Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

When do older adults turn to the internet for health information? Findings from the wisconsin longitudinal study

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding how and when patients use nonphysician sources of health information is important to facilitate shared decision making within provider outpatient visits. However, little is known about which older adults seek health information on the internet or when.

OBJECTIVE: To determine how patient characteristics are related to seeking health information online and to the timing of these searches in relation to doctor visits.

PARTICIPANTS: Six thousand two hundred and seventy-nine respondents (aged 63 to 66 years) who completed the 2004 round of phone and mail surveys (70% response) as part of the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study Graduate Sample.

MEASUREMENTS: Self-reported use of the internet to search for health information and timing of use.

RESULTS: One-third of respondents had searched online for information about their own health or health care. Half of these searched for health information unrelated to their last doctor visit, while 1/3 searched after a visit, and 1/6 searched before. Among respondents with internet access at home or work, years of education (odds ratio [OR]=1.09, confidence interval [CI]=1.06 to 1.13) and openness-to-experience (OR=1.26, CI=1.16 to 1.36) were positively associated with searching online for health information irrespective of timing in relation to doctor visits. Compared with those who had never sought health information online, sicker individuals (especially those with cancer, OR=1.51, CI=1.14 to 1.99) were more likely to seek information online after a doctor visit. Attitudinal and personality factors were related to seeking health information online before or unrelated to a visit.

CONCLUSIONS: There are important differences in the timing of online health information searches by psychological and health characteristics among older adults with internet access.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jenkins V, Fallowfield L, Saul J. Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres. Br J Cancer. 2001;84:48–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Benbassat J, Pilpel D, Tidhar M. Patients’ preferences for participation in clinical decision making: a review of published surveys. Ann Behav Med. 1998;24:81–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Woolf SH, Chan EC, Harris R, et al. Promoting informed choice: transforming health care to dispense knowledge for decision making. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:293–300.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McNutt RA. Shared medical decision making: problems, process, progress. JAMA. 2004;292:2516–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Institute of Medicine. Improving Medical Education: Enhancing the Behavioral and Social Science Content of Medical School Curricula. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:681–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stevenson FA, Barry CA, Britten N, Barber N, Bradley CP. Doctorpatient communication about drugs: the evidence for shared decision making. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50:829–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cotten SR, Gupta SS. Characteristics of online and offline health information seekers and factors that discriminate between them. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59:1795–806.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wagner TH, Baker LC, Bundorf MK, Singer S. Use of the internet for health information by the chronically ill. Prev Chronic Dis. 2004;1:A13.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Czaja R, Manfredi C, Price J. The determinants and consequences of information seeking among cancer patients. J Health Commun. 2003;8:529–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Peterson MW, Fretz PC. Patient use of the internet for information in a lung cancer clinic. Chest. 2003;123:452–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shuyler KS, Knight KM. What are patients seeking when they turn to the Internet? Qualitative content analysis of questions asked by visitors to an orthopaedics Web site. Med Internet Res. 2003;5:e24.

  13. Fox S. Health Information Online. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pautler SE, Tan JK, Dugas GR, et al. Use of the internet for self-education by patients with prostate cancer. Urology. 2001;57:230–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Baker L, Wagner TH, Singer S, Bundorf MK. Use of the internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey. JAMA. 2003;289:2400–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ziebland S, Chapple A, Dumelow C, Evans J, Prinjha S, Rozmovits L. How the internet affects patients’ experience of cancer: a qualitative study. BMJ. 2004;328:564.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Grant RW, Cagliero E, Chueh HC, Meigs JB. Internet use among primary care patients with type 2 diabetes: the generation and education gap. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:470–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fox S. Older Americans and the Internet. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Diaz JA, Griffith RA, Ng JJ, Reinert SE, Friedmann PD, Moulton AW. Patients’ use of the Internet for medical information. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17:180–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wagner TH, Bundorf MK, Singer SJ, Baker LC. Free internet access, the digital divide, and health information. Med Care. 2005;43:415–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Houston TK, Allison JJ. Users of Internet health information: differences by health status. J Med Internet Res. 2002;4:E7.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Meischke H, Eisenberg M, Rowe S, Cagle A. Do older adults use the Internet for information on heart attacks? Results from a survey of seniors in King County, Washington. Heart Lung. 2005;34:3–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Adams N, Stubbs D, Woods V. Psychological barriers to Internet usage among older adults in the UK. Med Inform Internet Med. 2005;30:3–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mead N, Varnam R, Rogers A, Roland M. What predicts patients’ interest in the Internet as a health resource in primary care in England? J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003;8:33–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rogers A, Mead N. More than technology and access: primary care patients’ views on the use and non-use of health information in the Internet age. Health Soc Care Community. 2004;12:102–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa ER. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002;287:2691–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wisconsin Longitudinal Study 1957–2004. http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/wlsresearch.

