Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T11:31:51.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of Carbamazepine and Lithium in the Prophylaxis of Bipolar Disorders

A Meta-analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

R. Dardennes*
Affiliation:
Clinique des maladies mentales et de l'encéphale, Hôpital Sainte Anne, Paris
C. Even
Affiliation:
Clinique des maladies mentales et de l'encéphale, Hôpital Sainte Anne, Paris
F. Bange
Affiliation:
Clinique des maladies mentales et de l'encéphale, Hôpital Sainte Anne, Paris
A. Heim
Affiliation:
Clinique des maladies mentales et de l'encéphale, Hôpital Sainte Anne, Paris
*
Dr Dardennes, CMME, Hôpital Sainte Anne, 1 rue Cabanis, 75014 Paris, France

Abstract

Background

This meta-analysis assessed the equipotency of carbamazepine and lithium prophylaxis in bipolar disorder.

Method

We selected only randomised, double-blind, controlled studies comparing carbamazepine with lithium from a manual and computerised search, and subjected them to a quality inventory. Their statistical results were weighted by their quality score and combined. Results. Four studies met our criteria, yielding, overall, P = 0.15. This result is not straightforward because the studies showed significant heterogeneity (P < 0.01).

Conclusion

Differences in statistical power and sensitivity of outcome measure explain this heterogeneity and the conflicting results of the studies. Therefore, the prophylactic efficacy of carbamazepine remains questionable.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (1980) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd edn) (DSM–III). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
Casagrande, J. T., Pike, M. C. & Smith, P. G. (1978) An improved approximate formula for calculating sample sizes for comparing two binomial distributions. Biometrics, 34, 483486.Google Scholar
Coxhead, N., Silverstone, T. & Cookson, J. (1992) Carbamazepine versus lithium in the prophylaxis of bipolar affective disorder. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 85, 114118.Google Scholar
King, P. R. (1990) Appraising the quality of drug evaluation research. II. A methodological review procedure for prophylactic treatment trials. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 10, 2226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusznat, R. M., Murphy, D. P. & Nunn, C. M. (1988) Carbamazepine vs lithium in the treatment and prophylaxis of mania. British Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 198204.Google Scholar
Okuma, T., Inanaga, K., Otsuki, S., et al (1981) A preliminary double-blind study on the efficacy of carbamazepine in prophylaxis of manic-depressive illness. Psychopharmacology, 73, 9596.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Overall, J. E. & Rhoades, H. M. (1987) Adjusting p values for multiple tests of significance. In Psychopharmacology: the Third Generation of Progress (ed. Meltzer, H. Y.), pp. 10131018. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
Placidi, G. F., Lenzi, A., Lazzerini, F., et al (1986) The comparative efficacy and safety of carbamazepine versus lithium: a randomised, double-blind 3-year trial in 83 patients. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 47, 490494.Google Scholar
Post, R. M., Altshuler, L. L., Ketter, T. A., et al (1991) Antiepileptic drugs in affective illness. Clinical and theoretical implications. In Advances in Neurology, Vol. 55 (eds Smith, D., Treitman, D. & Trimble, M.), pp. 239277. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, R. (1991) Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research. Newbury Park: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, S. E., Callender, K., Thomas, D. R., et al (1987) The effect of carbamazepine and lithium on remission from affective illness. British Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 180182.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.