Abstract
Most computing serves as a resource or tool to support other work: performing complex analyses for engineering projects, preparing documents, or sending electronic mail using office automation equipment, etc. To improve the character, quality, and ease of computing work, we must understand how automated systems actually are integrated into the work they support. How do people actually adapt to computing as a resource? How do they deal with the unreliability in hardware, software, or operations; data inaccuracy; system changes; poor documentation; inappropriate designs; etc.; which are present in almost every computing milieu, even where computing is widely used and considered highly successful? This paper presents some results of a detailed empirical study of routine computer use in several organizations. We present a theoretical account of computing work and use it to explain a number of observed phenomena, such as:
How people knowingly use “false” data to obtain desired analytical results by tricking their systems.
How organizations come to rely upon complex, critical computer systems despite significant, recurrent, known errors and inaccurate data.
How people work around inadequate computing systems by using manual or duplicate systems, rather than changing their systems via maintenance or enhancement.
In addition, the framework for analyzing computing and routine work presented here proves useful for representing and reasoning about activity in multiactor systems in general, and in understanding how better to integrate organizations of people and computers in which work is coordinated.
- 1 BECKER, F. Workspace: Creating Environments in Organizations. Praeger, New York, 1981.Google Scholar
- 2 BECKER, H. Art Worlds. University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif., 1982.Google Scholar
- 3 BENDIFALLAH, S., AND SCACCHI, W. Understanding software maintenance work. IEEE Trans. So{tw. Eng. To be published. Google Scholar
- 4 BENNETT, H.S. On Becoming a Rock Musician. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst, Mass., 1980.Google Scholar
- 5 BOSK, C.L. Forgive and Remember: Managing Medical Failure. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., 1979.Google Scholar
- 6 CROZIER, M., AND FRIEDBERG, E. Actors and Systems. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., 1980.Google Scholar
- 7 CYERT, R., AND MARCH, J. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1963.Google Scholar
- 8 DER~, D. Computers in Welfare: The MIS-Match. Sage, Beverly Hills, CaliL, 1981. Google Scholar
- 9 ESTR{N, D., AND GASSER, L. Applying distributed problem-solving to large, multi-organization, heterogeneous internetworks. Working Paper, Computer Science Dept. Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, 1986.Google Scholar
- 10 FAULKNER, R. Music on Demand: Composers and Careers in the Hollywood Film Industry. Transaction Books, New Brunswick, N.J., 1983.Google Scholar
- 11 FI~ES, R. A commitment-based framework for describing informal cooperative work. Cognitive Sci. 6 (1982), 331-347.Google Scholar
- 12 GASSER, L. The social dynamics of routine computer use in complex organizations. Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of California, Irvine, 1984. Google Scholar
- 13 GASSER, L. MACE: A multi-agent computing environment. Working Paper, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, 1986.Google Scholar
- 14 GASSER, L. Negotiated order: Concerted action in multi-agent systems. Working Paper, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, 1986.Google Scholar
- 15 GERSON, E. On quality of life. Am. Sociol. Rev. 41 (Oct. 1976), 793-806.Google Scholar
- 16 GERSON, E. Scientific work and social worlds. Knowledge 3 (Mar. 1983), 357-377.Google Scholar
- 17 GERSON, E., AND STAR, S.L. Modeling due process in the workplace. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Office Information Systems. ACM, New York, 1986. To be published. Google Scholar
- 18 HEWITT, C., AND DE JONG, P. Open systems. In On Conceptual Modeling. M. L. Brodie, J. Mylopoulous, and J. W. Schmidt, Eds. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984, pp. 147-164.Google Scholar
- 19 HUGHES, E.C. Men and Their Work. Free Press, New York, 1958.Google Scholar
