Skip to main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Tribbles homolog 3 denotes a poor prognosis in breast cancer and is involved in hypoxia response

Abstract

Introduction

Hypoxia in solid tumors is associated with treatment resistance, resulting in poor prognosis. Tribbles homolog 3 (TRIB3) is induced during hypoxia and is involved in multiple cellular pathways involved in cell survival. Here, we investigated the role of TRIB3 in breast cancer.

Methods

TRIB3 mRNA expression was measured in breast tumor tissue from 247 patients and correlated with clinicopathological parameters and clinical outcome. Furthermore, we studied TRIB3 expression regulation in cell lines, xenografts tissues and human breast cancer material using Reverse transcriptase, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and immunohistochemical staining. Finally, the effect of small interfering RNA (siRNA) mediated TRIB3 knockdown on hypoxia tolerance was assessed.

Results

Breast cancer patients with low, intermediate or high TRIB3 expression exhibited a mean disease free survival (DFS) of 80 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 74 to 86), 74 (CI = 67 to 81), and 63 (CI = 55 to 71) months respectively (P = .002, Mantel-Cox log-rank). The prognostic value of TRIB3 was limited to those patients that had received radiotherapy as part of their primary treatment (n = 179, P = .005) and remained statistically significant after correction for other clinicopathological parameters (DFS, Hazard Ratio = 1.90, CI = 1.17 to 3.08, P = .009). In breast cell lines TRIB3 expression was induced by hypoxia, nutrient starvation, and endoplasmic reticulum stress in an hypoxia inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) independent manner. TRIB3 induction after hypoxia did not increase with decreasing oxygen levels. In breast tumor xenografts and human breast cancer tissues TRIB3 co-localized with the hypoxic cell marker pimonidazole. The induction of TRIB3 by hypoxia was shown to be regulated via the PERK/ATF4/CHOP pathway of the unfolded protein response and knockdown of TRIB3 resulted in a dose-dependent increase in hypoxia sensitivity.

Conclusions

TRIB3 is independently associated with poor prognosis of breast cancer patients, possibly through its association with tumor cell hypoxia.

Introduction

The accelerated growth and erratic angiogenesis of solid tumors induce a lack of oxygen and nutrients in parts of the tumor that are distal to functional blood vessels. This is known to have important repercussions for treatment sensitivity and prognosis of cancer patients [1–3]. Variation in the duration and severity of hypoxic stress differentially activates different "do or die" programs and leads to substantial phenotypic variations amongst otherwise identical tumor cells. Best known in this perspective is the Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1 (HIF-1) pathway, which is induced during hypoxia and has often been associated with poor prognosis in solid tumors including breast cancer [4–6]. Under more anoxic conditions another hypoxia-related program is activated, that is the unfolded protein response (UPR) [7], which results from endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress caused by misfolding of proteins in the ER. One of the mechanisms that are activated by the UPR is autophagy [8], which can temporarily relieve ER stress by reutilization of cellular components. ER stress-induced expression of activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) and CHOP (C/EBP homologous protein) also leads to transcription of Tribbles homolog 3 (TRIB3) [9]. TRIB3 is known to inhibit phosphorylation of AKT/protein kinase B (AKT) [10]. AKT is a phosphoinositide-dependent serine/threonine protein kinase that plays a critical role in the signal transduction of growth factor receptors. Furthermore, TRIB3 has been described to have a role in the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway [11] and nuclear factor (NF) κB activated apoptosis [7]. However, the literature is not conclusive on the role of TRIB3 in cell fate; it has been described to have pro-apoptotic [9] as well as anti-apoptotic features [12]. TRIB3 is strongly upregulated by hypoxia, nutrient starvation and ER stress-inducing agents [13–15] and has been implicated in ER stress-induced autophagy [16]. Interestingly, TRIB3 was shown to be upregulated compared with normal tissue in tumors of the human lung, colon, and breast [14, 17, 18].

We hypothesized that TRIB3 could be relevant for breast cancer prognosis, because in breast cancer, several ER stress, UPR, and/or hypoxia-associated markers have been found to be related to prognosis [19–22]. Furthermore, the involvement of TRIB3 in the other pathways described above makes it more interesting than other proteins in the UPR and other hypoxia pathways, because, for example, the growth factor receptor-induced phosphorylation cascades are also known to be relevant for breast cancer treatment [23]. We hypothesized that TRIB3 could be an important protein by determining the tumor cell fate under stressed conditions. To this end, TRIB3 mRNA expression levels were correlated with disease characteristics and patient survival in a large breast cancer patient cohort. In addition, we determined if TRIB3 expression could be induced in breast cancer cells by a variety of stressors, and we assessed the expression and localization of TRIB3 in breast cancer xenografts and patient tissues. Finally, we determined the effect of TRIB3 knockdown on the hypoxia response of breast cancer cells.

Materials and methods

Patient samples

Coded tumor tissues were used in accordance with the Code of Conduct of the Federation of Medical Scientific Societies in the Netherlands ('Code for Proper Secondary Use of Human Tissue in the Netherlands' [24]). The study adhered to all relevant institutional and national guidelines, and was reported according to REMARK guidelines [25]. A series of 247 patients with unilateral, resectable breast cancer who had undergone resection of their primary tumor between November 1987 and December 1997 were selected based on the availability of frozen tissue in the tumor bank of the Department of Laboratory Medicine of the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre. This bank contains frozen tumor tissue from breast cancer patients of seven different hospitals of the Comprehensive Cancer Centre East in the Netherlands. The patients, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and their treatment have been described earlier [26]. To summarize, the median age was 59 years (range 31 to 88 years). Patients had undergone modified radical mastectomy (n = 178) or a breast-conserving lumpectomy (n = 69). Postoperative radiotherapy to the breast after an incomplete resection or after breast-conserving treatment, or parasternal radiotherapy when the tumor was medially localized, had been administered to 179 patients. Adjuvant systemic therapies were given almost exclusively to the 128 patients with lymph node involvement, according to standard practice at that time [26]. During follow up, 95 patients experienced a recurrence, either local or distant. A representative part of each tumor was macroscopically selected by a pathologist. The material was frozen in liquid nitrogen and determination of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status was performed by ligand binding assay according to the dextran-charcoal method [27]. Aliquots of tissue were pulverized using a microdismembrator (Braun, Melsungen, Germany) and kept in liquid nitrogen until RNA isolation.

To obtain patient material containing the exogenous hypoxia marker pimonidazole, patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer were enrolled in the period 1997 to 1999 in a tumor hypoxia study in accordance with a research protocol approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of North Carolina Hospitals. The patients provided signed informed consent prior to their participation in the study. Prior to tumor biopsy, patients received an intravenous infusion of pimonidazole hydrochloride (0.5 g/m2, Hypoxyprobe-1™, NPI Inc, Belmont, MA, USA) diluted in 100 ml NaCl 0.9% for 20 minutes. Between 16 to 24 hours later, biopsies were obtained from primary tumors. After biopsy, fresh tumor samples were placed in cold 10% neutral buffered formalin, held at 4°C for 12 to 24 hours, and processed into paraffin blocks. Four μm thick sections were sectioned and mounted on glass slides in preparation for immunohistochemical staining. One slide per block was stained with hematoxylin and eosin for pathologic review to confirm the presence of tumor. Based on the hypoxia scoring of the tumors according to a calibrated scoring system [28] three tumors with a high percentage of hypoxia (> 15% of the viable area) were chosen for analysis of TRIB3 expression.

Xenograft tissue

Xenografts of MDA-MB-231 cells were obtained after subcutaneous injection of 1 × 106 cells suspended in RPMI (MP Biomedicals, Illkirch, France) in six-week-old female athymic mice (BALB/c nu/nu, BonholdGard, Denmark). Animal housing and experimental procedures were in accordance with international guidelines and approved by the local ethical committee for animal use, respectively. At a mean tumor diameter of 6 to 8 mm at approximately six weeks after seeding that time mice were injected intravenously with 0.1 ml of 0.9% NaCl containing 2 mg of the hypoxic cell marker pimonidazole hydrochloride (1-((2-hydroxy-3-piperidinyl)propyl)-2-nitroimidazole hydrochloride, Natural Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC, USA) 60 minutes before harvesting the tumors. Pimonidazole is a bioreductive chemical probe with an immuno-recognizable side chain, which was described previously as a marker for hypoxia [29–31]. The animals were killed by cervical dislocation and the harvested xenograft tissues were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen.

Cell lines

MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 (ATCC, LGC Promochem, London, UK) human breast cancer cells were cultured for a limited number of passages in standard culture medium ((DMEM, MP Biomedicals, Amsterdam, the Netherlands) with 10% dialyzed FCS (Invitrogen, Breda, the Netherlands), 2 mM L-glutamine, 20 mM HEPES, 10 U/ml penicillin, 10 μg/ml streptomycin, and nonessential amino acids (NEAA, MP Biomedicals)) at 37°C with 5% CO2, unless stated otherwise. Knockdown of TRIB3 was performed using siRNA transfection reagent SAINT-RED (Synvolux Therapeutics BV, Groningen, the Netherlands). siRNAs MISSION® siRNA Universal Negative Control #1 (SIC001), TRIB3 (1) (SASI_Hs01_00197510) and TRIB3 (2) (SASI_Hs01_00197511) were acquired from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The knockdown of HIF-1α, PRKR-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), inositol-requiring 1 (IRE1), activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6), ATF4 and CHOP was performed in MCF7 cells as described previously for HCT116 cells [32].

Detection of RNA

Total RNA was isolated with the RNeasy RNA isolation kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with on-column DNAse treatment. For the reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) Reverse Transcription System from Promega Benelux B.V. (Leiden, the Netherlands) was used and cDNAs were amplified with specific primers (TRIB3 forward: att agg cag ggt ctg tcc tgt g, reverse: agt atg gac ctg gga ttg tgg a; VEGF forward: ccg cag acg tgt aaa tgt tcc t, reverse:cgg ctt gtc aca tct gca agt a; PAI-1 forward:ggc cat gga aca agg atg aga, reverse:gac cag ctt cag atc ccg ct; CAIX forward:gag gcc tgg ccg tgt tg, reverse:aat cgc tga gga agg ctc ag; MIF forward:cag ccc gga cag ggt cta c, reverse:tct tag gcg aag gtg gag ttg; ATF4 forward: cct tca cct tct tac aac c, reverse: gta gtc tgg ctt cct atc t; GRP78/BiP forward:tct atg aag gtg aaa gac cc, reverse:ctg tca ctc gaa gaa tac ca) using Sybr Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Nieuwerkerk a/d lJssel, the Netherlands) on an ABI Prism 7700 Sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems, Nieuwerkerk a/d lJssel, the Netherlands). All samples were normalized for levels of hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) expression. In the experiment in which the pathways involved in TRIB3 regulation were determined, RNA was reverse-transcribed using I-Script (Bio-Rad Laboratories BV, Veenendaal, the Netherlands). Furthermore, these samples were normalized to 18S rRNA.

Detection of protein

Protein localization of TRIB3 and other relevant proteins or markers in xenograft and human breast cancer tissue was determined using immunohistochemical staining. The frozen xenografts or frozen tumor tissues were sectioned at 5 μm thickness after embedding in Tissue-Tek (Sakura Finetek Europe, Zoeterwoude, the Netherlands). Sections were mounted on poly-L-Lysine coated microscopic slides (Menzel, Braunschweig, Germany), fixated in acetone and rehydrated in 0.1 M phosphate buffered saline pH 7.4 (PBS, Klinipath, Duiven, the Netherlands). Between all antibody incubations, sections were rinsed three times in PBS (Klinipath, Duiven, the Netherlands). The following primary antibodies were dissolved in primary antibody diluent (PAD, AbD serotec, Oxford, UK) and stained with the appropriate labeled secondary antibodies; rabbit-anti-TRIB3 (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA, USA), PAL-E for blood vessels in human tissue (Euro Diagnostica, Arnhem, the Netherlands), rat monoclonal against mouse endothelium (9F1, kind gift from Dr. G. van Muijen of the Department of Pathology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands), and rabbit-anti-pimonidazole for hypoxic regions in xenograft tissue. Slides were enclosed using Fluorostab (ICN pharmaceuticals, Inc. Zoetermeer, the Netherlands). Paraffin embedded breast tissue sections (4 μm) were deparaffinized and re-hydrated in histosafe (Klinipath, Duiven, the Netherlands) and graded alcohols (100%-96%-70%). For antigen retrieval, slides were heated (90°C) in 10 mM citrate buffer pH 6.0 (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark). Endogenous peroxidase was blocked with 3% H2O2 in methanol before the incubation with polyclonal rabbit-anti-TRIB3 (Novus Biologicals, Cambridge, UK) or rabbit-anti-pimonidazole. Subsequently, slides were incubated with Powervision (Lab Vision Products, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cheshire, UK) and visualization of peroxidase was performed using PowerDAB (Lab Vision Products, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cheshire, UK). A counterstain with hematoxylin (Klinipath, Duiven, the Netherlands) was performed before dehydration and mounting using Permount (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cheshire, UK).

All microscopic images were acquired using IP-Lab for Macintosh software (Scanalytics Inc., Fairfax, VA, USA) in combination with a monochrome CCD camera (Retiga SRV, 1392 × 1040 pixels) and a RGB filter (Slider Module; QImaging, Burnaby, BC, Canada) attached to a motorized microscope (Leica DM 6000, Wetzlar, Germany). For comparison between TRIB3 and pimonidazole expression, whole tumor sections were scanned with a 10× objective at 100× magnification [33]. The individual colors (DAB (brown) and hematoxylin (blue) signals) were extracted and unmixed from the bright fields images [33].

Treatment of cells

For anoxia experiments, treatments included addition of 1.2 U/ml oxyrase (Oxyrase, Inc., Mansfield, OH, USA), a reagent that removes all oxygen from culture medium [34, 35] or 100 μM CoCl2 (Sigma, Zwijndrecht, the Netherlands), a hypoxia mimetic, to the standard culture medium. The effect of CoCl2 on HIF-1α protein levels stabilization was confirmed by performing a standard western blot analysis [36] with minor adjustments using mouse anti-HIF-1α (BD Biosciences, Erembodegem, Belgium) antibody and the effect on HIF-1 activity by measuring CAIX expression on mRNA level.

For less than 0.01% O2 exposure, MCF7 cells were transferred to a hypoxic culture chamber (MACS VA500 microaerophilic workstation, Don Whitley Scientific, West Yorkshire, UK) as described previously [32].

For 0.1% to 0.5% O2 exposure MDA-MB-231 cells were transferred to a hypoxic culture chamber (H35 hypoxystation, Don Whitley Scientific, West Yorkshire, UK).

In nutrient starvation experiments, either glucose-free DMEM including the same additions as the standard culture medium, or the standard culture medium in which the NEAA were omitted, were used. To induce ER-stress, 0.5 μM thapsigargin (Sigma, Zwijndrecht, the Netherlands) was added to the standard culture medium.

Cell proliferation assay

To measure cell survival we used the CellTiter 96® AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay (MTS, Promega Benelux BV, Leiden, the Netherlands). Assays were performed in a 96-well plate format in which cells were transfected with siRNA 24 hours after seeding. Treatment started 24 hours after transfection. Directly after treatment for 48 hours 20 μl of MTS solution was added to 100 μl cell culture medium per well. After three hours of incubation with MTS absorbance at 492 nm was measured using a Multiskan Ascent Photometric plate reader (Labsytems, Helsinki, Finland).

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS 10.0.5 software (SPSS Benelux BV, Gorinchem, the Netherlands). Normality of distribution of variables was tested using Kolmogorov-Smirnov testing. Differences in TRIB3 expression in cells with different treatments were evaluated using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Tukey's testing. Differences in levels of TRIB3 expression in samples from patients categorized by clinicopathological characteristics, used as grouping variables, were assessed with non-parametric Mann-Whitney U tests (for two groups) or with Kruskall-Wallis tests (for more than two groups) where appropriate. Non-parametric correlations were established using Spearman Rank correlation testing. Disease free survival (DFS) time (defined as the time from surgery until diagnosis of recurrent or metastatic disease) and overall survival (OS) time (defined as the time between date of surgery and death by any cause) were used as follow-up endpoints. Survival curves were generated using the method of Kaplan and Meier, after patients were categorized by TRIB3 expression in either two or three equally sized groups, thus either at the p50, or at the p33 and p66. Equality of survival distributions was tested using log-rank testing, with Mantel-Cox test for trend when more than two groups were analyzed, and using Cox univariate and multivariable regression analyses. Variables were selected for the multivariable survival analyses by backward stepwise selection, with removal testing based on the probability of the likelihood-ratio statistic, at a P > 0.10. Two-sided P-values below 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Cases with more than 96 months of follow up were censored at 96 months, because of the rapidly declining number of patients thereafter, although data on some patients was available for up to 169 months after primary surgery. This censoring was done because after a certain period of observation patients are frequently redirected to their general practitioner for checkups and mammography and cease to be among the outpatients of the breast cancer clinics. Further inclusion of the small remaining groups in statistical analyses would be non-informative. Additionally, the data met the proportional hazard assumption, and hazard ratios did not change over time.

Results

TRIB3 mRNA association with a poor prognosis in human breast cancer

To investigate whether the variation in TRIB3 expression is relevant for prognosis in breast cancer, TRIB3 mRNA levels were measured in 247 tumor samples from breast cancer patients. The TRIB3 levels were log-normally distributed among the patient samples, with 26 of 247 (10.5%) samples in which TRIB3 levels were not detectable. TRIB3 levels showed no association with most clinicopathological characteristics (Table 1). TRIB3 mRNA levels were only significantly different in tumors that were not of ductal or lobular histology.

Table 1 Associations of TRIB3 expression levels with clinicopathological factors.

When the patients were divided into three equally sized groups based on the level of TRIB3 mRNA in the primary tumor the group with the lowest amount of TRIB3 expression had a mean DFS of 80 months (95% confidence interval (CI) = 74 to 86 months), whereas the group with an average amount of TRIB3 had a mean DFS of 74 months (95% CI = 67 to 81 months) and the group with high levels of TRIB3 had a mean DFS of 63 months (95% CI = 55 to 71 months; P = 0.002, Figure 1a). Patients with the lowest amount of TRIB3 expression had a mean OS of 91 months (95% CI = 88 to 94 months), whereas those with an intermediate amount of TRIB3 had a mean OS of 83 months (95% CI = 77 to 89 months) and those with high levels of TRIB3 had a mean OS of 74 months (95% CI = 67 to 80 months; P < 0.001, Figure 1b). Similar differences were found after division of the patients in two equal groups (DFS: hazard ratio (HR) = 2.15, 95% CI = 1.39 to 3.31, P < 0.001; OS: HR = 3.48, 95% CI = 2.00 to 6.06, P < 0.001; Table 2), and when TRIB3 was entered as a continuous factor after log-normalization in a univariate Cox regression analysis (not shown). In multivariate Cox regression analyses, TRIB3 remained statistically significantly associated with both DFS and OS after correction for other clinicopathological parameters (Table 2).

Figure 1
figure 1

TRIB3 expression is associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer. Patients where divided into three groups based on their TRIB3 mRNA levels; less than 33% (dotted line), 33% to 66% (dashed line) and more than 66% (solid line). Kaplan-Meier plots of (a) disease-free survival (DFS; P = 0.002) and (b) overall survival (OS; P < 0.001) in breast cancer patients (n = 274) and DFS (c) in patients with mastectomy without further radiotherapy (n = 67, P = 0.719) and (d) in patients that received postoperative radiotherapy (n = 179, P = 0.005).

Table 2 Cox uni- and multivariate analyses of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in all patients (n = 247).

In exploratory subgroup analyses, we found that the prognostic value of TRIB3 mRNA expression was limited to those patients receiving radiotherapy as part of their primary treatment. In those patients that had a mastectomy without further radiotherapy, no relation between TRIB3 and DFS was seen (P = 0.719, n = 67, Figure 1c). Postoperative radiotherapy was given to 179 patients (to the breast after an incomplete resection or after breast-conserving treatment, or parasternal radiotherapy when the tumor was medially localized). In this group, TRIB3 was highly significantly associated with DFS (P = 0.005, n = 179, Figure 1d). We did not find a correlation between TRIB3 mRNA expression and local/regional or distant control in the radiotherapy treated group (P = 0.13, P = 0.11 and P = 0.17 respectively), neither in the group not treated with radiotherapy (P = 0.91 P = 0.75 and P = 0.84, respectively).

TRIB3 mRNA is induced by a variety of stresses

To test the effect of different stresses on TRIB3 mRNA expression we used the estrogen receptor positive MCF7 and estrogen receptor negative MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Anoxia exposure was performed using oxyrase, HIF-1 protein was stabilized using CoCl2, ER stress was induced by treating the cells with 0.5 μM thapsigargin (an inhibitor of endoplasmic reticular Ca2+-ATPase), and nutrient starvation was achieved by deprivation of the medium from either glucose or NEAA. After different incubation periods TRIB3 mRNA levels were measured by RT-qPCR. Figure 2a shows the results of 24 hours of incubation. TRIB3 expression was increased in breast cancer cells after 24 hours of anoxia (P < 0.05, Figure 2a). However, incubation with CoCl2, which indeed stabilized HIF1α protein confirmed by western blot (see insert in Figure 2a) and induced HIF1-dependent transcription measured by CAIX mRNA expression (fold induction ranging from 1.3 to 4.3 for MDA-MB-231 and 35.7 to 65.4 for MCF7 cells) did not induce TRIB3 mRNA. Thapsigargin induced a significant increase in TRIB3 mRNA levels within two hours, which was further extended after up to 24 hours of incubation (P < 0.01, Figure 2a). After MCF7 cells were starved for glucose for 24 hours, TRIB3 expression was significantly increased (P < 0.01, Figure 2a). After omission of NEAA from the growth medium, a statistically significant increase in TRIB3 mRNA was detected at 48 hours (P < 0.01, data not shown).

Figure 2
figure 2

TRIB3 is induced by cell stress and is expressed in hypoxic areas. (a) Fold induction of TRIB3 mRNA expression (mean + standard deviation (SD)) after 24 hours incubation with hypoxia mimetic (CoCl2, inhibitor of the degradation of HIF-1, see insert), anoxia (oxyrase), estrogen receptor (ER) stress (thapsigargin) or nutrient starvation in the ER positive MCF7 and the ER negative MDA-MB-231 cell lines. Each measurement was performed at least in triplicate. (b) Fold induction of TRIB3 mRNA expression (mean + SD) after incubation of MDA-MB-231 cells at increasing oxygen concentrations (oxyrase (~0%), 0.1%, 0.2% and 0.5% oxygen) compared with normoxia. Each measurement was performed at least in triplicate. (c) Triple fluorescent staining in two different xenografts of MDA-MB-231 cells for TRIB3 (red), pimonidazole (green), and 9F1 (blue) showing colocalization of TRB3 and hypoxia, distal from blood vessels.

TRIB3 induction by hypoxia in breast cancer cells, xenografts and breast cancer tissues

To specify the oxygen dependence of TRIB3 up-regulation MDA-MB-231 cells were cultured under controlled oxygen concentrations of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.5%. A time dependent up-regulation of TRIB3 mRNA compared with HPRT was seen at all tested oxygen tensions after 24 hours. More severe oxygen deprivation does not lead to a higher induction of TRIB3 compared with intermediate hypoxia (Figure 2b).

Next, to assess whether the oxygen dependence of TRIB3 expression could also be observed in tissues, frozen sections of MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cell xenografts grown on nude mice were triple stained with fluorescent anti-pimonidazole, anti-TRIB3, and anti-endothelial antibodies. TRIB3 staining was specifically seen in the hypoxic regions of the tumor, distant from the blood vessels (Figure 2c).

Next, we assessed TRIB3 staining in breast cancer tissue from three patients that had received pimonidazole prior to biopsy. In all three tumor tissues, large pimonidazole positive hypoxic areas were found, often around necrotic cores. TRIB3 was almost exclusively expressed in these hypoxic areas (Figure 3). Excellent co-localization was seen between pimonidazole and TRIB3 within the same regions at higher magnification (Figures 3c to 3e). Thus, in human breast cancer tissues, TRIB3 is up-regulated in hypoxic regions of the tumor, similar to that seen in xenograft samples shown above.

Figure 3
figure 3

TRIB3 colocalizes with pimonidazole in human breast cancer tissue. Results after linear unmixing of scanned images from immunohistochemical stainings of (a) TRIB3 (DAB, brown) and (b) pimonidazole (DAB, brown), and single images from immunohistochemical stainings at 100× magnification of (c) TRIB3 (DAB, brown), (d) pimonidazole (DAB, brown) and (e) hematoxylin (blue), in human breast cancer tissue. See methods for details of unmixing and scanning.

TRIB3 is induced through the unfolded protein response via PERK, ATF4 and CHOP

Tumor cells respond to oxygen deprivation by, among others, stabilization of HIF-1 and activation of the UPR, which consists of three parallel pathways (PERK, IRE1, and ATF6) [8, 37]. To assess through which of these pathways TRIB3 is up-regulated after anoxia, TRIB3 mRNA levels were measured in MCF7 cells in which the different pathways were silenced by gene knockdown [32]. For all genes used an efficient knockdown for that specific gene was seen (Figure 4a). In the control cells, TRIB3 mRNA was strongly induced after culturing under anoxic conditions (< 0.01% O2; Figure 4b). Knockdown of HIF-1α did not alter the anoxia induction of TRIB3 expression at any time point, which is in line with our results in breast cancer cells after CoCl2 incubation. ATF6 or IRE1 knockdown also did not have an effect on the anoxia-induced up-regulation of TRIB3. In contrast, knockdown of PERK, ATF4 or CHOP completely inhibited the up-regulation of TRIB3 (P < 0.01).

Figure 4
figure 4

TRIB3 is induced through the PERK/ATF4/CHOP pathway of the unfolded protein response. (a) mRNA abundance of the specific genes targeted by the specific siRNAs (mean + standard deviation (SD; n = 3). (b) Fold induction of TRIB3 expression (mean + SD) after anoxia (< 0.01% O2) in MCF7 cells with knockdown of scrambled control (SCR), HIF1, PERK, ATF6, IRE1, ATF4 or CHOP gene by siRNAs. *Significantly different from control (SCR) under anoxia, P < 0.01, each measurement was performed in triplicate.

TRIB3 mRNA expression is not a hypoxia marker

Expression levels of other hypoxia and UPR-associated genes were also determined in the breast cancer patient cohort. No correlation between TRIB3 mRNA expression and the hypoxia markers VEGF, PAI-1, CAIX, or MIF was observed (Spearman correlation coefficient (Rs) = 0.19, P = 0.05, Rs = -0.38, P = 0.59, Rs = 0.78, P = 0.25 and Rs = 0.11, P = 0.08, respectively). The expression of ATF4, the main regulator of TRIB3, was borderline significantly correlated with TRIB3 mRNA expression (P = 0.05) with a low correlation coefficient of 0.18. Another UPR-associated gene GRP78/BiP was not correlated with TRIB3 expression (Rs = 0.12, P = 0.15).

Knockdown of TRIB3 results in a increased hypoxia sensitivity

MDA-MB-231 cells were used for siRNA-mediated knockdown of TRIB3. Two different siRNAs against TRIB3 were used and TRIB3 expression was compared with cells transfected with negative control siRNA. TRIB3 (1) siRNA led to a reduction in TRIB3 expression of 48%, and TRIB3 (2) siRNA led to a reduction of 87% (Figure 5a). Next, we sought to establish whether TRIB3 is associated with poor prognosis solely as a marker for hypoxia, or that it has a functional role in hypoxia resistance of tumor cells. To this end, MDA-MB-231 cells were transfected with the above mentioned TRIB3 siRNAs and cultured under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. In cells transfected with control siRNA, the total activity of cells measured by MTS assay cultured for 48 hours at 0.1% did not differ significantly from cells cultured in standard conditions (Figure 5b). In cells transfected with the two different siRNAs against TRIB3 the MTS assay readout was significantly (P = 0.003 and P < 0.001 for siRNA TRIB3 (1) and (2), respectively) diminished after hypoxia. Noteworthy, the siRNA that has the greatest knockdown effect on TRIB3 mRNA levels also had the greatest effect on total cell activity after hypoxia.

Figure 5
figure 5

Knockdown of TRIB3 results in lower cell survival under hypoxic conditions. (a) Fold induction of TRIB3 expression levels (mean + standard deviation (SD)) in MDA-MB-231 cells after transfection with negative control siRNA and two siRNAs against TRIB3 transcript. Each measurement was performed in triplicate. (b) Average absorbance at 492 nm (+ SD) measured by MTS assay of cells cultured under normal culture conditions and 0.1% oxygen. Each condition was measured in 10 independent wells.

Discussion

Here, we find that TRIB3 is associated with poor prognosis of breast cancer patients, independent of other clinicopathological characteristics. TRIB3 is expressed in hypoxic areas of both breast cancer xenografts and human breast tumor tissues. We found that this TRIB3 up-regulation is induced by ER stress, hypoxia and nutrient starvation, and is dependent on the PERK pathway of the UPR. TRIB3 induction is most pronounced at a moderate oxygen concentration and TRIB3 seems involved in hypoxia response of tumor cells.

Tribbles was originally identified as a delayer of mitosis in Drosophila Melanogaster [38–40]. One of the three human homologs, TRIB3, has recently been described to be involved in regulation of the cell cycle regulator cdc25A in human cells [41]. Furthermore, TRIB3 has a role in insulin sensitivity and diabetes [10, 42–44] and has also been described to interact as a scaffold protein in multiple signaling cascades, including v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 1 (PKB/Akt) [10, 13] but also MAPK [11] pathways. This apparent involvement of TRIB3 in tumor cell proliferation and/or survival and growth factor receptor signaling cascades combined with its role in hypoxia and cell stress pathways [9, 13–15, 45, 46] originally spurred us to investigate its role in breast cancer progression. Our results presented here show that TRIB3 could be involved in the hypoxia response of breast cancer cells; it is induced by cell stressors including hypoxia, ER stress, and nutrient starvation in breast cancer cells, which is in line with earlier observations in other cell types [9, 13–15, 45, 46]. We confirmed here that TRIB3 is part of the UPR [9, 12], more specifically the PERK/ATF4/CHOP pathway. We find that knockdown of TRIB3 results in cells that are more sensitive to hypoxia. One pathway involved in hypoxia tolerance of tumor cells is the UPR [32]. Tumor cells utilize this pathway to counter cell stresses like hypoxia, most likely through induction of autophagy [32]. By "self-eating" of cellular components, cells can provide for their own energy and constituents, thereby surviving prolonged periods of severe hypoxia [32]. TRIB3 is known to inhibit PKB/Akt [10], a putative link between the UPR and autophagy [16].

