Skip to main content
Log in

Fostering professionalism in medical education

A call for improved assessment and meaningful incentives

  • Perspective
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasing attention has been focused on developing professionalism in medical school graduates. Unfortunately, the culture of academic medical centers and the behaviors that faculty model are often incongruent with our image of professionalism. The need for improved role modeling, better assessment of student behavior, and focused faculty development is reviewed. We propose that the incentive structure be adjusted to reward professional behavior in both students and faculty. The third-year medicine clerkship provides an ideal opportunity for clinician-educators to play a leading role in evaluating, rewarding, and ultimately fostering professionalism in medical school graduates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Curry RH, Makoul G. The evolution of courses in professional skills and perspectives for medical students. Acad Med. 1998;73:10–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Makoul G, Curry RH, Novack DH. The future of medical school courses in professional skills and perspectives. Acad Med. 1998;73:48–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. American Board of Internal Medicine. Project Professionalism; 1995. Available at: http://www.abim.org/pubs/profess.pdf. Accessed May 28, 2003.

  4. ABIM Foundation. Professionalism. Available at: http://www.abimfoundation.org/professional.html. Accessed May 28, 2003.

  5. American Board of Pediatrics. Professionalism. Available at: http://www.abp.org/residentmnprofguid.htm. Accessed May 23, 2003.

  6. Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. An argument for professionalism. Available at: http://www.saem.org/inform/adams.htm. Accessed May 23, 2003.

  7. Howard University College of Medicine, American College of Chest Physicians, and the CHEST Foundation, Washington, DC. Overcoming disparities in health care: a national dialogue facilitated by the surgeons general. April 9, 2003. Available at: http://www.kaisernetwork.org/health_cast/hcast_index.cfm?display=detail&hc=829. Accessed June 19, 2003.

  8. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Principles of medical ethics and professionalism in orthopaedic surgery. Available at: http://www.aaos.org/wordhtml/papers/ethics/prin.htm. Accessed May 23, 2003.

  9. American Board of Internal Medicine. American professionalism in medicine: issues and opportunities. Definition and objectives. Available at: http://www.abim.org/pubs/p2/definitn.htm. Accessed October 15, 2003.

  10. Medical School Objectives Writing Group. Report I: learning objectives for medical student education. Acad Med. 1999;74:13–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Outcome project slides. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/outcome/project/OutIntro.htm. Accessed May 28, 2003.

  12. Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Outcome project timeline. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/outcome/project/timeline.asp. Accessed May 28, 2003.

  13. Swick HM, Szenas P, Danoff D, Whitcomb ME. Teaching professionalism in undergraduate medical education. JAMA. 1999;282:830–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kao A, Lim M, Spevick J, Barzansky B. Teaching and evaluating school’s professionalism in US medical schools, 2002–2003. JAMA. 2003;290:1151–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cohen JJ. Leadership for medicine’s promising future. Acad Med. 1998;73:132–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ludmerer KM. Instilling professionalism in medical education. JAMA. 1999;282:881–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Feudtner C, Christakis DA, Christakis NA. Do clinical clerks suffer ethical erosion? Students’ perceptions of their ethical environment and personal development. Acad Med. 1994;69:670–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hafferty FW, Franks R. The hidden curriculum, ethics teaching, and the structure of medical education. Acad Med. 1994;69:861–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hafferty FW. Beyond curriculum reform: confronting medicine’s hidden curriculum. Acad Med. 1998;73:403–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Stern DT. In search of the informal curriculum: when and where professional values are taught. Acad Med. 1998;73(10 suppl):S28-S30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Preston R. Reaffirming professionalism through the education community. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:609–14.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  23. American Board of Internal Medicine. A Guide to Awareness and Evaluation of Humanistic Qualities in the Internist. Philadelphia, Pa: American Board of Internal Medicine; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Barrows HS. An overview of the uses of standardized patients for teaching and evaluating clinical skills. Acad Med. 1993;68:443–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Burack JH, Irby DM, Carline JD, Root RK, Larson EB. Teaching compassion and respect: attending physicians’ responses to problematic behaviors. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:49–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Richards BF, Wilking AP, Kirkland R. A four-month faculty development curriculum on teaching and learning. Acad Med. 1999;74:614–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hewson MG. A theory-based faculty development program for clinician-educators. Acad Med. 2000;75:498–501.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education and American Board of Medical Specialities Joint Initiative. Toolbox of Assessment Methods. Version 1.1, September 2000.

  29. Kreiter CD, Ferguson K, Lee WC, Brennan RL, Densen P. A generalizability study of a new standardized rating form used to evaluate students’ clinical clerkship performances. Acad Med. 1998;73:1294–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Littlefield J, Terrel C. Improving the quality of resident performance appraisals. Acad Med. 1997;72(suppl 1):S45-S47.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cunnington JPW, Neville AJ, Norman GR. The risks of thoroughness: reliability and validity of global ratings and checklists in an OSCE. Adv Health Sci Educ. 1997;1:227–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Swing S. The ACGME Outcome Project: Where are we now? Where are we going? Plenary session presented at the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Association for the Behavioral Sciences and Medical Education, Charleston, SC, October 10, 2003.

  33. Roberts J, Norman G. Reliability and learning from the objective structured clinical examination. Med Educ. 1990;24:219–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hodges B, Turnbull J, Cohen R, Bienenstock A, Norman G. Evaluating communication skills in the OSCE format: reliability and generalizability. Med Educ. 1996;30:38–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Roberts C, Wass V, Jones R, Sarangi S, Gillet A. A discourse analysis study of ‘good’ and ‘poor’ communication in an OSCE: a proposed new framework for teaching students. Med Educ. 2003;37:186–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Altshuler L, Kachur E. A culture OSCE: teaching residents to bridge different worlds. Acad Med. 2001;76:514.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Rogers JC, Coutts L. Do students’ attitudes during preclinical years predict their humanism as clerkship students? Acad Med. 2000;75(10 suppl):S74-S77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Pieters HM, Touw-Otten FW, DeMelker RA. Simulated patients in assessing consultation skills of trainees in general practice vocational training: a validity study. Med Educ. 1994;38:226–33.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Schnabl GK, Hassard TH, Kopelow ML. The assessment of interpersonal skills using standardized patients. Acad Med. 1991;66(9 suppl):S34-S36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. United States Medical Licensing Examination. Americans over-whelmingly support new medical license test; field trials show fairness, reliability of test. Available at: http://www.usmle.org/news/cse/newsrelease2503.htm. Accessed May 22, 2003.

  41. Freedman JA, Lehmann HP, Ogborn CJ. Web-based peer evaluation by medical students. Acad Med. 2000;75:539–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Arnold L, Willoughby L, Calkins V, Gammon L, Eberhart G. Use of peer evaluation in the assessment of medical students. J Med Educ. 1981;56:35–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Helfer RE. Peer evaluation: its potential usefulness in medical education. Br J Med Educ. 1972;6:224–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Small PA Jr, Stevens B, Duerson MC. Issues in medical education: basic problems and potential solutions. Acad Med. 1993;68(10 suppl):S89-S93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Asch E, Saltzberg D, Kaiser S. Reinforcement of self-directed learning and the development of professional attitudes through peer- and self-assessment. Acad Med. 1998;73:575.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Facteau CL, Facteau JD, Schoel LC, Russell JEA, Poteet ML. Reactions of leaders to 360-degree feedback from subordinates and peers. Leadership Q. 1998;9:427–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Antonioni D. Designing an effective 360-degree appraisal feedback process. Organ Dyn. 1996;25:24–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Musick DW, McDowell SM, Clark N, Salcido R. Pilot study of a 360-degree assessment instrument for physical medicine and rehabilitation residency programs. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82:394–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Minsch DA. Evaluating physicians’ professionalism and humanism: the case for humanism “connoisseurs.” Acad Med. 2002;77:489–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Henderson JV. Comprehensive, technology-based clinical education: the “virtual practicum.” Int J Psych Med. 1998;28:41–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Branch WT, Paranjape A. Feedback and reflection: teaching methods for clinical settings. Acad Med. 2002;77:1185–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Gordon J. Assessing students’ personal and professional development using portfolios and interviews. Med Educ. 2003;37:335–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Baernstein A, Fryer-Edwards K. Promoting reflection on professionalism: a comparison trial of educational interventions for medical students. Acad Med. 2003;78:742–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Arnold L. Assessing professional behavior: yesterday, today and tomorrow. Acad Med. 2002;77:502–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education. Key considerations for selecting assessment instruments and implementing assessment systems. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/outcome/assess/keyConsider.asp. Accessed October 15, 2003.

  56. American Board of Internal Medicine. Strategies for evaluating professionalism. Available at: http://www.abim.org/pubs/p2/strategy.htm. Accessed October 15, 2003.

  57. Arnold E, Blank L, Race K, Cipparone N. Can professionalism be measured? The development of a scale to be used in the medical environment. Acad Med. 1998;73:1119–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Papadakis MA, Osborn EHS, Cooke M, Healy K. University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine Clinical Clerkships Operation Committee. A strategy for the detection and evaluation of unprofessional behavior in medical students. Acad Med. 1999;74:980–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Smith S. An Educational Blueprint for the Brown University School of Medicine: Competency-based Curriculum. 3rd ed. Providence, RI: Brown University School of Medicine; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Sachdeva AK. Use of effective feedback to facilitate adult learning. J Cancer Educ. 1996;11:106–18.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Skinner BF. Science and Human Behavior. New York, NY: Macmillan; 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Weirsma UJ. The effects of extrinsic rewards in intrinsic motivation: a meta-analysis. J Occup Organ Psychol. 1992;65:101–14.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Maudsley RF. Content in context: medical education and society’s needs. Acad Med. 1999;74:143–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Association of American Medical Colleges. Humanism in Medicine Award. Available at: http://www.aamc.org/about/awards/humanism.htm. Accessed May 22, 2003.

  65. Arnold P. Gold Foundation. Humanism in Medicine Awards. Available at: http://www.humanism-in-medicine.org/. Accessed May 22, 2003.

  66. Healthcare Foundation of New Jersey. HFNJ Humanism in Medicine Awards. Available at: http://hfnj.org/patient.htm. Accessed May 22, 2003.

  67. Nutter DO, Bond JS, Coller BS, et al. Measuring faculty effort and contributions in medical education. Acad Med. 2000;75:199–207.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William H. Shrank MD.

Additional information

Funding for this project was provided in part by the C. Everett Koop Institute at Dartmouth, where Dr. Shrank was previously a fellow.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shrank, W.H., Reed, V.A. & Jernstedt, C. Fostering professionalism in medical education. J GEN INTERN MED 19, 887–892 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30635.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30635.x

Key words

Navigation