skip to main content
10.1145/1460563.1460675acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Changes in use and perception of facebook

Published:08 November 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

As social computing systems persist over time, the user experiences and interactions they support may change. One type of social computing system, Social Network Sites (SNSs), are becoming more popular across broad segments of Internet users. Facebook, in particular, has very broad participation amongst college attendees, and has been growing in other populations as well. This paper looks at how use of Facebook has changed over time, as indicated by three consecutive years of survey data and interviews with a subset of survey respondents. Reported uses of the site remain relatively constant over time, but the perceived audience for user profiles and attitudes about the site show differences over the study period.

References

  1. Ackerman, M. The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility. in Carroll, J. ed. Human Computer Interaction in the New Millennium, ACM Press, New York, NY, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ackerman, M. S. and McDonald, D. W., Answer Garden 2: Merging Organizational Memory with Collaborative Help. in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, (1996), ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. boyd, d., Friendster and Publicly Articulated Social Networks. in Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems, (Vienna, Austria, 2004), ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. boyd, d. m. and Ellison, N. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 13 (1). article 11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruckman, A. MediaMOO: A Professional Community for Media Researchers. Convergence, 1 (1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bryant, S., Forte, A. and Bruckman, A., Becoming Wikipedian: Transformation of Participation in a Collaborative Online Encyclopedia. in ACM-GROUP, (Sanibel Island, FL, 2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Churchill, E. F. and Bly, S., Virtual Environments at Work: ongoing use of MUDs in the Workplace. in WACC'99, (San Francisco, CA, 1999), ACM Press, 99--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. DiMicco, J. M. and Millen, D. R., Identity management: multiple presentations of self in facebook. in Conference on Supporting Group Work, (Sanibel Island, FL, 2007), ACM Press, 383--386. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Donath, J. S. Signals in social supernets. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 13 (1). 12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellison, N., Steinfield, C. and Lampe, C. The benefits of Facebook "friends:" Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 12 (4). article 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Erickson, T. and Kellogg, W. A. Social Translucence: Designing Systems that Support Social Processes. in Carroll, J. ed. Human-Computer Interaction in the New Millennium, ACM Press, New York, 2002, 325--345. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gilbert, E., Karahalios, K. and Sandvig, C., The Network in the Garden: An Empirical Analysis of Social Media in Rural Life. in Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), (Florence, Italy, 2008), ACM Press, 1603--1612. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Golder, S., Wilkinson, D. and Huberman, B. A., Rhythms of Social Interaction: Messaging within a Massive Online Network. in 3rd International Conference on Communities and Technologies (CT2007). (East Lansing, MI, 2007), Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Gross, R. and Acquisti, A., Information Revelation and Privacy in Online Social Networks. in Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society, (Alexandria, VA, 2005), ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hargittai, E. Whose Space? Differences Among Users and Non-Users of Social Network Sites Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 13 (1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Joinson, A. N., Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: motives and use of facebook. in Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), (Florence, Italy, 2008), ACM Press, 1027--1036. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Lakhani, K. R. and Hippel, E. v. How open source software works: "Free" user to user assistance. Research Policy, 32 (6). 923--943.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Lampe, C., Ellison, N. and Steinfield, C., A Face(book) in the Crowd: Social Searching vs. Social Browsing. in ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, (Banff, Canada, 2006), ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Lampe, C., Ellison, N. and Steinfield, C., Profile Elements as Signals in an Online Social Network. in ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), (San Jose, CA, 2007), ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Moreland, R. L. and Levine, J. M. Socialization in small groups: Temporal changes in individual-group relations. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 15. 137--192.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Nonnecke, B., Preece, J. and Andrews, D., What lurkers and posters think of each other. in 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, (Hawaii, 2004), IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Smith, M. Measures and Maps of Usenet. in Lueg, C. and Fisher, D. eds. From Usenet to CoWebs: Interacting with Social Information Spaces, Springer Verlag, New York, NY, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Wellman, B. An Electronic Group is Virtually a Social Network. in Kiesler, S. ed. Culture of the Internet, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Wellman, B. Which Types of Ties and Networks Give What Kinds of Social Support? Advances in Group Processes, 9. 207--235.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Changes in use and perception of facebook

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '08: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
      November 2008
      752 pages
      ISBN:9781605580074
      DOI:10.1145/1460563

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 November 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader