- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
David A. Larson, Jeffrey M. Suplica, Susan M. Chang, Kathleen R. Lamborn, Michael W. McDermott, Penny K. Sneed, Michael D Prados, William M. Wara, M. Kelly Nicholas, Mitchel S. Berger, Permanent iodine 125 brachytherapy in patients with progressive or recurrent glioblastoma multiforme, Neuro-Oncology, Volume 6, Issue 2, April 2004, Pages 119–126, https://doi.org/10.1215/S1152851703000425
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
This study reports the initial experience at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) with tumor resection and permanent, low-activity iodine 125 (125I) brachytherapy in patients with progressive or recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GM) and compares these results to those of similar patients treated previously at UCSF with temporary brachytherapy without tumor resection. Thirtyeight patients with progressive or recurrent GM were treated at UCSF with repeat craniotomy, tumor resection, and permanent, low-activity 125I brachytherapy between June 1997 and May 1998. Selection criteria were Karnofsky performance score ≥60, unifocal, contrast-enhancing, well-circumscribed progressive or recurrent GM that was judged to be completely resectable, and no evidence of leptomeningeal or subependymal spread. The median brachytherapy dose 5 mm exterior to the resection cavity was 300 Gy (range, 150-500 Gy). One patient was excluded from analysis. Median survival was 52 weeks from the date of brachytherapy. Age, Karnofsky performance score, and preimplant tumor volume were all statistically significant on univariate analyses. Multivariate analysis for survival showed only age to be significant. Median time to progression was 16 weeks. Both univariate and multivariate analysis of freedom from progression showed only preoperative tumor volume to be significant. Comparison to temporary brachytherapy patients showed no apparent difference in survival time. Chronic steroid requirements were low in patients with minimal postoperative residual tumor. We conclude that permanent 125I brachytherapy for recurrent or progressive GM is well tolerated. Survival time was comparable to that of a similar group of patients treated with temporary brachytherapy.
References
Agbi, C.B., Bernstein, M., Laperriere, N., Leung, P., and Lumley, M. (
Ammirati, M., Vick, N., Liao, Y.L., Ciric, I., and Mikhael, M. (
Ammirati, M., Galicich, J.H., Arbit, E., and Liao, Y. (
Dirks, P., Bernstein, M., Muller, P.J., and Tucker, W.S. (
Garden, A.S., Maor, M.H., Yung, W.K., Bruner, J.M., Woo, S.Y., Moser, R.P., and Lee, Y.Y. (
Gaspar, L.E., Fisher, B.J., Macdonald, D.R., LeBer, D.V., Halperin, E.C., Schold, S.C., Jr., and Cairncross, J.G. (
Gaspar, L.E., Zamorano, L.J., Shamsa, E., Fontanesi, J., Ezzell, G.E., and Yakar, D.A. (
Halligan, J.B., Stelzer, K.J., Rostomily, R.C., Spence, A.M., Griffin, T.W., and Berger, M.S. (
Harsh, G.R., 4th, Levin, V.A., Gutin, P.H., Seager, M., Silver, P., and Wilson, C.B. (
Hochberg, F.H., and Pruitt, A. (
Koot, R.W., Maarouf, M., Hulshof, M.C., Voges, J., Treuer, H., Koedooder, C., Sturm, V., and Bosch, D.A. (
Lee, S.W., Fraass, B.A., Marsh, L.H., Herbort, K., Gebarski, S.S., Martel, M.K., Radany, E.H., Lichter, A.S., and Sandler, H.M. (
Leibel, S.A., Gutin, P.H., Wara, W.M., Silver, P.S., Larson, D.A., Edwards, M.S., Lamb, S.A., Ham, B., Weaver, K.A., Barnett, C., and Phillips, T.L. (
Liang, B.C., Thornton, A.F., Jr., Sandler, H.M., and Greenberg, H.S. (
Marin, L.A., Smith, C.E., Langston, M.Y., Quashie, D., and Dillehay, L.E. (
Oppitz, U., Maessen, D., Zunterer, H., Richter, S., and Flentje, M. (
Patel, S., Breneman, J.C., Warnik, R.E., Albright, R.E., Jr., Tobler, W.D., van Loveren, H.R., and Tew, J.M. (
Scharfen, C.O., Sneed, P.K., Wara, W.M., Larson, D.L., Phillips, T.L., Prados, M.D., Weaver, K.A., Malec, M., Acord, P., Lamborn K.R., Lamb, S.A., Ham, B., and Gutin, P.H. (
Schupak, K., Malkin, M., Anderson, L., Arbit, E., Lindsley, K., and Leibel, S. (
Sneed, P.K., Gutin, P.H., Larson, D.A., Malec, M.K., Phillips, T.L., Prados, M.D., Scharfen, C.O., Weaver, K.A., and Wara, W.M. (
Sneed, P.K., Larson, D.A., and Gutin, P.H. (
Sneed, P.K., Lamborn, K.R., Larson, D.A., Prados, M.D., Malec, M.K., McDermott, M.W., Weaver, K.A., Phillips, T.L., Wara, W.M., and Gutin, P.H. (
Sneed, P.K., McDermott, M.W., and Gutin, P.H. (
Sneed, P.K., Stauffer, P.R., McDermott, M.W., Diederich, C.J., Lamborn, K.R., Prados, M.D., Chang, S., Weaver, K.A., Spry, L., Malec, M.K., Lamb, S.A., Voss, B., Davis, R.L., Wara, W.M., Larson, D.A., Phillips, T.L., and Gutin, P.H. (
Vick, N.A., Ciric, I.S., Eller, T.W., Cozzens, J.W., and Walsh, A. (
Videtic, G.M., Gaspar, L.E., Zamorano, L., Fontanesi, J., Levin, K.J., Kupsky, W.J., Tekyi-Mensah, S. (
Walker, M.D., Strike, T.A., and Sheline, G.E. (
Wallner, K.E., Galicich, J.H., Krol, G., Arbit, E., and Malkin, M.G. (
Author notes
Departments of Radiation Oncology (D.A.L., J.M.S., M.W.M., P.K.S., W.M.W.) andNeurological Surgery (D.A.L., S.M.C., K.R.L., M.W.M., M.D.P., M.K.N., M.S.B.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA