Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T13:21:38.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Call to Heal Medicine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Abstract

Authors in this special Hypatia issue seem called to heal ethics, medicine, and the new field — medical ethics. After explaining why feminists should feel this calling, I group authors” contributions as responses to questions: 1. Why hasn't medical ethics already healed medicine? 2. What role should “caring” play? 3. Must we first heal science? 4. Are we calling health a virtue? 5. Why haven't the many medical ethics books helped? 6. How do our sisters in sociology support us?

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Callahan, Daniel. 1987. Setting limits. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Ehrenreich, Barbara and English, Deirdre. 1979. For her own good. New York: Anchor/Doubleday.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelhardt, H. Tristram. 1986. The foundations of bioethics. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Fisher, Sue. 1986. In the patient's best interest. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Joffe, Carole. 1986. The regulation of sexuality. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder and Meyers, Diana T. eds., 1987. Women and moral theory. Totowa, NJ: Rowan & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Narayan, Uma. 1988. Working together across difference: Some considerations on emotions and political practice. Hypatia 3 (2):3147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, Barbara Katz. 1987. The tentative pregnancy. New York: Viking Penguin.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. 1938. Three guineas. London: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar