Skip to main content
Log in

Formative Feedback in Teaching Undergraduate Psychiatry

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: This paper describes the introduction of formative feedback into a psychiatry attachment at an Australian university and evaluates students’ responses to that initiative. Method: Students were provided with formative feedback sessions employing a standardized instrument, also used at the end of the attachment for summative assessment. They were asked to both define formative feedback and rate its usefulness on a questionnaire, providing open-ended written comments where appropriate. Results: The concept and purpose of formative feedback were understood by 91.9% of the students who completed a questionnaire. The vast majority considered it to be useful, but some identified the need for constructive criticism and structured feedback as important characteristics of formative sessions. Conclusions: Rigorous research is needed to establish whether formative feedback impacts summative assessments. However, it is clear that such feedback is desirable, in that it increases student confidence and direction. We encourage our colleagues to consider introducing and evaluating formative feedback into psychiatry curricula.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Adelle Atkinson, Christopher J. Watling & Paul L. P. Brand

References

  1. Sadler DR: Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science 1989; 18: 119–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rolfe I, McPherson J: Formative assessment: how am I doing? Lancet 1995; 345: 837–839

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hays R, Wellard R: In-training assessment in postgraduate training for general practice. Med Educ 1998; 32: 507–513

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kelly DR, Murray TS: The development and evaluation of a personal learning log for Senior House Officers. Med Educ 1999; 33: 260–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McKinley RK, Fraser RC, van der Vleuten C, et al: Formative assessment of the consultation performance of medical students in the setting of general practice using a modified version of the Leicester Assessment Package. Med Educ 2000; 34: 573–579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brass K, Pilven P: Using timely feedback on student progress to facilitate learning, in Cornerstones: What Do We Value in Higher Education? Canberra, Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia, 1999

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Chur-Hansen Ph.D..

Additional information

The authors thank Ms. Kaye Brown and Ms. Lara Duff who distributed and collected the questionnaires at the two teaching sites and the students for their cooperation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chur-Hansen, A., Koopowitz, L.F. Formative Feedback in Teaching Undergraduate Psychiatry. Acad Psychiatry 29, 66–68 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.29.1.66

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.29.1.66

Keywords

Navigation