Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Mode of death in heart failure: findings from the ATLAS trial
  1. P A Poole-Wilson1,
  2. B F Uretsky2,
  3. K Thygesen3,
  4. J G F Cleland4,
  5. B M Massie5,
  6. L Rydén6,
  7. On Behalf Of The Atlas Study Group
  1. 1Faculty of Medicial Imperial College, London, UK
  2. 2University of Texas, Galveston, Texas, USA
  3. 3Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  4. 4University of Hull, Hull, Humberside, UK
  5. 5University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
  6. 6Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
  1. Correspondence to:
    Professor Philip A Poole-Wilson, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, Dovehouse Street, London SW3 6LY, UK;
    p.poole-wilson{at}ic.ac.uk

Abstract

Objective: To investigate markers that predict modes of death in patients with chronic heart failure.

Design: Randomised, double blind, three period, comparative, parallel group study (ATLAS, assessment of treatment with lisinopril and survival).

Patients: 3164 patients with mild, moderate, or severe chronic heart failure (New York Heart Association functional class II–IV).

Interventions: High dose (32.5 or 35 mg) or low dose (2.5 or 5 mg) lisinopril once daily for a median of 46 months.

Main outcome measures: All cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, sudden death, and chronic heart failure death related to prognostic factors using competing risks analysis. Mode of death was classified by trialists and by an independent end point committee.

Results: Age, male sex, pre-existing ischaemic heart disease, increasing heart rate, creatinine concentration, and certain drugs taken at randomisation were markers of increased risk of all cause mortality and cardiovascular death. There were risk markers for sudden death that were different from the risk markers for death from chronic heart failure. Low systolic blood pressure at baseline, raised creatinine, reduced serum sodium or haemoglobin, and increased heart rate were associated with chronic heart failure death. Use of β blockers or antiarrhythmic agents (mainly amiodarone) was associated with a reduced risk of sudden death, whereas long acting nitrates and previous use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors were markers for increased risk.

Conclusions: The use of competing risks analysis on the data from the ATLAS study has identified variables associated with certain modes of death in heart failure patients. This approach to analysing outcomes may make it possible to predict which patients might benefit most from particular therapeutic interventions.

  • congestive heart failure
  • lisinopril
  • competing risks analysis
  • predictive factors
  • AIRE, acute infarction ramipril efficacy
  • ATLAS, assessment of treatment with lisinopril and survival
  • NYHA, New York Heart Association
  • SOLVD, studies of left ventricular dysfunction
  • V-HeFT II, vasodilator heart failure trial II

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

Linked Articles

  • Miscellanea
    BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Cardiovascular Society