Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate whether occupational gender segregation moderates the association between job stress in terms of effort-reward imbalance and the risk of myocardial infarction. This analysis was conducted in 1,381 cases and 1,697 referents of the Swedish SHEEP case control study aged 45-70 years. Information on myocardial infarction and biological coronary risk factors (e.g. hypertension, blood lipids) was achieved from clinical screenings. Information on socio-demographic variables, effort-reward imbalance, behavioral coronary risk factors (e.g., smoking), and additional coronary risk factors (e.g., diabetes, family history of coronary heart disease) was derived from well-tested standardized questionnaires. After adjustment for confounders the strongest association between overcommitment (the intrinsic component of effort-reward imbalance) and risk of belonging to the myocardial infarction group was found among women in male-dominated jobs (odds ratio [OR] = 2.71, 95% CI = 1.13-6.52) as compared to the remaining group (OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.01-2.31). Moreover, a significant interaction between pronounced overcommitment and male domination in relation to myocardial infarction was observed among women (OR = 2.44, 95% CI = 1.05-5.67). In men, an association between the ratio of effort and reward (the extrinsic component of the model) and risk of myocardial infarction was found for the majority, that is the group not working in women-dominated jobs (OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.04-1.86). Despite methodological limitations, this study gives preliminary evidence of a moderating effect of occupational gender segregation on the association of effort-reward imbalance (i.e., the intrinsic model component overcommitment) with acute myocardial infarction risk among women, but not among men.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abell, L. L., Levy, B. B., Brodie, B. B., & Kendall, F. E. (1952). A simplified method for the estimation of total cholesterol in serum and demonstration of its specifity. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 195, 357–366.
Alexanderson, K., Leijon, M., Åkerlind, I., Rydh, H., & Bjurulf, P. (1994). Epidemiology of sickness absence in a Swedish county in 1985, 1986 and 1987. A three year longitudinal study with focus on gender, age and occupation. Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine, 22(1), 27–34.
Arber, S., & Gilbert, N. (Eds.). (1991). Women and working lives: Divisions and change. London: Macmillan.
Barnett, R., Brennan, R., & Marshall, N. (1994). Gender and the relationship between parent role, quality and psychological distress. Journal of Family Issues, 15, 229–252.
Bernin, P., & Theorell, T. (2001). Demand-control-support among female and male managers in eight Swedish companies. Stress and Health, 17, 231–243.
Bosma, H., Peter, R., Siegrist, J., & Marmot, M. (1998). Two alternative job stress models and the risk of coronary heart disease. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 68–74.
Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Efron, B. (1975). The efficiency of logistic regression compared to normal discriminant analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 892–898.
Emslie, C., Hunt, K., & Macintyre, S. (1999). Problematizing gender, work, and health: The relationship between gender, occupational grade, working conditions, and minor morbidity in full-time bank employees. Social Science & Medicine, 48, 33–48.
Evans, J. (2004). Men nurses: A historical and feminist perspective. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 47(3), 321–328.
Evans, O. & Steptoe, A. (2002). The contribution of gender-role orientation, work factors and home stressors to psychological well-being and sickness absence in male- and female-dominated occupational groups. Social Science & Medicine, 54, 481–492.
Frankenhaeuser, M., Lundberg, U., & Chesney, M. (1991). Women, work and health. Stress and opportunities. New York: Plenum Press.
Gallo, L. C., Troxel, W. M., Kuller, L. H., Sutton-Tyrrell, K., Edmundowicz, D., & Matthews, K. A. (2003). Marital status, marital quality, and atherosclerotic burden in postmenopausal women. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65(6), 952–962.
Glynn, L. M., Christenfeld, N., & Gerin, W. (1999). Gender, social support, and cardiovascular responses to stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 61(2), 234–242.
Hall, E. M. (1989). Gender, work control and stress: A theoretical discussion and an empirical test. International Journal of Health Services, 19, 725–745.
Hall, E. (1992). Double exposure: The combined impact of the home and work environments on psychosomatic strain in Swedish women and men. International Journal of Health Services. 22(2), 239–260.
Hallman, T. (2003). Gender perspective on psychosocial risk factors. Conditions governing women’s lives in relation to stress and coronary health disease. Unpublished thesis, Karolinska Institute, Dept of Clinical Neuroscience, Section for Personal Prevention, Stockholm, Sweden.
Härenstam, A., Aronsson, G., & Hammarström, A. (2001). Gender and health from a future perspective. In P. Östlin, M. Danielsson, F. Diderichsen, A. Härenstam, & G. Lindberg (Eds.), Gender Inequalities in Health: A Swedish perspective (pp. 269–304). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard University Press.
Hensing, G., & Alexanderson, K. (2004). The association between sex segregation, working conditions, and sickness absence among employed women. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 61(2), e7.
Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshaw, S. (1989). Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley.
Hunt, K., & Emslie, C. (1998). Men’s work, women’s work? Occupational sex roles and health. In K. Orth-Gomer, M. Chesney, & N. K. Wenger (Eds.), Women, stress, and heart disease (pp. 37–107). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Johnson, J. V., Stewart, W., Hall, E. M., Fredlund, P., Theorell, T. (1996). Long-term psychosocial work environment and cardiovascular mortality among Swedish men. American Journal of Public Health, 86, 324–331.
Jünsson, D., Rosengren, A., Dotevall, A., Lappas, G., & Wilhelmsen, L. (1999). Job control, job demands, and social support at work in relation to cardiovascular risk factors in MONICA 1995, Göteborg. Journal of Cardiovascular Risk, 6, 379–85.
Kim, J. O., & Muller, C. W. (1978). Factor analysis. Statistical Methods and Practical Issues. London: Sage.
Kivimäki, M., Leino-Arjas, P., Luukkonen, R., Riihimäki, H., Vahtera, J., & Kirjonen, J. (2002). Work stress and risk of cardiovascular mortality: Prospective cohort study of industrial employees. British Medical Journal, 325, 857–860.
Kleinbaum, D. G., Kupper, L. L., & Morgenstern, H. (1982). Epidemiologic research—Principles and quantitative methods. New York: Van Norstrand Reinhold.
Klumb, P. L., & Lampert, T. (2004). Women, work, and well-being 1950–2000: A review and methodological critique. Social Science & Medicine, 58(6), 1007–1024.
Leijon, M., Hensing, G., & Alexanderson, K. (2004). Sickness absence due to musculoskeletal diagnoses: Association with occupational gender segregation. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 32(2), 94–101.
Lundberg, U. (2002). Gender, multiple role, and physiological reactions. In S. Wamala & J. Lynch (Eds), Gender and social inequalities in health. A public health isssue (pp. 123–157). Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
Matschinger, H., Siegrist, J., Siegrist, K., & Dittman, K. (1986). Type A as a coping career: Towards a conceptual and methodological redefinition. In T. H. Schmidt, T. M. Dembroski, and G. Blümchen (Eds.), Biological and psychological factors in cardiovascular disease (pp. 104~). Berlin: Springer.
Matthews, S., Hertzman, C., Ostry, C., & Power, C. (1998). Gender, work roles, and psychosocial work characteristics as determinants of health. Social Science & Medicine, 46, 1417–24.
Orth-Gomer, K., & Chesney, M. A. (1997). Social stress/strain and heart disease in women. In G. J. Desmond & N. K. Wenger (Eds.), Women and heart disease (pp. 407–420). London: Martin Dunitz Ltd.
Orth-Gomer, K., Wamala, S. P., Horsten, M., Schenck-Gustafsson, K., Schneiderman, N., & Mittleman, M. A. (2000). Marital stress worsens prognosis in women with coronary heart disease: The Stockholm Female Coronary Risk Study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284(23), 3008–3014.
Östlin, P. (2002). Gender inequalities in health: The signifance of work. In S. Wamala & J. Lynch (Eds), Gender and social inequalities in health. A public health isssue (pp. 43–65). Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
Östlin, P., Alfredsson, L., Hammar, N., & Reuterwall, C. (1998). Myocardial infarction in male and female dominated occupations. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 55, 642–644.
Peter, R. (1991). Berufliche Belastungen, Belastungsbewältigung und koronares Risiko bei Industriearbeitern [Work stress, coping behavior, and coronary risk among blue-collar workers]. Hamburg Münster, Germany: Lit.
Peter, R., Alfredsson, L., Hammar, N., Siegrist, J., Theorell, T., & Westerholm, P. (1998). High effort, low reward and cardiovascular risk factors in employed Swedish men and women— Baseline results from the WOLF-Study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 52, 540–547.
Peter, R., Alfredsson, L., Knutsson, A., Siegrist, J., & Westerholm, P. (1999). Is a stressful psychosocial work environment mediating the effects of shiftwork on cardiovascular risk factors in men? Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health, 25, 376–381.
Peter, R., & Siegrist, J. (1999). Chronic psychosocial stress at work and cardiovascular disease: The role of effort-reward imbalance. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 22, 441–449.
Peter, R., Siegrist, J., Hallqvist, J., Reuterwall, C., & Theorell, T. (2002) Psychosocial work environment and myocardial infarction: Improving risk estimation by combining two complementary job stress models in the SHEEP Study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56, 294–300.
Pugh, H., & Moser, K. (1990). Measuring women’s mortality differences. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Women’s health counts (pp. 93–112). London: Routledge.
Pugliesi, K. (1995). Work and wellbeing: Gender differences in the psychological consequences of employment. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36, 57–71.
Reuterwall, C., Hallqvist, J., Ahlbom, A., De Faire, V., Diderichen, F., Hogstedt, C., et al. (1999). Higher relative but lower absolute risks of myocardial infarction in women than in men: Analysis of some major risk factors in the SHEEP Study. Journal of Internal Medicine, 246, 161–174.
Rosenfield, S. (1989). The effects of women’s employment: Personal control and sex differences in mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 30, 77–91.
Siegrist, J. (1996). Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1, 27–41.
Siegrist, J., Peter, R., Junge, A., Cremer, P. & Seidel, D. (1990). Low status control, high effort at work and ischemic heart disease: Prospective evidence from blue-collar men. Social Science & Medicine, 31, 1127–34.
Siegrist, J., Starke, D., Chandola, T., Godin, I., Niedhammer, I., & Peter, R. (2004). The measurement of effort-reward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Social Science & Medicine, 58, 1483–1500.
Statistics Sweden (1989). Occupations in the Population and Housing Census 1985 according to the Nordic standard occupational classification and the Swedish socioeconomic classification. Stockholm: Author.
Statistics Sweden. (2004). Women and men in Sweden. Facts and figures 2004. Stockholm: Sweden.
Theorell, T., & Karasek, R. (1996). Current methodological issues relating to psychosocial job strain and cardiovascular disease research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1, 9–26.
Theorell, T., Michelson, H., & Nordemar, R. (1991). Tre arbetsmiljö- index soma anväts i Stockholmsundersökening 1 [Three work environment indices which are used in the Stockholm study 1]. In M. Hagberrg & C. Hogstedt (Eds.), Stockholmsundersökningen 1 (Stockholm study 1). Stockholm, Sweden: Music Books: pp. 150–154.
Theorell, T., Tsutsumi, A., Hallqvist, J., & The SHEEP Study Group. (1998). Decision latitude, job strain, and myocardial infarction: A study of working men in Stockholm. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 382–88.
van Vegchel, N., de Jonge, J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2002). Testing global and specific indicators of rewards in the Effort-Reward Imbalance Model: Does it make any difference? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, 403–421.
Waldron, I., & Jacobs, A. (1989). Effects of multiple roles on women’s health—Evidence from a national longitudinal study. Women and Health, 15, 3–19.
Wamala, S. (1999). Socioeconomic status and cardiovascular vulnerability in women. Psychosocial, behavioral and biological mediators. Unpublished thesis, Karolinska Institute, Dept. of Public Health Sciences, Division of Preventive Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden.
Wamala, S. P., Mittleman, M. A., Horsten, M., Schenck-Gustafsso, K., & Orth-Gomer, K. (2000). Job stress and the occupational gradient in coronary heart disease risk in women. The Stockholm Female Coronary Risk Study. Social Science & Medicine, 51, 481–489.
Warnick, G. T. (1983). Colirometric assessment of high density lipoprotein cholesterol. In G. R. Cooper (Ed.), Selected methods of clinical chemistry (pp. 91–99). Washington DC: American Association for clinical chemistry.
Westberg, H. (1998) Where are women in today’s workplace? In Å. Kilbom, K. Messing, & C. Bildt Thorbjörnsson (Eds.), Women’s health and work (pp. 27–57). Solna, Sweden: National Institute for Working Life.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peter, R., Hammarström, A., Hallqvist, J. et al. Does occupational gender segregation influence the association of effort-reward imbalance with myocardial infarction in the SHEEP study?. Int. J. Behav. Med. 13, 34–43 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327558ijbm1301_5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327558ijbm1301_5