Keywords
psychiatric disorders, serotonin, pathophysiology, depression
psychiatric disorders, serotonin, pathophysiology, depression
Serotonin (5-HT) is really puzzling. Originally discovered in the blood and in enthero-cromaffin cells and first thought to be a vasoconstrictor agent, 5-HT was also described after about twenty years in the central nervous system (CNS)1, where it is now considered to represent one of the most diffuse, most influential, and probably most investigated neurotransmitters. However, in spite of decades of research all over the world, its nature remains elusive and its role is still surrounded by mystery.
Undoubtedly, the amount of data relative to 5-HT has permitted investigators to describe several aspects of its distribution, physiology, receptor subtypes, mode of functioning, and modulation of different activities in both the CNS and the periphery, including appetite, sleep, mood, sexuality, aggression/impulsivity, biological rhythms, motor control, memory, learning, neuronal degeneration, and gastrointestinal motility and vasoconstriction2–5. In addition, a rich literature shows the involvement of 5-HT in a series of disorders, including almost every neuropsychiatric domain. Indeed, all psychiatric disorders seem to be related to 5-HT dysfunctions, and many, if not all, psychotropic drugs used to treat psychopathological conditions interfere more or less directly with the 5-HT system6,7. However, as we analyze the evolution of hypotheses related to the involvement of 5-HT in the pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders, it is evident that the original enthusiasm based on classic theories, which now appears quite simplistic, has dampened.
The investigation of the neurobiology of depression is a clear example of this process and how old theories should be re-conceptualized on the basis of the latest findings. In the 1970s, depression was believed to be due to a deficit of 5-HT neurotransmission8–10. Taken together, convergent data from studies on tryptophan depletion, cerebrospinal fluid levels of 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid, neuroendocrine challenges, autopsy, and peripheral models of presynaptic serotonergic neurons, like platelets, seemed to support the presence of a reduced functioning of the 5-HT system in depression8–11. Interestingly, if we critically analyze those findings, it is evident that negative results were also present since the beginning but were mostly neglected. Moreover, attempts were made to encompass them in the defect hypothesis through rather complicated explanations, sometimes involving the 5-HT transporter (SERT) and one or more of the 5-HT receptor subtypes (of which there are now 14) discovered and characterized throughout the years12–14. Similarly, the function of the genes or genetic polymorphisms that have been continually proposed in depression in the last two decades was not always confirmed subsequently and led to less conclusive or inconclusive hypotheses15,16. In any case, all of these activities have promoted the synthesis and introduction into clinical practice of selective 5-HT re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs), which represent one of the most successful psychopharmacological advancements and are still among the most widely prescribed drugs17.
Currently, both clinicians and investigators realize the shortcomings of the previous findings and developments, and new data are considered more realistic but are taken with more caution.
First, there is clear-cut evidence of serotonergic dysfunctions in different psychopathological disorders (depression, anxiety disorders, eating disorders, schizophrenia, impulse control disorders, autism, and aggressive behaviors, just to mention the main ones), and, as just noted, several drugs with main activities on 5-HT, such as SSRIs, are reasonably effective therapeutic agents in all of these conditions. There has been a significant advancement not only in SSRIs but also in the field of psychosis, in which the development of second-generation antipsychotics targets specific 5-HT receptor subtypes17. Unfortunately, the 5-HT dysfunctions widely described with different tools are not detected in all patients, and the non-response rate to serotonergic drugs is still quite significant (around 50% of the cases), and only 30% reach effective remission18. Furthermore, no real achievement has been made in terms of possible predictors of response or prompt identification of individuals more prone to relapses in all the conditions related to 5-HT neurotransmission. However, more recent research has suggested changes in central 5-HT1B receptor binding, and the associated peripherally available biomarker p11 has been shown to be associated with response to both SSRIs and cognitive behavioral treatment of depression19.
Second, it is clear that the level of “core” serotonergic dysfunction in the disorders where it has been described (or supposed to be present) should be considered still unknown, as it might result from one or more different processes, such as defective synthesis, release, re-uptake, catabolism, or metabolism of 5-HT per se, or from aberrations in one or more of the 14 receptors10,11.
Third, if (as suggested by some authors) decreased 5-HT functioning played a minimal or no role in depression20 or could be even hyperfunctioning21, it should be questioned whether 5-HT represents just one of the final, and not the main, factors in the neurological chain of events underlying those psychopathological symptoms attributable to this neurotransmitter22.
It is not our intention to disregard the efforts and incredible achievements in the field of 5-HT that have inspired generations of researchers and continue to enliven them everywhere. However, we have to recognize that, without a doubt, the impact of the 5-HT hypothesis on the pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders has been quite robust, a sort of paradigm, according to Kuhn’s theory that may be in need of an update, including newer data suggesting 5-HT to be not the one but rather one of many important parts of the CNS that are involved in the pathophysiology of depression. We cannot exclude tout court that 5-HT is involved in the depressive psychopathology (for example, 30% of depressed patients reach remission from SSRI treatment) or exempt ourselves from exploring other working models21. According to the recently emerging role of 5-HT in brain development, it is suggested that early alterations of this process, following environmental stressors or genetic liability, impair brain circuits, pathways, and differentiation and constitute a sort of basic “vulnerability” toward a greater risk of developing psychopathology16. In this case, subsequent life events should act through epigenetic mechanisms acting on stress response and emotion regulation23,24. Of interest, both SERT-s allele carriers and sensory processing sensitivity are associated with greater sensitivity to environmental stimuli in humans25. Long-follow-up studies and impact of stressors in childhood and adolescence, together with studies on human DNA methylation or acetylation, should be planned to explore epigenetic mechanisms more thoroughly. It would also be interesting to ascertain whether different types of stressors (familial, emotional, and environmental) should produce different biochemical effects on the 5-HT system, why some individuals become ill and others do not, and what the individual factors promoting resilience are.
Other recent biological hypotheses on the role of 5-HT in depression (and perhaps in all other disorders where serotonergic alterations have been detected) highlight how this neurotransmitter is part of a more complex network including even the immune system and the whole body26,27 or might play a more general role in the energy homeostasis through modulation of mitochondria activity21.
In any case, all research in the 5-HT field might benefit from a deeper knowledge of more precise anatomical data in humans. Undoubtedly, the latest functional magnetic resonance imaging approaches linking brain circuits to SERT-gene polymorphism, emotional processing, and pharmacological challenges appear extremely helpful and promising in this sense28–30.
The precise role of 5-HT in psychiatric disorders remains elusive after decades of intensive research. Currently, two main notions are widely accepted in this field. One is that the serotonergic dysfunctions cannot be related to distinct nosological entities but rather to symptoms/dimensions shared by different conditions31. The second, related to the first, is that the 5-HT hypothesis of psychopathology has become less casual and tends to be more comprehensive, albeit cautious. Therefore, currently, different elements are taken into account when considering the role of 5-HT: its relationships with other neurotransmitters, neuropeptides, and neurotrophins10 and how it may regulate emotions, cognition, motivation, and behaviors to produce different clinical pictures according to individual vulnerability due to genetic load, life events, and environmental stressors32.
In 1998, John Greden had already written about 5-HT that “much we have learned” but that there is “So much to discover”33. After twenty years, we are strongly convinced that “the best is yet to come”, again to quote Greden33. That is, 5-HT continues (and probably will continue for a long time) to represent a “hot” topic in neuropsychiatry, a real challenge for research, and a “never-ending story”34,35 that hopefully will permit us to disentangle one of the most fascinating mysteries of our nature and lead to really innovative pharmacological and psychosocial interventions effective in a broad range of psychiatric disorders.
5-HT, serotonin; CNS, central nervous system;SERT, serotonin transporter; SSRI, selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | |||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |
Version 1 23 Feb 17 |
read | read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)