  28. Henmon VAC, Nelson MJ. Henmon-Nelson Tests of Mental Ability, High School Examination—Grades 7 to 12—Forms A, B, and C. Teacher’s Manual. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company; 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Henmon VAC, Nelson MJ. The Henmon-Nelson Tests of Mental Ability. Manual for Administration. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company; 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Seltzer MM, Floyd F, Greenberg J, Lounds J, Lindstromm M, Hong J. Life course impacts of mild intellectual deficits. Am J Ment Retard. 2005;110:451–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ware J Jr.,Kosinaki M, Keller SD. A 12-Item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-12: How To Score the SF-12 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Duke University Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development. Multidimensional Functional Assessment: The OARS Methodology. Durham, NC: Duke University: 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  34. McCrae RR, Costa PT Jr. Personality in Adulthood: A Five-Factor Perspective. 2nd edn. New York: Guilford Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Srivastava S, John OP, Gosling SD, Potter J. Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: set like plaster or persistent change? J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;84:1041–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:651–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A, Moskowitz MA. Measuring patients’ desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:23–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Krantz DS, Baum A, Wideman M. Assessment of preferences for self-treatment and information in health care. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980;39:977–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. SAS Institute. SAS Statistical Software, 9.1 edn. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  40. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software, 9.0 edn. College Station, TX: Stata Statistical Software; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Number of “cyberchondriacs”—U.S. adults who go online for health information—increases to estimated 117 million. Harris Poll No. 54 2005;5.

  42. Winick BJ. Foreword: planning for the future through advance directive instruments. Psychol Public Policy Law. 1998;4:579–609.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Gaston CM, Mitchell G. Information giving and decision-making in patients with advanced cancer; a systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:2252–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Torke AM, Corbie-Smith GM, Branch WT Jr. African American patients’ perspectives on medical decision making. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:525–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. U.S. Bureau of the Census. Educational Attainment in the United States: March 2000. Series P-20, No. 536. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Blackhall LJ, Murphy ST, Frank G, Michel V, Azen S. Ethnicity and attitudes toward patient autonomy. JAMA. 1995;274:820–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Sudman S, Bradburn NM. Asking Questions: A Practical Guide to Questionnaire Design. San Francisco, CA: Josecy-Bass Inc.; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Bessel TL, McDonald S, Silagy CA, Anderson JN, Hiller JE, Sansom LN. Do Internet interventions for consumers cause more harm than good? A systematic review. Health Expect. 2002;5:28–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Diaz JA, Sciamanna CN, Evangelou E, Stamp MJ, Ferguson T. Brief report: what types of Internet guidance do patients want from their physicians? J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:683–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, WI, USA

    Maureen A. Smith MD, MPH, PhD

  2. Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA

    Jeremy Freese PhD

  3. Robert Wood Johnson Scholars in Health Policy Research Program, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Jeremy Freese PhD

  4. Center for Clinical and Genetic Economics, Duke Clinical Research Institute, PO Box 17969, 27715, Durham, NC

    Kathryn E. Flynn PhD

Authors
  1. Kathryn E. Flynn PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maureen A. Smith MD, MPH, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jeremy Freese PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathryn E. Flynn PhD.

Additional information

No conflicts of interest to declare.

Kathryn Flynn was supported by dissertation grant R36-HS015544 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and a postdoctoral research fellowship awarded by Johnson & Johnson.

This research uses data from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (WLS) of the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Since 1991, the WLS has been supported principally by the National Institute on Aging (AG-9775 and AG-21079), with additional support from the Vilas Estate Trust, the National Science Foundation, the Spencer Foundation, and the Graduate School of the University of Wisconsin-Madison. A public use file of data from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study is available at http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/wlsresearch. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flynn, K.E., Smith, M.A. & Freese, J. When do older adults turn to the internet for health information? Findings from the wisconsin longitudinal study. J GEN INTERN MED 21, 1295–1301 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00622.x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00622.x

Key words

Search

Navigation