Importantly, hypoxic cells are particularly refractory to treatment and tend to have an increased metastatic potential [1, 3]. Further, the hypoxia and nutrient starvation-induced UPR-pathway is important for cancer treatment efficacy [21, 32, 47, 48] and therefore an interesting new target for therapy. In comparison with HIF-1, which is activated over a wide range of oxygen concentrations of around 2%, maximum activation of the UPR requires exposure to more severe hypoxia (reviewed in [49]). Nevertheless, activation of the UPR has been shown to protect tumor cells against hypoxia-induced cell death both in vitro and in vivo over a range of oxygen concentrations [47, 48, 50]. We are the first to describe the specific oxygen tensions that induce TRIB3, and found that up-regulation of TRIB3 does not increase with decreasing oxygen tensions. These results indicate that the up-regulation of TRIB3 under moderate hypoxia is at least partly due to other pathways than the UPR. PI3K is already described to up-regulate TRIB3 expression [13] and could be responsible for the up-regulation of TRIB3 at the more physiological moderate hypoxia, rather than at severe hypoxia (i.e. anoxia). Severe hypoxia is mainly found in perinecrotic areas within solid tumors and probably has less influence on prognosis and treatment sensitivity than areas with more moderate hypoxia. Within the moderate hypoxic tumor regions cells can adapt, and are eventually more likely to reoxygenate and/or metastasize as they are more proximal to blood vessels.

Here, we show that TRIB3 expression can independently predict disease outcome in human breast cancer patients. The importance of TRIB3 in cancer is supported by the finding that TRIB3 is also involved in the prognosis of colorectal cancer patients [17]. The data suggest that TRIB3 is induced by hypoxia in an ATF4 dependent manner and supports hypoxia sensitivity, but from the measurements of other hypoxia markers we find that TRIB3 mRNA abundance from tumor biopsies is not merely a reflection of tumor hypoxia. This suggests that TRIB3 marks or supports tumor aggressiveness rather than reflecting hypoxia itself. Furthermore, the predictive value of TRIB3 expression in our study was specifically significant in the patient group that received radiotherapy. Combined with the observation that TRIB3 is mostly expressed in the therapy resistant hypoxic areas of breast tumors this indicates that the prognostic role of TRIB3 could indeed be a consequence of therapy resistance. When this would be solely due to radiotherapy resistance one would expect also a correlation with loco-regional control but this was not the case. However, a correlation with distant control could also not be found, probably both due to low number of events and small group sizes. In addition, as this was a non-randomized retrospective analysis, any predictive value of TRIB3 mRNA remains to be confirmed in a larger prospective trial.

Conclusions

Examining TRIB3 expression in human breast tumor material revealed that there was an independent association with poor prognosis of breast cancer patients. A relation of TRIB3 with hypoxia was seen by the co-localization with the hypoxia marker pimonidazole in both breast cancer xenografts and human breast tumor tissue. We found that TRIB3 up-regulation after hypoxia, ER stress and nutrient starvation also holds true for breast cancer cells and is HIF-1 independent and UPR dependent. TRIB3 up-regulation after hypoxia was found to be most pronounced at physiological intermediate hypoxia, in contrast to most UPR-induced proteins. Finally, knockdown of TRIB3 revealed an effect on hypoxia response of breast cancer cells. In combination these results indicate that TRIB3 might be associated with tumor cell survival under prolonged intermediate hypoxic stress. This hypothesis warrants further experiments in other (breast cancer) cell lines applying additional knockdown, possibly with rescue, and/or overexpression techniques. Furthermore, the involvement of TRIB3 in multiple important signaling pathways makes it an interesting target for cancer therapy. Further research will provide more insight into the mechanisms of action and possibilities of intervention.

Abbreviations

ANOVA:

analysis of variance

ATF4:

activating transcription factor 4

CHOP:

C/EBP homologous protein

CI:

confidence interval

DFS:

disease free survival

DMEM:

Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium

ER:

endoplasmic reticulum

HIF-1:

hypoxia inducible factor 1

HPRT:

hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase

HR:

hazard ratio

IRE1:

inositol-requiring 1

MAPK:

mitogen activated protein kinase

NEAA:

nonessential amino acids

NF:

nuclear factor

OS:

overall survival

PERK:

PRKR-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase

PBS:

phosphate buffered saline pH 7.4

PKB/Akt:

v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 1

RT-qPCR:

reverse transcriptase: quantitative polymerase chain reaction

siRNA:

small interfering RNA

TRIB3:

Tribbles homolog 3

UPR:

unfolded protein response.

References

  1. Harris AL: Hypoxia--a key regulatory factor in tumour growth. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002, 2: 38-47. 10.1038/nrc704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hockel M, Schlenger K, Aral B, Mitze M, Schaffer U, Vaupel P: Association between tumor hypoxia and malignant progression in advanced cancer of the uterine cervix. Cancer Res. 1996, 56: 4509-4515.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Milani M, Harris AL: Targeting tumour hypoxia in breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2008, 44: 2766-2773. 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.09.025.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bertout JA, Patel SA, Simon MC: The impact of O2 availability on human cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008, 8: 967-975. 10.1038/nrc2540.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bos R, Zhong H, Hanrahan CF, Mommers EC, Semenza GL, Pinedo HM, Abeloff MD, Simons JW, van Diest PJ, van der Wall E: Levels of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha during breast carcinogenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001, 93: 309-314. 10.1093/jnci/93.4.309.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Generali D, Berruti A, Brizzi MP, Campo L, Bonardi S, Wigfield S, Bersiga A, Allevi G, Milani M, Aguggini S, et al: Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha expression predicts a poor response to primary chemoendocrine therapy and disease-free survival in primary human breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2006, 12: 4562-4568. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2690.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rzymski T, Paantjens A, Bod J, Harris AL: Multiple pathways are involved in the anoxia response of SKIP3 including HuR-regulated RNA stability, NF-kappaB and ATF4. Oncogene. 2008, 27: 4532-4543. 10.1038/onc.2008.100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rouschop KM, Wouters BG: Regulation of autophagy through multiple independent hypoxic signaling pathways. Curr Mol Med. 2009, 9: 417-424. 10.2174/156652409788167131.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ohoka N, Yoshii S, Hattori T, Onozaki K, Hayashi H: TRB3, a novel ER stress-inducible gene, is induced via ATF4-CHOP pathway and is involved in cell death. Embo Journal. 2005, 24: 1243-1255. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600596.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Du KY, Herzig S, Kulkarni RN, Montminy M: TRB3: A tribbles homolog that inhibits Akt/PKB activation by insulin in liver. Science. 2003, 300: 1574-1577. 10.1126/science.1079817.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kiss-Toth E, Bagstaff SM, Sung HY, Jozsa V, Dempsey C, Caunt JC, Oxley KM, Wyllie DH, Polgar T, Harte M, et al: Human tribbles, a protein family controlling mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2004, 279: 42703-42708. 10.1074/jbc.M407732200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ord D, Meerits K, Ord T: TRB3 protects cells against the growth inhibitory and cytotoxic effect of ATF4. Experimental Cell Research. 2007, 3 (13): 3556-3567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schwarzer R, Dames S, Tondera D, Klippel A, Kaufmann J: TRB3 is a PI 3-kinase dependent indicator for nutrient starvation. Cellular Signalling. 2006, 18: 899-909. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2005.08.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bowers AJ, Scully S, Boylan JF: SKIP3, a novel Drosophila tribbles ortholog, is overexpressed in human tumors and is regulated by hypoxia. Oncogene. 2003, 22: 2823-2835. 10.1038/sj.onc.1206367.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ord D, Ord T: Characterization of human NIPK (TRB3, SKIP3) gene activation in stressful conditions. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2005, 330: 210-218. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.02.149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Salazar M, Carracedo A, Salanueva IJ, Hernandez-Tiedra S, Lorente M, Egia A, Vazquez P, Blazquez C, Torres S, Garcia S, et al: Cannabinoid action induces autophagy-mediated cell death through stimulation of ER stress in human glioma cells. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2009, 119: 1359-1372. 10.1172/JCI37948.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Miyoshi N, Ishii H, Mimori K, Takatsuno Y, Kim H, Hirose H, Sekimoto M, Doki Y, Mori M: Abnormal expression of TRIB3 in colorectal cancer: a novel marker for prognosis. Br J Cancer. 2009, 101: 1664-1670. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605361.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Xu JM, Lv S, Qin Y, Shu F, Xu YJ, Chen J, Xu BE, Sun XQ, Wu J: TRB3 interacts with CtIP and is overexpressed in certain cancers. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta-General Subjects. 2007, 1770: 273-278. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2006.09.025.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chi JT, Wang Z, Nuyten DS, Rodriguez EH, Schaner ME, Salim A, Wang Y, Kristensen GB, Helland A, Borresen-Dale AL, et al: Gene expression programs in response to hypoxia: cell type specificity and prognostic significance in human cancers. PLoS Med. 2006, 3: e47-10.1371/journal.pmed.0030047.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Chia SK, Wykoff CC, Watson PH, Han C, Leek RD, Pastorek J, Gatter KC, Ratcliffe P, Harris AL: Prognostic significance of a novel hypoxia-regulated marker, carbonic anhydrase IX, in invasive breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2001, 19: 3660-3668.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Davies MP, Barraclough DL, Stewart C, Joyce KA, Eccles RM, Barraclough R, Rudland PS, Sibson DR: Expression and splicing of the unfolded protein response gene XBP-1 are significantly associated with clinical outcome of endocrine-treated breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2008, 123: 85-88. 10.1002/ijc.23479.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Span PN, Bussink J, Manders P, Beex LV, Sweep CG: Carbonic anhydrase-9 expression levels and prognosis in human breast cancer: association with treatment outcome. Br J Cancer. 2003, 89: 271-276. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601122.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Nicholson RI, Hutcheson IR, Britton D, Knowlden JM, Jones HE, Harper ME, Hiscox SE, Barrow D, Gee JM: Growth factor signalling networks in breast cancer and resistance to endocrine agents: new therapeutic strategies. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2005, 93: 257-262. 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2004.12.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. [http://www.fmwv.nl]

