OriginalesIncidencia de fractura no vertebral por fragilidad en una cohorte de 5.201 mujeres de 65 años o más durante 3 años de seguimientoFragility non-spinal fractures in a cohort of 5,201 women aged 65 years and older during a 3-year follow-up
Referencias bibliográficas (23)
- et al.
Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures
Lancet
(2002) - et al.
Ecografía cuantitativa ósea: impacto de la aplicación de dos poblaciones de referencia diferentes a una cohorte de 5.195 mujeres posmenopáusicas
Med Clin (Barc)
(2003) - et al.
Prevalencia de factores de riesgo de osteoporosis y fracturas osteoporóticas en una serie de 5.195 mujeres mayores de 65 años
Med Clin (Barc)
(2004) - et al.
The incidente of distal forearm fractures in Zaragoza (Spain)
Chir Main
(2003) - et al.
The relationship between fractures and increasing age with reference to the proximal humerus
Curr Orthop
(2002) - et al.
Epidemiology of fractures in England and Wales
Bone
(2001) - et al.
Datos actualizados sobre la epidemiología de la fractura osteoporótica en España
Rev Esp Enf Metab Óseas
(1998) - et al.
The variable incidente of hip fracture in southern Europe: the MEDOS study
Osteoporos Int
(1994) - et al.
Prevalencia de fractura vertebral en población asturiana mayor de 50 años de acuerdo con diferentes criterios radiológicos
Med Clin (Barc)
(2000) - et al.
The effect of vertebral fracture as a risk factor for osteoporotic fracture and mortality in a Spanish population
Osteoporos Int
(2003)
Incidence of limb fracture across Europe: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS)
Osteoporos Int
Cited by (20)
[Translated article] Epidemiological study of distal radius fractures in the sanitary area of Vigo
2022, Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y TraumatologiaCitation Excerpt :Our overall incidence rate is also much lower than that published in Saragossa by Cuenca et al.16 (305.8 × 105 p/y) although similar to that published by Luque et al. in Badajoz in 201017 (159 × 105 p/y). In 2006, a Spanish multicentre study was published on non-vertebral fragility fractures in women aged 65 years and over22 in which they reported an incidence rate of 580 distal radius fractures per 100,000 women ≥65 years/year, a figure similar to that obtained in our study if we only include women in that age range who suffered a low energy mechanism (563 × 105 women > 65 years/year). However, we obtained an incidence rate one third lower than that published by Naves et al.23 within the EVO osteoporosis study where DRF were recorded in women aged 50 years and over, although this study was published in 2003.
Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures in Andalusia, Spain, from 2000-2010
2018, Medicina ClinicaStudy of Bone Mass in Young Daughters of Women With Fracture of the Distal End of the Radius
2013, Journal of Clinical DensitometryCitation Excerpt :Both facts reflect the important role that heredity seems to play in determining BMD of a subject (3,6). The first osteoporotic fracture, which occurs in the maturational development of women, is located at the distal forearm, and this type of fracture is one of the most common in women, becoming regarded as the second most common osteoporotic fracture after the vertebral (7). Numerous studies have found that women with fractures of the distal end of the radius (DER) show an increased frequency of osteoporosis (in the forearm, spine, and hip) in relation to the control population (5,6) and an increase in the occurrence of future osteoporotic fractures (8).
Probability of fractures predicted by FRAX® and observed incidence in the Spanish ECOSAP Study cohort
2012, BoneCitation Excerpt :However, in our opinion, the assumption that the ratio of hip/major osteoporotic fractures observed in the Malmö cohort is applicable to the Spanish postmenopausal subjects is questionable. This is because Spanish epidemiological data for hip fractures [11–13] and non-vertebral, non-hip fractures [13,14] indicate that while the incidence of hip fractures in Sweden is approximately twice as frequently as in Spain, the incidence of the latter is relatively similar. To have more precise figures, we have compared the age-adjusted incidences of forearm, humerus and hip fractures observed in the ECOSAP Study cohort with the original Malmö epidemiological study fracture data (5).
Risk factors for fragility fractures in a cohort of Spanish women
2011, Gaceta SanitariaNondisplaced proximal humeral fractures: High incidence among outpatient-treated osteoporotic fractures and severe impact on upper extremity function and patient subjective health perception
2011, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow SurgeryCitation Excerpt :This is due in part to the fact that proximal humeral fracture has been considered to have a lower incidence. Nonetheless, epidemiologic studies have found proximal humeral fractures to be the fourth most frequent type of osteoporotic fracture after vertebral, hip, and distal radius fractures,21 and it is estimated that their incidence will increase sharply in the near future, in view of their recent trend.26 Our study shows that, to date, proximal humeral fractures account for almost one-fifth of all osteoporotic fractures treated conservatively on an ambulatory basis, with important health, social, and economic implications.
- 1
Al final del artículo se indican los investigadores participantes en el Estudio ECOSAP.