Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Compound Kushen Injection suppresses human breast cancer stem-like cells by down-regulating the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway

Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research volume 30, Article number: 103 (2011) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) play an important role in cancer initiation, relapse and metastasis. To date, no specific medicine has been found to target CSCs as they are resistant to most conventional therapies and proliferate indefinitely. Compound Kushen Injection (CKI) has been widely used for cancer patients with remarkable therapeutic effects in Chinese clinical settings for many years. This study focused on whether CKI could inhibit MCF-7 SP cells in vitro and in vivo.

Methods

The analysis of CKI on SP population and the main genes of Wnt signaling pathway were studied first. Then we studied the tumorigenicity of SP cells and the effects of CKI on SP cells in vivo. The mice inoculated with 10,000 SP cells were randomly divided into three groups (6 in each group) and treated with CKI, cisplatin and saline (as a control) respectively for 7 weeks. The tumor formation rates of each group were compared. The main genes and proteins of the Wnt signaling pathway were analyzed by RT-PCR and western blot.

Results

CKI suppressed the size of SP population (approximately 90%), and down-regulated the main genes of Wnt signaling pathway. We also determined that MCF-7 SP cells were more tumorigenic than non-SP and unsorted cells. The Wnt signaling pathway was up-regulated in tumors derived from SP cells compared with that in tumors from non-SP cells. The tumor formation rate of the CKI Group was 33% (2/6, P < 0.05), and that of Cisplatin Group was 50%(3/6, P < 0.05), whereas that of the Control Group was 100% (6/6).The RT-PCR and western blot results indicated that CKI suppressed tumor growth by down-regulating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, while cisplatin activated the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and might spare SP cells.

Conclusions

It suggested that CKI may serve as a novel drug targeting cancer stem-like cells, though further studies are recommended.

Background

Accumulating evidence has indicted that cancer stem cells (CSCs) are the roots of oncogenesis, cancer relapse and metastasis as they are resistant to all conventional therapies, even the advanced targeted therapy [1–6]. To date, CSCs have been identified in leukemia [7], breast cancer [8], brain cancer [9], prostate cancer [10], gastrointestinal cancer [11], and other cancers with various techniques. One of them, the side population cell sorting analysis, is now capable of isolating cells which contain CSCs [12–17]. CSCs have the ability to exclude the DNA binding dye, Hoechst33342 through an adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette (ABC) membrane transporter. Recently, SP cells have been identified in multiple solid tumors and cancer cell lines including breast cancer cell line MCF-7 [12–17]. SP cells exhibit characteristics similar to CSCs because of their ability to proliferate indefinitely and to enrich more tumorigenic cells than other populations. These rare cells have the potential to survive conventional therapeutics and regenerate cancer populations, leading to relapse and metastasis. Hence, SP cells are known as cancer stem-like cells and are a target for improved cancer therapy.

Compound Kushen Injection (CKI), commonly known as the Yanshu Injection, is extracted from two herbs Kushen (Radix Sophorae Flavescentis) and Baituling (Rhizoma smilacis Glabrae) with the primary components being oxymatrine and matrine [18]. The fingerprint of CKI is provided as additional file 1. CKI has been extensively used alone for cancer patients or in combination with chemotherapy or radiotherapy in Chinese clinical settings for many years. Previous clinical studies have shown that CKI attenuates side effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy by improving the quality of life, regulating the immune function of cancer patients and synergizes the therapeutic effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy as well [19, 20]. It has been demonstrated that CKI suppresses tumor cell growth by inducing apoptosis [21] and inhibits the migration, invasion and adhesion capacity by down-regulating the expression of CD44v6 protein [22]. However, the underlying anti-cancer mechanisms are not fully understood.

The abnormal activation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and subsequent upregulation of β-catenin driven downstream targets -- c-Myc and CyclinD1 is associated with the development of breast cancer [23]. Recent studies indicate that the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway also plays an important role in the maintenance of CSCs [24–27]. In addition, Wnt signaling pathway is also activated in SP breast cancer cells in vitro [14, 27]. Accordingly, in order to know the importance of Wnt signaling pathway in the tumorigenicity of SP cells, the key regulators of the Wnt signaling pathway from tumors derived from both SP and non-SP cells were tested.

Our initial study revealed that the main component of CKI, oxymatrine, can decrease both MCF-7 cell viability and the size of the SP (by approximately 90%) by inhibiting β-catenin, the main component of the Wnt signaling pathway, in a dose-dependent manner, while cisplatin (DDP) only inhibits non-SP cells and spares SP cells in vitro [28]. However, studies of CKI therapy on the regulation of SP cells have never been evaluated. So we studied the effects of CKI on the treatment of SP cells and its mechanism.

Methods

Cell culture

Breast cancer cell line MCF-7 was kindly donated by Prof. Shuren Zhang (Department of Immunology, Cancer Institute, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences). MCF-7 cells were maintained in RPMI1640 culture (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone), 100 units/ml penicillin G, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. All cells were cultured at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.

SP cell isolation

Cells were detached from cell culture flasks with 0.25% trypsin, and viable cells were counted with trypan blue and collected for inoculation into NOD/SCID mice. The remaining cells were stained with the fluorescent dye Hoechst 33342 (Sigma) at a concentration of 5 μg/mL (37°C for 90 min) as described by Goodell et al.[29] After washing with HBSS/2% FBS, the cells were incubated with 1 μg/ml propidium iodide to exclude dead cells, cell analysis and sorting were performed on a FACS Vantage SE (Becton Dickinson) by using a dual-wavelength analysis (blue, 420-470 nm; red, 660- 680 nm). We collected both MCF-7 SP and non-SP cells for the experiment.

Tumor formation in an animal model and drug intervention

For the tumor formation assay, the NOD/SCID female mice (5-6 weeks old) were purchased from the Animal Institute of Peking Union Medical College and maintained under standard conditions according to the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Peking University. The mice were allowed to adapt to the new environment for one week. We first identified the tumorigenicity of SP cells. Unsorted, SP and non-SP cells were collected, and cells were resuspended in PBS/Matrigel (BD Biosciences) (1:1) ranging from 103 to 5 × 106 cells per 100 μl. Cells were then injected s.c. into the bilateral mammary pads of the mice. The mice were received an estradiol supplement (0.4 mg/kg s.c., Sigma) every 10 days until the end of the experiment after cell injection. The mice without tumors were examined visually everyday. Throughout the study, mice were weighed and tumors were measured with a caliper twice a week. Tumor volumes were calculated using the formula (length×width2/2). When the xenograft tumors grew to proper size, the mice were euthanized and a portion of the s.c. tumor tissue was collected, fixed in 4% formalin, and embedded in paraffin for H&E staining to assess tumor pathology.

For the drug administration assay, an identical protocol was followed. The mice were randomized into three groups (6 in each group). SP cells were resuspended in PBS/Matrigel (BD Biosciences) (1:1) with 1 × 104 cells per 100 μl. 1 × 104 cells were then injected s.c. into the right mammary fat pad of each mouse at day 0. The CKI group was injected i.p. with CKI (courtesy of the Shanxi Zhengdong Pharmaceutical Co. LTD., Z14021230, China), (2 ml/kg, diluted with saline in a final volume of 200 ul) every two days, and the control group was administered with the same volume of 200 ul saline every two days beginning from 24 hours after xenotransplantation, while the DDP group was applied with DDP (courtesy of the Yunnan Supertrack Bio- pharmaceutical Corporation, H53021740, China), (5 mg/kg, diluted with saline in a final volume of 200 ul, dose according to Hardman et al.[30]) for three times at Day1, Day 8, Day 15 post inoculation.

Quantitative RT-PCR (QRT-PCR) analysis

To assess the expression levels of β-catenin, LEF1, TCF4, CyclinD1, c-Myc, total RNA from cells/tumors was extracted by Trizol (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNA (2 μg) was quantified by spectrophotometry (DU640, Backman, USA), and reverse transcribed into cDNA using a RevertiAid™ First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Fermentas, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Reactions were performed using SYBR Green I Master Mix(Applied Biosystems, CA) on a GeneAmp 7500 TaqMAN PCR (Applied Biosystems, CA). PCR conditions were: initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles: 95°C,25 s; 55°C, 25 s and 72°C,50 s with a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The sequences of the primers used were as follows: β-actin forward, 5'-GAGACCTTCAACACCCCAGCC-3' and reverse,

5'-AATGTCACGCACGATTTCCC-3'; β-catenin forward, 5'-AAGGTCTGAGGAGCAGCTTC-3' and reverse, 5'-TGGACCATAACTGCAGCCTT-3'; LEF1 forward, 5'-CTACCACGACAAGGCCAGAG-3' and reverse, 5'-CAGTGAGGATGGGTAGGGTTG-3' and TCF4 forward 5'-TCCCACCACATCATACGCTACAC-3', and reverse,

5'- TCGCTTGCTCTTCTCTGGACAG-3'. CyclinD1 forward, 5'-CGATGCCAACCTCCTCAACGAC-3' and reverse, 5'-CCAGCATCCAGGTGGCGACG-3' and c-Myc forward 5'-CAGCAAACCTCCTCAGCC-3', and reverse, 5'-ATTGTTTTCCAACTCCGGGAT-3'.

