Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little information is available on physician characteristics and patient presentations that may influence complicance with evidence-based guidelines for acute low back pain.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether physicians’ management decisions are consistent with the Agency for Health Research Quality’s guideline and whether responses varied with the presentation of sciatica or by physician characteristics.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using a mailed survey.
PARTICIPANTS: Participants were randomly selected from internal medicine, family practice, general practice, emergency medicine, and occupational medicine specialties.
MEASUREMENTS: A questionnaire asked for recommendations for 2 case scenarios, representing patients without and with sciatica, respectively.
RESULTS: Seven hundred and twenty surveys were completed (response rate=25%). In cases 1 (without sciatica) and 2 (with sciatica), 26.9% and 4.3% of physicians fully complied with the guideline, respectively. For each year in practice, the odds of guideline noncompliance increased 1.03 times (95% confidence interval [CI]=1.01 to 1.05) for case 1. With occupational medicine as the referent specialty, general practice had the greatest odds of noncompliance (3.60, 95% CI=1.75 to 7.40) in case 1, followed by internal medicine and emergency medicine. Results for case 2 reflected the influence of sciatica with internal medicine having substantially higher odds (vs case 1) and the greatest odds of noncompliance of any specialty (6.93, 95% CI=1.47 to 32.78), followed by family practice and emergency medicine.
CONCLUSIONS: A majority of primary care physicians continue to be noncompliant with evidence-based back pain guidelines. Sciatica dramatically influenced clinical decision-making, increasing the extent of noncompliance, particularly for internal medicine and family practice. Physicians’ misunderstanding of sciatica’ natural history and belief that more intensive initial management is indicated may be factors underlying the observed influence of sciatica.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Hart GL, Deyo RA, Cherkin DC. Physician office visits for low back pain: frequency, clinical evaluation, and treatment patterns from a national survey. Spine. 1995;20:11–9.
Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Conrad D, Volinn E. Cost, controversy, crisis: low back pain and health of the public. Annu Rev Pub Health. 1991;12:141–56.
Frymoyer JW. An overview of the incidences and costs of low back pain. Orthop Clin North Am. 1991;22:263–71.
Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Wheeler K, Ciol MA. Physician variation in diagnostic testing for low back pain: who you see is what you get. Arth Rheum. 1994;37:15–22.
Spitzer WO, LeBlanc FE, Dupuis M. Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders. Spine. 1987;12:S1–60.
Bigos S, Bowyer O, Braen G, et al. Acute low back problems in adults: clinical practice guideline No. 14. AHCPR publication No. 95-0642. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services. December; 1994.
Koes BW, van Tulder MW, Ostelo R, Burton KA, Waddell G. Clinical guidelines for the management of LBP in primary care: an international comparison. Spine. 2001;26:2504–14.
Andersson GB, Svensson HO, Oden A. The intensity of work recovery in low back pain. Spine. 1983;8:880–4.
Mahmud MA, Webster BS, Courtney TK, Matz S, Tacci JA, Christiani DC. Clinical management and the duration of disability for work-related low back pain. J Occup Environ Med. 2000;42:1178–87.
Schers H, Braspenning J, Drijver R, Wensing M, Grol R. Low back pain in general practice: reported management and reasons for not adhering to the guidelines in The Netherlands. Br J Gen Pract. 2000;50:640–4.
Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Wheeler K, Ciol MA. Physician views about treating low back pain: results of a national survey. Spine. 1995;20:1–9.
Bishop PB, Wing PC. Compliance with clinical practice guidelines in family physicians managing worker’s compensation board patients with acute lower back pain. Spine J. 2003;3:442–50.
Dilorio D, Henley E, Doughty A. A survey of physician practice patterns and adherence to acute low back guidelines. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1015–21.
Directory of Physicians in the United States on CD-ROM, 1998. Chicago: American Medical Association; 1999.
SPSS Inc. SPSS 11.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc.; 2002.
Choudhry NK, Fletcher RH, Soumerai SB. The relationship between clinical experience and quality of health care. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:260–73.
Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:1129–36.
AMA Council on Long Range Planning and Development. Demographic Characteristics of AMA Leadership. CLRPD Report 2-I-98. Chicago: American Medical Association; 1998.
Jones TV, Gerrity MS, Earp J. Written case simulations: do they predict physicians’ behavior? J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43:805–15.
Carey TS, Garrett J. Patterns of ordering diagnostic tests for patients with acute low back pain. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:807–14.
Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999;282:1458–65.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety is owned and operated by the Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. The Institute conducts original scientific investigations into the causes and prevention of job-related injuries and disability. All research is published in peer-reviewed journals in science, engineering, or medicine.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Webster, B.S., Courtney, T.K., Huang, YH. et al. Brief report: Physicians’ initial management of acute low back pain versus evidence-based guidelines. J GEN INTERN MED 20, 1132–1135 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0230.x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0230.x