Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Internal medicine residents’ perceptions of cross-cultural training

Barriers, needs, and educational recommendations

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physicians increasingly face the challenge of managing clinical encounters with patients from a range of cultural backgrounds. Despite widespread interest in cross-cultural care, little is known about resident physicians’ perceptions of what will best enable them to provide quality care to diverse patient populations.

OBJECTIVES: To assess medicine residents’ (1) perceptions of cross-cultural care, (2) barriers to care, and (3) training experiences and recommendations.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Qualitative individual interviews were conducted with 26 third-year medicine residents at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston (response rate=87%). Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed.

RESULTS: Despite significant interest in cross-cultural care, almost all of the residents reported very little training during residency. Most had gained cross-cultural skills through informal learning. A few were skeptical about formal training, and some expressed concern that it is impossible to understand every culture. Challenges to the delivery of cross-cultural care included managing patients with limited English proficiency, who involve family in critical decision making, and who have beliefs about disease that vary from the biomedical model. Residents cited many implications to these barriers, ranging from negatively impacting the patient-physician relationship to compromised care. Training recommendations included making changes to the educational climate and informal and formal training mechanisms.

CONCLUSIONS: If cross-cultural education is to be successful, it must take into account residents’ perspectives and be focused on overcoming residents’ cited barriers. It is important to convey that cross-cultural education is a set of skills that can be taught and applied, in a time-efficient manner, rather than requiring an insurmountable knowledge base.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roter Debra, Hall Judith A. Doctors Talking with Patients, Patients Talking with Doctors. Westport, CT: Auburn House; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barrier PA, Li JT, Jensen NM. Two words to improve physician-patient communication: what else? Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78:211–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stewart M, Brown JB, Boon H, Galajda J, Meredith L, Sangster M. Evidence on patient-doctor communication. Cancer Prev Control. 1999;3:25–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bradley CP. Commentary on “Interventions for health care providers improve provider patient interactions and patient satisfaction.” ACP J Club. 2002;137:34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Betancourt JR, Carrillo JE, Green AR. Hypertension in multicultural and minority populations: linking communication to compliance. Curr Hypertens Rep. 1999;1:482–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Eisenberg JM. Sociologic influences on decision-making by clinicians. Ann Intern Med. 1979;90:957–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Institute of Medicine. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kristal L, Pennock PW, Foote SM, Trygstad CW. Cross-cultural family medicine residency training. J Fam Prac. 1983;17:683–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zweifier J, Gonzalez AM. Teaching residents to care for culturally diverse populations. Acad Med. 1998;73:1056–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shapiro J, Lenahan P. Family medicine in a culturally diverse world: a solution-oriented approach to common cross-cultural problems in medical encounters. Fam Med. 1996;28:249–55.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Culhane-Pera KA, Like RC, Lebensolhn-Chialvo P, Loewe R. Multicultural curricula in family practice residencies. Fam Med. 2000;3:167–73.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Betancourt JR. Cross-cultural medical education: conceptual approaches and frameworks for evaluation. Acad Med. 2003;78:560–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Patton M. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, 3rd Spiral edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Park ER, Betancourt JR, Kim M, Maina A, Blumenthal D, Weissman J. Mixed message: residents’ experiences learning cross-cultural care. Acad Med. 2005;80:874–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Weissman JS, Betancourt JR, Campbell EG, et al. Room for improvement: resident physicians preparedness to provide cross-cultural care. JAMA. 2005;294:1058–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Accreditation Standards. Available at: http://www.lcme.org/standard.htm. Accessed February 7, 2005.

  19. Goroll AH, Sirio C, Duffy FD, et al. A new model for accreditation of residency programs in internal medicine. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:902–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Brotherton SE, Rockey PH, Etzel SI. US graduate medical education, 2003–2004. J Am Med Assoc. 2004;292:1032–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Like RC, Steiner R, Rubel AJ. Recommended core curriculum guidelines on culturally sensitive and competent health care. Fam Med. 1996;28:291–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Carillo JE, Green AR, Betancourt JR. Cross-cultural primary care: a patient-based approach. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:829–34.

    Google Scholar 

  23. American Academy of Pediatrics. Culturally effected pediatric care: a patient-based approach. Pediatrics. 1999;103:167–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Betancourt JR, Green A, Carillo E, Park ER. Cultural competence, quality, and disparities in health care: key perspectives and recent trends from managed care, Government and Academia. Health Aff. 2005;24:499–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fortier JP, Bishop D. Setting the Agenda for Research on Cultural Competence in Health Care. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Minority Health and Agency for Health Care Research and Quality; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shapiro J, Hollingshead Morrison EH. Primary care resident, faculty, and patient views of barriers to cultural competence, and the skills needed to overcome them. Med Educ. 2002;36:749–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lingard L, Tallett S, Rosenfield J. Culture and physician-patient communication: a qualitative exploration of residents’ experiences and attitudes. Ann R Coll Surg Can. 2002;35:331–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Data contained in this manuscript have been presented at the Society of General Internal Medicine and at the Society of Behavioral Medicine annual meetings.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, E.R., Betancourt, J.R., Miller, E. et al. Internal medicine residents’ perceptions of cross-cultural training. J GEN INTERN MED 21, 476–480 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00430.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00430.x

Key words

Navigation