The amount of each target gene in a given sample was normalized to the level of β-actin in that sample. The 2-ΔΔC Tmethod was applied to analyze the relative changes in gene expression [31].

Western blot assay

Tumors were ground and lysed with the Keygen Total Protein Extraction Kit (KGP250, Keygen Serving Science, China) on ice. Tissue debris was removed by centrifugation at 4°C for 5 min. Tissue extracts were collected, and the protein concentration was determined by using the BCA Protein Assay Kit (KGPBCA, Keygen serving science, China). 60 μg of protein was run on SDS/PAGE gel and, after electrophoresis, the proteins were transferred to a PVDF membrane. Primary antibodies including anti-β-catenin (BD Bioscience, USA), anti-wnt1 (ab15251, Abcam, UK), anti-CyclinD1 (ab6125, Abcam, UK), anti-c-Myc (ab32, Abcam, UK) were applied, followed by incubation with secondary antibodies (Goat Anti-rabbit IgG, ZB2301; Goat Anti-mouse IgG, ZB2305, Zhongshan Golden Bridge Biotechnology CO., LTD., China). Blots were developed by ChemiDoc XRS System (Bio-Rad, USA).

Statistical analysis

Student's independent-samples t-test, one-way ANOVA, and χ2-test were used for statistical analysis by SPSS 10.0 software (SPSS, China, 657180). P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

The effect of CKI on the number of SP cells in vitro

In Figure 1A, the P3 gate showed the SP cells with Hoechst 33342 negative/dim. SP cells accounted for approximately 2.7% of total cells. The percentage of SP population was decreased markedly by treatment with verapamil, which was consistent with the reports that verapamil could prohibit Hoechst 33342 efflux [12].

Figure 1
figure 1

Analysis of SP cells by CKI treatment. (A) MCF-7 cells were labeled with Hoechst 33342 and analyzed by flow cytometry or with the addition of Verapamil. The percentage of SP cells appeared as the Hoechst low fraction in the P3 is about 2.7%. (B) MCF-7 cells were treated with CKI (30 μl/ml, 50 μl/ml, 70 μl/ml) for 48 h, and SP cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. P3 gate is the percentage of SP cells. Data from a representative experiment (from a total of three) are shown.

Full size image

To determine whether the SP cell number decreased with CKI treatment, cells were treated with a range of concentrations of CKI (30, 50, 70 μl/ml) for 48 hours and then the SP cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. The results showed that the size of the SP population was decreased by CKI treatment in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 1B). However, our previous study didn't find the same phenomena in the cisplatin-treated cells, which were broadly used as an anti-breast cancer agent [28].

Canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway analysis on CKI group in vitro

RT-PCR analysis was used to investigate whether CKI could down-regulate the expression of the main genes of Wnt/β-catenin Pathway. Sorted SP cells were treated with CKI (70 μl/ml) for 48 h and then analyzed by Quantitative RT-PCR. The study found a dramatic decrease of β-catenin, CyclinD1, c-Myc at the mRNA level with CKI treatment (Figure 2).

Figure 2
figure 2

The main genes of Wnt/β-catenin pathway was down-regulated in the CKI group in vitro. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis revealed that the expression of β-catenin, CyclinD1 and c-Myc (mean ± SD) were lower in CKI group than those in the control group. Most of the differences were statistically significant (** P < 0.01,*** P < 0.001).

Full size image

SP cells are more tumorigenic in vivo

SP (P3) and non- SP (P4) cells were isolated by flow cytometry and collected for this experiment (Figure 3A, B). Tumorigenicity assays were performed by injecting MCF-7 unsorted, SP and non-SP cells into NOD/SCID mice. The SP cells showed higher tumorigenicity than the unsorted and non-SP cells (Table 1). Notably, 6 of 6, and 5 of 6 mice inoculated with 10,000, and 1,000 SP cells respectively gave rise to tumors, whereas only 5 of 6, and 2 of 6 inoculations of the same number of the non-SP cells grew tumors, and 5 of 6, and 3 of 6 inoculations of the same number of MCF-7 cells grew tumors. The tumors derived from non-SP cells were smaller than those from SP cells (Figure 4A, B).

Figure 3
figure 3

Cell sorting results. MCF-7 cells were labeled with Hoechst 33342 and analyzed by flow cytometry (A) or with the addition of Verapamil (B) SP cells appeared as the Hoechst low fraction in the P3 gate about 2.5%, while non-SP cells retained high levels of Hoechst staining in the P4 gate. Both SP and non-SP cells were sorted, respectively.

Full size image
Table 1 Tumorigenicity of SP Cells in NOD/SCID Xenotransplant Assay
Full size table
Figure 4
figure 4

SP cells were more tumorigenic. (A) Tumor volumes (mean ± SEM) were plotted for 1 × 103 cells of each population (SP, non-SP) injected (n = 6 per group). Tumors derived from SP were larger than those from non-SP. (B) Representative tumors due to injection of SP cells (1 × 104 cells, 1 × 103 cells) compared with non-SP injection (1 × 104 cells, 1 × 103 cells). (C) A representative tumor in a mouse specimen at the SP injection (1 × 103 cells) site, but not at the non-SP injection (1 × 103 cells) site. Histology from the SP injection site ((D), Original magnification, ×200) contained malignant cells, whereas the non-SP injection site ((E), Original magnification, ×200) revealed only normal mammary tissue.

Full size image

Nine weeks after injection, the injection sites of 1 × 103 tumorigenic SP cells and 1 × 103 nontumorigenic non-SP cells were examined by histology. The SP site contained a tumor about 1 cm in diameter, whereas non-SP injection site contained no detectable tumor (Figure 4C). The tumor formed by SP cells showed the typical pathological features of breast cancer (Figure 4D), whereas only normal mouse mammary tissue was observed by histology at the site of non-SP injection (Figure 4E).

Wnt signaling pathway is activated in tumors derived from SP cells

The key regulator of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, β-catenin, was first tested. The results showed that the expression of β-catenin was significantly higher in tumors derived from SP cells than that in tumors from non-SP cells at both mRNA and protein level (Figure 5). Wnt1 as an activator of canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling in MCF-7 cells [32] was tested with other downstream genes and proteins. Quantitative RT-PCR results showed that the main genes of Wnt/β-catenin signaling Wnt1, CyclinD1, c-Myc, TCF4, LEF1 expressed markedly higher in tumors derived from SP compared with those from non-SP (Figure 5A). Moreover, this was associated with a significant increase of the expression of upstream Wnt1, consistent with the up-regulation of lower-stream CyclinD1 and c-Myc at protein level (Figure 5B).

Figure 5
figure 5

Wnt/β-catenin was up-regulated in tumors derived from SP cells.(A) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis revealed that the expression of β-catenin, TCF4, LEF1, CyclinD1 and c-Myc (mean ± SD) were higher in tumors derived from SP than those in tumors from non-SP. These differences were all statistically significant (* P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001). (B) Western blotting analysis showed that Wnt1, β-catenin, CyclinD1 and c-Myc in tumors derived from SP expressed higher than those in tumors from non-SP cells. The experiment was run in triplicate.

Full size image

The effect of CKI on SP cells in vivo

Tumor volumes were measured for up to 7 weeks after inoculation (Figure 6A). Incised tumors among three groups were compared (Figure 6B). Both the CKI and DDP groups showed lower tumor formation rates compared to the control group (P < 0.05) (Figure 6C). A representative mouse specimen without a tumor was observed in the CKI group (Figure 6D), whereas a representative specimen with a tumor was observed in the control group (Figure 6E). No body weight loss was observed in the CKI group, whereas a slight body weight loss was observed in the DDP group (Figure 6F).

Figure 6
figure 6

In vivo efficacy of CKI in the MCF-7 SP xenograft model. (A) Tumor volumes (Mean ± SEM) were plotted for each group (n = 6 per group). Both CKI and DDP suppressed tumor growth. (B) A representative comparison image of the incised tumors from CKI, DDP, and the control group. (C) The tumor formation rate of the control group was 100% (6/6), while that of CKI group was 33.33% (2/6) and that of the DDP group was 50% (3/6) (* P < 0.05). (D) A representative mouse specimen without a tumor from the CKI group. (E) A representative specimen with a tumor from the control group. (F) Schematic outline of mice body weight (mean ± SD). No body weight loss was observed in the CKI group, but a slight body weight loss was observed in the DDP group compared to the control group.

Full size image

Canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway analysis on CKI and DDP group in vivo

Western blot and RT-PCR analyses were used to investigate whether CKI could down-regulate the expression of the main components of Wnt/β-catenin Pathway. The study found a dramatic decrease of β-catenin with CKI treatment, but the same down-regulation was not observed at the mRNA level. Both the related downstream genes, including TCF4, LEF1, CyclinD1, and c-Myc expressed significantly lower in tumors of CKI group than those of control group as well as the key proteins including wnt1, CyclinD1, c-Myc (Figure 7), which indicated that canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway was inactive in tumors within the CKI group.

