Skip to main content
Log in

Hospital ownership and preventable adverse events

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if type of hospital ownership is associated with preventable adverse events.

DESIGN: Medical record review of a random sample of 15,000 nonpsychiatric, non-Veterans Administration hospital discharges in Utah and Colorado in 1992.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A two-stage record review process using nurse and physician reviewers was used to detect adverse events. Preventability was then judged by 2 study investigators who were blinded to hospital characteristics. The association among preventable adverse events and hospital ownership was evaluated using logistic regression with nonprofit hospitals as the reference group while controlling for other patient and hospital characteristics. We analyzed 4 hospital ownership categories: nonprofit, for-profit, major teaching government (e.g., county or state ownership), and minor or nonteaching government.

RESULTS: When compared with patients in nonprofit hospitals, multivariate analyses adjusting for other patient and hospital characteristics found that patients in minor or nonteaching government hospitals were more likely to suffer a preventable adverse event of any type (odds ratio [OR] 2.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45 to 4.20); preventable operative adverse events (OR, 4.85; 95% CI, 2.44 to 9.62); and preventable adverse events due to delayed diagnoses and therapies (OR, 4.27; 95% CI, 1.48 to 12.31). Patients in forprofit hospitals were also more likely to suffer preventable adverse events of any type (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.38); preventable operative adverse events (OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.42 to 4.87); and preventable adverse events due to delayed diagnoses and therapies (OR, 4.15; 95% CI, 1.84 to 9.34). Patients in major teaching government hospitals were less likely to suffer preventable adverse drug events (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.89).

CONCLUSIONS: Patients in for-profit and minor teaching or nonteaching government-owned hospitals were more likely to suffer several types of preventable adverse events. Further research is needed to determine how these events could be prevented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eckholm E. While congress remains silent, healthcare transforms itself. New York Times. December 18, 1994:A1.

  2. Tomsho R. Giant hospital chain uses tough tactics to push fast growth. Wall Street Journal. July 12, 1994:A1, A6.

  3. Gray B. H. Conversion of HMO’s and hospitals: what’s at stake? Health Aff (Millwood). 1997;16(2):29–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ad Hoc Committee to Defend Health. For our patients, not for profits: a call to action. JAMA. 1997;278:1733–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Prospective Payment Assessment Commission. Annual Report. Washington, DC; 1991.

  6. Andrulis DP. The public sector in health care: evolution or dissolution? Health Aff (Millwood). 1997;16(4):131–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Arrow KJ. Uncertainty and the Welfare economics of medical care. Am Econ Rev. 1963;53:941–73.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Starr P. The Social Transformation of American Medicine. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pellegrino E. In: Williams K, Donnelly P, eds. Medical Care Quality and the Public Trust. Chicago, Ill: Pluribus Press; 1982;ix-xiv.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ginzberg E. For-profit medicine, reassessment. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:757–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Relman AS. The new medical-industrial complex. N Engl J Med. 1980;303:963–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Relman AS. Shattuck Lecture. The health care industry: where is it taking us? N Engl J Med. 1991;325:854–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shortell SM, Hughes EF. The effects of regulation, completion, and ownership on mortality rates among hospitalized inpatients. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:1100–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gray BH, McWerney WS. For-profit enterprise in health care. The institute of medicine study. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:1523–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Watt JM, Derzon RA, Renn SC, Schramm CS, Hahn JS, Pillari GD. The comparative economic performance of investor-owned chain and not-for-profit hospitals. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:89–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pattison RV, Katz HM. Investor-owned and not-for-profit hospitals: comparison based on California data. N Engl J Med. 1983;309:347–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Campbell P, Kane N. Physician-management relationships at HCA: a case study. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1990;15(3):591–605.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuttner R. Columbia/HCA and the resurgence of the for-profit hospital business (first of two parts). N Engl J Med. 1996;335:446–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuttner R. Columbia/HCA and the resurgence of the for-profit hospital business (second of two parts). N Engl J Med. 1996;335(6):446–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Taylor DH, Whellan DJ, Sloan FA. Effects of admission to a teaching hospital on the cost and quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries. N Engl J Med 1999;340:293–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Burstin HR, Lipsitz SR, Udvarhelyi IS, Brennan TA. The effect of hospital financial characteristics on quality of care. JAMA. 1993;270:845–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hartz AJ, Krakauer H, Kuhn EM, et al. Hospital characteristics and mortality rates. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:1720–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hartz AJ, Gottlieb MS, Kuhn EM, Rimm AA. Relationship of hospital characteristics and the results of peer review in six larger states. Med Care. 1991;291:1028–38.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hospital Association Guide to Hospitals. Chicago, Ill: American Hospital Association, 1993.

