Abstract
Background
Most breast cancers originate in the ductal epithelium with normal cells progressing to atypia and finally to carcinoma. Ductoscopy enables one to visualize and sample the ductal epithelium and therefore identify early changes cytologically. This report describes our experience with mammary ductoscopy as a tool for evaluation of nipple discharge at Beth Israel Medical Center.
Methods
A prospective review of all patients who have undergone ductoscopy for evaluation of persistent nipple discharge was performed. The Acueity ductoscopy system with .9-mm scope and a video monitor with ×60 magnification were used. Brush biopsy samples and lavage fluid were obtained from some patients and were sent for cytologic analysis. A subset of patients underwent ductoscopically guided duct excision.
Results
Ninety-three patients underwent ductoscopic evaluation of 110 ducts. Of these, 67 patients had abnormal findings and therefore underwent ductoscopically guided duct excision. The remaining 26 patients (28%) had normal ductoscopic examinations. The depth at which intraductal abnormalities were visualized was from 3 to 8 cm with an average of 4.4 cm for cancer cases and from 1 to 10 cm with an average of 4.5 cm for papillomas. Forty-two patients were diagnosed with papilloma/papillomatosis, six patients were diagnosed with atypical papilloma/atypical ductal hyperplasia/atypical lobular hyperplasia, and six patients were diagnosed with cancer. Of the six patients diagnosed with cancer, 67% had normal breast imaging, and other than nipple discharge, 67% had normal breast examinations.
Conclusion
Mammary ductoscopy is a useful tool in the evaluation of patients with nipple discharge. Although the most common cause of nipple discharge is an intraductal papilloma, nipple discharge can be the presenting symptom for cancer. Our experience revealed a papilloma rate of 45% (42 of 93), cancer rate of 6.5% (6 of 93), and an atypia rate of 6.5% (6 of 93) among the patients with nipple discharge. Mammary ductoscopy allows for accurate visualization, analysis, and excision of intraductal abnormalities. Many deeper intraductal abnormalities could be missed by blind surgical excision.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shao ZM, Liu Y, Nguyen M. The role of the breast ductal system in the diagnosis of cancer [review]. Oncol Rep 2001; 8:153–6.
Shao ZM, Nguyen M. Nipple aspiration in diagnosis of breast cancer. Semin Surg Oncol 2001; 20:175–80.
Sparks CA. Using ductoscopy to detect breast mass at an early stage. AORN J 2002; 76:851–4.
Gong G, DeVries S, Chew KL, et al. Genetic changes in paired atypical and usual ductal hyperplasia of the breast by comparative genomic hybridization. Clin Cancer Res 2001; 17:2410–4.
Wrensch MR, Petrakis NL, King EB, et al. Breast cancer incidence in women with abnormal cytology in nipple aspirates of breast fluid. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 135:130–41.
Shen KW, Wu J, Lu JS, et al. Fiberoptic ductoscopy for patients with nipple discharge. Cancer 2000; 89:1512–9.
Shen KW, Wu J, Lu JS, et al. Fiberoptic ductoscopy for breast cancer patients with nipple discharge. Surg Endosc 2001; 15:1340–5.
Love SM, Barsky SH. Breast-duct endoscopy to study stages of cancerous breast disease. Lancet 1996; 348:997–9.
Mokbel K, Elkak AE. The evolving role of mammary ductoscopy. Curr Med Res Opin 2002; 18:30–2.
Matsunaga T, Ohta D, Misaka T, et al. Mammary ductoscopy for diagnosis and treatment of intraductal lesions of the breast. Breast Cancer 2001; 8:213–21.
Makita M, Akiyama F, Gomi N, et al. Endoscopic classification of intraductal lesions and histological diagnosis. Breast Cancer 2002; 9:220–5.
Dietz JR, Kim JA, Malycky JL, et al. Feasibility and technical consideration of mammary ductoscopy in human mastectomy specimens. Breast J 2000; 6:161–5.
Okazaki A, Okazaki M, Asaishi K, et al. Fiberoptic ductoscopy of the breast: a new diagnostic procedure for nipple discharge. Jpn J Clin Oncol 1991; 21:188–93.
Okazaki A, Hirata K, Okazaki M, et al. Nipple discharge disorders: current diagnostic management and the role of fiber-ductoscopy. Eur Radiol 1999; 9:583–90.
Dooley WC. Routine operative breast endoscopy for bloody nipple discharge. Ann Surg Oncol 2002; 9:920–3.
Kim JA. Mammary ductoscopy—current and future applications (breast cancer and benign disease). Available at: http://www.cancernews.com/data/Article/236.asp. Accessed June 16, 2008
Cabioglu N, Hunt KK, Singletary SE, et al. Surgical decision making and factors determining a diagnosis of breast carcinoma in women presenting with nipple discharge. J Am Coll Surg 2003; 196:354–64.
Falkenberry SS. Nipple discharge. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2002; 29:21–9.
Van Zee KJ, Perez GO, Minnard E, et al. Preoperative galactography increases the diagnostic yield of major duct excision for nipple discharge. Cancer 1998; 82:1874–80.
Baitchev G, Gortchev G, Todorova A, et al. Intraductal aspiration cytology and galactography for nipple discharge. Int Surg 2003; 88:83–6.
Yamamoto D, Shoji T, Kawanishi H, et al. A utility of ductography and fiberoptic ductoscopy for patients with nipple discharge. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2001; 70:103–8.
Dietz JR, Crowe JP, Grundfest S, et al. Directed duct excision by using mammary ductoscopy in patients with pathological nipple discharge. Surgery 2002; 132:582–8.
Dunn JM, Lucarotti ME, Wood SJ, et al. Exfoliative cytology in the diagnosis of breast disease. Br J Surg 1995; 82:789–91.
Grunwald S, Heyer H, Paepke S, et al. Diagnostic value of ductoscopy in the diagnosis of nipple discharge and intraductal proliferations in comparison to standard methods. Onkologie 2007; 30:243–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Poster presentation at the 29th Annual Symposium of American Society of Breast Diseases, April 14–16, 2005, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kapenhas-Valdes, E., Feldman, S.M., Cohen, JM. et al. Mammary Ductoscopy for Evaluation of Nipple Discharge. Ann Surg Oncol 15, 2720–2727 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0012-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0012-1