Figure 7
figure 7

The Wnt/β-catenin pathway was down-regulated in the CKI group and up-regulated in the DDP group. a Quantitative RT-PCR analysis revealed that the expression of β-catenin, TCF4, LEF1, CyclinD1 and c-Myc (mean ± SD) were lower in CKI group than those in the control group. Most of the differences were statistically significant (* P < 0.05). The expression of β-catenin, TCF4, LEF1, CyclinD1 and c-Myc (mean ± SD) in DDP group were comparable to those in the control group. b Western blot analysis showed that Wnt1, β-catenin, CyclinD1 and c-Myc in the CKI group were significantly lower than those observed in the control group. The protein level of Wnt1, β-catenin, CyclinD1, and c-Myc in DDP group were comparable to those in the control group. The experiment was run in triplicate.

Full size image

The Wnt/β-catenin Pathway of the DDP group was analyzed at both the protein and mRNA level. The main genes and proteins in DDP group were comparable to those in the control group, suggesting that Wnt/β-catenin Pathway was still active in the DDP group (Figure 7).

Discussion

How to target CSCs has become a major area of research in recent years. Thus, establishing an appropriate in vivo cancer stem cell model is critical for the study of the treatment of CSCs. Our studies confirmed that SP cells sorted by flow cytometry from human breast cancer cell line MCF-7 showed high expression of CD44+CD24- cells and had greater tumorigenicity than non-SP and unsorted cells, which indicates SP cells enrich CSCs. The tumorigenic rate of the mice inoculated with 10,000 SP cells is 100% (6/6), based on which we created a mouse model for the drug intervention study of SP cells. CKI has been widely used in Chinese clinics for many years with the remarkable effects of controlling tumor size and improving the quality of life among cancer patients. But the underlying mechanism has yet to be determined. Our group was the first to show that CKI suppressed cancer-stem like cells (SP) in vitro and in vivo in comparison to the control group.

Wnts are secreted lipid-modified signaling proteins that initiate the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway [33], resulting in the accumulation of cytoplasmic (signaling) β-catenin, which are then able to bind the T cell factor/lymphoid enhancer Factor (TCF/LEF) family of transcription factors and to induce the transcriptional activities of targeted genes including CyclinD1, c-Myc, CD44, and matrix metalloproteinase 7 (MMP7), etc [34, 35]. In the absence of Wnt signaling, the level of β-catenin is kept low through degradation. The Wnt signaling pathway plays a critical role for the maintenance of CSCs of various cancers [24–26, 36–38]. The RT-PCR and western blot analyses showed that Wnt signaling pathway was activated in tumors derived from SP cells, but down-regulated in tumors derived from non-SP cells. It was reported that the aberrant activation of the canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway is associated with tumor development and progression [23, 24, 39–41]. Therefore the up-regulation of Wnt signaling pathway correlates with the tumor progression, which explains the high tumorigenicity of SP cells. The results showed that the CKI down-regulated Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in vitro and in vivo, but the down-regulation of β-catenin was not observed at the mRNA level in vivo, suggesting that the underlying mechanism is not transcriptional activation but the increased degradation of β-catenin via the destruction complex [42]. Thus, we surmise that the effect of CKI on SP cells may be related to the down-regulation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.

The asymmetric division of each CSC allows it to generate one stem cell and another cell that differentiates [43]. So drugs only targeting on differentiated cells will ultimately fail to inhibit tumor growth. Chemotherapeutic drugs are known to be resistant to CSCs which have the capacity to efflux drugs by ABC drug pumps [2, 3]. In this study, the DDP suppressed the tumorigenicity of SP cells but the DDP activated the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Our in vitro study demonstrated that the activation of the Wnt pathway promotes the proliferation and self-renewal of SP cells, and the DDP only inhibits non-SP cells (differentiated cells) leading to the survival of cancer-stem like cells (SP cells) [28], which is also consistent with other studies related to the use of chemotherapeutic drugs [44–46]. Hence, we postulate that the DDP inhibits the differentiated cells derived from SP cells which accounts for 97~98% of MCF-7 cell line leading to a decrease of tumor size, but spares the SP cells endowed with drug-resistance properties and activates the Wnt pathway [44], which requires longer latency period of tumor formation. Further prolonged study is required to demonstrate this.

We also observed that this study has some limitations owing to the use of NOD/SCID mice. In clinical settings, we administered CKI intravenously to cancer patients daily for 2-3 courses (a course consists of 2-3 weeks). Based on this, we injected CKI into NOD/SCID mice i.p. daily. However, the NOD/SCID mice gradually died from a dramatic weight loss about one month post-xenotransplantation in both control group and the CKI group, which didn't occur in the DDP group that was given an injection once a week for three weeks. We attributed this to the severe immune deficiency of NOD/SCID mice which couldn't endure the daily injections of i.p. stimuli. Subsequently, we changed our drug administration to every other day and thereafter mice from CKI group displayed no abnormal weight loss.

Conclusions

In summary, CKI suppressed MCF-7 SP cells in vitro and in vivo which may be caused by the down-regulation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. It suggests that CKI may serve as a novel drug targeting CSCs. In Chinese clinics, we commonly administer CKI to synergizes the therapeutic effects of chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Since CKI specifically suppresses SP cells and cisplatin is known to inhibit non-SP cells, future studies may combine them together to determine the effects on suppressing the tumorigenicity of SP cells. In addition, further studies are warranted to confirm the effects of CKI on cancer stem-like cells of other cancer cell lines and primary carcinomas.

Abbreviations

CSCs:

cancer stem cells

SP:

side population

CKI:

Compound Kushen Injection

NOD/SCID:

non-obese diabetic/severe-combined immunodeficient

DDP:

cisplatin

HBSS:

Hank's balanced salt solution

H&E:

hematoxylin and eosin

LEF:

lymphoid enhancer factor

TCF:

T-cell factor

MMP:

matrix metalloproteinase

FACS:

fluorescence activating cell sorter

ABC:

adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette

References

  1. Reya T, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF, Weissman IL: Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells. Nature. 2001, 414: 105-111. 10.1038/35102167.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gottesman MM: Mechanisms of cancer drug resistance. Annu Rev Med. 2002, 53: 615-627. 10.1146/annurev.med.53.082901.103929.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhou S, Schuetz JD, Bunting KD, Colapietro AM, Sampath J, Morris JJ, Lagutina I, Grosveld GC, Osawa M, Nakauchi H, Sorrentino BP: The ABC transporter Bcrp1/ABCG2 is expressed in a wide variety of stem cells and is a molecular determinant of the side-population phenotype. Nat Med. 2001, 7: 1028-1034. 10.1038/nm0901-1028.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bao S, Wu Q, Mclendon RE, Hao Y, Shi Q, Hjelmeland AB, Dewhirst MW, Bigner DD, Rich JN: Glioma stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response. Nature. 2006, 444: 756-760. 10.1038/nature05236.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Graham SM, Jorgensen HG, Allan E, Pearson C, Alcorn MJ, Richmond L, Holyoake TL: Primitive, quiescent, Philadelphia-positive stem cells from patients with chronic myeloid leukemia are insensitive to STI571 in vitro. Blood. 2002, 99: 319-325. 10.1182/blood.V99.1.319.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Reim F, Dombrowski Y, Ritter C, Buttmann M, Hausler S, Ossadnik M, Krockenberger M, Beier D, Beier CP, Dietl J, Becker JC, Honig A, Wischhusen J: Immunoselection of breast and ovarian cancer cells with trastuzumab and natural killer cells: selective escape of CD44high/CD24low/HER2low breast cancer stem cells. Cancer Res. 2009, 69: 8058-8066. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0834.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bonnet D, Dick JE: Human acute myeloid leukemia is organized as a hierarchy that originates from a primitive hematopoietic cell. Nat Med. 1997, 3: 730-737. 10.1038/nm0797-730.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Al-Hajj M, Wicha MS, Benito-Hernandez A, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF: Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 3983-3988. 10.1073/pnas.0530291100.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Singh SK, Hawkins C, Clarke ID, Squire JA, Bayani J, Hide T, Henkelman RM, Cusimano MD, Dirks PB: Identification of human brain tumour initiating cells. Nature. 2004, 432: 396-401. 10.1038/nature03128.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Richardson GD, Robson CN, Lang SH, Neal DE, Maitland NJ, Collins AT: CD133, a novel marker for human prostatic epithelial stem cells. J Cell Sci. 2004, 117: 3539-3545. 10.1242/jcs.01222.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Haraguchi N, Inoue H, Tanaka F, Mimori K, Utsunomiya T, Sasaki A, Mori M: Cancer stem cells in human gastrointestinal cancers. Hum Cell. 2006, 19: 24-29. 10.1111/j.1749-0774.2005.00004.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kondo T, Setoguchi T, Taga T: Persistence of a small subpopulation of cancer stem-like cells in the C6 glioma cell line. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 781-786. 10.1073/pnas.0307618100.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Haraguchi N, Utsunomiya T, Inoue H, Tanaka F, Mimori K, Barnard GF, Mori M: Characterization of a side population of cancer cells from human gastrointestinal system. Stem Cells. 2006, 24: 506-513. 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0282.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Patrawala L, Calhoun T, Schneider-Broussard R, Zhou J, Claypool K, Tang DG: Side population is enriched in tumorigenic, stem-like cancer cells, whereas ABCG2+ and ABCG2- cancer cells are similarly tumorigenic. Cancer Res. 2005, 65: 6207-6219. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0592.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang J, Guo LP, Chen LZ, Zeng YX, Lu SH: Identification of cancer stem cell-like side population cells in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell line. Cancer Res. 2007, 67: 3716-3724. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4343.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brown MD, Gilmore PE, Hart CA, Samuel JD, Ramani VA, George NJ, Clarke NW: Characterization of benign and malignant prostate epithelial Hoechst 33342 side populations. Prostate. 2007, 67: 1384-1396. 10.1002/pros.20620.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Seigel GM, Campbell LM, Narayan M, Gonzalez-Fernandez F: Cancer stem cell characteristics in retinoblastoma. Mol Vis. 2005, 11: 729-737.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tian J, Wang WH, Gao HM, Wang ZM: [Determination of matrine, sophoridine and oxymatrine in Compound Kushen Injection by HPLC]. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2007, 32: 222-224.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang ZY, Li GS, Huang HX: [Clinical observation on treatment of 75 mid-late stage cancer patients with yanshu Injection]. Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2006, 26: 681-684.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen J, Mei Q, Xu YC, Du J, Wei Y, Xu ZM: [Effects of Matrine Injection on T-lymphocyte subsets of patients with malignant tumor after gamma knife radiosurgery]. Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao. 2006, 4: 78-79. 10.3736/jcim20060121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dai ZJ, Gao J, Wang XJ, Ji ZZ, Wu WY, Liu XX, Kang HF, Guan HT, Ren HT: [Apoptotic mechanism of gastric carcinoma cells induced by matrine injection]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008, 11: 261-265.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dai ZJ, Gao J, Wu WY, Wang XJ, Li ZF, Kang HF, Liu XX, Ma XB: [Effect of matrine injections on invasion and metastasis of gastric carcinoma SGC-7901 cells in vitro]. Zhong Yao Cai. 2007, 30: 815-819.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Brown AM: Wnt signaling in breast cancer: have we come full circle?. Breast Cancer Res. 2001, 3: 351-355. 10.1186/bcr321.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang W, Yan HX, Chen L, Liu Q, He YQ, Yu LX, Zhang SH, Huang DD, Tang L, Kong XN, Chen C, Liu SQ, Wu MC, Wang HY: Wnt/beta-catenin signaling contributes to activation of normal and tumorigenic liver progenitor cells. Cancer Res. 2008, 68: 4287-4295. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6691.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ysebaert L, Chicanne G, Demur C, De Toni F, Prade-Houdellier N, Ruidavets JB, Mansat-De Mas V, Rigal-Huguet F, Laurent G, Payrastre B, Manenti S, Racaud-Sultan C: Expression of beta-catenin by acute myeloid leukemia cells predicts enhanced clonogenic capacities and poor prognosis. Leukemia. 2006, 20: 1211-1216. 10.1038/sj.leu.2404239.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Malanchi I, Peinado H, Kassen D, Hussenet T, Metzger D, Chambon P, Huber M, Hohl D, Cano A, Birchmeier W, Huelsken J: Cutaneous cancer stem cell maintenance is dependent on beta-catenin signalling. Nature. 2008, 452: 650-653. 10.1038/nature06835.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Li X, Ren J: [Isolation of CD44+/CD24 -/low and side population cells from MDA-MB-453 cells and the analysis of their activation of Wnt and Notch pathway]. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao. 2008, 40: 471-475.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang Y, Piao B, Hua B, Hou W, Xu W, Qi X, Zhu X, Pei Y, Lin H: Oxymatrine diminishes the side population and inhibits the expression of beta-catenin in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Med Oncol. 2010,