- 20 INBAR, M. Routine Decision Making: The Future of Bureaucracy. Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif., 1979.Google Scholar
- 21 SLING, R. Automated welfare client-tracking service integration: The political economy of computing. Commun. ACM 21, 6 (June 1978), 484-492. Google Scholar
- 22 KLING, R. Defining the boundaries of computing across complex organizations. In Critical Issues in Information Systems Research. Wiley, New York. To be published. Google Scholar
- 23 SLING, R., AND IACONO, S. Behind the terminal: The backstage organization of computing in organizations. Working Paper, Public Policy Research Organization, Univ. of California, Irvine, 1983.Google Scholar
- 24 SLING, R., AND SCACCHI, W. Recurrent dilemmas of computer use in complex organizations. In Proceedings of the 1979 National Computer Conference. AFIPS Press, Reston, Va., 1979, pp. 573-581.Google Scholar
- 25 SLING, R., AND SCACCHi, W. The web of computing: Computer technology as social organization. In Advances in Computers, M. C. Yovits, Ed. Academic Press, Orlando, Fla., 1982, pp. 1-89.Google Scholar
- 26 KUSTERER, K. Knowhow on the Job: The Important Working Knowledge of "Unskilled" Workers. Westview Press, Boulder, Colo., 1979.Google Scholar
- 27 LOFLAND, J. Doing Social Life: The Qualitative Study of Human Interaction ~n Natural Settings. Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1976.Google Scholar
- 28 LUCAS, H.C. Implementation: The Key to Successful Information Systems. Columbia University Press, New York, 1981. Google Scholar
- 29 MALVEV, M. Simple Systems, Complex Environments. Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif., 1981. Google Scholar
- 30 MARCH, J., AND SIMON, H. Organizations. Wiley, New York, 1958.Google Scholar
- 31 McCuE, G.M. IBM's Santa Teresa Laboratory: Architectural design for program development. IBM Syst. J. 17 (1978), 4-25.Google Scholar
- 32 ORLICKY, J. Material Requirements Planning. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975. Google Scholar
- 33 REIMER, J. Hard Hats: The Work World of Construction Workers. Sage, Beverly Hills., Calif., 1979.Google Scholar
- 34 SCACCH,, W., GASSER, L., AND GERSON, E. Problems and strategies in organizing computeraided design work. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (Oct.). IEEE, New York, 1983.Google Scholar
- 35 SCACCHI, W., BENDIFALLAH, S., BLOCH, A., CHOI, S., GARG, P., JAZZAR, A., SAFAVI, A., SKEER, Z., AND TURNER, M. Modeling the software process: A knowledge-based approach. Working Paper, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, 1986.Google Scholar
- 36 STRAUSS, A. Negotiations." Varieties, Contexts, Processes, and Social Order. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Calif., 1978.Google Scholar
- 37 STRAUSS, A., FAGERHAUGH, S., SUZCEK, B., AND WEINER, C. The Social Organization o{Medical Work. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., 1985.Google Scholar
- 38 THOMPSON, J.D. Organizations in Action. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
- 39 WEICK, K. The Social Psychology of Organizing. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1969.Google Scholar
- 40 WIC, HT, O.W. Production and Inventory Management in the Computer Age. Cahners Books, Boston, Mass., 1974.Google Scholar
Index Terms
The integration of computing and routine work
Recommendations
Agent-Based Cloud Computing
Agent-based cloud computing is concerned with the design and development of software agents for bolstering cloud service discovery, service negotiation, and service composition. The significance of this work is introducing an agent-based paradigm for ...
Agents and Service-Oriented Computing for Autonomic Computing: A Research Agenda
Autonomic computing is the solution proposed to cope with the complexity of today's computing environments. Self-management, an important element of autonomic computing, is also characteristic of single and multiagent systems, as well as systems based ...
Hidden Work and the Challenges of Scalability and Sustainability in Ambulatory Assisted Living
Assisted living technologies may help people live independently while also—potentially—reducing health and care costs. But they are notoriously difficult to implement at scale and many devices are abandoned following initial adoption. We report findings ...
Comments