Article Text

Download PDFPDF
The “inverse housing law” and respiratory health
  1. D Blanea,
  2. R Mitchellb,
  3. M Bartleyc
  1. aDivision of Population Science, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, bSchool of Geographical Science, University of Bristol, cDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London
  1. Dr Blane, Department of Social Science and Medicine, ICSTM: Charing Cross, St Dunstan's Road, London W6 8RP (d.blane{at}ic.ac.uk)

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE To investigate whether there is a mismatch within Britain between climate severity and housing quality (“inverse housing law”) and whether this mismatch is associated with respiratory health.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Cross sectional observational study. Britain (Scotland, Wales and England). The 3023 male and 3694 female Health and Lifestyle Survey participants with valid data available on all relevant items.

MAIN RESULTS Geographical mapping shows a mismatch between climate severity and housing quality. Individual level analysis shows that lung function is associated with climate and housing, and their interaction, independently of cigarette smoking status. The physical quality of the housing seems to be most important to respiratory health in areas with harsh climate.

CONCLUSIONS Interpretation must be cautious because cross sectional data have been used to investigate processes that are longitudinal and, possibly, selective. Nevertheless, there does seem to be an “inverse housing law”, such that some of the worst quality housing is found in areas with severe climate; and, on the balance of probabilities, this inverse housing law affects respiratory health.

  • climate
  • housing
  • lung function

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Funding: Economic and Social Research Council research grants L128251003 and L128251012.

  • Conflicts of interest: none.