    Google Scholar 

  29. Goodell MA, Brose K, Paradis G, Conner AS, Mulligan RC: Isolation and functional properties of murine hematopoietic stem cells that are replicating in vivo. J Exp Med. 1996, 183: 1797-1806. 10.1084/jem.183.4.1797.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hardman WE, Moyer MP, Cameron IL: Efficacy of treatment of colon, lung and breast human carcinoma xenografts with: doxorubicin, cisplatin, irinotecan or topotecan. Anticancer Res. 1999, 19: 2269-2274.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001, 25: 402-408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. He B, You L, Uematsu K, Xu Z, Lee AY, Matsangou M, Mccormick F, Jablons DM: A monoclonal antibody against Wnt-1 induces apoptosis in human cancer cells. Neoplasia. 2004, 6: 7-14.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Willert K, Brown JD, Danenberg E, Duncan AW, Weissman IL, Reya T, Yates JR, Nusse R: Wnt proteins are lipid-modified and can act as stem cell growth factors. Nature. 2003, 423: 448-452. 10.1038/nature01611.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Behrens J, Von Kries JP, Kuhl M, Bruhn L, Wedlich D, Grosschedl R, Birchmeier W: Functional interaction of beta-catenin with the transcription factor LEF-1. Nature. 1996, 382: 638-642. 10.1038/382638a0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cadigan KM, Nusse R: Wnt signaling: a common theme in animal development. Genes Dev. 1997, 11: 3286-3305. 10.1101/gad.11.24.3286.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Khan NI, Bradstock KF, Bendall LJ: Activation of Wnt/beta-catenin pathway mediates growth and survival in B-cell progenitor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2007, 138: 338-348. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2007.06667.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Woodward WA, Chen MS, Behbod F, Alfaro MP, Buchholz TA, Rosen JM: WNT/beta-catenin mediates radiation resistance of mouse mammary progenitor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007, 104: 618-623. 10.1073/pnas.0606599104.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Schulenburg A, Cech P, Herbacek I, Marian B, Wrba F, Valent P, Ulrich-Pur H: CD44-positive colorectal adenoma cells express the potential stem cell markers musashi antigen (msi1) and ephrin B2 receptor (EphB2). J Pathol. 2007, 213: 152-160. 10.1002/path.2220.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Peifer M, Polakis P: Wnt signaling in oncogenesis and embryogenesis--a look outside the nucleus. Science. 2000, 287: 1606-1609. 10.1126/science.287.5458.1606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bienz M, Clevers H: Linking colorectal cancer to Wnt signaling. Cell. 2000, 103: 311-320. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00122-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Polakis P: Wnt signaling and cancer. Genes Dev. 2000, 14: 1837-1851.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Nelson WJ, Nusse R: Convergence of Wnt, beta-catenin, and cadherin pathways. Science. 2004, 303: 1483-1487. 10.1126/science.1094291.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Morrison SJ, Kimble J: Asymmetric and symmetric stem-cell divisions in development and cancer. Nature. 2006, 441: 1068-1074. 10.1038/nature04956.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bertolini G, Roz L, Perego P, Tortoreto M, Fontanella E, Gatti L, Pratesi G, Fabbri A, Andriani F, Tinelli S, Roz E, Caserini R, Lo Vullo S, Camerini T, Mariani L, Delia D, Calabro E, Pastorino U, Sozzi G: Highly tumorigenic lung cancer CD133+ cells display stem-like features and are spared by cisplatin treatment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106: 16281-16286. 10.1073/pnas.0905653106.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Cortes-Dericks L, Carboni GL, Schmid RA, Karoubi G: Putative cancer stem cells in malignant pleural mesothelioma show resistance to cisplatin and pemetrexed. Int J Oncol. 2010, 37: 437-444.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Honoki K, Fujii H, Kubo A, Kido A, Mori T, Tanaka Y, Tsujiuchi T: Possible involvement of stem-like populations with elevated ALDH1 in sarcomas for chemotherapeutic drug resistance. Oncol Rep. 2010, 24: 501-505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Ma Shiliang (Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China) for assisting in cell sorting by FACS. This paper was supported by Grants No.30772867 from the National Nature Science Foundation of China and No.2006BAI04A05 from the Eleventh Five-Year Program of the National Science and Technology Project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Oncology Department, Guang An Men Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No.5 Bei Xian Ge Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, China

    Weiru Xu, Hongsheng Lin, Ying Zhang, Baojin Hua, Wei Hou, Xin Qi, Yingxia Pei, Zhizheng Zhao & Liangliang Yang

  2. Department of Hematology and Oncology, Dong Zhi Men Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No. 5, Haiyuncang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China

    Weiru Xu & Xinyi Chen

  3. Endocrinology Department, Guang An Men Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No.5 Bei Xian Ge Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, China

    Xiaoyun Zhu

Authors
  1. Weiru Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hongsheng Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ying Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xinyi Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Baojin Hua
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wei Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xin Qi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yingxia Pei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Xiaoyun Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Zhizheng Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Liangliang Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongsheng Lin.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

LHS and ZY conceived of the study. XWR did the cell culture, cell isolation, and wrote this paper. XWR, ZZZ and YLL did in vivo experiments. XWR and ZXY did RT-PCR and Western Blot. LHS, ZY, CXY, HBJ, HW, QX and PYX participated in the study design and coordination. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

13046_2011_523_MOESM1_ESM.TIFF

Additional file 1: A representative fingerprint of CKI. A representative fingerprint of CKI showing 8 common peaks. Peak 3 is Oxymatrine, Peak 4 is Oxysophocarpine, Peak 6 is Matrine, and Peak 7 is Sophocarping. (TIFF 5 MB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, W., Lin, H., Zhang, Y. et al. Compound Kushen Injection suppresses human breast cancer stem-like cells by down-regulating the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 30, 103 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-30-103

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-30-103

Keywords

Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research

ISSN: 1756-9966

Contact us