Comparative analysis of Alu repeats in primate genomes

  1. George E. Liu1,6,
  2. Can Alkan2,3,
  3. Lu Jiang4,
  4. Shaying Zhao5,6 and
  5. Evan E. Eichler2,3
  1. 1 USDA, ARS, ANRI, Bovine Functional Genomics Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland 20705, USA;
  2. 2 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA;
  3. 3 Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA;
  4. 4 Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA;
  5. 5 Department of Biochemistry and Department of Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA

    Abstract

    Using bacteria artificial chromosome (BAC) end sequences (16.9 Mb) and high-quality alignments of genomic sequences (17.4 Mb), we performed a global assessment of the divergence distributions, phylogenies, and consensus sequences for Alu elements in primates including lemur, marmoset, macaque, baboon, and chimpanzee as compared to human. We found that in lemurs, Alu elements show a broader and more symmetric sequence divergence distribution, suggesting a steady rate of Alu retrotransposition activity among prosimians. In contrast, Alu elements in anthropoids show a skewed distribution shifted toward more ancient elements with continual declining rates in recent Alu activity along the hominoid lineage of evolution. Using an integrated approach combining mutation profile and insertion/deletion analyses, we identified nine novel lineage-specific Alu subfamilies in lemur (seven), marmoset (one), and baboon/macaque (one) containing multiple diagnostic mutations distinct from their human counterparts—Alu J, S, and Y subfamilies, respectively. Among these primates, we show that that the lemur has the lowest density of Alu repeats (55 repeats/Mb), while marmoset has the greatest abundance (188 repeats/Mb). We estimate that ∼70% of lemur and 16% of marmoset Alu elements belong to lineage-specific subfamilies. Our analysis has provided an evolutionary framework for further classification and refinement of the Alu repeat phylogeny. The differences in the distribution and rates of Alu activity have played an important role in subtly reshaping the structure of primate genomes. The functional consequences of these changes among the diverse primate lineages over such short periods of evolutionary time are an important area of future investigation.

    Footnotes

    | Table of Contents

    Preprint Server