin, T., Sakai, H., Hashimoto, K., and Fujishima, A. (
Chang, E., Miller, J. S., Sun, J. T., Yu, W. W., Colvin, V. L., Drezek, R., and West, J. L. (
Chemseddine, A., and Mortiz, T. (
Cheng, H., Ma, J., Zhao, Z., and Qi, L. (
Cho, M., Chung, H., Choi, W., and Yoon, J. (
Colvin, V. L. (
Cronstein, B. N., Levin, R. I., Philips, M., Hirschhorn, R., Abramson, S. B., and Weissmann, G. (
Dargel, R. (
Davis, R. J. (
Decker, T., and Lohmann-Matthes, M.-L. (
DeLong, S. A., Moon, J. J., and West, J. L. (
Ding, Z., Lu, G. Q., and Greenfield, P. F. (
Doelman, C. J. A., and Bast, A. (
Donaldson, K., Li, X. Y., and MacNee, W. (
Fortner, J. D., Lyon, D. Y., Sayes, C. M., Boyd, A. M., Falkner, J. C., Hotze, E. M., Alemany, L. B., Tao, Y. J., Guo, W., Ausman, K. D., et al. (
Frenkel, K. (
Gilmour, P., Brown, D. M., Beswick, P. H., Benton, E., MacNee, W., and Donaldson, K. (
Gurr, J. R., Wang, A. S., Chen, C. H., and Jan, K. Y. (
Hadjimitova, V., Traykov, T., Mileva, M., and Ribarov, S. (
Hallett, M. B., and Campbell, A. K. (
Hashimoto, K., Wasada, K., Toukai, N., Kominami, H., and Kera, Y. (
Hirsch, L. R., Stafford, R. J., et al. (
Hurum, D. C., Agrios, A. G., Gray, K. A., Rajh, T., and Thurnauer, M. C. (
Hurum, D., Gray, K., Rajh, T., and Thurnauer, M. (
Jaeschke, H. (
Katari, J. E. B., Colvin, V. L., and Alivisatos, A. P. (
Kirchner, C., Liedl, T., Kudera, S., Pellegrino, T., Javier, A. M., Gaub, H. E., Stolzle, S., Fertig, N., and Parak, W. J. (
Kissinger, H. E. (
Klug, H., and Alexander, L. (
Kominami, H., Kato, J., Murakami, S., Kera, Y., Inoue, M., Inui, T., and Ohtani, B. (
Kukreja, R. C., and Hess, M. L. (
Legrand, C. (
Li, Q. W., Luo, G. A., and Feng, J. (
Linsebigler, A. L., Lu, G. Q., and Yates, J. T. (
Maness, P. C., Smolinski, S., Blake, D. M., Huang, Z., Wolfrum, E. J., and Jacoby, W. A. (
Mossman, T. (
Murata, H. (
Murray, C. B., Norris, D. J., and Bawendi, M. G. (
Navrotsky, A., Jamieson, J. C., and Kleppa, O. J. (
Nolan, J. S., and Packer, L. (
Oberdorster, G. (
Oberdorster, G., Ferin, J., Gelein, R., Soderholm, S., and Finkelstein, J. (
Oberdorster, G., Gelein, R., Ferin, J., and Weiss, B. (
Oberdorster, G., Maynard, A., Donaldson, K., Castranova, V., Fitzpatrick, J., Ausman, K., Carter, J., Karn, B., Kreyling, W., Lai, D., et al. (
Ohtani, B., and Nishimoto, S. (
Otwinowski, Z., and Minor, W. (
Paul, B. K., and Moulik, S. P. (
Rajeshwar, K., de Tacconi, N. R., and Chenthamarakshan, C. R. (
Sayes, C. M., Fortner, J. D., Lyon, D., Boyd, A. M., Ausman, K. D., Tao, Y. J., Sitharaman, B., Wilson, L. J., West, J. L., and Colvin, V. L. (
Sayes, C. M., Gobin, A. M., Ausman, K. D., Mendez, J., West. J. L., and Colvin, V. L. (
Selloni, A., Vittadini, A., and Gratzel, M. (
Serpone, N., and Emeline, A. V. (
Serpone, N., Salinaro, A., et al. (
Sun, B., and Smirniotis, P. G. (
Takayama, H., Shimada, N., Mikami, O., and Murata, H. (
Trentler, T. J., Denler, T. E., Bertone, J. F., Agrawal, A., and Colvin, V. L. (
Uchino, T., Tokunaga, H., Ando, M., and Utsumi, H. (
Vittadini, A., Selloni, A., Rotzinger, F. P., and Gratzel, M. (
Vogler, E. A. (
Yu, W. W., Falkner, J. C., Yavuz, C. T., and Colvin, V. L. (
Zhang, H., and Banfield, J. F. (
Author notes
*Department of Chemistry, †Department of Bioengineering, and ‡Center for Biological and Environmental Nanotechnology, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005; and §DuPont Haskell Lab, Newark, Delaware 19714
Comments