  25. McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE, Gion M, Clark GM: Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK). J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005, 97: 1180-1184. 10.1093/jnci/dji237.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Span PN, Waanders E, Manders P, Heuvel JJ, Foekens JA, Watson MA, Beex LV, Sweep FC: Mammaglobin is associated with low-grade, steroid receptor-positive breast tumors from postmenopausal patients, and has independent prognostic value for relapse-free survival time. J Clin Oncol. 2004, 22: 691-698. 10.1200/JCO.2004.01.072.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sweep CG, Geurts-Moespot J: EORTC external quality assurance program for ER and PgR measurements: trial 1998/1999. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Int J Biol Markers. 2000, 15: 62-69.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Raleigh JA, Chou SC, Bono EL, Thrall DE, Varia MA: Semiquantitative immunohistochemical analysis for hypoxia in human tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001, 49: 569-574. 10.1016/S0360-3016(00)01505-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Arteel GE, Thurman RG, Yates JM, Raleigh JA: Evidence that hypoxia markers detect oxygen gradients in liver: pimonidazole and retrograde perfusion of rat liver. Br J Cancer. 1995, 72: 889-895. 10.1038/bjc.1995.429.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Ljungkvist AS, Bussink J, Rijken PF, Kaanders JH, van der Kogel AJ, Denekamp J: Vascular architecture, hypoxia, and proliferation in first-generation xenografts of human head-and-neck squamous cell carcinomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002, 54: 215-228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wijffels KI, Kaanders JH, Marres HA, Bussink J, Peters HP, Rijken MSPF, van den Hoogen FJ, de Wilde PC, van der Kogel AJ: Patterns of proliferation related to vasculature in human head-and-neck carcinomas before and after transplantation in nude mice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001, 51: 1346-1353. 10.1016/S0360-3016(01)02605-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rouschop KM, van den Beucken T, Dubois L, Niessen H, Bussink J, Savelkouls K, Keulers T, Mujcic H, Landuyt W, Voncken JW, et al: The unfolded protein response protects human tumor cells during hypoxia through regulation of the autophagy genes MAP1LC3B and ATG5. J Clin Invest. 2010, 120: 127-141. 10.1172/JCI40027.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rijken PF, Bernsen HJ, van der Kogel AJ: Application of an image analysis system to the quantitation of tumor perfusion and vascularity in human glioma xenografts. Microvasc Res. 1995, 50: 141-153. 10.1006/mvre.1995.1048.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ho KC, Leach JK, Eley K, Mikkelsen RB, Lin PS: A simple method of producing low oxygen conditions with oxyrase for cultured cells exposed to radiation and tirapazamine. Am J Clin Oncol. 2003, 26: e86-91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Joseph JK, Bunnachak D, Burke TJ, Schrier W: A novel method of inducing and assuring total anoxia during in vitro studies of O2 deprivation injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1990, 1: 837-840.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Laemmli UK: Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970, 227: 680-685. 10.1038/227680a0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rademakers SE, Span PN, Kaanders JH, Sweep FC, van der Kogel AJ, Bussink J: Molecular aspects of tumour hypoxia. Mol Oncol. 2008, 2: 41-53. 10.1016/j.molonc.2008.03.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Grosshans J, Wieschaus E: A genetic link between morphogenesis and cell division during formation of the ventral furrow in Drosophila. Cell. 2000, 101: 523-531. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80862-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mata J, Curado S, Ephrussi A, Rorth P: Tribbles coordinates mitosis and morphogenesis in Drosophila by regulating string/CDC25 proteolysis. Cell. 2000, 101: 511-522. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80861-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Seher TC, Leptin M: Tribbles, a cell-cycle brake that coordinates proliferation and morphogenesis during Drosophila gastrulation. Current Biology. 2000, 10: 623-629. 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00502-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sakai S, Ohoka N, Onozaki K, Kitagawa M, Nakanishi M, Hayashi H: Dual Mode of Regulation of Cell Division Cycle 25 A Protein by TRB3. Biol Pharm Bull. 2010, 33: 1112-1116. 10.1248/bpb.33.1112.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kato S, Du KY: TRB3 modulates C2C12 differentiation by interfering with Akt activation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007, 353: 933-938. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.12.161.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Koo SH, Satoh H, Herzig S, Lee CH, Hedrick S, Kulkarni R, Evans RM, Olefsky J, Montminy M: PGC-1 promotes insulin resistance in liver through PPAR-alpha-dependent induction of TRB-3. Nat Med. 2004, 10: 530-534. 10.1038/nm1044.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Prudente S, Hribal ML, Flex E, Turchi F, Morini E, De Cosmo S, Bacci S, Tassi V, Cardellini M, Lauro R, et al: The functional Q84R polymorphism of mammalian tribbles homolog TRB3 is associated with insulin resistance and related cardiovascular risk in Caucasians from Italy. Diabetes. 2005, 54: 2807-2811. 10.2337/diabetes.54.9.2807.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Corcoran CA, Luo X, He Q, Jiang C, Huang Y, Sheikh MS: Genotoxic and endoplasmic reticulum stresses differentially regulate TRB3 expression. Cancer biology & therapy. 2005, 4: 1063-1067. 10.4161/cbt.4.10.2205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Wasef SZY, Robinson KA, Berkaw MN, Buse MG: Glucose, dexamethasone, and the unfolded protein response regulate TRB3 mRNA expression in 3T3-L1 adipocytes and L6 myotubes. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2006, 291: E1274-E1280. 10.1152/ajpendo.00117.2006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Bi M, Naczki C, Koritzinsky M, Fels D, Blais J, Hu N, Harding H, Novoa I, Varia M, Raleigh J, et al: ER stress-regulated translation increases tolerance to extreme hypoxia and promotes tumor growth. EMBO J. 2005, 24: 3470-3481. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600777.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Romero-Ramirez L, Cao H, Nelson D, Hammond E, Lee AH, Yoshida H, Mori K, Glimcher LH, Denko NC, Giaccia AJ, et al: XBP1 is essential for survival under hypoxic conditions and is required for tumor growth. Cancer Res. 2004, 64: 5943-5947. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Koumenis C, Wouters BG: "Translating" tumor hypoxia: unfolded protein response (UPR)-dependent and UPR-independent pathways. Mol Cancer Res. 2006, 4: 423-436. 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-06-0150.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Koritzinsky M, Rouschop KM, van den Beucken T, Magagnin MG, Savelkouls K, Lambin P, Wouters BG: Phosphorylation of eIF2 alpha is required for mRNA translation inhibition and survival during moderate hypoxia. Radiother Oncol. 2007, 83: 353-361. 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.04.031.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The contributors to the breast tumor bank: surgeons, internists, oncologists and in particular patients are gratefully acknowledged. M. Withaar, D. van Tienoven, A.J. Geurts-Moespot, J.P.W Peters and W.J.M. Peeters are acknowledged for technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marloes Wennemers.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

MW performed laboratory experiments, data analysis and participated in the experimental design and drafting of the manuscript. JB participated in the design and coordination of the research and assisted in xenograft assays. BS contributed to the interpretation of the data and critical revised the manuscript. IDN participated in the immunohistochemical stainings and the interpretation of these data. HWML participated in the collection of the patient material and data. JAR and MAV participated in the collection of patient material containing pimonidazole. JJTMH participated in RT-qPCR experiments and interpretation of the results. KMR carried out the MCF-7 knockdown experiments and critically revised the manuscript. FCGJS participated in the design and coordination of the research and assisted in the patient material collection. PNS participated in the design and coordination of the research, performed the statistical analysis and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wennemers, M., Bussink, J., Scheijen, B. et al. Tribbles homolog 3 denotes a poor prognosis in breast cancer and is involved in hypoxia response. Breast Cancer Res 13, R82 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr2934

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr2934

Keywords