  25. Health Care Investment Analysts. Directory of U.S. Hospitals. Baltimore, Md: HCIA; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:370–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Localio AR, Weaver SL, Landis R, et al. Identifying adverse events caused by care: degree of physician agreement in retrospective chart review. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:457–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N et al., for the ADE Prevention Study Group. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events: implications for prevention. JAMA. 1995;274:29–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, Mackenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Diggle PJ, Liang K, Zeger SL. Analysis of Longitudinal Data. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Burstin HR, et al. Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado in 1992. Med Care. 2000. In press.

  32. Bloche MG. Should government intervene to protect nonprofits? Health Aff (Millwood). September/October 1998:7–25.

  33. Schlesinger M, Gray BH, Bradley E. Charity and community: the role of non-profit ownership in a managed health care system. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1996;21:697–751.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Andrulis D, Acuff KL, Weiss KB, Anderson RJ. Public hospitals and health reform: choices and challenges. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:162–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Colorado Hospitals Reference Guide. Denver, Colo: Colorado Hospital Association; 1997.

  36. Ginzberg E. The patient as profit center: Hospital Inc. comes to town. The Nation November 1996:18–22.

  37. Cherry RL. Agents of nursing home quality of care: ombudsmen and staff ratios revisited. Gerontologist. 1991;31(3):302–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Iezzoni LI, Daley J, Heeren T, et al. Using administrative data to screen hospitals for high complication rates. Inquiry. 1994;31(1):40–55.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Munro DJ. The influence of registered nurse staffing on the quality of nursing home care. Res Nurs Health. 1990;13:263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Silber JH, Rosenbaum PR, Schwartz JS, Ross RN, Williams SV. Evaluation of the complication rate as a measure of quality of care in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA. 1995;274(4):317–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Wan TT, Shukla RK. Contextual and organizational correlates of the quality of hospital nursing care. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1987;13(2):61–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Limbacher PB. Another hit for Columbia. Mod Healthcare. 1998;28:2–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Limbacher P. Columbia: year in review—Federal probe, new management leave their mark. Mod Healthcare. 1998;28:26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hasan M. Let’s end the non-profit charade. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1057–8.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Leape LL. Error in medicine. JAMA. 1994;272:1851–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Perrow C. Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Reason J. Human Error. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Moray N. Error reduction as a systems problem. In: Bogner MS, ed. Human Error in Medicine. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Brennan TA, Berwick DM. New Rules: Regulation, Markets and the Quality of American Health Care. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass Inc; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Elmore JG, Wells CK, Lee CH, Howard DH, Feinstein AR. Variability in radiologists’ interpretations of mammograms. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:1493–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Shekelle PG, Kahan JP, Bernstein SJ, Leape LL, Kamberg CJ, Park RE. The reproductibility of a method to identify the overuse and underuse of medical procedures. N Engl J Med. 1988;338:1888–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Brennan TA, Hebert LE, Laird NM, et al. Hospital characteristics associated with adverse events and substandard care. JAMA. 1991;265:3265–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Mitchell PH, Shortell SM. Adverse outcomes and variations in organization of care delivery. Med Care. 1997;35:NS19-NS32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Leape LL, Bates DW, Cullen DJ, et al. Systems analysis of adverse drug events: ADE prevention group. JAMA. 1995;274(1):35–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric J. Thomas MD, MPH.

Additional information

Funding for this work was provided by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, E.J., Orav, E.J. & Brennan, T.A. Hospital ownership and preventable adverse events. J GEN INTERN MED 15, 211–219 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2000.07003.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2000.07003.x

Key words

Navigation