skip to main content
article
Free Access

The integration of computing and routine work

Published:01 July 1986Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Most computing serves as a resource or tool to support other work: performing complex analyses for engineering projects, preparing documents, or sending electronic mail using office automation equipment, etc. To improve the character, quality, and ease of computing work, we must understand how automated systems actually are integrated into the work they support. How do people actually adapt to computing as a resource? How do they deal with the unreliability in hardware, software, or operations; data inaccuracy; system changes; poor documentation; inappropriate designs; etc.; which are present in almost every computing milieu, even where computing is widely used and considered highly successful? This paper presents some results of a detailed empirical study of routine computer use in several organizations. We present a theoretical account of computing work and use it to explain a number of observed phenomena, such as:

  • How people knowingly use “false” data to obtain desired analytical results by tricking their systems.

  • How organizations come to rely upon complex, critical computer systems despite significant, recurrent, known errors and inaccurate data.

  • How people work around inadequate computing systems by using manual or duplicate systems, rather than changing their systems via maintenance or enhancement.

In addition, the framework for analyzing computing and routine work presented here proves useful for representing and reasoning about activity in multiactor systems in general, and in understanding how better to integrate organizations of people and computers in which work is coordinated.

References

  1. 1 BECKER, F. Workspace: Creating Environments in Organizations. Praeger, New York, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2 BECKER, H. Art Worlds. University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif., 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3 BENDIFALLAH, S., AND SCACCHI, W. Understanding software maintenance work. IEEE Trans. So{tw. Eng. To be published. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4 BENNETT, H.S. On Becoming a Rock Musician. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst, Mass., 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5 BOSK, C.L. Forgive and Remember: Managing Medical Failure. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6 CROZIER, M., AND FRIEDBERG, E. Actors and Systems. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7 CYERT, R., AND MARCH, J. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1963.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8 DER~, D. Computers in Welfare: The MIS-Match. Sage, Beverly Hills, CaliL, 1981. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9 ESTR{N, D., AND GASSER, L. Applying distributed problem-solving to large, multi-organization, heterogeneous internetworks. Working Paper, Computer Science Dept. Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10 FAULKNER, R. Music on Demand: Composers and Careers in the Hollywood Film Industry. Transaction Books, New Brunswick, N.J., 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11 FI~ES, R. A commitment-based framework for describing informal cooperative work. Cognitive Sci. 6 (1982), 331-347.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12 GASSER, L. The social dynamics of routine computer use in complex organizations. Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of California, Irvine, 1984. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13 GASSER, L. MACE: A multi-agent computing environment. Working Paper, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14 GASSER, L. Negotiated order: Concerted action in multi-agent systems. Working Paper, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15 GERSON, E. On quality of life. Am. Sociol. Rev. 41 (Oct. 1976), 793-806.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16 GERSON, E. Scientific work and social worlds. Knowledge 3 (Mar. 1983), 357-377.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17 GERSON, E., AND STAR, S.L. Modeling due process in the workplace. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Office Information Systems. ACM, New York, 1986. To be published. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18 HEWITT, C., AND DE JONG, P. Open systems. In On Conceptual Modeling. M. L. Brodie, J. Mylopoulous, and J. W. Schmidt, Eds. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984, pp. 147-164.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19 HUGHES, E.C. Men and Their Work. Free Press, New York, 1958.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20 INBAR, M. Routine Decision Making: The Future of Bureaucracy. Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif., 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21 SLING, R. Automated welfare client-tracking service integration: The political economy of computing. Commun. ACM 21, 6 (June 1978), 484-492. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 22 KLING, R. Defining the boundaries of computing across complex organizations. In Critical Issues in Information Systems Research. Wiley, New York. To be published. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. 23 SLING, R., AND IACONO, S. Behind the terminal: The backstage organization of computing in organizations. Working Paper, Public Policy Research Organization, Univ. of California, Irvine, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 24 SLING, R., AND SCACCHI, W. Recurrent dilemmas of computer use in complex organizations. In Proceedings of the 1979 National Computer Conference. AFIPS Press, Reston, Va., 1979, pp. 573-581.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. 25 SLING, R., AND SCACCHi, W. The web of computing: Computer technology as social organization. In Advances in Computers, M. C. Yovits, Ed. Academic Press, Orlando, Fla., 1982, pp. 1-89.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. 26 KUSTERER, K. Knowhow on the Job: The Important Working Knowledge of "Unskilled" Workers. Westview Press, Boulder, Colo., 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. 27 LOFLAND, J. Doing Social Life: The Qualitative Study of Human Interaction ~n Natural Settings. Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. 28 LUCAS, H.C. Implementation: The Key to Successful Information Systems. Columbia University Press, New York, 1981. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. 29 MALVEV, M. Simple Systems, Complex Environments. Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif., 1981. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. 30 MARCH, J., AND SIMON, H. Organizations. Wiley, New York, 1958.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. 31 McCuE, G.M. IBM's Santa Teresa Laboratory: Architectural design for program development. IBM Syst. J. 17 (1978), 4-25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. 32 ORLICKY, J. Material Requirements Planning. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. 33 REIMER, J. Hard Hats: The Work World of Construction Workers. Sage, Beverly Hills., Calif., 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. 34 SCACCH,, W., GASSER, L., AND GERSON, E. Problems and strategies in organizing computeraided design work. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (Oct.). IEEE, New York, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. 35 SCACCHI, W., BENDIFALLAH, S., BLOCH, A., CHOI, S., GARG, P., JAZZAR, A., SAFAVI, A., SKEER, Z., AND TURNER, M. Modeling the software process: A knowledge-based approach. Working Paper, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. 36 STRAUSS, A. Negotiations." Varieties, Contexts, Processes, and Social Order. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Calif., 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. 37 STRAUSS, A., FAGERHAUGH, S., SUZCEK, B., AND WEINER, C. The Social Organization o{Medical Work. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. 38 THOMPSON, J.D. Organizations in Action. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. 39 WEICK, K. The Social Psychology of Organizing. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. 40 WIC, HT, O.W. Production and Inventory Management in the Computer Age. Cahners Books, Boston, Mass., 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The integration of computing and routine work

                            Recommendations

                            Comments

                            Login options

                            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                            Sign in

                            Full Access

                            PDF Format

                            View or Download as a PDF file.

                            PDF

                            eReader

                            View online with eReader.

                            eReader