Skip to main content
Log in

Ductal Lavage Findings in Women With Mammographic Microcalcifications Undergoing Biopsy

  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

We designed a prospective study to assess the likelihood that early lesions presenting as mammographic calcifications could be accessed for cytological diagnosis by ductal lavage (DL).

Methods

Consenting women with calcifications (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 4 or 5) underwent DL of fluid-yielding ducts (FYDs) before stereotactic core or excisional biopsy. The DL catheter was used to inject .2 to 1 mL of Isovue 300 into the duct to determine whether the FYD corresponded to the duct containing calcifications (designated overlap). Additional FYDs were injected, if possible, until overlap was identified. DL cytology was compared with histology.

Results

Twenty women were enrolled (mean age, 54.2 years); the mean size of the calcification-bearing area was 190 mm2. The histological findings were as follows: 1 invasive cancer, 9 ductal carcinomas-in-situ (DCIS), 5 atypical hyperplasias, and 5 usual hyperplasias or fibrocystic changes. Four women had no FYD. In 15 women who underwent DL and ductography, overlap of dye and calcifications was seen in 4 (27%): 1 fibrocystic change, 1 hyperplasia, 1 atypical hyperplasia (cytological diagnosis mildly atypical), and 1 DCIS (cytological diagnosis benign). Of the remaining 8 DCIS lesions, 4 had no nipple aspiration fluid, 1 showed extravasation, and 3 were lavaged but the duct did not overlap.

Conclusions

These results are consistent with data from women undergoing mastectomy for larger invasive cancer and DCIS and show that cancer-containing ducts do not yield nipple fluid in most cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002;225:165–75

    Google Scholar 

  2. Porter PL, El Bastawissi AY, Mandelson MT, et al. Breast tumor characteristics as predictors of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:2020–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dooley WC, Ljung B-M, Veronesi U, et al. Ductal lavage for detection of cellular atypia in women at high risk for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:1624–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Khan SA, Rodriguez N, Baird C, et al. Ductal lavage findings in women with known breast cancer undergoing mastectomy (abstract). Breast Cancer Res Treat 2002;76(Suppl 1):S35

    Google Scholar 

  5. Khan SA, Wiley EL, Rodriguez N, et al. Ductal lavage findings in women with known breast cancer undergoing mastectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:1510–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. The uniform approach to breast fine needle aspiration biopsy. A synopsis. Acta Cytol 1996;40:1120–6

  7. Papanicolaou GN, Holmquist DG, Bader GM, Falk EA. Exfoliative cytology of the human mammary gland and its value in the diagnosis of cancer and other diseases of the breast. Cancer 1958;11:377–409

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sartorius OW, Smith HS, Morris P, Benedict D, Friesen L. Cytologic evaluation of breast fluid in the detection of breast disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1977;59:1073–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sartorius OW, Morris PL, Benedict DL, Smith HS. Contrast ductography for recognition and localization of benign and malignant breast lesions: an improved technique. In: Logan WW, ed. Breast Cancer. New York: Wiley, 1977: 281–300

  10. Wrensch MR, Petrakis NL, King EB, et al. Breast cancer incidence in women with abnormal cytology in nipple aspirates of breast fluid. Am J Epidemiol 1992;135:130–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wrensch MR, Petrakis NL, Miike R, et al. Breast cancer risk in women with abnormal cytology in nipple aspirates of breast fluid. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:1791–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brogi E, Robson M, Panageas KS, Casadio C, Ljung BM, Montgomery L. Ductal lavage in patients undergoing mastectomy for mammary carcinoma: a correlative study. Cancer 2003;98:2170–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. King BL, Tsai SC, Gryga ME, et al. Detection of chromosomal instability in paired breast surgery and ductal lavage specimens by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:1509–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Supported by the Bluhm Family Breast Cancer Early Detection and Prevention Program, Specialized Program of Research Excellence grant P50-CA89018, and the Cytyc Corporation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seema A. Khan MD.

Additional information

Published by Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. © 2005 The Society of Surgical Oncology, Inc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khan, S.A., Wolfman, J.A., Segal, L. et al. Ductal Lavage Findings in Women With Mammographic Microcalcifications Undergoing Biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 12, 689–696 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2005.04.037

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2005.04.037

Key Words:

Navigation